:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:挑戰空汙:初探社區行動科學的在地實踐
書刊名:傳播研究與實踐
作者:杜文苓施佳良
作者(外文):Tu, Wen-lingShih, Chia-liang
出版日期:2019
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:公民科學空汙監測知識生產空汙治理Citizen scienceAir monitoringKnowledge generationAir governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:8
期刊論文
1.Scott, Dianne、Barnett, Clive(2009)。Something in the Air: Civic Science and Contentious Environmental Politics in Post-apartheid South Africa。Geoforum,40(3),373-382。  new window
2.周桂田(2005)。爭議性科技之風險溝通--以基因改造工程為思考點。生物科技與法律研究通訊,18,42-50。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wynne, Brian(2003)。Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002)。Social Studies of Science,33(3),401-417。  new window
4.Yearley, Steve、Cinderby, Steve、Forrester, John、Bailey, Peter、Rosen, Paul(2003)。Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: a three-city case study。Environmental Values,12(2),247-262。  new window
5.Bonney, R.、Cooper, C. B.、Dickinson, J.、Kelling, S.、Phillips, T.、Rosenberg, K. V.、Shirk, J.(2009)。Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy。BioScience,59(11),977-984。  new window
6.Fischer, Frank(1993)。Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Cases。Policy Sciences,26(3),165-187。  new window
7.江淑琳、張瑜倩(20160100)。更民主的科學溝通:科學類博物館實踐公眾參與科學之角色初探。傳播研究與實踐,6(1),199-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.范玫芳、張簡妙琳(20140300)。科學知識與水政治:旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究。人文及社會科學集刊,26(1),133-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bonney, R.、Phillips, T. B.、Ballard, H. L.、Enck, J. W.(2016)。Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?。Public Understanding of Science,25(1),2-16。  new window
10.行政院環境保護署(2015)。多層式微型感測物聯網,改善空氣品質。環保政策月刊,18(12)。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄧凱元(20150317)。你的故鄉,PM2.5濃度有多高?。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉懿德(20141128)。從本位主義的醫療專業轉化為常民知識的社區醫師。獨立評論@天下。  延伸查詢new window
13.Cinderby, S.、Forrester, J.(2005)。Facilitating the local governance of air pollution using GIS for participation。Applied Geography,25(2),143-158。  new window
14.Hampton, G.(2004)。Enhancing public participation through narrative analysis。Policy Sciences,37,261-276。  new window
15.O'Rourke, D.、Macey, G. P.(2003)。Community environmental policing: Assessing new strategies of public participation in environment regulation。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,22(3),383-414。  new window
16.Ottinger, Gwen(2010)。Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science。Science, Technology, & Human Values,35,244-270。  new window
17.Ottinger, G.(2010)。Constructing empowerment through interpretations of environmental data。Surveillance & Society,8,221-234。  new window
18.Yearley, Steven(2006)。Bridging the Science: Policy Divide in Urban Air-Quality Management: Evaluating Ways to Make Models More Robust through Public Engagement。Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,24(5),701-714。  new window
研究報告
1.詹長權、李永凌、洪壽宏(2012)。100年度沿海地區空氣汙染物及環境健康世代研究計畫期末報告。臺北市:國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張景儀(2014)。鑲嵌於管制政策制度的科學政治:以VOCs、PM2.5為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ascher, William、Steelman, Toddi A.、Healy, Robert G.(2010)。Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Re-Imagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
2.Fischer, Frank(2009)。Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Nowotny, Helga、Scott, Peter B.、Gibbons, Michael T.(2001)。Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty。Polity Press。  new window
4.Jasanoff, Sheila S.(1990)。The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Corburn, Jason(2005)。Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice。MIT Press。  new window
6.杜文苓(2015)。環境風險與公共治理:探索臺灣環境民主實踐之道。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hidy, George M.、Brook, Jeffery R.、Demerjian, Kenneth L.、Molina, Luisa T.、Pennell, William T.、Scheffe, Richard D.(2011)。Technical challenges of multipollutant air quality management。Springer Science and Business Media。  new window
8.Jackson, T.(1996)。Material concerns: Pollution, profit, and quality of life。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
9.Ottinger, G.、Cohen, B. R.(2011)。Technoscience and environmental justice: Expert cultures in a grassroots movement。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
10.Baber, W. F.、Bartlett, R. V.(2005)。Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
其他
1.王敏玲(2011)。我們要空污總量管制!,http://www.cet-taiwan.org/info/story/1423。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院環境保護署(2018)。空氣品質指標,https://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0201.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
3.地球公民基金會(20120517)。地球公民百日拍攝計畫,揭露高屏空汙的真相!,http://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/1504。  延伸查詢new window
4.地球公民基金會(20121122)。我要乾淨空氣,實施空汙總量管制、即時播報空品,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/71652。  延伸查詢new window
5.林冠妙(20141103)。空汙嚴重,環團發起升空汙旗活動要學童寫空汙日誌,http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/16410164-2990-4c82-868c-e37c5f3f041f。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部(2015)。教育部校園空氣品質旗幟宣導試辦計畫,http://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CA89ABD8A8B76D99965236EDA4CA337705C78D1A09C901B6BEE1B840BFE5915D28B2650C04E989DE08447BE71E3A5F6C669835ABA55507DF12450B21845ED67DFD939539B1F463722&n=95594A5DBC171FE00AD919DBBF65F6ACD70792484A1B011DC24E2956C90B281942AE26DACF65DF95D546038870D26F0C&icon=..pdf。  延伸查詢new window
7.嘉義市政府環境保護局(20150810)。空氣品質好與壞,玉山指標隨時看,https://www.chiayi.gov.tw/2015web/02_news/content.aspx?id=45355。  延伸查詢new window
8.臺灣公民科學入口網簡介,https://pansci.asia/tw-citizen-science。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡文居(20150524)。反空汙做半套,臺南空汙自救會66上街頭,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1327592。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡文居(20150627)。臺江廟公民會議,社大師生為反空汙發聲,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/1361118。  延伸查詢new window
11.About,https://www.citizenscience.org/about。  new window
12.United States Environmental Protection Agency。Air sensor toolbox for citizen scientists, researchers and developers,https://www.epa.gov/airsensor-toolbox。  new window
圖書論文
1.Moore, Kelly(2006)。Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science。The New Political Sociology of Science: Networks, institutions, and power。Madison, Wisconsin:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
2.Fischer, Frank(2003)。Beyond Empiricism: Policy Analysis as Deliberative Practice。Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Douglas, Heather(2005)。Inserting the Public Into Science。Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making。Dordrecht:Spinger。  new window
4.Heinrichs, Harald(2005)。Advisory Systems in Pluralistic Knowledge Societies: A Criteria-Based Typology to Assess and Optimize Environmental Policy Advice。Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
5.Jasanoff, Sheila(2005)。Judgment Under Siege: The Three-Body Problem of Expert Legitimacy。Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
6.Maasen, Sabine、Weingart, Peter(2005)。What's New in Scientific Advice to Politics?。Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making。Dordrecht:Spinger。  new window
7.Irwin, Alan、Wynne, Brian(1996)。[Misunderstanding Science? the Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology] Introduction。Misunderstanding Science? the Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Cavalier, D.(2016)。An unlikely journey into citizen science。The rightful place of science: Citizen science。Tempe, Arizona:Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes。  new window
9.Lidskog, R.、Pleijel, H.(2011)。Co-producing policy-relevant science and science-based policy: The case of regulating ground-level ozone。Governing the air: The dynamics of science, policy, and citizen interaction。London:MIT Press。  new window
10.Ottinger, Gwen(2017)。Reconstructing or reproducing? Scientific authority and models of change in two traditions of citizen science。The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science。London:Routledge。  new window
11.Ottinger, Gwen(2016)。Social movement-based citizen science。The rightful place of science: Citizen science。Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes。  new window
12.Wynne, B.(1991)。Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information。When science meets the public。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 臺灣公民參訪非制式科學教育機構對公民參與科學的影響:科學興趣所扮演的中介角色
2. 從協力創新析探社區空氣污染治理之發展
3. 科學博物館協力公眾參與科學之實踐--以沃爾巴克氏菌防治登革熱展示為例
4. 從缺陷到對話到創作--論博物館科技的「共享權威」與「數位策展」實踐
5. 量體流動與風的時空政治--以大林蒲的空氣污染為例
6. 臺灣南部某國立大學學生對空氣汙染防制政策支持度之研究
7. 公民科學與創客運動:空氣盒子計畫的案例探討
8. Book Review: Hui-Chen Fang, Jung-Shin Ho, Yu-Yo Lin, Yi-Ying Chiang, eds., 《煙囪之島:我們與石化共存的兩萬個日子》(A Smoking Island: Petrochemical Industry, Our Dangerous Companion for More than Fifty Years) (Taipei: Spring Hill Publishing, 2019)
9. 探索自發性地理資訊方法對公共事務治理之應用
10. 臺灣「科學傳播」研究析論:理論詮釋與反思(1970~2019)
11. 臺灣公民參與科技議題活動與參訪科學工藝類博物館的關係及變化
12. 臺灣空污治理的挑戰:反空污行動凸顯的未竟知識
13. 大學與地方社群的協力合作策略與挑戰:以埔里空污減量為例
14. 事業廢棄物治理模式之困境與契機:旗山農地汙染案為例
15. 氣候變遷下的網絡觀點:探索環境政治協商的複雜性[評Jennifer Hadden, «Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change» (論點中的網絡概念:氣候變遷的政治分裂) (Cambridge University Press, 2015)]
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE