:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生態主義如何介入農業生產政策?論述制度主義的觀點
作者:江俊宜
作者(外文):Chun-Yi Jiang
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:林子倫
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:農業中的環境概念生態國家理論論述制度論環境關切農業生產管理環境管理
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
當今農業政策討論當中,兼顧環境為目標,甚至藉由農業行為維持生態系的現象,成為普遍接受的理念。然而本研究指出農業生產必須與環境協調的生態主義訴求,並非自古皆然,更不可能是放任發展的結果,而是受到政治力量的介入與協調。是故,要求農業生產兼顧環境維護,甚至協助生態系運作的「生態主義」思維,如何取得農業事務討論當中的普遍性與正當性,便是本研究的核心提問。此外,本研究為了分析「國家如何在農業文本當中使用環境概念」,採取論述制度論的研究方法,來理解「農業環境國家」角色與「生態主義」主張之關係。
歸納不同的「農業環境主題」之後,「農業環境國家」作為論述互動的場域,同時作為重要的行動者,以此預設,來理解民間的「農業環境關切」,以及國家所採取的「農業環境政策」與「農業環境組織」。
「回應型國家」主要在回應初始環境意識興起下,社會對農業污染的注目,而政府採取生產管理與環境管理區隔的策略,因為既有的污染問題,是農業機關在有限的環境制度能力下,僅能採取被動回應污染問題的作法,並且與民間同聲譴責污染者。對污染問題的歸責的組織討論,則反映回應型國家窮於回應污染問題,而尚未思考到農業環境問題的制度解決的可能性。
「非生產型農業環境國家」採納永續發展思潮當中減少消耗環境資源的主題,建構「環境管理」優先於「生產管理」的原則。降低農業生產,與減少生產波及的環境損失,成為這個時期主要的農業環境政策主軸。另一方面,1998年成立的永續會,也延續了降低生產手段以維護自然資源的永續環境理解,以此為主軸,來定位農業機關在國家永續發展體制的角色。
「積極型農業環境國家」的特徵,顯現在國家意圖回應國際糧食危機,及其所帶來的國內的農業環境關切,宣示「回復生產」與「兼顧環境」的原則。民間發展於非生產時期的「公民農業」與農業環境主張,以及相關的制度改革提案,在這個時期當中,因為制度轉變的政治議程當中的討論,顯示對於「兼顧環境」的不同路徑。代表性的農業環境政策討論中,以「綠色競爭力」為主的論述策略,為稻作給付的環境轉向爭取正當性。此外,積極行動者欲以行政院級農業審議會的組織提案,來爭取農業機關對農業環境事務的主導性。
本研究以農業環境與生產活動高度相繫的特徵,來延伸生態國家理論的適用範圍,指出「生態主義」的主張介入「農業生產」的型態,高度受到「國家角色」與「農業統治的政治過程」所影響。
Environmental goals, ideas, and concerns have been an emerging trend in the agricultural discussion. This research proposed that under governmental intervention, the ever-changing environmental ideas and concepts in agriculture don''t come naturally. The research investigates how environmental ideas, concepts, and discourses work on agri-environment(policy) via a discursive institutionalist view, to realize the relationship between "Agriculture Environmental State", agricultural production policy and ecologism.
With the merging of environmental awareness, the main task of ''Passive-responsive state'' was dealing with agricultural pollution. The measures to deal with pollution was isolation between production management and environmental management, out of the limited environmental institutional capacity. Especially the agriculture administration (COA, Council of Agriculture), it can only have responded the blames and even blamed on those polluters. It represented the limited environmental institutional imagination when we revised the responsibility and accountability of pollution in institute organization.
"Non-Production Agr-Environmental State" embraced specific ideas of natural-resources-saving from sustainable development thought. Therefore, the way of reduction of agricultural production has become the first strategy of resource-saving. Besides, National Council for Sustainable Development, Executive Yuan, which was founded in 1998, has strengthened the non-production way of COA.
Active Agri-Environment State, which initiated from the international food crisis, accidentally has changed Taiwan''s agri-environmental agenda. Civil agriculture has organized the community to propose agri-environmetal institutional reform. Those disputes between ways of environmental reform from civil agriculture and their dissenters, has included into governmental agr-environmental measures and policies. Additionally, green competitiveness(in international trade arena) as the main discourse in the persuasion of rice payment (Green environment payment). Besides, agri-environmental reform activists have put the Council of Food, Agriculture and Rural Area Policies forward legislative process, to pursue COA''s institutional power of environmental affairs.
After inducting different ''agr-environmental themes'', agr-enviromental states play a central role in realizing agri-environmental concerns, agri-environment policies been formed, and Taiwan''s reorganization of agricultural administration. The research shows the puzzle that how environmental ideas and concepts influence agri-environmet in Taiwan.
Keywords: Environmental concepts in agriculture; Eco-state theory; Discursive institutionalism; Environmental concerns; Agricultural production management; Agricultural environmental management
Abdelal, R., Blyth, M., & Parsons, C. (2015). Constructing the international economy: Cornell University Press.
Abramson, P. R. (1997). Postmaterialism and Environmentalism: A Comment on an Analysis and a Reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press), 78(1), 21-23.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in human geography, 24(3), 347-364.
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77-86.
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., . . . Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3), 335-354.
Agrawal, A., & Lemos, M. C. (2007). A Greener Revolution in the Making?: Environmental Governance in the 21st Century. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(5), 36-45.
Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Fu, T.-T., Krupnick, A., Liu, J.-T., Shaw, D., & Harrington, W. (1997). Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34(2), 107-126.
Aligica, P. D. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond: Oxford University Press.
Allen, P. (2008). Mining for justice in the food system: perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(2), 157-161.
Almeida, C., & Báscolo, E. (2006). Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 22, S7-S19.
Alt, J. E., Frieden, J., Gilligan, M. J., Rodrik, D., & Rogowski, R. (1996). The political economy of international trade: Enduring puzzles and an agenda for inquiry. Comparative Political Studies, 29(6), 689-717.
Altieri, M., Nicholls, C., & Montalba, R. (2017). Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective. Sustainability, 9(3), 349.
Ananda, J., & Proctor, W. (2013). Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics, 86, 97-106.
Andersson, R. (2015). The Green State and the Prospects of greening Sovereignty. In K. Bäckstrand & A. Kronsell (Eds.), Rethinking the Green State: Environment governance towards climate and sustainability transitions (pp. 63-79). London nad NY: Routledge.
Andonova, L. B. (2010). Public-private partnerships for the earth: politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 25-53.
Angel, D., & Rock, M. T. (2009). Environmental rationalities and the development state in East Asia: prospects for a sustainability transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(2), 229-240.
Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014-1040.
Ansell, C., Maxwell, R., & Sicurelli, D. (2006). Protesting food: NGOs and political mobilization in Europe. What’s the beef, 97-122.
Ansell, D., Gibson, F., & Salt, D. (Eds.). (2016). Learning from agri-environment schemes in Australia: Investing in biodiversity and other ecosystem services on farms. Australia: ANU Press.
Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of political economy, 58(4), 328-346.
Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest policy and economics, 11(5), 340-347.
Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change. Public Organization Review, 6(2), 93-106.
Aspinwall, M., & Schneider, G. (2001). The rules of integration: Institutionalist approaches to the study of Europe: Manchester University Press.
Axtell, R. L. (2003). Economics as distributed computation. Paper presented at the Meeting the Challenge of Social Problems via Agent-Based Simulation.
Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24-41.
Bäckstrand, K. (2004). Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics, 13(4), 695-714.
Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74-102.
Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions: Routledge.
Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions: Routledge.
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 50-75.
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Competing Discourses of Green Governmentality, Ecological Modernization and Civic Environmentalism. In M. E. Pettenger (Ed.), The Social Construction of Climate Change (pp. 123-148). Bodmin, Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing.
Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions: Routledge.
Bakari, M. E.-K. (2014). Sustainability’s Inner Conflicts: From ‘Ecologism’to ‘Ecological Modernization’. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 6(1).
Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571-598.
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
Barry, J. (2012). The politics of actually existing unsustainability: Human flourishing in a climate-changed, carbon constrained world: Oxford University Press.
Barry, J., & Eckersley, R. (2005). The state and the global ecological crisis: MIT Press.
Bateman, I. J., & Willis, K. G. (2001). Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Bates, R. H. (1982). Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies: With a New Preface: Univ of California Press.
Bates, R. H. (2005). Beyond the miracle of the market: The political economy of agrarian development in Kenya: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, R. H., & Block, S. A. (2013). Revisiting African Agriculture: Institutional Change and Productivity Growth. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 372-384.
Baxter, B. (2000). Ecologism: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bechtel, M. M., & Tosun, J. (2009). Changing Economic Openness for Environmental Policy Convergence: When Can Bilateral Trade Agreements Induce Convergence of Environmental Regulation? International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 931-953.
Beck, U. (1998). Politics of risk society. The politics of risk society, 9-22.
Beddington, J. R., Asaduzzaman, M., Fernandez, A., Clark, M., Guillou, M., Jahn, M., . . . Nobre, C. A. (2012). Achieving food security in the face of climate change: Final report from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change.
Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European public policy, 16(5), 701-718.
Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Ideas and politics in social science research: Oxford University Press.
Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(04), 883-906.
Berman, S. (2013). Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences since '' Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State''. Governance, 26(2), 217-237.
Bernard, B., & Lux, A. (2017). How to feed the world sustainably: an overview of the discourse on agroecology and sustainable intensification. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1279-1290.
Bernstein, H., Mackintosh, M., Martin, C., & Crow, B. (2014). The food question: Profits versus people: Routledge.
Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2001). NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 65-85.
Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public understanding of science, 17(2), 145-169.
Biermann, F., & Dingwerth, K. (2004). Global environmental change and the nation state. Global Environmental Politics, 4(1), 1-22.
Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277-294.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local environment, 4(3), 257-278.
Blandford, D., & Boisvert, R. N. (2002). Multifunctional agriculture and domestic/international policy choice. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 3(1), 106.
Blühdorn, I. (1997). A theory of post‐ecologist politics. Environmental Politics, 6(3), 125-147.
Blühdorn, I. (2000). Post-ecologist politics: social theory and the abdication of the ecologist paradigm: Routledge.
Blühdorn, I. (2008). The politics of unsustainability : eco-politics in the post-ecologist era. London: Routledge.
Blühdorn, I. (2008). The governance of unsustainability: ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 16-36.
Blühdorn, I. (2011). The politics of unsustainability: COP15, post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 34-53.
Blühdorn, I. (2013). The governance of unsustainability: ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 16-36.
Blyth, M. (1997). " Any More Bright Ideas?" The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy: JSTOR.
Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2003). Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: Interests, ideas, and progress in political science. Perspectives on politics, 1(04), 695-706.
Blyth, M. (2003a). Same as it never was: temporality and typology in the varieties of capitalism. Comparative European Politics, 1(2), 215.
Blyth, M. (2003b). Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: Interests, ideas, and progress in political science. Perspectives on politics, 1(04), 695-706.
Brechin, S. R. (1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Science Quarterly, 793-809.
Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L., Wilshusen, P. R., & West, P. C. (2003). Contested nature: promoting international biodiversity with social justice in the twenty-first century: Suny Press.
Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: a challenge to the postmaterialism thesis? Social Science Quarterly, 75(2), 245-269.
Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1997). Beyond postmaterialist values: National versus individual explanations of global environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 16-20.
Brouwer, F., & Crabtree, B. (Eds.). (1999). Environmental indicators and agricultural policy: CABI.
Brulle, R. J. (1996). Environmental discourse and social movement organizations: A historical and rhetorical perspective on the development of US environmental organizations. Sociological Inquiry, 66(1), 58-83.
Brulle, R. J. (2010). Politics and the environment Handbook of Politics (pp. 385-406): Springer.
Brulle, R. J. (2010). From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82-98.
Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political geography, 24(8), 875-902.
Buller, H., Wilson, G. A., & Holl, A. (Eds.). (2000). Agri-environmental policy in the European Union. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and planning A, 30(8), 1445-1460.
Busby, J. (2014). The G20 and Climate Change–Beyond Goal-Setting at Brisbane: Stanley Foundation/Lowy Institute. Available from http://www. lowyinstitute. org/files/busby_the_g20_and_climate_change_-_beyond_goal-setting_at_brisbane. pdf.
Buttel, F. (1993). Environmentalization and greening: origins, processes and implications. In S. Harper (Ed.), The Greening of Rural Policy (pp. 12-26). London and New York: Belhaven Press.
Buttel, F. H. (1992). Environmentalization: Origins, processes, and implications for rural social change. Rural Sociology, 57(1), 1-27.
Cadger, K., Quaicoo, A., Dawoe, E., & Isaac, M. (2016). Development Interventions and Agriculture Adaptation: A Social Network Analysis of Farmer Knowledge Transfer in Ghana. Agriculture, 6(3), 32.
Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Ideas and politics in social science research, 167, 172-190.
Carey, J. M. (2000). Parchment, equilibria, and institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6-7), 735-761.
Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Ideas are Not as Stable as Political Scientists Want Them to Be: A Theory of Incremental Ideational Change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596-615.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European public policy, 23(3), 318-337.
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public understanding of science, 16(2), 223-243.
Carvalho, A. (2010). Media (ted) discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis) engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(2), 172-179.
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance, 15(4), 503-529.
Castro, P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: contributions from the social representations approach. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(4), 247-266.
Chasek, P. S., Downie, D. L., & Brown, J. W. (2016). Global environmental politics: Westview Press.
Christoff, P. (2005). Out of chaos, a shining star? Toward a typology of green states The state and the global ecological crisis (pp. 25-52).
Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 237-246.
Clark, J., & Lowe, P. (1992). Cleaning up agriculture: environment, technology and social science. Sociologia Ruralis, 32(1), 11-29.
Clark, J. R. A., Jones, A., Potter, C. A., & Lobley, M. (1997). Conceptualising the Evolution of the European Union''s Agri-Environment Policy: A Discourse Approach. Environment and planning A, 29(10), 1869-1885.
Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 441-466.
Co-operation, O. f. E., & Development. (2013). OECD compendium of agri-environmental indicators: OECD Publishing.
Conca, K., & Conca, K. (2006). Governing watercontentious transnational politics and global institution building.
Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory. Progress in human geography, 36(4), 475-489.
Cowell, R. (2009). ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATION IN PRACTICE. SHAPING INSTITUTIONS FOR LEARNING Måns Nilsson and Katarina Eckerberg (eds). Public Administration, 87(2), 418-420.
Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world''s electoral systems: Cambridge University Press.
CP Tang. (2011a). Inclusion, Identity, and Environmental Justice in New Democracies: The Politics of Pollution Remediation in Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 43(3), 333-350.
Crepaz, M. M. (1995). Explaining national variations of air pollution levels: Political institutions and their impact on environmental policy‐making. Environmental Politics, 4(3), 391-414.
Crespy, A. (2010). When ‘Bolkestein’ is trapped by the French anti-liberal discourse: a discursive-institutionalist account of preference formation in the realm of European Union multi-level politics. Journal of European public policy, 17(8), 1253-1270.
Crespy, A., & Schmidt, V. (2014). The clash of Titans: France, Germany and the discursive double game of EMU reform. Journal of European public policy, 21(8), 1085-1101.
Cumings, B. (1984). The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences. International Organization, 38(1), 1-40.
Curry, L. (1962). The climatic resources of intensive grassland farming: The Waikato, New Zealand. Geographical Review, 52(2), 174-194.
Dale, A., & Hill, S. B. (2001). At the edge: Sustainable development in the 21st century (Vol. 6): UBC Press.
Dalton, R. J. (1994). The green rainbow: Environmental groups in Western Europe: Yale University Press.
Daniels, D. P., Krosnick, J. A., Tichy, M. P., & Tompson, T. (2012). Public opinion on environmental policy in the United States. Handbook of US environmental policy, 461-486.
Darragh, H. S., & Emery, S. B. (2017). What Can and Can''t Crowding Theories Tell Us about Farmers’ ‘Environmental’ Intentions in Post-Agri-Environment Scheme Contexts? Sociologia Ruralis, n/a-n/a.
Dauvergne, P., & Clapp, J. (2016). Researching Global Environmental Politics in the 21st Century. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 1-12.
De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological complexity, 7(3), 260-272.
De Stefano, L., Duncan, J., Dinar, S., Stahl, K., Strzepek, K. M., & Wolf, A. T. (2012). Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 193-209.
De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2014). The European commission''s neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: Legitimizing continuity through subtle discursive change. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 149-167.
Death, C. (2011). Summit theatre: exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 1-19.
Death, C. (2016). Green states in Africa: beyond the usual suspects. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 116-135.
Defrancesco, E., Gatto, P., Runge, F., & Trestini, S. (2008). Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective. Journal of agricultural economics, 59(1), 114-131.
DeLind, L. B. (2011). Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 273-283.
Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the association of American geographers, 91(2), 307-337.
den Besten, J. W., Arts, B., & Verkooijen, P. (2014). The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 40-48.
Der Wiele, V., & Fay, C. (2004). Understanding the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices and the role of ecological design within the milieu of chronic conflict and political instability: A case study of smallholder households in Nimba County, Liberia.
Dewulf, A. (2013). Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(4), 321-330.
Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Cronin, T., Muharrom, E., Mardiah, S., & Santoso, L. (2015). Deadlock or transformational change? Exploring public discourse on REDD+ across seven countries. Global Environmental Politics.
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335-372.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. science, 302(5652), 1907-1912.
Dobson, A. (2007). Green political thought (4 ed.): Psychology Press.
Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: an institutional‐stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73.
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. The public.
Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S., Downes, D., Hunold, C., Schlosberg, D., & Hernes, H.-K. (2003). Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway: OUP Oxford.
Duit, A. (2012). Adaptive capacity and the ecostate. Adapting institutions: governance, complexity and social-ecological resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Duit, A.(Ed.) (2014). State and environment: the comparative study of environmental governance: MIT Press.
Duit, A. (2016). The four faces of the environmental state: environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 69-91.
Duit, A., Feindt, P. H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Greening Leviathan: the rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25(1), 1-23.
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1997). Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 24-29.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). Environmental concern: a bibliography of empirical studies and brief appraisal of the literature: Vance Bibliographies.
Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529-563.
Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2012). SurveysThe Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys. QuarterlySociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529-563.
Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2013). The Globalizatiohn of Environmental Concern. In P. F. Steinberg & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Comparative Environmental Politics: theory, practice and prospects (pp. 89-112). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach: Suny Press.
Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty: MIT Press.
Ehrlich, P. (1970). The population bomb. New York Times, 47.
Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (1981). Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1970). Population, resources, environment. Issues in human ecology. Population, resources, environment. Issues in human ecology.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1990). The population explosion: Simon and Schuster New York.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth.
Ehrlich, P. R. E., Anne, H., & Holdren, J. P. (1977). Ecoscience: population, resources environment/Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, John P. Holdren.
Eisenstadt, T. A., & West, K. J. (2017). Public Opinion, Vulnerability, and Living with Extraction on Ecuador''s Oil Frontier: Where the Debate Between Development and Environmentalism Gets Personal. Comparative Politics, 49(2), 231-251.
Engle, N. L., & Lemos, M. C. (2010). Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 4-13.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
Ester, P., Simões, S., & Vinken, H. (2004). Cultural change and environmentalism: a cross-national approach of mass publics and decision makers. Ambiente & sociedade, 7(2), 45-66.
Evans, N., Morris, C., & Winter, M. (2002). Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy. Progress in human geography, 26(3), 313-332.
Fairbrother, M. (2013). Rich People, Poor People, and Environmental Concern: Evidence across Nations and Time. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 910-922.
Falkner, R. (2012). Global environmentalism and the greening of international society. International Affairs, 88(3), 503-522.
Feindt, P. H., & Flynn, A. (2009). Policy stretching and institutional layering: British food policy between security, safety, quality, health and climate change. British Politics, 4(3), 386-414.
Feldman, M. S., Khademian, A. M., Ingram, H., & Anne, S. S. (2006). Ways of Knowing and Inclusive Management Practices. Public Administration Review, 66, 89-99.
Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46-59.
Fioretos, O. (2001). The domestic sources of multilateral preferences: Varieties of capitalism in the European Community. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, 213-244.
Fischer, F., & Hajer, M. A. (1999). Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse: Oxford University Press.
Fleming, A., & Vanclay, F. (2011). Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Volume 2 (pp. 283-293): Springer.
Forsyth, T. (2012). Politicizing environmental science does not mean denying climate science nor endorsing it without question. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 18-23.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge, trans. AM Sheridan Smith (New York: Pantheon, 1972), 24.
Foucault, M., Faubion, J. D., & Rabinow, P. (2000). Power: essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984: New Press.
Foust, C. R., & O''Shannon Murphy, W. (2009). Revealing and Reframing Apocalyptic Tragedy in Global Warming Discourse. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 151-167.
Fox, W. (1990). Toward a transpersonal ecology: Developing new foundations for environmentalism: SUNY Press.
Frank, D. J., Longhofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2007). World Society, NGOs and Environmental Policy Reform in Asia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48(4), 275-295.
Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and reserach findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369-382.
Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219-234.
Franzese, R. J. (2001). Institutional and sectoral interactions in monetary policy and wage/price-bargaining. Hall, P. and Soskice, D.“Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage”, Oxford, 104-144.
Friedmann, H. (1982). The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food Order. American journal of sociology, 88, S248-S286.
Friedmann, H. (1993). The political economy of food: a global crisis. New left review(197), 29.
Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country: Results from an Istanbul survey. Environment and behavior, 30(4), 520-534.
Genus, A. (2014). Governing sustainability: A discourse-institutional approach. Sustainability, 6(1), 283-305.
Gereffi, G., & Wyman, D. L. (2014). Manufacturing miracles: paths of industrialization in Latin America and East Asia: Princeton University Press.
Ghinoi, S., Junior, V. J. W., & Piras, S. (2018). Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf. Land Use Policy, 76, 68-80.
Gofas, A., & Hay, C. (2010). The role of ideas in political analysis: a portrait of contemporary debates: Routledge.
Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework. Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change, 3-30.
Goodin, R. E. (1998). The theory of institutional design: Cambridge University Press.
Gottlieb, R. (2005). Forcing the spring: The transformation of the American environmental movement: Island Press.
Gough, I. (2016). Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 24-47.
Gough, I., & Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Decarbonizing the welfare state: Oxford University Press.
Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(04), 881-912.
Grano, S. A. (2015). Environmental governance in Taiwan : a new generation of activists and stakeholders. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Groenfeldt, D. (2006). Multifunctionality of agricultural water: looking beyond food production and ecosystem services. Irrigation and Drainage, 55(1), 73-83.
Guthman, J. (2014). Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California: Univ of California Press.
Guthman, J., Morris, A. W., & Allen, P. (2006). Squaring Farm Security and Food Security in Two Types of Alternative Food Institutions*. Rural Sociology, 71(4), 662-684.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society: MIT press.
Hagedorn, K. (2004). Multifunctional agriculture: an institutional interpretation. Paper presented at the 90th EAAE Seminar. October.
Hagedorn, K. (2007). Towards an institutional theory of multifunctionality. In Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, & K. Helming (Eds.), Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services (pp. 105-124). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hagedorn, K. (2007). Towards an institutional theory of multifunctionality. Paper presented at the Multifunctional land use: Meeting future demands for landscape goods and services.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Hajer, M. (1996). Ecological modernisation as cultural politics. Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology, 253.
Hajer, M. (2003). A frame in the fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, 88-110.
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175-184.
Hajer, M. A. (1993). The politics of environmental discourse: a study of the acid rain controversy in Great Britain and the Netherlands. University of Oxford.
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Hajer, M. A. (2005). Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE Discourse theory in European politics (pp. 297-315): Springer.
Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 39(03), 449-482.
Hall, P. A., & Lamont, M. (2013). Social resilience in the neoliberal era: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage: OUP Oxford.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2003). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities Institutional Conflicts and Complementarities (pp. 43-76): Springer.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936-957.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1998). The potential of historical institutionalism: a response to Hay and Wincott. Political Studies, 46(5), 958-962.
Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-economic review, 7(1), 7-34.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., & Thatcher, M. (2007). Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy: Oxford University Press.
Hardin, R. (2013). Why a constitution. The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, 51-72.
Harper, S. (Ed.) (1993). The Greening of Rural Policy. London and New York: Belhaven Press.
Harrison, C., Limb, M., & Burgess, J. (1986). Recreation 2000: views of the country from the city. Landscape Research, 11(2), 19-24.
Hay, C. (2001). The ‘crisis’ of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: An ideational institutionalist approach. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis, 193-218.
Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the Construction of Interests. Ideas and politics in social science research, 65-82.
Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46(5), 951-957.
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2012). Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: the role of institutional resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(2).
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
Hoggart, K. (1990). Let''s do away with rural. Journal of rural studies, 6(3), 245-257.
Hoggart, K., Black, R., & Buller, H. (1995). Rural Europe: Routledge.
Hollander, G. M. (2004). Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape. Geoforum, 35(3), 299-312.
Hope, M., & Raudla, R. (2012). Discursive institutionalism and policy stasis in simple and compound polities: the cases of Estonian fiscal policy and United States climate change policy. Policy Studies, 33(5), 399-418.
Horlings, L. G., & Marsden, T. K. (2011). Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could ‘feed the world’. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 441-452.
Hough, P. (2011). Persistnet Prganic Pollutants and Pesticides. In G. Kütting (Ed.), Global Environmental Politics: Concepts, Theories and case Studies (pp. 179-191). Madison Avenue, NY: Routledge.
Huber, J. (2008). Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: Theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory. Global Environmental Change, 18(3), 360-367.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order: Penguin Books India.
Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880-900.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(01), 57-72.
Inglehart, R. (2000). Culture and democracy. Culture matters: How values shape human progress, 80-97.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. F. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(04), 880-900.
Inglehart, R. F. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. F. (2008). Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1-2), 130-146.
Inglehart, R. F., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American sociological review, 19-51.
Inglehart, R. F., & Welzel, C. (2003). Political culture and democracy: Analyzing cross-level linkages. Comparative Politics, 61-79.
Isgren, E., & Ness, B. (2017). Agroecology to Promote Just Sustainability Transitions: Analysis of a Civil Society Network in the Rwenzori Region, Western Uganda. Sustainability, 9(8), 1357.
Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349-385.
Jänicke, M. (1997). The political system’s capacity for environmental policy National environmental policies (pp. 1-24): Springer.
Jänicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557-565.
Jasanoff, S. (2004). Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance: MIT press.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1994). Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of public policy, 14(02), 175-203.
Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., . . . Persson, J. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 69-82.
Jones, A., & Clark, J. R. A. (1998). The Agri-Environment Regulation EU 2078/92: The Role of the European Commission in Policy Shaping and Setting. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 16(1), 51-68.
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental policy and governance, 20(3), 147-158.
Joskow, P. L. (1988). Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: empirical evidence. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 95-117.
Kamieniecki, S., & Kraft, M. (Eds.). (2013). The oxford handbook of US environmental policy: Oxford University Press.
Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370-1380.
Kjaer, P., & Pedersen, O. (2001). Translating Liberalization. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis, 219-248.
Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate: Simon and Schuster.
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390-400.
Knickel, K. (1990). Agricultural structural change: Impact on the rural environment. Journal of rural studies, 6(4), 383-393.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12(3), 1-22.
Lake, D. A. (1999). Entangling relations: American foreign policy in its century: Princeton University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70-81.
Lam, W. F. (1996). Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: a study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. World Development, 24(6), 1039-1054.
Lampe, M. (2016). ‘Sekolah Lapang Petani’: Membangun Komitmen, Disiplin dan Kretivitas Petani Melalui SLP-PHT. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 1(1).
Lane, D. S., & Myant, M. R. (2007). Varieties of capitalism in post-communist countries: Springer.
Lassen, I., Horsbøl, A., Bonnen, K., & Pedersen, A. G. J. (2011). Climate change discourses and citizen participation: A case study of the discursive construction of citizenship in two public events. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(4), 411-427.
Latacz-Lohmann, U., & Hodge, I. (2003). European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(1), 123-139.
Lauber, V., & Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: a discursive-institutionalist analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508-527.
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 31, 297-325.
Lenschow, A., Newig, J., & Challies, E. (2016). Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 136-159.
Lewis, O. A., & Steinmo, S. (2012). How institutions evolve: Evolutionary theory and institutional change. Polity, 44(3), 314-339.
Lockie, S. (2006). Capturing the sustainability agenda: Organic foods and media discourses on food scares, environment, genetic engineering, and health. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(3), 313-323.
Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33-44.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445-459.
Lövbrand, E., & Linnér, B.-O. (2015). Governing beyond or with the state? State conceptions in studies of non-state climate action Rethinking the Green State (pp. 59-78): Routledge.
Lowe, P. (1992). Industrial agriculture and environmental regulation: a new agenda for rural sociology. Sociologia Ruralis, 32(1), 4-10.
Lowe, P., Clark, J., Seymour, S., & Ward, N. (1997). Moralizing the environment: countryside change, farming and pollution: UCL Press Limited.
Lowndes, V. (2010). The institutional approach. Theory and methods in political science, 3, 60-79.
Luke, T. W. (2009). An Apparatus of Answers? Ecologism as Ideology in the 21st Century. New Political Science, 31(4), 487-498.
Luken, R., & Castellanos‐Silveria, F. (2011). Industrial transformation and sustainable development in developing countries. Sustainable Development, 19(3), 167-175.
Lynggaard, K. (2006). The common agricultural policy and organic farming: CABI.
Lynggaard, K. (2007). The institutional construction of a policy field: a discursive institutional perspective on change within the common agricultural policy. Journal of European public policy, 14(2), 293-312.
Lynggaard, K. (2011). Domestic change in the face of European integration and globalization: Methodological pitfalls and pathways. Comparative European Politics, 9(1), 18-37.
Lynggaard, K. (2012). Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization (pp. 85-104). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Lyson, T. A. (2004). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford, Massachusetts: Tuft University Press.
Mahoney, J. (2001). The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America: JHU Press.
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences: Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: Simon and Schuster.
Marsden, T. (1988). Exploring political economy approaches in agriculture. Area, 315-322.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2003). The Environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation: Edward Elgar Publishing.
McAfee, K. (1999). Selling Nature to save It? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(2), 133-154.
Mccann, E., Sullivan, S., Erickson, D., & De Young, R. (1997). Environmental Awareness, Economic Orientation, and Farming Practices: A Comparison of Organic and Conventional Farmers. Environmental Management, 21(5), 747-758.
McHenry, H. (1996). Farming and environmental discourses: a study of the depiction of environmental issues in a German farming newspaper. Journal of rural studies, 12(4), 375-386.
McMichael, P. (2009). A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis’. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(4), 281.
McMichael, P. (2014). Rethinking land grab ontology. Rural Sociology, 79(1), 34-55.
Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Greening the State? In P. F. Steinberg & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Comparative Environmental Politics: theory, practice, and prospects (pp. 63-87). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Meadows, D., & Randers, J. (2012). The limits to growth: the 30-year update: Routledge.
Migliorini, P., Gkisakis, V., Gonzalvez, V., Raigón, M., & Bàrberi, P. (2018). Agroecology in Mediterranean Europe: Genesis, State and Perspectives. Sustainability, 10(8), 2724.
Miller, G. (2000). Rational choice and dysfunctional institutions. Governance, 13(4), 535-547.
Mol, A. P. (1997). Ecological modernization: industrial transformations and environmental reform. The international handbook of environmental sociology, 138-149.
Mol, A. P. (2006). Environment and modernity in transitional China: frontiers of ecological modernization. Development and Change, 37(1), 29-56.
Mol, A. P., & Buttel, F. H. (Ed.) (2002). The Environmental State under Pressure.
Mol, A. P., Spaargaren, G., & Sonnenfeld, D. (2014). Ecological Modernisation Theory: where do we stand? Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte Und Gegenwart Eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik Und Sozialwissenschaften.
Mol, A. P. J. (2016). The environmental nation state in decline. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 48-68.
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49.
Montpetit, é. (2000). Europeanization and domestic politics: Europe and the development of a French environmental policy for the agricultural sector. Journal of European public policy, 7(4), 576-592.
Morris, C., & Winter, M. (1999). Integrated farming systems: the third way for European agriculture? Land Use Policy, 16(4), 193-205.
Murphy, J., & Gouldson, A. (2000). Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum, 31(1), 33-44.
Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8(1).
Næss, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S., & Vevatne, J. (2005). Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 125-138.
Nathan, A. J. (2003). Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 6-17.
Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi‐level–and effective? Environmental policy and governance, 19(3), 197-214.
Niyaki, A., Radjabi, R., & Allahyari, M. S. (2010). Social factors critical for adoption of biological control agents Trichogramma spp. egg parasitoid of rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis in North of Iran. Agric. & Environ. Sci, 9(2), 133-139.
Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World politics, 61(04), 670-702.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history: Norton.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press.
North, D. C., & Wallis, J. J. (1994). Integrating institutional change and technical change in economic history a transaction cost approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(4), 609-624.
O''Driscoll, G. P., Rizzo, M. J., & Garrison, R. W. (1996). The economics of time and ignorance: Psychology Press.
Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change: MIT Press.
OECD. (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework(Agriculture and Food). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/40782727.pdf
OECD. (2008). Multifunctionality in Agriculture: evaluating the degree of jointness, policy implications: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). Linkages between Agricultural Policies and Environmental Effects. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and behavior, 38(4), 462-483.
Orsato, R. J., & Clegg, S. R. (2005). Radical reformism: towards critical ecological modernization. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 253-267.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: Cambridge university press.
Ostrom, E. (1991). Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Toward Complementarity. American Political Science Review, 85(01), 237-243.
Ozier-Lafontaine, H., & Lesueur-Jannoyer, M. (2014). Sustainable agriculture reviews 14: Agroecology and global change (Vol. 14): Springer.
Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 93-103.
Palmer, J. (2010). Stopping the Unstoppable? A Discursive-Institutionalist Analysis of Renewable Transport Fuel Policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(6), 992-1010.
Panizza, F., & Miorelli, R. (2013). Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory. Political Studies, 61(2), 301-318.
Parris, K. (1998). Agricultural nutrient balances as agri-environmental indicators: an OECD perspective. Environmental Pollution, 102(1, Supplement 1), 219-225.
Pelling, M. (2003). Natural disaster and development in a globalizing world: Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: the new institutionalism: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Pettenger, M. E. (Ed.) (2013). The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses. Bodmin, Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Pielke Jr, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics: Cambridge University Press.
Pierce, J. C., Nicholas P. Lovrich, J., Tsurutani, T., & Abe, T. (1987). Culture, Politics and Mass Publics: Traditional and Modern Supporters of The New Environmental Paradigm In Japan and the United States. The Journal of Politics, 49(1), 54-79.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis: Princeton University Press.
Pierson, P. (2008). Big, Slow-Moving, and …Invisible: Macrosocial Process in the Study of Comparative Politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pimbert, M., & Moeller, N. (2018). Absent Agroecology Aid: On UK Agricultural Development Assistance Since 2010. Sustainability, 10(2), 505.
Piorr, A., Uthes, S., Müller, K., Sattler, C., & Happe, K. (2005). Design of a MEA-compatible multifunctionality concept. Deliverable Report, 2.
Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2010). Integrating perspectives on adaptive capacity and environmental governance Adaptive capacity and environmental governance (pp. 1-19): Springer.
Potter, C. (1998). Against the grain: agri-environmental reform in the United States and the European Union. New York: CAB INTERNATIONAL.
Potter, C., & Burney, J. (2002). Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO—legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? Journal of rural studies, 18(1), 35-47.
Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. science, 302(5652), 1912-1914.
Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating agriculture: policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance: Joseph Henry Press.
Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012). Recasting Institutionalism: Institutional Analysis and Public Policy. European Political Science, 11(4), 537-550.
Raitio, K. (2013). Discursive institutionalist approach to conflict management analysis — The case of old-growth forest conflicts on state-owned land in Finland. Forest policy and economics, 33, 97-103.
Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P., & Wiedemann, P. M. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse (Vol. 10): Springer Science & Business Media.
Renting, H., Rossing, W., Groot, J., Van der Ploeg, J., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., . . . Van Ittersum, M. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, S112-S123.
Revesz, R. L. (1992). Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the race-to-the-bottom rationale for federal environmental regulation. NYUL Rev., 67, 1210.
Rodrik, D. (2014). When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 189-208.
Röling, N. G., Hounkonnou, D., Offei, S. K., Tossou, R., & Van Huis, A. (2004). Linking science and farmers'' innovative capacity: diagnostic studies from Ghana and Benin. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 52(3), 211-235.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129-168.
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European public policy, 5(1), 98-130.
Sabatier, P. A. (2006). Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach (theoretical lenses on public policy).
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2016). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier, PA (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition, 189-217.
Sabin, P. (2013). The bet: Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon, and our gamble over Earth''s future: Yale University Press.
Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37-55.
Schmidt, E., & Sinabell, F. (2004). Modelling multifunctionality of agriculture-concepts, challenges, and an application: Univ. für Bodenkultur Wien, Department für Wirtschafts-u. Sozialwiss., Inst. für Nachhaltige Wirtschaftsentwicklung.
Schmidt, S. K. (2000). Only an agenda setter? The European Commission''s power over the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, 1(1), 37-61.
Schmidt, V. A. (2003). The boundaries of" bounded generalizations": discourse as the missing factor in actor-centered institutionalism: na.
Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Give peace a chance: reconciling four (not three)“new institutionalisms”. Paper presented at the presentation for the National meetings of the American Political Science Association (Philadelphia, PA., Aug. 31–Sept. 1).
Schmidt, V. A. (2007). Trapped by their ideas: French élites'' discourses of European integration and globalization 1. Journal of European public policy, 14(7), 992-1009.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). From historical institutionalism to discursive institutionalism: Explaining change in comparative political economy. Paper presented at the presentation at the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 11, 303-326.
Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in Yet Again. World politics, 61(3), 516-546.
Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European political science review, 2(1), 1-25.
Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical policy studies, 5(2), 106-126.
Schmidt, V. A. (2012). A curious constructivism: A response to Professor Bell. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 705.
Schmidt, V. A. (2012). Scope, Dynamics, and Philosophical Underpinnings. The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice, 85.
Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2-22.
Schmidt, V. A. (2014). Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU''s Sovereign Debt Crisis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 188-209.
Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Discursive institutionalism: Understanding policy in context. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 171-189.
Schmidt, V. A., Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Reconciling ideas and institutions through discursive institutionalism. Ideas and politics in social science research, 47-64.
Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183-210.
Schumacher, E. F. (2011). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered: Random House.
Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 993-1006.
Scialabba, N., & Hattam, C. (2002). Organic agriculture, environment and food security: Food & Agriculture Org.
Scott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: a deep history of the earliest states. Yale University Press.
Sevilla Guzmán, E., & Woodgate, G. (2013). Agroecology: Foundations in Agrarian Social Thought and Sociological Theory. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 32-44.
Shambaugh, G., Matthew, R., Silver, R. C., McDonald, B., Poulin, M., & Blum, S. (2009). Public perceptions of traumatic events and policy preferences during the George W. Bush administration: A portrait of America in turbulent times. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(1), 55-91.
Shepsle, K. A. (1986). Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions. Political science: The science of politics, 51, 51.
Shoard, M. (1980). The theft of the countryside: Temple Smith.
Sikkink, K. (1991). Ideas and institutions: developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina: Cornell University Press.
Sjöstedt, M. (2014). Enforcement and compliance in African fisheries: the dynamic interaction between ruler and ruled. State and Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance. MIT Press, Boston.
Skogstad, G. (2006). Regulating food safety risks in the European Union: a comparative perspective. What’s the beef, 213-236.
Sommerer, T. (2014). Early Bird or Copycat, Leader or Laggard? A Comparison of Cross-National Patterns of Environmental Policy Change. In A. Duit (Ed.), State and Environment: the Comparative study of Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Massahusetts: The MIT Press.
Sommerer, T., & Lim, S. (2016). The environmental state as a model for the world? An analysis of policy repertoires in 37 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 92-115.
Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2012). The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies—Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest policy and economics, 16, 51-64.
Spiertz, J. (2010). Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30(1), 43-55.
Stassen, K., Gislason, M., & Leroy, P. (2010). Impact of environmental discourses on public health policy arrangements: A comparative study in the UK and Flanders (Belgium). public health, 124(10), 581-592.
Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual review of psychology, 43(1), 269-302.
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of social issues, 50(3), 65-84.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 81-97.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern. Environment and behavior, 25(5), 322-348.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies: Univ. Press.
Swinnen, J. F. (2010). The political economy of agricultural and food policies: recent contributions, new insights, and areas for further research. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33-58.
Tang, S.-Y., Prakash, V., & Tang, C.-P. (2005). A comparison of Guangzhou, Delhi, and Taipei. Comparative Politics: Comparative public policy, 6(3), 292.
Taylor, P. J., & Buttel, F. H. (1992). How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum, 23(3), 405-416.
Thelen, K. (2001). Varieties of labor politics in the developed democracies. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, 71-103.
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: Insights from Coparative Historical Analysis Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471-498.
Therborn, G. (1987). Welfare States and Capitalist Markets. Acta Sociologica, 30(3-4), 237-254.
Thomson, H. (2017). Food and Power: Agricultural Policy under Democracy and Dictatorship. Comparative Politics, 49(2).
Toledo, V., & Barrera-Bassols, N. (2017). Political Agroecology in Mexico: A Path toward Sustainability. Sustainability, 9(2), 268.
Tosun, J. (2013). Environmental policy change in emerging market democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America compared (Vol. 41): University of Toronto Press.
True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (1999). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking. Theories of the policy process, 97-115.
Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(03), 289-325.
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work: Princeton University Press.
Underdal, A. (2010). Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 386-393.
Uthes, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Studies on Agri-environmental Measures: A Survey of the Literature. Environmental Management, 51(1), 251-266.
Vail, D., Hasund, K. P., & Drake, L. (1994). The Greening of Agricultural Policy in Industrial Societies: Swedish Reforms in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
van der Heijden, H.-A. (2008). Green governmentality, ecological modernisation or civic environmentalism? Dealing with global environmental problems. Environmental Politics, 17(5), 835-839.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. 2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 63-74.
Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Durand, G. (2003). Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Durand, G. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development (pp. 1-16): Ashgate Publishing.
Van Huylenbroeck, G., Vandermeulen, V., Mettepenningen, E., & Verspecht, A. (2007). Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living reviews in landscape research, 1(3), 1-43.
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
van Tatenhove, J. P., & Leroy, P. (2009). Environment and participation in a context of political modernisation The Ecological Modernisation Reader. Environmental reform in theory and practice. (pp. 190-206): Routledge.
Vatn, A. (2007). Institutions and the Environment: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wapner, P. (2002). Horizontal politics: Transnational environmental activism and global cultural change. Global Environmental Politics, 2(2), 37-62.
Ward, N. (1993). The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post‐productivist era. Sociologia Ruralis, 33(3‐4), 348-364.
Ward, N., Clark, J., Lowe, P., & Seymour, S. (1998). Keeping matter in its place: pollution regulation and the reconfiguring of farmers and farming. Environment and planning A, 30(7), 1165-1178.
Warren, J., Lawson, C., & Belcher, K. (2008). The Agri-Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342.
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315.
Weible, C. M., & Nohrstedt, D. (2012). Coalitions, learning and policy change. Routledge handbook of public policy, 125-137.
Wekerle, G. R. (2004). Food Justice Movements:Policy, Planning, and Networks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(4), 378-386.
Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2011). Agroecology as a Science, a Movement and a Practice. In E. Lichtfouse, M. Hamelin, M. Navarrete, & P. Debaeke (Eds.), Sustainable Agriculture Volume 2 (pp. 27-43). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
While, A., Jonas, A. E. G., & Gibbs, D. (2010). From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 76-93.
Wiilson, G. A., & Rigg, J. (2003). ‘Post-productivist’agricultural regimes and the South: discordant concepts? Progress in human geography, 27(6), 681-707.
Williams, M. (2011). Agriculture and the Environment. In G. Kütting (Ed.), Global Environmental Politics: Concepts, Theories and case Studies (pp. 164-178). Madison Avenue, NY: Routledge.
Williamsom, O. E. (1993). Transaction cost economics and organizational theory. Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 107-156.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American journal of sociology, 87(3), 548-577.
Wilson, G. A. (1996). Farmer environmental attitudes and ESA participation. Geoforum, 27(2), 115-131.
Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post‐productivism… and back again? Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 77-102.
Wilson, G. A. (2004). The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’rural governance? Journal of rural studies, 20(4), 461-484.
Wilson, G. A. (2009). The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: A human geography perspective. Geoforum, 40(2), 269-280.
Wilson, G. A., & Hart, K. (2001). Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: Towards Conservation-Oriented Thinking? Sociologia Ruralis, 41(2), 254-274.
Winter, M. (1996). Rural politics: policies for agriculture, forestry and the environment: Psychology Press.
Wittrock, B., & Wagner, P. (1996). Social science and the building of the early welfare state: Toward a comparison of statist and non-statist Western societies. States, social knowledge, and the origins of modern social policies, 90-113.
Wueest, B., & Fossati, F. (2015). Quantitative discursive institutionalism: a comparison of labour market policy discourse across Western Europe. Journal of European public policy, 22(5), 708-730.
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale: MIT press.
Young, O. R. (2003). Environmental Governance: The Role of Institutions in Causing and Confronting Environmental Problems. International Environmental Agreements, 3(4), 377-393.
Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 378-385.
Young, O. R. (2017). Beyond Regulation: Innovative Strategies for Governing Large Complex Systems. Sustainability, 9(6), 938.
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 253-260.
丁文郁,2011,〈台灣農民運動〉,《農業推廣文彙》,56輯:281-290。
中國農村經濟學會,1998,《當前農業政策研討會專輯》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
中國國民黨中央委員會政策研究工作會,《邁向二十一世紀挑戰的農業政策與發展策略,台北市:中國國民黨中央委員會政策研究工作會。
毛育剛編,1994,《臺灣農業發展論文集》,台北:聯經。
王俊豪、劉小蘭,2010,〈生物多樣性公約對我國農地管制之啟示:兼論歐盟與德國之制度設計〉,《農業推廣文彙》,(55):179-199。
王光緒、史美強, 2016,〈行政院組織再造之歷史制度分析,1987-2012〉,王業立、宋興洲、傅恆德編,《臺灣政經轉型下之制度變遷》,台北:獨立作家,285-329。
王振寰,1996,《誰統治台灣?:轉型中的國家機器與權力結構》,台北:巨流圖書公司。
王振寰,2007,《全球化與後進國家:兼論東亞的發展路徑與轉型》,《台灣社會學刊》,(31):1-44。
王振寰,2010,《追趕的極限:臺灣的經濟轉型與創新》,台北:巨流。
王業立、宋興洲、傅恆德編,2016,《臺灣政經轉型下之制度變遷》,臺北市:獨立作家。
立法院國會圖書館
江采潔,2017,《台灣農食運動中的公民參與和民主意涵》,台北:臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所碩士論文。
伊慶春等,1991,《台灣地區社會意向調查八十年二月定期調查報告》,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
行政院研究發展考核委員會,1998a,《國土規劃管理問題之研究—以農地資源規劃及轉用問題為例》,台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
行政院研究發展考核委員會,1998b,《中央政府機關自然保育職權重劃之研究》,台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1998年1月19日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會第二次會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1998年4月8日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會第三次會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1998年7月10日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會第四次會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1998年10月8日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會第五次會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1999年1月25日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會第六次會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,1999年4月12日,《行政院國家永續發展委員會臨時專案會議議案》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,2009,《2009永續發展國際論壇》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會,2012年12月,《2011永續發展指標系統評量結果》,臺北市 : 行政院國家永續發展委員會。
行政院國家永續發展委員會委員會議記錄(第1次至第43次),https://nsdn.epa.gov.tw/Nsdn_ListA_Page.aspx?midnb1=CC&midnb2=C1&midnb3=0&midnb4=0
行政院國家永續發展委員會工作會議記錄(第13次至第30次),https://nsdn.epa.gov.tw/Nsdn_ListA_Page.aspx?midnb1=CC&midnb2=C1&midnb3=0&midnb4=0
行政院經濟建設委員會,1998,《全國國土及水資源會議實錄》,台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會,1998,《全國國土及水資源會議引言報告》,台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會、工業技術研究院能源與資訊研究所,1997,《中華民國永續發展策略綱領相關基本資料(一)》,臺北市 : 行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會、工業技術研究院能源與資訊研究所,1997,《中華民國永續發展策略綱領相關基本資料(二):國家永續發展論壇計畫計畫報告》,臺北市 : 行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院環境保護署,2013,《行政院環境保護署重要政策及文獻彙編 口述歷史》,台北市:行政院環境保護署。
行政院農業委員會,1980,《提高農民所得加強農村建設方案》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1983,《加強基礎建設提高農民所得方案》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1986,《改善農業結構提高農民所得》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,198,《第二次全國農業會議總報告》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1991,《農業綜合調整方案》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1992,《改善農業結構提高農民所得方案六年(七五∼八〇年度執行成果報告》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1995,《第三次全國農業會議總報告》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1995,《農業政策白皮書淺說》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1996,《跨世紀農業建設方案》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1998,《農業綜合調整方案期末(八一∼八六年度)執行成果報告》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1998,《第四次全國農業會議預備會議紀要及結論》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1998,《第四次全國農業會議引言報告》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,1998,《第四次全國農業會議分組結論報告》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2003,《第五次全國農業會議實錄》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,甘俊二,2000,《農業用水量化目標及總量清查報告》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2001,《邁進二十一世紀農業新方案》,台北市:行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2004,《本會中期施政方案(94至97年度)》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2006,《新農業運動—台灣農業亮起來》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2008,《本會中期施政方案(98至101年度)》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2008,《精緻農業健康卓越方案(98年1月∼101年12月)》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2008,《農業施政方針—健康、效率、永續經營之全民農業》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2012,《本會中期施政方案(102至105年度)》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
行政院農業委員會,2016,《本會中期施政方案(106至109年度)》,台北市,行政院農業委員會。
余玉賢,1991年6月,〈農業生產零成長及改善農業體質〉,《臺中區農推專訊》,115。
何明修,2001,〈台灣環境運動的開端:專家學者,黨外,草根(1980-1986)〉,《台灣社會學》,2:97-162。
何明修,2002,〈衝突的制度化?公害糾紛處理法與環境抗爭〉,《教育與社會研究》,3:35-63。
何明修,2003,〈政治民主化與環境運動的制度化〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,50:217-275。
何明修,2003a,〈自主與依賴: 比較反核四運動與反美濃水庫運動中的政治交換模式〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,30:1-49。
何明修,2006,《綠色民主:台灣環境運動的研究》,台北:群學出版社。
何明修,2010,〈誰的家園, 哪一種願景?-發展主義陰影下的社區運動〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,7(1):1-30。
杜文苓,2015,《環境風險與公共治理—探索臺灣環境民主實踐之道》,台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
李丁讚,2011,〈公民農業與社會重建〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,(84):431-464。
李丁讚、林文源,2000,〈社會力的文化根源:論環境權感受在台灣的歷史形成;1970-86〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,(38):133-206。
李光中、范美玲、藍姆路・卡造、顏佋伃,2017,〈增進全球變遷下農村調適以強化農業生產地景回復力〉,收於張長義、周桂田編,《氣候變遷下的國家發展藍圖》 台北:國立臺灣大學,頁331-352。
李承嘉,2012,《農地與農村發展政策:新農業體制下的轉向》,台北:五南。
李永展,1991,〈環境態度與保育行為之研究:美國文獻回顧與概念模式之發展〉,《建築與城鄉研究學報》,(6):73-90。
李永展,1995,《環境態度與環保行為:理論與實證》,台北:胡氏圖書。
李永展,2003,《永續發展:大地反撲的省思》,台北:巨流圖書有限公司。
李永展、陳錦賜,2001,〈永續發展之反思〉,《建築與規劃學報》,2(1):43-57。
李河清、譚偉恩,2012,〈氣候變遷與人權:以農業和糧食安全為起點的思考〉,《台灣人權學刊》,1(2):59-75。
李明璋,2008,《台灣稻作生產效率與休耕政策調適之研究》,台北:台灣大學經濟學系碩士論文。
李登輝,1980,《臺灣農業發展的經濟分析》,台北:聯經出版事業公司。
余玉賢先生紀念文集編輯委員會編,1994,《余玉賢先生紀念集》,台北市:余玉賢先生紀念文集編輯委員會。
杜文苓,2015,《環境風險與公共治理—探索臺灣環境民主實踐之道》,台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
呂佩安,2014,《論述制度論與政策分析-以臺灣採認大陸學歷之政策調整為例》,台北:世新大學行政管理學研究所博士論文。
吳晟、吳明益,2011,《溼地・石化・島嶼想像》,臺北:有鹿文化。
吳悅、黃屏綸、賴允正、林海珍,2013,〈臺灣永續發展決策機制落實策略〉,《科技政策觀點》,台北:國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
吳音寧,2007,《江湖在哪裡?—台灣農業觀察》,臺北縣中和市:印刻。
吳榮杰,2004,〈全球化下的臺灣農業發展與挑戰〉,《興大歷史學報》,15:163-170。
施順意、張靜貞、傅祖壇、李元和,2004,〈WTO架構下的臺灣稻作誘因與競爭力分析〉,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,35(1):41-64。
林國慶主持,楊振榮協同主持,2003,《加入WTO農地政策調適之研究》,台北:農委會,計畫編號:92農科-1.5.4-企-Q1(4)。
林國慶主持,2006,《京都議定書相關規範在農業結構調整上應用之研究》,台北:農委會,計畫編號:95農科-2.1.1-企-Q1(9)。
姚星賓,2007,《以水稻田多功能觀點評估合理綠色補貼》,台北:臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文。
柯志明,2003,《米糖相剋::日本殖民主義下台灣的發展與從屬》,台北:群學。
施佳良,. (2015). 《環境管制行政中的科學框架與決策困境: 以台灣石化產業環評爭議為例》.
施孟隆、黃炳文,2006,〈臺灣農業發展與農業結構變遷之研究〉,《中華農學會報》,7(4):324-342。
林俊義,2005,〈永續農業之理念與發展策略〉,《合理化施肥專刊》,戴振耀、林俊義、蔡武雄、廖慶樑主編,《合理化施肥專刊》。臺中:行政院農業委員會農業試驗所、中華永續農業協會,頁1-14。
林國慶、柳婉郁、施瑩艷、林信維,2015,〈因應經貿自由化強化糧食安全體系〉, 《因應氣候變遷及糧食安全之農業創新研究—103 年度成果發表暨研討會論文集》,24-34。
林子倫,2008,〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉,《公共行政學報》,(28):153-175。
林子倫、陳亮宇,2009,〈重返民主的政策科學—審議式政策分析概念意涵與途徑之探討〉,6(4):1-47。
林德昌,2005,《永續發展與聯合國「廿一世紀議程」》,台北:青輔會。
林水波,2006,〈政策變遷的三面向分析〉,《政策研究學報》,(6):1-18。
林水波、王崇斌,1998,〈政策論述與政策變遷的關聯性—批判取向的分析〉,《台灣政治學刊》,(3):245-273。
林益仁,2004,〈環境實踐的“全球”與“在地”辯證”:以法鼓山的“環保”論述爲例〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,(55):1-46。
林繼文,2001,〈創設,選擇與演化:制度形成的三個理論模式〉,《政治學報》,(32):61-94。
林韋廷,2013,〈國際糧食建制的形成與轉變:1945~ 2010〉, 台北:東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。
洪金珠,1980年6月,〈台灣農業三大危機〉,《大時代》,(2)6。
張春炎,2015,〈臺灣有機農業如何推廣?從生產者與消費者兩行動者觀點進行探討〉,《傳播與發展學報》,(32):56-80。
張春炎、蕭崑杉,2012,〈永續消費論述與日常生活的實踐:以主婦聯盟消費者社群為例〉,《農業推廣學報》,(29):71-104。
高一中譯,2007,《成長的極限:三十週年最新增訂版》,台北:臉譜。譯自Donella Meadows, D. H., J. Randers, & D. Meadows,. Limits to Growth: the 30-Year Update. Routledge. 2007.
陳吉仲主持,林國慶、張靜貞,李ùÚ綺、柳婉郁,2007,《休耕農地環境用途效益評估及農地環境給付政策措施之研究》,台北:農委會,計畫編號:96-5.1.1-企-Q3(4)。
柴田明夫著,孫玉珍譯,2009,《糧食爭奪戰》,台北市:商週出版:家庭傳媒城邦分公司發行。
教育部,1999,《跨世紀教育議程:環境與永續發展教育論文集》,台北市:教育部。
湯曉虞,1999,〈行政院國家永續發只委員會生態與永續農業工作分組報告〉,收於教育部,《跨世紀教育議程:環境與永續發展教育論文集》,136-141。
監察院,2008,《面對全球糧荒問題,因應未來糧食需求,我國農糧及農地利用政策之檢討專案調查研究報告》,台北:監察院。
鄧子衿譯,2012,《雜食者的兩難:速食、有機和野生食物的自然史》,新北市:大家出版。譯自Michael Pollan. The Omnivore''s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin. 2006.
劉小蘭,2009,《以自然保育為觀點檢討臺灣農地釋出政策規劃與執行》,台北:臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。
劉小蘭,2013,《農業與環境:臺灣問題與歐盟對策》,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
劉阿榮、謝登旺,2009,〈台灣永續發展之環境與社會經濟的辯證〉,《國家與社會》,(6):1-49。
劉健哲,1994,〈農業發展與環境維護〉,收於毛育剛編,《臺灣農業發展論文集》,491-516。
劉志偉,2009,〈國際農糧體制與臺灣的糧食依賴:戰後臺灣養豬業的歷史考察〉,《臺灣史研究》,16(2):105-160。
劉華真,2011,〈消失的農漁民:重探台灣早期環境抗爭〉,《台灣社會學》,(21):1-49。
劉凱翔,2007,《有機農業法規及政策之研究》,台北:臺灣大學農藝學研究所碩士學位論文。
劉進慶著,王宏仁、林繼文譯,1992,《臺灣戰後經濟分析》,台北:人間。
彭明輝,2011,《糧食危機關鍵報告》,台北市:商週出版:家庭傳媒城邦分公司發行。
廖哲強、蕭崑杉、郭大玄,2011,〈臺灣農業地理研究之進展(2001-2010)》,《地理學報》,62期:155-178。
廖安定,2001,〈農業政策與農業法規〉,《農政與農情》,103:
廖彥豪,2013,《臺灣戰後空間治理危機的歷史根源:重探農地與市地改革(1945─1954)》,台北:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
廖憶華,2014,《日本與台灣農業環境政策之比較研究》,新北市:淡江大學亞洲研究所碩士在職專班論文
廖正宏、黃俊傑、蕭新煌,1986,《光復後臺灣農業政策的演變:歷史與社會的分析》,台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
廖石,2001,〈從農業在鄉村經濟體系中的角色變遷探討台灣鄉村地區< 三生環境> 的建構〉,《臺灣土地金融季刊》,38(2):71-88。
蔡勳雄,1999,〈環境永續發展政策及執行現況〉,收於教育部,《跨世紀教育議程:環境與永續發展教育論文集》,78-83。
曾華璧,2008,〈臺灣的環境治理(1950-2000):基於生態現代化與生態國家理論的分析〉,《臺灣史研究》,15(4):121-148。
曾華璧,2011,《戰後臺灣環境史—從毒油到國家公園》,台北市:國立編譯館。
瞿宛文,2017,《臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起:後進發展的為何與如何》,台北:中央研究院、聯經出版公司。
紀駿傑,1998,〈我們沒有共同的未來:西方主流「環保」關懷的政治經濟學〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,(31):141-168。
紀駿傑、王俊秀、蕭新煌,1996,〈台灣社會環境生態論述之演化與衝突〉,臺大全球變遷硏究中心編,《台灣近代自然環境與人文變遷探討硏討會論文集》,台北:台大全球變遷研究中心。
紀駿傑、蕭新煌,2003,〈當前臺灣環境正義的社會基礎〉,《國家政策季刊》,2(3):169-179。
葉俊榮,1997,《環境理性與制度抉擇》,臺北市:三民。
葉俊榮,2005,〈轉型與發展:台灣21世紀議程-國家永續發展願景與策略綱領〉,《研考雙月刊》,29(5):6-18。
葉俊榮,2010,《環境政策與法律》,臺北市:元照。
葉俊榮、施奕任,2005,〈從學術建構到政策實踐:永續臺灣指標的發展歷程及其對制度運作影響〉,《都市與計劃》,32(2):103-124。
董建宏,2009,〈台灣農村規劃與再生的困境—台灣農業與農村發展過程的反思〉,《經濟前瞻》,(122):82-90。
董建宏,2010,〈農村土地商品化與國家農村治理治理想像:對台灣農村土地使用與所有權轉變的一個初步歷史分析〉, 王振寰、王瑞琦、陳永生編,《兩岸鄉村發展與農村治理》,台北:五南。
董建宏,2012,〈站在台灣農業發展的十字口:1970 年代台灣農業政策轉變對農地與農業、農村發展之衝擊〉,《跨界: 大學與社會參與》,(2):56-76。
蔡培慧,2009,《農業結構轉型下的農民分化(1980-2005)》,台北:臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系博士論文。
蔡晏霖,2014,〈農作為方法:「以農為本」的抵抗政治〉,《文化研究》,(18): 217-226。
蔡晏霖,2016,〈農藝復興:臺灣農業新浪潮〉,《文化研究》,(22):23-74。
蕭代基、張瓊婷、郭彥廉,2003,〈自然資源的參與式管理與地方自治制度〉,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,34(1) :1-37。
蕭全政,2009,〈行政院組織改造的部會架構評議〉,《研考雙月刊》,33(3):44-57。
蕭國和,1987,《台灣農業興衰四十年》,台北:自立晚報。
蕭新煌,1991,〈一九八○年代末期台灣的農民運動:事實與解釋〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,(70):67-93。
蕭新煌,1999,〈台灣環境意識與價值研究1999〉,《調查研究》,(7):79-82。
蕭新煌、朱雲鵬、蔣本基、劉小如、紀駿傑、林俊全,2003,《永續台灣2011》,台北市:天下遠見。
羅伯・高特里布(Robert Gottlieb)、阿努帕瑪・喬旭(Anupama Joshi)著,朱道凱、蘇采禾譯,2018,《食物正義:小農,菜市﹐餐廳與餐桌的未來樣貌》,台北市:早安財經文化。
藍逸之、李承嘉,2015,〈作為制度舒緩的三生農業——臺灣農地新自由化、調節過程與農業體制再結構〉,《地理學報》,(75):25-68。
行政院農業委員會編, 1996,《明賢論集》,臺北市:農委會。
行政院農業委員會, 1998,《農業綜合調整方案期末(八一-八六年度)執行成果報告》,臺北市:行政院農業委員會。
許咏真,2013,《納入農地環境效益之補貼對農地轉用的影響─以雲嘉南地區為例》,成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。
謝順景,2010,〈臺灣一百多年來的有機農業發展之歷史回顧〉,〈臺中區農業改良場研究彙報》,1-12。
趙永茂、黃瓊文,2000,〈台灣威權體制轉型前後農會派系特質變遷之研究〉,《政治科學論叢》,(13):1-27。
辛年豐,2013,《環境風險的公私協力:國家任務變遷的觀點》,台北:臺灣大學法律學研究所博士論文。
郭華仁,2006,〈農業轉型之倫理與法制基礎〉,於「中華民國農學團體九十五年聯合年會加速農業轉型,促進永續發展論壇」載於《農業轉型之倫理與法制基礎》,頁52-58。
郭華仁,2010,〈「農業基本法」的內涵及其催生〉,《新社會》,9:43-46。
柯三吉、官有垣,1987,《我國環境保護行政體系與功能之研究》,行政院環境保護署委託計畫,台北:行政院環境保護署。
黃錦堂,1994). 《臺灣地區環境法之研究》. 臺北:月旦。
陳兆勇,2011,《土地改革與政權鞏固:戰後臺灣土地政策變革過程中的國家、地主與農民(1945-1953)》,台北:臺灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。
陳吉仲、張靜貞、李恆綺、顏宏德,2005,〈台灣稻米政策調整對稻米市場經濟影響之評估〉,《農業經濟叢刊》,10(2):163-197。
陳嫈郁,2014,〈評析 Schmidt [論述制度論] 與對政策制訂的啟示〉,《臺灣國際研究季刊》,10(4):145-179。
陳嫈郁,2014,〈新制度論的困境與挑戰〉,《政治學報》,(58):1-36。
陳怡婷,2008,《臺灣農地使用策略調整之研究—以農業多功能性為核心》,台北:臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系學位論文。
陳敦源,2001,〈新制度論的範圍與方法:一個理性選擇觀點的方法論檢視〉,《行政暨政策學報》,(3):129-184。
陳明健,1995,《臺灣農業與環境保護——農業管理協議研究》,台北:行政院農業委員會。
陳明健,1998,《跨世紀農業政策與方向》,台北:中國國民黨中央政策會政策研究工作會。
陳榮五,2009,〈台灣有機農業發展之瓶頸〉,臺中:臺中區農業改良場。
陳歆柔,2013,〈農民偏好與農地轉用意願關係之研究─以雲林縣為例〉,成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文。
陳玉璽,1995,《台灣的依附型發展:依附型經濟發展及其社會政治後果》,台北市:人間。
陳瑞樺,2016,〈以農之名:臺灣戰後農運的歷史考察〉,《文化研究》,(22):75-122。
陳郁蕙、詹滿色、陳雅惠,2014,〈台灣農民對農業休耕補貼政策及農地出租之參與意願及接受金額分析〉,《調查研究-方法與應用》,32,53-86。
國科會永續發展研究委員會,2002,《台灣永續發展的危機與轉機:永續台灣的願景與策略白皮書》,台北:國科會。
國科會永續發展研究委員會,2002,《台灣永續發展的危機與轉機:永續台灣的願景與策略建議書》,台北:國科會。
國科會永續發展研究委員會,2005,《「永續台灣的願景與策略」整合計畫成果總結報告》,台北:國科會。
陸雲,1990,〈農業污染問題之檢討〉,《台灣經濟預測與政策》,21(1):33-58。
陸雲,2000,〈台灣化學肥料使用量影響因素之探討——民國四十二年至八十一年〉,伊懋可、劉翠溶編《積漸所致——中國環境史論文集》,頁1117-1158,台北:中央研究院。
顏愛靜、孫稚堤、陳亭伊,2016,〈有機農業多功能性之研究以新竹縣尖石鄉石磊部落為例〉,《地理學報》,(82):59-86。
駱尚廉、顏秀慧,2002,〈環境資源主管機關之定位及職權探討〉,《國家政策季刊》,1(1):183-194。
黃世勛、徐世榮,2014,〈戰後臺灣的環境治理進路:一個生態現代化視角的考察〉,《思與言》,52(4):5-63。
黃樹仁,2002,《心牢:農地農用意識形態與臺灣城鄉發展》,台北市:巨流。
黃樹民,2013,〈臺灣有機農業的發展及其限制:一個技術轉變簡史〉,《臺灣人類學刊》,11(1):9-34。
闕雅文,2007,〈市場失靈還是政府失靈?台灣農業用水移用市場分析〉,《高應科大人文社會科學學報》,4:309-338。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE