:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:環境風險與公共治理:探索臺灣環境民主實踐之道-
作者:杜文苓
出版日期:2015
出版項:臺北:五南
ISBN:9789571180380
主題關鍵詞:科技業環境保護風險管理
學門:經濟學
資料類型:專書
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
期刊論文
1.Chilvers, J.(2008)。Deliberating competence: Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice。Science, Technology, & Human Values,33(2),155-185。  new window
2.羅清俊、郭益玟(20120600)。管制政策的分配政治特質:臺灣環境保護訴願決定的實證分析。行政暨政策學報,54,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Perrow, Charles(2011)。Fukushima and the Inevitability of Accidents。Bulletin ofthe Atomic Scientists,67(6),44-52。  new window
4.Bäckstrand, Karin(2003)。Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance。Global Environmental Politics,3(4),24-41。  new window
5.Scott, Dianne、Barnett, Clive(2009)。Something in the Air: Civic Science and Contentious Environmental Politics in Post-apartheid South Africa。Geoforum,40(3),373-382。  new window
6.Wynne, Brian、周任芸(20071000)。風險社會、不確定性和科學民主化:STS的未來[演講稿]。科技、醫療與社會,5,15-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Clarke, Lee、Chess, Caron、Holmes, Rachel、O'Neill, Karen M.(2006)。Speaking with One Voice: Risk Communication Lessons from the US Anthrax Attacks。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,14(3),160-169。  new window
8.Nowotny, Helga(2003)。Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge。Science and Public Policy,30(3),151-156。  new window
9.Ottinger, Gwen、Cohen, Benjamin(2012)。Environmentally Just Transformations of Expert Cultures: Toward the Theory and Practice of a Renewed Science and Engineering。Environmental Justice,5(3),158-163。  new window
10.O'Rourke, Dara、Macey, Gregg P.(2003)。Community Environmental Policing: Assessing New Strategies of Public Participation in Environmental Regulation。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,22(3),383-414。  new window
11.周桂田(20080300)。全球在地化風險典範之衝突--生物特徵辨識作為全球鐵的牢籠。政治與社會哲學評論,24,101-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周桂田(2005)。爭議性科技之風險溝通--以基因改造工程為思考點。生物科技與法律研究通訊,18,42-50。  延伸查詢new window
13.Limoges, Camille(1993)。Expert Knowledge and Decision-making in Controversy Contexts。Public Understanding of Science,2(4),417-426。  new window
14.Andrews, Kenneth T.、Edwards, Bob(2005)。The organizational structure of local environmentalism。Mobilization: An International Journal,10(2),213-234。  new window
15.杜文苓、李翰林(20110600)。環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題--以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議為例。臺灣民主,8(2),59-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Wynne, Brian(20071200)。Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political-Conceptual Category Mistake。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,1(1),99-110。new window  new window
17.Jasanoff, Sheila(2003)。Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science。Minerva,41(3),223-244。  new window
18.Kao, Shu-Feng(2012)。EMF controversy in Chigu, Taiwan: contested declarations of risk and scientific knowledge have implications for risk governance。Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,12(2),81-97。  new window
19.林崇熙(20080100)。科技就是風險。科學發展月刊,421,60-63。  延伸查詢new window
20.Renn, Ortwin(2005)。Risk perception and communication: lessons for the food and food packaging industry。Food Additives and Contaminants,22(10),1061-1071。  new window
21.杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(20071000)。風險溝通與民主參與:以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會,5,71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Wynne, Brian(2002)。In Risk Assessment, One has to admit Ignorance。Nature,416(6877)。  new window
23.李建良(20100401)。中科環評的法律課題--臺灣法治國的淪喪與危機。臺灣法學雜誌,149,17-28。  延伸查詢new window
24.杜文苓、施佳良(20140600)。環評知識的政治角色--檢視六輕健康風險評估爭議。臺灣民主季刊,11(2),89-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Gross, Matthias(2007)。The unknown in process: Dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts。Current Sociology,55(5),742-759。  new window
26.Hsu, Shih-Chieh、Hsieh, Hwey-Lian、Chen, Chang-Po、Tseng, Chun-Mao、Huang, Shou-Chung、Huang, Chou-Hao、Huang, Yi-Tang、Radashevsky, Vasily、Lin, Shuen-Hsin(2011)。Tungsten and other heavy metal contamination in aquatic environments receiving wastewater from semiconductor manufacturing。Journal of Hazardous Materials,189,193-202。  new window
27.Leydesdorff, Loet、Ward, Janelle(2005)。Science shops: A kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe。Public Understanding of Science,14,353-372。  new window
28.Wu, Ben-Zen、Feng, Tien-Zhi、Sree, Usha、Chiu, Kong-Hwa、Lo, Jiunn-Guang(2006)。Sampling and analysis of volatile organics emitted from wastewater treatment plant and drain system of an industrial science park。Analytica Chemica Acta,576,100-111。  new window
29.Wynne, Brian(1992)。Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science。Public Understanding of Science,1(3),281-304。  new window
30.王鴻濬(20010300)。環境影響評估制度中公眾參與之設計與分析。中華林學季刊,34(1),73-84。  延伸查詢new window
31.Torgerson, Douglas(1986)。Between Knowledge and Politics: Three Faces of Policy Analysis。Policy Sciences,19(1),33-59。  new window
32.王迺宇(20060600)。永續發展下之無牙老虎?--我國環境影響評估法的檢討。靜宜人文社會學報,1(1),79-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Jasanoff, Sheila、Kim, Sang-Hyun(2009)。Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea。Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy,47(2),119-146。  new window
34.曾冠球(20040600)。基層官僚人員裁量行為之初探:以臺北市區公所組織為例。行政暨政策學報,38,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳志瑋(20040500)。行政課責與地方治理能力的提昇。政策研究學報,4,23-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.湯京平(20021200)。環境保護與地方政治 : 北高兩市環保官員對於影響執法因素的認知調查。臺灣政治學刊,6,138-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Wynne, Brian(2001)。Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs。Science as Culture,10(4),445-481。  new window
38.湯京平(19990600)。鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略--以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六輕建廠及拜耳投資案。政治科學論叢,10,355-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Slovic, Paul(1999)。Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield。Risk Analysis,19(4),689-701。  new window
40.葉俊榮(19930100)。環境影響評估的公共參與--法規範的要求與現實的考慮。經社法制論叢,11,17-42。  延伸查詢new window
41.林崇熙(20001200)。從兩種文化到「科技與社會」。通識教育,7(4),39-58。  延伸查詢new window
42.Jasanoff, Shelia(2004)。Science and Citizenship: A New Synergy。Science and Public Policy,31(2),90-94。  new window
43.朱斌妤、李素貞(19981200)。環境影響評估中民眾參與機制之檢討。中國行政評論,8(1),85-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Plough, Alonza、Krimsky, Sheldon(1987)。The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context。Science, Technology & Human Values,12(3/4),4-10。  new window
45.Klinke, Andreas、Renn, Ortwin(2002)。A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies。Risk Analysis,22(6),1071-1094。  new window
46.周桂田(20050600)。知識、科學與不確定性--專家與科技系統的「無知」如何建構風險。政治與社會哲學評論,13,131-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.徐世榮、許紹峰(20010500)。以民眾觀點探討環境影響評估制度。臺灣土地研究,2,101-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.范玫芳(20080600)。科技、民主與公民身份:安坑灰渣掩埋場設置爭議之個案研究。臺灣政治學刊,12(1),185-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.杜文苓、施佳良、蔡宛儒(20140500)。傳統農業縣的石化課題:檢視六輕環境爭議與治理困境。臺灣土地研究,17(1),59-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.張國暉(20130400)。當核能系統轉化為科技政體:冷戰下的國際政治與核能發展。科技、醫療與社會,16,103-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.Fischer, Frank(1993)。Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases。Policy Sciences,26,165-187。  new window
52.Hamlett, Patrick W.(2003)。Technology, theory and deliberative democracy。Science Technology & Human Values,28(1),112-140。  new window
53.Jasanoff, Sheila(1995)。Procedural choices in regulatory science。Technology in Society,17(3),279-293。  new window
54.Weingart, Peter(1999)。Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics。Science and Public Policy,26(3),151-161。  new window
55.Yearley, Steve、Cinderby, Steve、Forrester, John、Bailey, Peter、Rosen, Paul(2003)。Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: a three-city case study。Environmental Values,12(2),247-262。  new window
56.朱元鴻(19950600)。風險知識與風險媒介的政治社會學分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,19,195-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
57.杜文苓、彭渰雯(20080300)。社運團體的體制內參與及影響--以環評會與婦權會為例。臺灣民主季刊,5(1),119-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.Otway, Harry、Wynne, Brian(1989)。Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox。Risk Analysis,9(2),141-145。  new window
59.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究季刊,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
60.周桂田(20000900)。生物科技產業與社會風險--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究季刊,39,239-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.湯京平、邱崇原(20100600)。專業與民主:臺灣環境影響評估制度的運作與調適。公共行政學報,35,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
