:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:事業廢棄物治理模式之困境與契機:旗山農地汙染案為例
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:范玫芳 引用關係邱智民
作者(外文):Fan, Mei-fangChiu, Chih-ming
出版日期:2019
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁1-41
主題關鍵詞:治理事業廢棄物公民參與新科學政治社會學在地知識GovernanceIndustrial wasteNew political sociology of sciencePublic participationLocal knowledge
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:9
期刊論文
1.范玫芳(20071000)。風險論述、公民行動與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議。科技、醫療與社會,5,43-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wynne, Brian(2001)。Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs。Science as Culture,10(4),445-481。  new window
3.Frickel, Scott、Gibbon, Sahra、Howard, Jeff、Kempner, Joanna、Ottinger, Gwen、Hess, David J.(2010)。Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting。Science, Technology & Human Values,35(4),444-473。  new window
4.范玫芳、張簡妙琳(20140300)。科學知識與水政治:旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究。人文及社會科學集刊,26(1),133-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Ottinger, Gwen(2010)。Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science。Science, Technology, and Human Values,35(2),244-270。  new window
6.呂國禎、陳良榕(2015)。全台污泥亂倒,政府在哪?。天下雜誌,568,96-98。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊智元、周桂田(20150900)。超越決定論的風險治理:替代性風險知識的產生。政治與社會哲學評論,54,109-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Jasanoff, S.(1996)。Is Science Socially Constructed--And Can It Still Inform Public Policy?。Science and Engineering Ethics,2(3),263-276。  new window
9.Orsini, M.、Smith, M.(2010)。Social Movements, Knowledge and Public Policy: The Case of Autism Activism in Canada and the US。Critical Policy Studies,4(1),38-57。  new window
10.杜文苓、陳致中(20070900)。民眾參與公共決策的反思--以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例。臺灣民主季刊,4(3),33-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Renn, O.、Graham, P.(2005)。Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach。Geneva, CH:International Risk Governance Council。  new window
2.Hajer, Maarten A.、Wagenaar, Hendrik(2003)。Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society。Cambridge University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.黃煥彰(2016)。控訴高雄市政府長期包庇中聯公司於水質水量保護區掩埋爐碴,https://www.cet-taiwan.org/sites/cet-taiwan.org/files/%E9%99%84%E4%BB%B6-%E6%97%97%E5%B1%B1%E6%B1%99%E6%9F%93%E5%8F%B2%28%E6%92%B0%E6%96%87_%E9%BB%83%E7%85%A5%E5%BD%B0%29.pdf。  new window
其他
1.(20170514)。政府沒看見嗎?爐渣埋田剝四層皮!「一田四吃」業者賺飽,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyQ7gdh5gsM。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2018)。旗山大林里轉爐石回填大坑洞的故事,http://www.chc.com.tw/chi.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20140926)。大林反爐渣回填,自救會長遭毆,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/816360。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院農委會(2015)。轉爐石不得回填農地,違反者應依區域計畫法裁罰及限期改善,https://www.coa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=agri&id=5310。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20161228)。映誠公司涉非法回填魚塭獲利近4億,實際負責人詐欺起訴,https://house.ettoday.net/news/838085#ixzz5ThKMQl3z。  延伸查詢new window
6.高雄市旗山區公所(2018)。認識旗山,https://cishan88.kcg.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=A5FE81E9DBC4BCC9。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20170512)。旗山大林農地回填廢爐渣案,在地居民與聲援團體盼盡速清除,https://www.facebook.com/chishannews/videos/1832095887051553/。  延伸查詢new window
8.監察院(2015)。糾正案文,http://www.taiwanwatch.org.tw/sites/default/files/epapers/20150506-03.pdf。  new window
9.鄭涵文,陳貞樺(2016)。旗山找「碴」當農地變成掩埋場,https://www.twreporter.org/i/steel-slag/01/#chapter-01。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bucchi, Massimiano、Neresini, Federico(2008)。Science and public participation。The handbook of science and technology studies。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
2.Wynne, B.(1996)。Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science。Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge:Cambridge University。  new window
3.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(2000)。Governance and Public Administration。Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Frickel, Scott、Moore, Kelly(2006)。Prospects and Challenges for a New Political Sociology of Science。The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
5.Jasanoff, S.(2004)。Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society。States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
6.Jasanoff, S.(2012)。The Politics of Public Reason。The politics of knowledge。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
7.Rayner, S.(1993)。Risk Perception, Technology Acceptance, and Institutional Culture: Case Studies and Some New Definitions。Risk is a Construct: Perceptions of Risk Perception。Munich, DE:Knesebeck。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE