:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:環境因素對國小資優生學習成效之影響研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:盧台華
作者(外文):Lu, Emily Tai-hwa
出版日期:2001
卷期:20
頁次:頁221-239
主題關鍵詞:資優國小資優生統整教育教學模式學習環境學習成效
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:32
     本研究的主要目的係在探討統整教育教學模式之有感應學習環境組成要素的有效性,以推廣應用於國小資優班。除一項半天之整體環境實驗外,其餘均採實驗組-探制組準實驗設計方式進行,以確實了解統整教育教學模式部分組成要素與統整各環境因素之實驗成效。研究對象包括臺北市國小設立資優班之學校共445名學生,針對學習環境設計的要素進行一係列有關顏色、音樂、肌肉放鬆等五個小實驗與兩項統整上述學習環境因素之實驗,主要發現有以下數項: 1. 由三項顏色實驗之結果顯示,藍綠紫色系雖未顯著影響記憶力、文章推論與應用能力,然對文章大意理解能力的增進則有顯著成效,而紅黃橙色系亦未顯著影響學生的聯想力,但上述結果均有學生學習方式之個別差異存在。 2. 由三項顏色實驗之結果顯示,國小資優生對顏色的觀感與國外文獻結果大致一致,並無文化差異存在。由其意見分析中顯示,藍綠紫色系確有產生平靜、安定、自由、舒服、輕鬆、憂鬱、昏暗、傷感、單調、無趣、沈悉的感覺,而紅黃橙色則會產生緊張、明亮、刺眼、鮮豔、壓力、疲勞、快樂、溫暖、活力、奔放的感覺。 3. 肌肉放鬆訓練實驗結果顯示雖未顯著影響考試之成績,但由大多數的學生的意見分析中顯示對其心情之放鬆與考試成績有正面助益。 4. 音樂背景實驗結果顯示雖未能顯著影響學習之成效,但大多數學生表示對其學習之成效有正面助益,尤其是古典、柔和、輕鬆的音樂是多數資優學生能接納的。 5. 由二項整體環境實驗研究中學生的意見分析發現,大多數學生對統整教育教學模式有感應學習環境之建立元素包括顏色、放鬆訓練、音樂背景與整體環境均持正向之看法。 6. 整體而言,國小資優生對統整教育教學模式有感應的學習環境部分之顏色、音樂背景與肌肉放鬆的安排大致均表認同,絕大部份學生對整體成效相當滿意。其所提之正向理由涵蓋在知識、社交、人際、情緒與整體的層面,且在內容敘述上相當具體與豐富。
     The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of environmental factors of the Integrative Education Model for setting up a local responsive learning environment for elementary gifted students. Experimental-control group designs were used in five research settings. Four hundred and twenty-three elementary gifted students from schools with gifted classes in Taipei participated in color, background music, muscle relaxation, and whole learning environment studies. The results were: 1. Blue and violet color together has significant effect on enhancing gifted students' literary comprehension ability. Although the findings of the other two series color studies indicated color made no significant differences between the test scores of the two groups on memory and divergent thinking abilities, qualitative data of students' opinions showed that there were some mental influences. So learning centers with different colors still need to be established. Blues, greens, and violets were better for information processing, while red, orange, and yellow colors were effective for active thinking. 2. Muscle relaxation training had no significant influences on the performance scores of the subjects. However, students' opinion analysis showed some mental influences. 3. Although background music had no significant effects on the experimental group's test performance, the subjects admitted some mental influences. Classic, peaceful, graceful, and relax music were favored while teacher doing the lectures. 4. From student opinions' analysis, it indicated that most of the students favored the learning environment set according to the responsive environment factors of Integrative Education Model. According to the above findings, some suggestions were made for future implementation.
期刊論文
1.張慶仁(19870600)。淺談圖書館的色彩設計問題。書府,8,79-85。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧台華(19940300)。我國近十年來資優教育重要研究成果剖析。資優教育,50,15-19。  延伸查詢new window
3.王振德(19920600)。我國資優教育相關問題及教學狀況調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,8,249-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林幸台(1982)。大腦半球功能之研究與資優教育。資優教育,6,30-33。  延伸查詢new window
5.林幸台(1996)。資優教育研究的回顧與檢討。教育資料集刊,21,111-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.盧台華(1994)。資優教育季刊之回顧剖析。資優教育,50,3-5。  延伸查詢new window
7.方建明(1991)。校園中的色彩。國教天地,88,22-28。  延伸查詢new window
8.余鑑(1989)。放映性教材之視覺設計。視聽教育雙月刊,31(2),9-12。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳隆榮(1988)。學校建築之色彩運用。國教新知,34(11/ 12),13-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林煌耀(1990)。創意的教室布置。師友,279,50-60。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭靜姿(1994)。盲與忙-談現階段中學資優教育課程設計的幾個問題。資優教育,50,6-9。  延伸查詢new window
12.張世彗(1996)。我國一般能力資賦優異教育的回顧與前瞻。教育資料集刊,21,145-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊裕仁(1994)。初任教師教室經營-其影響因素及一些對策。國教新知,40(9/ 10),48-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉智美(1988)。高中生色彩情感與人格類型關係之研究(上)。教育資料文摘,21(6),164-183。  延伸查詢new window
15.盧台華(1995)。統整教育教學模式之介紹與應用實例。資優教育,54,1-3。  延伸查詢new window
16.戴博文(1965)。從色彩心理談到學校建築色調的改進。臺灣教育輔導月刊,15(5),13-14。  延伸查詢new window
17.Margolis, H.、Pica, L.(1990)。The effects of audiotaped progressive muscle relaxation training on the reading performance of emotionally disturbed adolescents。Journal of Clinical Reading Research and Programs,3(2),9-13。  new window
18.Poulton, E.(1978)。A new look at the effect of noise: A rejoinder。Psychological Bulletin,85,1068-1079。  new window
19.Pruitt, R. P.(1989)。Fostering creativity: The innovative classroom Environment。Educational Horizons,68(1),51-54。  new window
20.Rasid, Z. M.、Parish, T. S.(1998)。The effects of two types of relaxation training on students' levels of anxiety。Adolescence,33(129),99-101。  new window
21.Robertson, M. M.(1992)。Ergonomic considerations for the human environment: Color treatment, lighting, and furniture selection。School Library Media Quarterly,20(4),211-215。  new window
22.Santrock, J. W.(1976)。Affective and facilitative self-control: Influence of ecological setting, cognition, and social agent。Journal of Educational Psychology,68(5),529-535。  new window
23.Savitz, F. R.、Anthony, G.(1984)。Creativity: A missing stimulus to learning among the gifted/ talented。Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior,21(3/ 4),15-18。  new window
24.Zentall, S. S.(1986)。Color stimulation on performance activity of hyperactive and nonhyperactive Children。Journal of Educational Psychology,78(2),159-165。  new window
會議論文
1.Grangaard, E. M.(1995)。The color and light effects on learning。Washington, DC。  new window
2.Mahler, D.(1978)。Music for learning。Stirling, UK。  new window
3.Vannan, D.(1977)。Adapted suggestology and elementary science at Bloomsburg State College。Cincinnati, OH。  new window
研究報告
1.王振德(1995)。我國資優教育課程與教學實施現況之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡錦蕉(1995)。靜坐訓練對國小資優兒童創造力、注意力、自我概念及焦慮反應之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Clark, B.(1988)。Growing up Gifted。Growing up Gifted。Columbus, OH:Merrill。  new window
2.Joyce, B.、Weil, M.(1980)。Models of teaching。Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Clark, Barbara(1986)。Optimizing Learning: The Integrative Education Model in the Classroom。Columbus, Ohio:Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
4.Maker, C. J.(1982)。Curriculum development for the gifted。Austin, Texas:PRO-ED, Inc.。  new window
5.Senders, Mark S.、McCormick, Ernest J.(1987)。Human Factors in Engineering and Design。McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.盧台華(1986)。直接教學法在智能不足教學成效上之探討。我國特殊教育的現代化-中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.毛連塭(1994)。資優教育課程設計。開創資優教育的新世紀。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1988)。中華民國七十七年國際特殊教育研討會會議輯。中華民國七十七年國際特殊教育研討會會議輯。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.盧台華(1994)。教學篇第一,二節。啟智教育教師工作手冊。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
10.Assagioli, R.(1973)。The act of will。New York, NY:Viking。  new window
11.Casey, O. L.、Flake, M. H.(1976)。Essentials of suggestopedia: A primer for practitioners。Essentials of suggestopedia: A primer for practitioners。沒有紀錄。  new window
12.Kantowitz, B. H.、Sorkin, R. D.(1980)。Human facyore: Understanding people-system relationships。Human facyore: Understanding people-system relationships。New York, NY。  new window
13.Robert, T.、Clark, F.(1976)。Transpersonal psychology in education。Transpersonal Education。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Grangaard, E. M.(1993)。Effects of color and light on selected elementary students,0。  new window
2.Wolff, F. I.(1969)。An investigation of the effects of background music on learning of vocabulary and grammar and in public speaking,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳武典(1994)。資優教育的研究與課題。開創資優教育的新世紀。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學與中華民國特殊教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧台華(1994)。資優教育教學模式之選擇與應用。開創資優教育的新世紀。中華民國特殊教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE