中文部分
王世仁（2002）。在太遲之前。科技報導月刊，250，6-9。
王郁華（1996）。台灣南區中學數學科教師信念之研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
王明慧（2007）。教師在工作坊之數學哲學觀的演化和對教學實務的影響。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
呂玉琴、溫世展（2001）。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報，14，459-490。
李源順（1999）。數學教師在校內互動促進自我專業發展的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學系博士論文。未出版，台北市。
李源順、林福來（1998）。校內數學教師專業發展的互動模式。師大學報：科學教育類，4(32)，1-23。
李源順、林福來（2000）。數學教師的專業成長：教學多元化。師大學報：科學教育類，45(1)，1-25。
李源順、林福來（2003）。實習教師的學習：動機、身份與反思互動下的成長。科學教育學刊，11(1)，1-25。李宗祐（2008，12月11日）。台灣國中小數理，超會考卻超不愛。中國時報。
林碧珍、蔡文煥（1999）。以學校為中心的協同成長團體協助教師落實台灣的數學課程改革。數學教育，9，55-70。
林寶山（1996）。教學論：理論與方法。台北市：五南出版社。
吳武典（1997）。教育改革與資優教育。資優教育季刊，63，1-7。
郭重吉（2007）。科學教師之路-由實習輔導到專業成長。台北市：心理出版社。
教育部（2004）。特殊教育科目及專門科目名稱及學分表。2007年10月6日，取自http://rs.edu.tw/eduinf/rule/rule.htm。
教育部（2008）。資優教育白皮書。台北市：教育部。
鄭長河（2000）。一位國中數學教師專業成長個案研究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
鍾靜（1999）。在數學課程改革下以學校為本位的教師進修模式。載於林福來（主編），1999數學教師教育國際學術研討會彙編（頁446）。台北市：國立台灣師範大學。
英文部分
Ball, D.L, Lubienski, S. & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp.？？-？？). New York: Macmillan.
Barnes, M. (2000). Magical moments in mathematics: Insight into the process of coming to know. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 33-43.
Betts, G. T. (1991). The autonomous learner model for the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education(pp. 142-153). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). Autonomous learner model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
Bonnie, C. (2004). Developing creative thinking. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean(Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 313-351). Waco, Tex.: Prufrock Press.
Brown, S. I., Cooney, T. J., & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 639-656). New York: Macmillan.
Brousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. J. (1988). How do teacher education faculty members define desirable teacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 267-273.
Burns, D., & Reis, S. (1991). Developing a thinking skills component in the gifted education program. Roeper Review, 14, 72-79.
Campbell, S. R. & Zazkis, R. (1994). Distributive flaws: Latent conceptual gaps in preservice teachers' understanding of the property relating multiplication to addition. In D. Kirshner (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting for Psychology of Mathematics Education - Northern American Chapter (vol. 2, pp. 268-274). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-Eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers mathematics teachers: 1994 yearbook (pp. 37-48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cobb, P.(Ed.). (1994). Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interactionist theories of mathematical development. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J.(1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher. 28(2), 4-15.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researcher. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series, Number 4 (pp. 125-146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cooney, T. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9-31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cooney, T. J.(1994). Research and teacher education: In search of common ground. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 608-636.
Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T.(1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking(pp. 253-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Etchberger, M. L. & Shaw, K. L. (1992). Teacher change as a progression of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 92(8), 411-417.
Feldhusen, J. F.(1980). The Purdue creative thinking program: Design and evaluation. In I. Sato (Ed.), Directions in creativity(pp.？？-？？). Los Angeles, CA: Leadership Training Institute on Gifted and Talented.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1993). Talent development in education. Communicator: The Journal of the California Association for the Gifted, 23(4), 35-38.
Feldhusen, J. F. & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.).(pp271-282). United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1032-1055.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L.(1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.147-164). New York: Macmillan.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Netherlands：Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gagné, F. (1997). A differentiated model of giftedness and talent. Gifted, 15-16. Retrieved April 14, 2001, from http://www.nswagtc.org.au/info/definitions/gagnemodel.html
Ginsburg, H. P. (1996). Toby’s math. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 175-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1985). The structure-of-intellect model. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 225-266). NY: Willey.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.
Hardy, G. H. (1940). A mathematicians’ apology. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hollingsworth, H. (1999). Teacher professional growth: A study of primary teachers involved in mathematics professional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Austrila.
House, P. A. (1987). Providing opportunities for the mathematically gifted, K-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Jaworski. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3-31.
Jenlink, P. M., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 705-724.
Johnson, A. (2000). How to help students comprehend expository text. The Indiana Reading Quarterly, 31, 37-44.
Kelble, E. S., & Howard, R. E. (1994). Enhancing physical science instruction for gifted elementary school students: Developing teacher confidence and skills. Roeper Review, 16(3), 162-166.
Kennedy, M., & Barnes, H. (1994). Implications of cognitive science for teacher education. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students diverse perspectives (pp. 196-212). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
Koehler, M. S., & Grouws, D. A. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 115-125). New York: Macmillan.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning : Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, T. I., & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 309-328.
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier, (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839-854.
Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Martinez, M. E. & Haertel, E. (1991). Components of interesting science experiments. Science Education, 75(4), 471-479.
Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (1996). The process of understanding mathematical problems. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp.29-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Constantinou, C. P. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry. Physics Education, 35(6), 411-416.
National Association for Gifted Children. (2007). Analysis of differences between previous and current teacher preparation standards. Retrieved September 24, 2007, from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=1866
Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H. (2000). Becoming a teacher. Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligences and design for education. In G. Solomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational consideration (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29, 63-66. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/fix/publications/zdm/adm97
Philippou, G. and Christou, C. (1994), Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of fractions. In J. P. Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 33-40). Lisbon: University of Lisbon.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Book.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implication of new views of cognition. In B. J. Bibble, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teacher and teaching (pp.1223-1296). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Qualification and Curriculum Authority. (2007). Guidance on teaching the gifted and talented. Retrieved September 24, 2001, from http://www.nc.uk.net/gt/science/index.htm
Reid, N. (1989). News around the world-Contemporary Polynesian conceptions of giftedness. Gifted Education International, 6, 31-37.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment trial model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J.S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Renzulli, J.S., (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity through the pursuit of ideal acts of learning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 170-181.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1991). The reform movement and quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2, 26-35.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Researcher,15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Shy, H. Y. (2006). Mathematics learning quality for gifted junior high school students in Taiwan . In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 331-331.
Shy, H. Y. & Tsai, B. G. (2008). Envision the power of naturalism. Paper presented at the meeting of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Silverman, L.K.(1982). The gifted and talented . In E.L. Meyen (Ed.), Exceptional Children and Youth. Denver: Love Publishing.
Simon, M. A. (1990): Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. In G. Booker, P. Cobb, & T. Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 313-320). Oaxtepex, Mexico: PME.
Sousa, D. A. (2003). How the gifted brain learns. U. S. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20-36.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). What is mathematical thinking? In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Stofflett , R. T. (1994). The accommodation of science pedagogical knowledge: The application of conceptual change constructs to teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8) , 787-810.
Strahan, D. B. (1989). How experienced and novice teacher frame their views of instruction: An analysis of semantic ordered trees. Teacher and Teacher Education, 5(1), 53-67.
Tamir, P., Stavy, R., & Ratner, N. (1990). Teaching science by inquiry: assessment and learning. Journal of Biological Education. 33(1), 27-32.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1989). Barriers to higher-level cognitive learning in high school science. Science Education, 72(6), 659-682.
Tyler, W., & Tandra, L. (2000). An effective mathematics and science curriculum option for secondary gifted education. Roeper Review, 22(4), 266-269.
U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993). National excellence: a case for developing America’s talent. Washington, D.C.: The Office.
Usiskin, Z. (2000). The development into the mathematically talented. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 152-162.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Yen, Y. H., Shy, H. Y., Chen, C. F., Liang, C. H. & Feng, S. C. (2005). An alternative model on gifted education. In L.C. Helen & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,1, 296-296.