62.周桂田(20130300)。全球化風險挑戰下發展型國家之治理創新--以臺灣公民知識監督決策為分析。政治與社會哲學評論,44,65-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
63.王毓正(20100401)。我國環評史上首例撤銷判決:環評審查結論經撤銷無效抑或無效用之判決?。臺灣法學雜誌,149,145-158。  延伸查詢new window
64.Sarewitz, Daniel(2004)。How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse。Environmental Science and Policy,7(5),385-403。  new window
65.Michaels, David、Monforton, Celeste(2005)。Manufacturing uncertainty: Contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment。American Journal of Public Health,95(S1),S39-S48。  new window
66.Conrad, Cathy C.、Hilchey, Krista G.(2011)。A Review of Citizen Science and Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities。Environmental Monitoring & Assessment,176(1-4),273-291。  new window
67.曾家宏、張長義(20070200)。誰是民眾、如何參與?--論目前民眾參與環境影響評估之困境。工程,80(1),47-59。  延伸查詢new window
68.Yearley, Steven(2006)。Bridging the Science: Policy Divide in Urban Air-Quality Management: Evaluating Ways to Make Models More Robust through Public Engagement。Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,24(5),701-714。  new window
69.陳建仁、周柏彣(20120600)。都市內分權與環境治理機制--以臺中市大雪山社區為例。臺灣民主季刊,9(2),125-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
70.Frickel, Scott、Gibbon, Sahra、Howard, Jeff、Kempner, Joanna、Ottinger, Gwen、Hess, David J.(2010)。Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting。Science, Technology, and Human Values,35(4),444-473。  new window
71.Overdevest, Christine、Mayer, Brian(2008)。Harnessing the Power of Information through Community Monitoring Insights from Social Science。Texas Law Review,86(7),14-93。  new window
72.杜文苓(20091200)。高科技污染的風險論辯--環境倡議的挑戰。臺灣民主季刊,6(4),101-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
73.黃源銘(20100900)。論專家學者參與公共事務之法律地位--以行政法與刑法觀點為中心。臺北大學法學論叢,75,1-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
74.陳信行(20110400)。公害、職災與科學--RCA專輯導言。科技、醫療與社會,12,11-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
75.Bickerstaff, Karen、Pidgeon, Nick、Lorenzoni, Irene、Jones, Mavis(2010)。Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement。Science, Technology & Human Values,35(4),474-500。  new window
76.Chess, Caron、Dietz, Thomas、Shannon, Margaret(1998)。Who Should Deliberate When?。Human Ecology Review,5(1),60-68。  new window
77.Fiorino, Daniel J.(1990)。Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanism。Science, Technology, & Human Values,15(2),226-243。  new window
78.Fischer, Frank(2004)。Citizens and Experts in Risk Assessment: Technical Knowledge in Practical Deliberation。Technikfolgenabschatzung,13(2),90-98。  new window
79.Levidow, Les(20071200)。European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,1(1),19-51。new window  new window
80.Nali, Cristina、Lorenzini, Giacomo(2007)。Air Quality Survey Carried Out by School­children: An Innovative Tool for Urban Planning。Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,131,131-201。  new window
81.Renn, Ortwin(2003)。Hormesis and Risk Communication。Human and Experimental Toxicology,22,3-24。  new window
82.Uggla, Ylva(2008)。Strategies to Create Risk Awareness and Legitimacy: the Swedish Climate Campaign。Journal of Risk Research,11(6),719-734。  new window
83.廖俊松、張力亞(20101200)。臺灣地方治理的理想與實踐:英國經驗的借鏡。公共事務評論,11(2),13-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
84.Slovic, Paul(1987)。Perception of Risk。Science,236(4799),280-285。  new window
85.雷祥麟(20020300)。劇變中的科技、民主與社會:STS(科技與社會研究)的挑戰。臺灣社會研究,45,123-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
86.陳俊宏(19980900)。永續發展與民主:審議式民主理論初探。東吳政治學報,9,85-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
87.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
88.李建良(20040100)。環境行政程序的法制與實務--以「環境影響評估法」為中心。月旦法學,104,45-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
89.傅玲靜(20100600)。論環境影響評估審查與開發行為許可間之關係--由德國法「暫時性整體判斷」之觀點出發。興大法學,7,209-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
90.陳仲嶙(20100401)。環評撤銷後的開發許可效力--評環保署拒絕令中科三期停工。臺灣法學雜誌,149,29-34。  延伸查詢new window
91.杜文苓(20100600)。環評決策中公民參與的省思:以中科三期開發爭議為例。公共行政學報,35,29-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
92.杜文苓(20110600)。環境風險與科技決策:檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報,29(2),57-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
93.Corvellec, Hervé、Boholm, Åsa(2008)。The Risk/No-risk Rhetoric of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): the Case of Offshore Wind Farms in Sweden。Local Environment,13(7),627-640。  new window
94.Hayenhjelm, Madeleine(2006)。Asymmetries in Risk Communication。Risk Management,8(1),1-15。  new window
95.Pollock, Rebecca M.、Whitelaw, Graham S.(2005)。Community-based monitoring in support of local sustainability。Local Environment,10(3),211-228。  new window
96.Hinchliffe, Steve(2001)。Indeterminacy In-Decisions: Science, Policy and Politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) Crisis。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,26(2),182-204。  new window
97.Nelkin, Dorothy(1975)。The Political Impact of Technical Expertise。Social Studies of Science,5(1),35-54。  new window
98.Petts, Judith、Niemeyer, Simon(2004)。Health Risk Communication and Amplification: Learning from the MMR Vaccination Controversy。Health, Risk & Society,6(1),7-23。  new window
99.Renn, Ortwin(1999)。A Model for an Analytic-Deliberative Process in Risk Management。Environmental Science & Technology,33(18),3049-3055。  new window
會議論文
1.Parkinson, John、Bavister-Gould, Alex(2009)。Judging Macro-Deliberative Quality。The Democracy and the Deliberative Society Conference,The King's Manor, University of York 。The King's Manor, University of York。  new window
2.Tu, Wen-Ling、Lee, Yu-Jung(2009)。Ineffective Environmental Laws in Regulating Electronic Manufacturing Pollution: Examining Water Pollution Disputes in Taiwan。The 2009 International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology,(會議日期: 18-20 May, 2009)。Phoenix, AZ:IEEE-ISSST。  new window
3.林崇熙(2011)。不負責任的知識--對環境評估的知識論考察。第三屆STS年會。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田(2009)。科學專業主義的治理問題:SARS、H1N1、Dioxin、BSE、Melamine的管制科學與文化。「醫療、科技與台灣社會」工作坊研討會。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.柯三吉、陳啓清、賴沅暉、衛民、張執中、黃榮源、張惠堂、李有容(2010)。我國環境風險評估之公眾參與和專家代理機制探討 (計畫編號:EPA-099-E101-02-220)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王光聖(1995)。六輕石化工區大氣環境影響的再評估(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林聖慧(1990)。民眾參與政策議程建立過程之研究--宜蘭縣反六輕個案之分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林建龍(2004)。六輕問題與地方政府因應作為:網絡府際管理之觀點(碩士論文)。東海大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
4.高以文(2003)。第六座輕油裂解廠(六輕)社會面環境影響評估--以麥寮鄉為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳聯平(1994)。六輕設廠環境及社會影響評估分析(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳秉亨(2005)。六輕設廠歷程正義問題之探究(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張英華(1993)。以五、六輕設廠經過回顧分析國內環境影響評估制度推行之成效(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.詹嘉瑋(2007)。六輕離島工業區對空氣品質之影響評估研究(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭欣怡(2009)。六輕工業區鄰近地區空氣污染及居民健康風險評估(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.許靜娟(2009)。環境運動與環評制度的合作與矛盾:以第六屆環境影響評估委員會為個案(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃郁芩(2013)。核能科技官僚對風險溝通及科技民主化之觀點分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.李佳達(2009)。我國環境影響評估審查制度之實証分析(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐進鈺(1990)。台灣石化工業區位衝突之分析--以宜蘭反六輕運動為例(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rushefsky, Mark E.(1986)。Making Cancer Policy。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.Smith, Kevin B.、Larimer, Christopher W.、蘇偉業(2010)。公共政策入門。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Michaels, David(2008)。Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Davis, Debra L.(2002)。When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
5.Stone, Deborah A.、朱道凱(2007)。政策弔詭:政治決策的藝術。臺北:群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉俊榮(20100000)。環境政策與法律。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Nowotny, Helga、Scott, Peter、Gibbons, Michael T.(2001)。Re-thinking science : Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
8.Renn, Ortwin(2008)。Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World。London, England:Earthscan。  new window
9.胡湘玲(1995)。核工專家VS.反核專家。台北:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Douglas, Mary、Wildavsky, Aaron(1982)。Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers。University of California Press。  new window
11.Diers, Jim、黃光廷、黃舒楣(2009)。社區力量--西雅圖的社區營造實踐。台北:洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.張其祿(20070000)。管制行政:理論與經驗分析。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Fischer, Frank(2000)。Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
14.Fischer, Frank(1990)。Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise。Sage Publications。  new window
15.Corburn, Jason(2005)。Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice。MIT Press。  new window
