:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:內線交易犯罪所得的過去、現在與未來--兼論最高法院108年度臺上大字第4349號刑事大法庭裁定
書刊名:財產法暨經濟法
作者:許兆慶蘇琬鈺
作者(外文):Hsu, Andrew C.Su, Wan-yu
出版日期:2021
卷期:65
頁次:頁1-43
主題關鍵詞:內線交易犯罪所得淨利法市場吸收法關聯所得法實際所得法擬制所得法沒收Insider tradingProceeds of crimeNet profit approachMarket absorption approachActual gain methodRelated gain methodPresumptive gain methodForfeiture
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.Freeman, Lana L.(2012)。Sentences Should Be Reasonable, Not Shocking: A De-Emphasis on Loss for Federal Securities Fraud Sentencing。U. III. L. Rev.,2012(3),969-1002。  new window
2.Jones, James A. II(2011)。United States v. Berger: The rejection of civil loss causation principles in connection with criminal securities fraud。Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts,6(4),273-284。  new window
3.Law, Andrew(2010)。Insider Trading and Soft Information: U.S. v. Nacchio。Brigham Young Univ. L. Rev,2010(1),149-166。  new window
4.Richman, Daniel C.(2013)。Federal White Collar Sentencing in the United States: A Work in Progress。Law and CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS,76(1),53-73。  new window
5.吳元曜(20040900)。金融犯罪重刑化趨勢之評析。軍法專刊,50(9),13-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.賴英照(20131200)。內線交易的所得計算。中原財經法學,31,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.薛智仁(20121000)。內線交易之犯罪所得概念。政大法學評論,129,245-299。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Black, Nicole(2010)。United States v. Nacchio and the Implications of an Emerging Circuit Split: Practical and Policy Considerations of Amending Financial Gain as a Measure of Culpability。Denver University Law Review,87(3),633-668。  new window
9.Padgett, Amy Dominick(2011)。United States v. Nacchio: The Tenth Circuit's Civil Approach to Sentencing for Insider Trading。Okla. L. Rev.,63,579-606。  new window
10.江朝聖(20160400)。走出內線交易犯罪所得計算泥沼之嘗試--兼評最高法院104年度臺上字第2932號刑事判決。東海大學法學研究,48,117-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.廖大穎(20160214)。內線交易罪與計算犯罪所得的爭議/最高104臺上2932刑事判決。臺灣法學雜誌,289,169-174。  延伸查詢new window
12.林孟皇(20121000)。論內線交易犯罪所得金額的計算。萬國法律,185,2-22。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉連煜(2012)。內線交易刑事責任犯罪所得如何計算。月旦法學教室,121,24-26。  延伸查詢new window
14.涂春金(20100400)。證券交易法第171條第2項有關「犯罪所得」之研究--以臺開案判決為例。證交資料,576,56-67。  延伸查詢new window
15.賴英照(20170100)。內線交易犯罪所得如何計算?--評最高法院105年度臺上字第549號刑事判決。法令月刊,68(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.於知慶(20121000)。內線交易犯罪所得之計算方式--一個數學問題或是法律問題?。萬國法律,185,23-34。  延伸查詢new window
17.Jung, Soo Ji(2014)。Comment, U.S. v. RAJARATNAM-No "Gain" Without Pain: Amending the Sentencing Guidelines for Insider Trading to Better Reflect the Rapidly Evolving Financial Industry。NEW Eng. J. ON Crim. & Civ. Confinement,40。  new window
18.郭大維(20131200)。論內線交易犯罪所得之計算--評最高法院一○一年度臺上字第一八五七號刑事判決。月旦裁判時報,24,46-58。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳彥良(20190400)。內線交易犯罪所得計算之再探討--評最高法院106年度臺非字第223號刑事判決。月旦裁判時報,82,34-43。  延伸查詢new window
20.賴英照(20191200)。犯罪所得的奇幻旅程。財金法學研究,2(4),451-483。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳彥良(20110100)。內線交易犯罪所得計算爭議研析--最高法院九十八年度臺上字第四八〇〇號判決。月旦法學,188,201-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.顧立雄、陳一銘(20081000)。論內線交易犯罪所得之相關問題。萬國法律,161,60-65。  延伸查詢new window
23.吳天雲(20090315)。追徵內線交易犯罪所得的計算時點與方法。臺灣法學雜誌,124,103-117。  延伸查詢new window
24.江朝聖(20210114)。走出犯罪所得計算的迷霧森林。臺灣法學雜誌,407,13-18。  延伸查詢new window
25.江朝聖(20181200)。檢視以一億元犯罪所得加重法定刑之適當性與修法建議--以證券交易法第171條與銀行法第125條為中心。華岡法粹,65,101-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.劉連煜(20210600)。內線交易犯罪所獲取財物或財產上利益之計算--最高法院刑事大法庭108年臺上大字第4349號裁定評釋。月旦裁判時報,108,63-77。  延伸查詢new window
27.Chattin, Danielle DeMasi(2011)。The More You Gain, the More You Lose: Sentencing Insider Trading under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines。FORDHAM L. REV.,79。  new window
28.Conniff, Christopher P.、Goldschmidt, Steven S.、Gugel, Helen(2013)。Sentencing Guidelines for Insider Trading: Recent Amendments Create Greater Disparity。FED. SENT'G. REP.,26(1),43-48。  new window
29.Hewitt, Jillian(2016)。Fifty Shades of Gray: Sentencing Trends in Major White-Collar Cases。YALE L. J.,125。  new window
30.Debold, David、Benjamin, Matthew(2011)。"Losing Ground"--In Search of a Remedy for the Over emphasis on Loss and Other Culpability Factors in the Sentencing Guidelines for Fraud and Theft。PA. L. REV.,160。  new window
31.(2019)。Criminal Law-Insider Trading-Second Circuit Redefines Personal Benefit Requirement for Insider Trading--United States v. Martoma, 894 F.3d 64 (2d Cir. 2018)。HARV. L. REV.,132。  new window
32.Joynson, Nick(2020)。Securities Fraud。AM. CRIM. L. REV.,57(3)。  new window
33.Jacobs, Brain A.、Bussen, Joshua(2020)。Sentencing in Recent Insider Trading Cases: What Judges Have Said and Done。REV. SEC. & COMMODITIES REG.,53(7)。  new window
34.Nevins, Stephanie(2010)。Nacchio Profits: The Tenth Circuit in United States v. Nacchio Properly Departs from the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Mooney and Adopts the Civil Remedy of Disgorgement to Measure an Inside Trader's Gain under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines。CREIGHTON L. REV.,43。  new window
35.Pellicani, Nicholas P.(2010)。No Pain, No Gain: The Criminal Absence of the Efficient Capital Markets Theory from Insider Trader Sentencing。ST. JOHN'S L. REV.,84。  new window
圖書
1.Wang, William K. S.、Steinberg, Marc I.(2010)。Insider Trading。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.O'SULLIVAN, JULIE R.(2001)。FEDERAL WHITE COLLAR CRIME: CASES AND MATERIALS。  new window
3.U.S. Sentencing Commission(2018)。2018 Annual Report and Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics。  new window
4.U.S. Sentencing Commission(2019)。2019 Annual Report and Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics。  new window
5.U.S. Sentencing Commission(2020)。2020 Annual Report and Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics。  new window
6.劉連煜(20190000)。現代證券交易法實例研習。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.賴英照(2017)。最新證券交易法解析:股市遊戲規則。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE