Theory and Practice--A Meta-Discourse on Chin Sheng'T'an's Shui-Hu Chuan Commentary_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Theory and Practice--A Meta-Discourse on Chin Sheng'T'an's Shui-Hu Chuan Commentary
書刊名：	Tamkang Review
作者：	Wu,Hua L.
出版日期：	1997
卷期：	27:3
頁次：	頁311-341
主題關鍵詞：	Chin Sheng-t'an；Interpretation theory；Dissection；Su-pen；Intended reader；Spatial form；Commentary；Structuralist activity；Shui-hu chuan；Characterized reader；Articulation；Ku-pen；Aesthetic experience；Lexias；Crititcal interpretation；Divagations；Wolfgang Iser；Congeniality；Post-structuralism；Paul Ricoeur；Configurative meaning；Gestalt；Roland Barthes；Plurivocity；Codes；Joseph Frank；Surface meaning；Hermeneutic activity；Structuralism；金聖嘆；水滸傳
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:52

　　　　　What did Chin Sheng-t'an do in his commentary on the Shui-hu chuan﹖Is it a systematic theory of the novel or a mere idiosyncratic reading of the text ﹖ Through a comparative study of Chin Sheng-t'an's and Roland Barthes's running commentaries on the novels they studied, as well as other modern Western theorists' articulation of what constitute a literary theory and an interpretation theory, this article offers a meta-discourse on the nature and status of Chin's commentarial discourse. It dissects Chin's commentary into two components: a structuralist phase of theory formulation and a post-structuralist phase of critical interpretation. Via such an anatomy, it comes to the conclusion that although Chin Sheng-t'an's reading of the Shui-hu chuan is indeed iconoclastic and rather stretched, the descriptive apparatus and reading strategy that he designed are effective and theoretically sound, and thus his commentary is a systematic theory of the novel.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Frank, Joseph(1977)。Spatial Form: An Answer to Critics。Critical Inquiry，4(2)，231-252。
2.	Frank, Joseph(1978)。Spatial Form: Some Further Reflections。Critical Inquiry，4(5)，275-290。
3.	Todorov, Tzvetan(1969)。Structural Analysis of Narrative。Novel，3(1)，70-76。
4.	Wilson, W. Daniel(1981)。Readers in Texts。PMLA，96(5)，848-863。

圖書
1.	Barthes, Roland、Miller, Richard(1974)。S/Z: An Essay。New York：Hill and Wang。
2.	Buck, Pearl S.(1973)。All Men Are Brothers。New York：Grove Press, Inc.。
3.	Chen, Hsi-chung(1981)。Shui-hu chuan hui-p'ing-pen。Pe-king：Pei-ching ta-hsueh chu-pan-she。
4.	Smith, Frank(1971)。Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read。New York：Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。
5.	Wellek, Rene、Warren, Austin(1977)。Theory of Literature。New York：London：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
6.	Iser, Wolfgang(1978)。The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response。Johns Hopkins University Press。
7.	Ricoeur, Paul(1976)。Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning。Fort Worth, Texas：The Texas Christian University Press。
8.	Scholes, Robert(1974)。Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction。Yale University Press。
9.	Iser, Wolfgang(1974)。The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett。Johns Hopkins University Press。
10.	Plaks, Andrew H.(1987)。The Four Masterworks of the Ming Novel: Ssu ta ch'i-shu。Princeton University Press。

圖書論文
1.	Barthes, Roland(1971)。Structuralist Activity。Critical Theory Since Plato。New York：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
2.	Chin, Sheng-t'an(1982)。Preface One。Shun-hu chuan hui-p'ing-pen。Peking：Pei-ching ta-hsueh ch'u-pan-she。
3.	Fisk, Craig(1986)。Literary Criticism。The Indiana Companion to Traditional Chinese Literature。Bloomington：Indiana UP.。
4.	Frank, Joseph(1963)。Spatial Form in Modern Literature。The Widening Gyre: Crisis and Mastery in Modern Literature。New Brunswick：Rutgers University Press。
5.	Hu, Shih(1953)。Shui-hu chuan k'ao-cheng。Hu Shih wen-ts'un。T'ai-pei：Yuan-tung tu-shu yu-hsien kung-ssu。
6.	Hu, Shih(1953)。Pai-er-shih-hui Chung-i Shui-hu chuan hsu。Hu Shih wen-ts'un。T，ai-pei：Yuan-tung tu-shu yu-hsien kung-ssu。
7.	Lu, Hsun(1973)。T'an Chin Sheng-t'an。Lu Hsun chuan-chi。Peking：Jen-min wen-hsueh ch'u-pan-she。
8.	Ma, Y. W.(1986)。Fiction。The Indiana Companion to Traditional Chinese Literature。Bloomington：Indiana UP.。
9.	Plaks, Andrew H.(1987)。Terminology and Central Concepts。How to Read the Chinese Novel。Princeton：Princeton UP.。
10.	Suleiman, Susan R.(1980)。Introduction: Varieties of Audience-Oriented Criticism。The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation。Princeton：Princeton UP.。
11.	Todorov, Tzvetan(1977)。The Grammar of Narrative。The Poetics of Prose。Ithaca：Cornell UP.。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	論《水滸傳》的理想國--軍政化的社會主義
2.	論《水滸傳》之重複敘事美學
3.	金聖嘆評點探討--以繪畫理論評點【水滸傳】為中心
4.	金聖嘆《水滸傳》人物探討
5.	金批《水滸傳》的批評方法研究
6.	談貫華堂金聖嘆批本水滸傳

1.	金聖嘆文學批評理論之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