In this paper we explore the nature of experimental phonology. We point out that in order for linguistic rules to have descriptive adequacy, we cannot rely simply on introspective examinations of grammaticality by the linguists themselves. Studies in English and Taiwan Min are given as examples to show that formal rules do not necessarily reflect the language users' competence. In this paper we present studies in English plural formation rule and vowel shift rule, Mandarin phonotactic rule, Taiwan Min tone sandhi rule, nasality co-occurrence rule, segmental analysis, and syllable structure, to show the importance of using experiments to study the psychological reality of phonological rules. In order to ascertain the competence of the language users, we need to validate the formal rules by means of experiments.