:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:計畫性生產工廠績效評估與資源配置策略關係之研究
書刊名:中華管理學報
作者:李萬貴
作者(外文):Lee, Wann Guey
出版日期:2000
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁13-34
主題關鍵詞:績效評估資源配置策略核心資源Performance reviewResources allocation strategyCore resources
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:45
     本研究係運用資料包絡分析績效評估方法,用來作為衡量資源使用、資源配置策略與核心資源分析之績效指標值;另使用多變量統計分析方法,採整體的角度加以研究,藉此瞭解計畫性生產工廠營運活動型態及資源配置運用狀況。研究結果發現(1)研究發展投入規模對工廠經營績效、資源配置策略與核心資源均不顯著,此警訊值得計畫性生產工廠引為借境。(2)計畫性生產工廠近來資源配置策略均採成本領導策略,對經營效率非最佳的資源配置策略。(3)核心資源組合與資源配置策略所造成經營績效有較大變異,並影響整體經營績效。研究中亦發現建立一套系統性的「資源配置策略、核心資源、經營績效」關係模式,其分析模式可作為考核計畫性生產工廠資源配置策略,較明確地系統性績效評估制度,為當務之急,可避免資源浪費,增進整體國防力量。
     The DEA analysis of performance has been used as the benchmark for measuring resources utilization, resources allocation strategy and core resources analysis in this study. From all aspects and by means of multivariate statistical analysis, exploring the attributions of performance activities and resources allocation in the planned production factories. The results show (1)the relations between the scale of research and development and the performance, the resources allocation strategy or the core resources are all insignificant. This is an alarming signal for those planned production factories. (2)the cost dominating strategy, the resources allocation strategy adapted by planned production factories, is not the best resources allocation strategy as to performance effectiveness. (3)larger variations were caused by core resources combinations and resources allocation strategies and eventually affected the entire performance. This study also discovered that establishing a “resources allocation strategy, core resources and performance” relation model to review the resources allocation strategies of the planned production factories is extremely urgent. The model not only evaluates the performance precisely and systematically but also help to avoid resources waste and enhance the defense strength entirely.
期刊論文
1.李仁芳(1994)。企業如何掌握競爭優勢。世界經理文摘,89,48-61。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃思明、劉士豪(1992)。長期競爭優勢與策略性資訊系統--資源基礎理論之應用。管理評論,103-124。  延伸查詢new window
3.Adler, P. S.(1997)。A Plant Productivity Measure for High-Teach Manufacturing。Interface,17(6),75-85。  new window
4.Golden, B. G.(1992)。SBU Strategy and Performance: the Moderating Effects of the Corporate-SBU Relationship。Strategic Management Journal,13,145-158。  new window
5.Wernerfelt, B.(1995)。The Resource-Based View of the Firm: the Years after。Strategic Management Journal,16,171-174。  new window
6.Mcgrath, R. G.(1995)。Defining and Developing Competence: a Strategic Process Paradigm。Strategic Management Journal,16,251-275。  new window
7.Robins, J.、Wiersema, M. F.(1995)。A Resource-Based Approach to the Multi-business Firm: Empirical Analysis of Portfolio Interrelationships and Corporate Financial Performance。Strategic Management Journal,16,277-299。  new window
8.Maijoor, S.、Witteloostijn, A. V.(1996)。An Empirical Test of Resource-Based Theory: Strategic Regulation in the Dutch Audit Industry。Strategic Management Journal,17,549-569。  new window
9.Boyd, B. K.、Reuning-Elliott, E.(1998)。Research Notes and Communications a Measurement Model of Strategic Planning。Strategic Management Journal,19,181-192。  new window
10.Mosakoesi, E.(1998)。Management Prescriptions under the Resource-Based View of Strategy: the Example of Motivational Techniques。Strategic Management Journal,19,1169-1182。  new window
11.Farrell, M. J.(1978)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General,120(3),253-258。  new window
12.Papadakis, V. M.、Lioukas, S.、Chambers, D.(1998)。Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context。Strategic Management Journal,19(2),115-147。  new window
13.Hall, R.(1992)。The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources。Strategic Management Journal,13(2),135-144。  new window
14.Mahoney, Joseph T.、Pandian, J. Rajendran(1992)。The Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management。Strategic Management Journal,13(5),363-380。  new window
15.Aaker, David A.(1989)。Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage。California Management Review,31(2),91-106。  new window
16.吳思華(19930900)。策略九說 (總論):策略管理的內涵。世界經理文摘,85,60-70。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳思華(19940100)。策略九說 (第四說):資源說。世界經理文摘,89,74-87。  延伸查詢new window
18.Amit, Raphael、Schoemaker, Paul J. H.(19930101)。Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent。Strategic Management Journal,14(1),33-46。  new window
19.Barney, Jay B.(1991)。Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage。Journal of Management,17(1),99-120。  new window
會議論文
1.林榮春(1997)。企業核心資源的探討。1997產業科技研究發展管理研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.司徒達賢(1995)。資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張石柱(1998)。計畫性生產工廠效率評估之實證研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃旭男(1993)。資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭健雄(1998)。台灣休閒農場企業化經營策略之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.解宏賓(1998)。管理學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳明璋(1993)。聯勤兵工生產工廠營運效益評鑑總報告。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.馬維揚(1998)。台灣高科技產業發展之實證研究。台北:華泰書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.司徒賢達(1995)。策略管理。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.李長貴(1997)。績效管理與績效評估。華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.許士軍(1987)。管理學。台北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE