:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:桃竹地區幼稚園園長領導措施與教師工作滿意度之相關研究
書刊名:新竹師院學報
作者:許玉齡
作者(外文):Hsue, Yuling
出版日期:1998
卷期:11
頁次:頁281-300
主題關鍵詞:行政領導幼兒教育教師工作滿意度幼稚園行政LeadershipEarly childhood educationTeacher job satisfactionEducational administrationManagement of early childhood programs
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(21) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:21
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
     本研究主要的目的乃在探討幼稚園領導人的行政領導措施與教師工作滿意度之間的關係、幼稚園的行政現況與教師的理想狀況是否有顯著的差距、同時並瞭解教師個人背景變項如年齡、婚姻、學歷、薪資、幼教服務年資,以及組織變項如幼稚園的規模、公私立別、使用的課程、幼稚園園長年紀和性別等變相是否對幼稚園領導人的行政措施及教師工作滿意度具有關鍵性的影響。 本研究係以郵寄問卷的調查方式進行資料蒐集。研究對象為八十五年度台灣省桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市等三縣市立案幼稚園的服務教師。實際郵寄對象為這三各縣市抽樣的三百三十九位幼稚園教師。問卷採用幼兒教師工作滿意調查問卷(ECJSS)及行政措施調查問卷(LPS)兩份。所蒐集的資料主要採用以下幾種統計方式分析:一、描述性統計(descriptive statistics)如次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、及高低距;二、多元回歸分析;三、二元重複量數變藝數分析(doubly repeated measures ANOVA)以及T考驗。 研究結果顯示教師個人的不同背景並不影響教師對園長領導措施的看法或工作滿意度。但是,教師會因為任教的幼稚園有不同的結構而顯著影響教師對園長領導措施的看法和工作滿意度。另外,幼稚園教師對園長領導措施的看法與教師工作滿意度有顯著的關連性。在此,教師工作滿意度是指對工作的五個組成面,包括與同事的關係、與上司的關係、工作本質、工作環境、及薪資福利和進修機會。另外,在幼稚園教師的心目中,目前的園長領導方式與他們理想中的領導方式有很大的差距,而且教師對於現在的工作有許多部分是居於低滿意度。 根據本研究結果,建議桃竹地區的幼教管理單位儘速擬定幼稚園領導人,包括園長、老闆、校長和主任的在職進修計劃,以提高教師的滿意度,進而減低教師的流失率。另外,建議師資培育單位多增加幼稚園教師接觸領導理論與實務的課程,期使有經驗的優秀教師也能逐步成為幼稚園裡的領導人才。
     The purpose of this study were to examine the relationship between perceived leadership practices and job satisfaction of early childhood teachers, and investigate the differences between teachers' perceptions of current school leaders' behaviors and ideal school leaders' behaviors in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, and Hsinchu City. A survey method was used to collect data on two research instruments: the Early Childhood Job Satisfaction Survey (ECJSS) and the Leadership Practice Survey (LPS). Analyses included the computation of descriptive statistics, multiple regression, doubly repeated measures analysis of variance, and paired t tests. The study sample consisted of 339 kindergarten teachers selected from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, and Hsinchu City. The study found that the demographic variables did not make a significant contribution to the prediction of either current leadership practices or teacher job satisfaction. The school variables make a significant contribution to the prediction of both current leadership practices and teacher job satisfaction. The curriculum identified as Developmentally Appropriate Practice made significant contributions to the prediction of both current leadership practices and teacher job satisfaction when other variables were controlled. Other findings include teachers' preceptions of school leadership practices were highly associated with teachers' job satisfaction and teachers' perceptions of current leadership practices were both satistically and practically different from their ideal leadership practices. Demographic analyses showed male leaders composed an overwhelming percentage of administrators when compared wit the all-female teachers; over 40% of the teachers did not receive formal teacher education training and about 30% of the teachers worked 3 years or less in early childhood education.
期刊論文
1.Stremmel, A. J.(1991)。Predictors of intention to leave child care work。Early Childhood Research Quarterly,6(2),285-298。  new window
2.Whaley, K. W.、Hegstrom, T. G.(1992)。Perceptions of school principal communication effectiveness and teacher satisfaction on the job。Journal of Research and Development in Education,25(4),224-231。  new window
3.Herzberg, Frederick(1968)。One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?。Harvard Business Review,46(1),53-62。  new window
4.Locke, Edwin A.(1969)。What is job satisfaction?。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,4(4),309-336。  new window
5.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review,84(2),191-215。  new window
6.Tomhae, W.、Kelly, K.、Rottier, J.(1983)。Teacher burnout: Small and rural school style。Education,104(1),72-79。  new window
7.McIntire, S. G.、Marion, S. F.、Quaglia, R.(1991)。The relationship of teacher satisfaction to perceptions of school organization, teacher empowerment, work conditions, and community status。Education,112,206-216。  new window
8.Carlson, R. V.、Matten, W. A.(1986)。Conditions for practice: Why teachers select rural school。Journal of Rural and Small Schools,1,25-28。  new window
9.Dembo, M. H.、Gibson, S.(1984)。Quality of work life: Rural teachers' perceptions。The Canadian Administrator,23(2),1-6。  new window
10.Daniel, J.(1990)。Childcare: An endangered industry。Young Children,47(5),39-42。  new window
會議論文
1.Moore, B. M.(1987)。Individual difference and satisfaction with teaching。Washington, DC。  new window
研究報告
1.鐘梅菁、江麗莉(1996)。初任教師的困擾問題。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Robinson, G. H.(1993)。A study of the relationship of leadership styles of principals and teacher job satisfaction(博士論文)。University of Arkansas,AR。  new window
2.Williams, Carol Gatzke(1993)。Development and Test of a Conceptual Model of Teacher Job Satisfaction,沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Wilcox, H. Douglas(1992)。The Relationship between the Teachers' Perception of the High School Principal's Leadership Style and the Correlates Job Satisfaction and Morale,沒有紀錄。  new window
4.Tharrington, Donnie Everette(1992)。Perceived Principal Leadership Behavior and Reported Teacher Job Satisfaction,沒有紀錄。  new window
5.Jang, Me Seok(1987)。Principal's Leadership and Communication, and Teacher Job Satisfaction in Korea,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Beer, M.(1980)。Organization Change and Development: A Systems View。England:Santa Monica, CA:Scott, Foresman:Goodyear Publishing。  new window
2.臺灣省政府教育廳(1994)。臺灣省輔導幼兒教育發展成果評估與改進之研究。臺北:臺灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
3.Babbie, Earl R.(1990)。Survey Research Methods。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Pub. Co.。  new window
4.Lawler, Edward E. III(1973)。Motivation in Work Organizations。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
5.Hoy, W. K.、Miskel, C. G.(1991)。Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Vroom, Victor Harold(1964)。Work and motivation。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.Maslow, Abraham H.(1954)。Motivation and Personality。Harper & Row。  new window
8.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
9.蔡春美(1990)。臺灣地區幼稚園教師離職狀況調查研究。臺灣地區幼稚園教師離職狀況調查研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
10.Phillips, D.、Howes, C.、Whitebook, M.(1989)。Who cares? Child care and the quality of care in American。Who cares? Child care and the quality of care in American。Berkeley, CA。  new window
11.United Nations(1995)。Statistical yearbook。Statistical yearbook。New York, NY。  new window
12.Jorde-Bloom, P.(1989)。Measuring Work Attitudes in the Early Childhood Setting: Technical Manual for the Early Childhood Job Satisfaction Survey & Early Childhood Work Environment Survey。Measuring Work Attitudes in the Early Childhood Setting: Technical Manual for the Early Childhood Job Satisfaction Survey & Early Childhood Work Environment Survey。Evanston, IL。  new window
13.Kisker, E. E.、Hofferth, S. L.(1992)。The changing demographics of family day care in the United States。Family day care: Current research for informed public policy。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.行政院(1995)。臺灣地區人力調查統計,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Locke, E. A.(1976)。The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction。Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology。Chicago, IL:Rand McNally Press。  new window
2.Little, J. W.(1988)。Assessing the prospects for teacher leadership。Building a professional culture in schools。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE