:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:福利社區化實驗計畫之評估分析--以彰化縣鹿港鎮老人及身心障礙者服務方案為例
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:黃源協 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Yuan-shie
出版日期:1999
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁9-65
主題關鍵詞:社區福利社區化社區意識行動研究法CommunityCommunity-oriented welfare servicesCOWSCommunity consciousnessAction research method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:57
     本研究係以彰化縣鹿港鎮福利社區化實驗計畫中之老人與身心障礙者服務方案為例,旨在採社區行動研究法參與實驗計畫的推動,以對進行中的各方案進行輔導、評估與修正,也藉由對實驗計畫的成效進行總體以及推動原則的評估。研究發現,對鹿港地區而言,福利社區化是一個新穎的概念,且在推動過程中面臨著相當多的難題,例如,事先規劃的不足、社區居民「由下而上」的動機與能力缺乏、以及社區居民的參與欠佳等。然而,經一年多的推動,鹿港鎮的福利社區化也已獲得某種程度的效果,例如,社區居民和團體對福利社區化的認知、資源網絡的建立以及社區與團體意識的凝聚等;顯然,在某種程度上,實驗計畫的推動已為日後鹿港鎮福利社區化的發展奠定了基礎。此外,本研究也依推動過程的各種經驗,歸納出一些可供臺灣地區推動福利社區化之政策與實務上的建議。
     Based on the pilot project of community-oriented welfare services (COWS), in particular programs for elderly and disabled, at Lu-kang, Changhaw, this study aims to participate its implementation in order to guide, evaluate and rectify various programs in process through action research method. In addition, this study also conducts a summative evaluation and evaluation for its implementation principles of the COWS. This study shows that the idea of COWS is new for Lu-Kang's residents. Considerable difficulties have been faced during the pilot period, such as inadequate rational planning in advance, absence of motivation and ability of 'bottom-up' of community residents, and insufficient community participation etc. However, the pilot project, to a certain degree, has achieved some positive outcomes after one year's intervention such as recognition of the COWS's idea, building-up of community resource network, and consolidation of community consciousness etc. It is clear that the pilot project has already created a necessary basis for Lu-kang's further development of COWS. In addition, according to the Lu-Kang's experiences, this study also provides some suggestions of policy and practice for carrying out the COWS in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Higgins, J.(1989)。Defining community Care:realities and myths。Social Policy and Administration,23(1),3-16。  new window
2.謝美娥(19970900)。從失能老人社區照顧的需求初探服務網絡之建立。國立政治大學社會學報,27,47-88。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂寶靜(19970900)。臺灣地區老人日間照護方案功能之初探:從老人使用者及其家屬的觀點出發。國立政治大學社會學報,27,89-120。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃源協、黃松林、蕭文高(19990300)。社區照顧的政策與實踐--以英國新堡市與臺灣省臺南市為例。暨大學報,3(1),263-296+389。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.周月清(1998)。殘障『福利社區化』論殘障者、家庭與社區三者之關係。全國家庭福利與家庭政策學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.賴秀芬(1996)。失能老人照顧者社區支持體系組織動員之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳味鄉(1993)。臺灣地區老人照顧與社會網絡關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅詠娜(1993)。居家照顧服務員工作動機與工作滿意度之研究:以臺北市為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭金菊(1995)。家屬長期照顧慢性病老人對支持性服務需求之探究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Payne M。Social Work and Community Care。London:Macmillan。  new window
2.Hardcastle, D. A.、Wenocur, S.、Powers, P. R.(1997)。Community Pracitce: Theories and Skills for Social Workers。New York:Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.甘炳光、梁祖彬、陳麗雲、林香生、胡文龍、馮國堅、黃文泰、香港社區工作教育工作者聯席會議(1996)。社區工作:理論與實踐。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gabor, P. A.、Unrau, Y. A.、Grinnell, R. M.(1998)。Evaluation for Social Workers。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Morris, J.(1997)。Us and Them?Feminist Research and Community。London:Macmillan。  new window
6.Twelvetrees, A.(1993)。Community Work。London:Macmillan。  new window
7.Moore, S.(1993)。Social Welfare Alive!。Cheltenham:Stanley Thornes。  new window
8.Hart, E.、Bond, M.(1995)。Action Research for Health and Social Care--A Guide to Practice。Buckingham。  new window
9.Popple, K.(1995)。Analysing community work: Its theory and practice。Open University Press。  new window
10.Tester, S.(1996)。Community Care for the Older People: A Comparative Perspective。London:Macmillan。  new window
11.Posavac, E. J.、Carey, R. G.(1997)。Program Evaluation--Methods and Case Study。New Jeaey:Prentice Hall。  new window
12.Stringer, Ernest T.(1996)。Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners。Sage。  new window
13.Department of Health(1989)。Caring for people: Community care in the next decade and beyond。HMSO。  new window
14.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Jack, R.(1998)。Institution in community care。Residual versus Community Care。London, UK。  new window
16.(1982)。Social workers - Their Roles and Tasks。Social workers - Their Roles and Tasks。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.內政部(1995)。全國社區發展會議分組研討結論。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Symonds, A.(1998)。The social reconstruction of care:from the state to the community。The Social Construction of Community Care。London:Macmillan。  new window
2.嚴祥鸞(1996)。參與觀察法。質性研究--理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE