The purpose of the study was to investigate the ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring or interaction” among people in Taiwan. The self-administered questionnaire was distributed purposively among 2000 people across the island. Totally 1707 (85.35% of response rate) valid questionnaire was collected for analysis. It consists of 42.9% male and 57.1% female. The portion of respondents from each area consists of 74.9% (North area), 6.8% (Central area), 11.8% (South area) and 6.5% (East area). The ”sense of community” was measured by 21 questionnaire items, and it consists of 3 dimensions by factor analysis, namely ”community participation”, ”community belongingness” and ”sense of isolation or closeness.” The ”neighborhood caring or interaction” was measured by 11 questionnaire items, and it consists of 2 dimensions by factor analysis, namely ”care for the community surroundings” and ”care for people in the neighborhood.” The uniqueness about the research was its sample covering the island wide respondents and the items including in questionnaire measuring of ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring and interaction.” The research findings were as following: 1. Respondents had more than moderate level of ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring and interaction”. 2. About 40% of respondent expressed ”don't know” their community name. 3. There were no gender difference in both measure of ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring and interaction”. 4. There were existing age and profession difference in the measure of ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring and interaction”. It has shown that both measure increasing as age increased. Housewife and self-employed profession showed higher level of the measure than other professions. Students and workers showed the lowest level in both measures. 5. People with different educational and religious background had different level of ”sense of community” and ”neighborhood caring and interaction”. People with lower level of education and people with religious beliefs had higher level in both measures.6. There were existing significant difference in both measures between respondents live in community less than 5 years and those who live in the community more than 5 years. The longer they live the higher the level they show. 7. There were existing significant differences in both measures between respondents live in urban and country community. People live in country had higher sense of community and higher level of caring and interaction. 8. About 35% of the respondents had no visit with their neighboring, 53% of the respondents visit their neighbor occasionally, and about 12% of the respondents visit their neighbor very often. 9. On average the number of intensive-visiting neighbor was 4. There were exiting difference in number of intensive-visiting neighbor among respondent from different types of community, there were 5.5, 4.2, and 3.6 on average in countryside, suburban and urban community respectively. It also showed the number increasing as the time live in the community longer, there were 2, 4, 6 on average among respondent live in the community for less than 5, 5-20, and more than 20 years respectively. It also exiting area difference. There were 8.6, 5.7, 4.2, 3.5 neighborhood visiting on average among respondents living in eastern, middle, southern and northern parts of the island.10. The interaction frequency among respondents in different area has shown the same pattern as the number of people in ”intensive-visiting neighbor ”. 11. The detail discussion about the difference and exception in findings were also provided in the research.