16.Collingridge, David、Reeve, Colin(1986)。Science speaks to power: the role of experts in policy making。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
17.Jasanoff, Sheila(1990)。The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers。Harvard University Press。  new window
18.Keller, Ann Campbell(2009)。Science in environmental policy: the politics of objective advice。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
19.Primack, Joel、Von Hippel, Frank(1974)。Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena。New York:Basic Books。  new window
20.丘昌泰(1995)。台灣環境管制政策。台北:淑馨出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.Sismondo, Sergio、林宗德(2007)。科學與技術研究導論。群學。  延伸查詢new window
22.Latour, Bruno(2004)。Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy。Harvard University Press。  new window
23.Winner, Langdon(1986)。The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology。University of Chicago Press。  new window
24.Brown, Mark B.(2009)。Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
25.呂育誠(20010000)。地方政府管理:結構與功能的分析。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.江大樹(20060000)。邁向地方治理:議題、理論與實務。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Ascher, William、Steelman, Toddi、Healy, Robert(2010)。Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Reimagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics。Cambridge:The MIT Press。  new window
28.黃錦堂(1994)。臺灣地區環境法之研究。台北:月旦。  延伸查詢new window
29.Barber, Walter F.、Bartlett, Robert V.(2005)。Deliberative Environmental Politics。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
30.Bimber, Bruce A.(1996)。The Politic s of Expert Advice in Congress。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
31.DeLeon, Peter(1997)。Democracy and the Policy Sciences。Albany, NY:SUNY。  new window
32.Dye, Thomas R.(2004)。Understanding Public Policy。Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice Hall。  new window
33.Fischer, Frank(2009)。Democracy and Expertise。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
34.Jasanoff, Sheila(2012)。Science and Public Reason。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
35.Morgan, Granger M.、Fishhoff, Barich、Bostrom, Ann、Atmann, Cynthia J.(2002)。Risk Communication: A Mental Model Approach。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
36.O'Rourke, Dara(2003)。Community-Driven Regulation: Balancing Development and the Environment in Vietnam。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
37.Pielke, Roger A.(2007)。The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
38.Rampton, Sheldon、Stauber, John(2001)。Trust US, We are Experts!--How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future。Los Angeles, CA:Tarch。  new window
39.Tesh, Sylvia Noble(2001)。Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。  new window
40.Wilson, David、Game, Chris(2006)。Local government in the United Kingdom。New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
41.行政院環保署(2014)。保護環境的公民進行式:環境政策via公民參與。台北市:行政院環保署。  延伸查詢new window
42.周桂田(2014)。永續之殤--從高雄氣爆解析環境正義與轉型怠惰。台北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
43.Hecht, Gabrielle(2009)。The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press。  new window
44.Hess, David J.(2007)。Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation and the Environment in an Era of Globalization。The MIT Press。  new window
45.Fischer, Frank(2003)。Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices。Oxford University Press。  new window
46.Kooiman, Jan(2003)。Governing as Governance。Sage Publications。  new window
47.Bernstein, Marver H.(1955)。Regulating Business by Independent Commission。Princeton University Press。  new window
48.Sirianni, Carmen(2009)。Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
49.Beck, Urich、汪浩(2004)。風險社會:通往另一個現代的路上。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
50.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development。Routledge。  new window
51.Jasanoff, Sheila(2004)。States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order。Routledge。  new window
52.Salter, Liora(1988)。Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
53.Huang, Kuang-Huei(2006)。環境評估與管理導論。新北市。  延伸查詢new window
54.Ridley, M. Rosalind、Baker, Harry(1998)。Fatal Protein: The Story of CJD, BSE and Other Prion Diseases。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fischer, Frank(2003)。Policy Analysis as Discursive Practice: The Argumentative Turn。Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Dunn, William N.(1993)。Policy Reforms as Arguments。The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning。London:UCL。  new window
3.Renn, Ortwin(2010)。Risk communication: Insights and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs on Health and Environmental Hazards。Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication。New York:Routledge。  new window
4.Schneider, Anne L.、Ingram, Helen、DeLeon, Peter(2007)。Social Construction and Policy Design。Theories of the Policy Process。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
5.Wynne, Brian(2007)。Risky delusions: Misunderstanding science and misperforming publics in the GE Crops Issue。Genetically engineered crops: Interim policies, uncertain legislation。Haworth Press。  new window
6.Funtowicz, Silvio O.、Ravetz, Jerome R.(1992)。Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science。Social Theories of Risk。Praeger。  new window
7.Fischer, Frank(2003)。Beyond Empiricism: Policy Analysis as Deliberative Practice。Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Moore, Kelly(2006)。Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science。The new political sociology of science。Madison:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
9.Sarewitz, Daniel(2000)。Science and Environmental Policy: An Excess of Objectivity。Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
10.Wynne, Brian(1991)。Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information。When Science Meets the Public。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
11.Frickel, Scott、Moore, Kelly(2006)。Prospects and Challenges for a New Political Sociology of Science。The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
12.Bucchi, Massimiano、Neresini, Federico(2007)。Science and Public Participation。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
13.Elster, Jon(1997)。The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory。Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
14.Fischer, Frank(1995)。Hazardous Waste Policy, Community Movements and the Politics of NIMBY: Participatory Risk Assessment in the USA and Canada。Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainability Future。London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.。  new window
15.Irwin, Alan、Dale, Alison、Smith, Denis(1996)。Science and Hell's Kitchen。Misun­derstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Kleinman, Daniel L.、Vallas, Steven P.(2006)。Contradiction in Convergence: Universities and Industry in the Biotechnology Field。The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power。Madison:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
17.Wagenaar, Hendrik、Noam Cook, S. D.(2003)。Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation in Policy Analysis。Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.Wynne, Brian(1987)。May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-lay Knowledge Divide。Risk, Environment & Modernity。London:Sage。  new window
19.Wynne, Brian(1996)。Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and the Public Uptake of Science。Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.李建良(1988)。環境議題的形成與國家任務的變遷。憲法體制與法治行政。台北市:三民。  延伸查詢new window
21.Heinrichs, Harald(2005)。Advisory Systems in Pluralistic Knowledge Societies: A Criteria-Based Typology to Assess and Optimize Environmental Policy Advice。Democratization of Expertise?。  new window
22.Maasen, Sabine、Weingart, Peter(2005)。What's New in Scientific Advice to Politics?。Democratization of Expertise?。  new window
23.Douglas, Heather(2005)。Inserting the Public into Science。Democratization of Expertise?。  new window
24.Martin, Brian、Richards, Evelleen(1995)。Scientific Knowledge, Controversy, and Public Decision Making。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。Sage Publication。  new window
25.LaDou, Joseph(2006)。Occupational Health in the Semiconductor Industry。Challenging the Chip: Labor Rights and Environmental Justice in the Global Electronics Industry。Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
26.Lambert, Barrie(2002)。Radiation: Early Warnings; Late Effects。Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000。Luxembourg:European Environment Agency。  new window
27.Waterton, Claire、Wynne, Brian(2004)。Knowledge and Political Order in the European Environmental Agency。States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order。New York:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE