:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:種族科技民族主義與全球化--馬來西亞的困境
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:張亞中 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Yachung
出版日期:2002
卷期:41:1
頁次:頁89-104
主題關鍵詞:全球化馬來西亞民族主義科技民族主義種族科技民族主義GlobalizationMalaysiaNationalismTeco-nationalismEthnic techno-nationalism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:73
     本文為馬來西亞創造一個描繪其國家發展的名詞,即「種族科技民族主義」,並用以來討論馬來西亞在面臨全球化時的一些困境。除了前言與結論外,本文分為四個部分。第一部分介紹「科技民族主義」的概念;第二部分述及為何用「種族科技民族主義」來詮釋馬來西亞的國家發展;第三部分討論馬來西亞種族科技民族主義的發展經過;第四部分則析論為甚麼馬來西亞種族科技民族主義將很難面對全球化的挑戰?本文認為如果馬來西亞不能建立族群的平等與信任,它的國家發展將有相當的侷限。本文研究的心得在於提出一個命題,即「任何自陷於某種種族、族群、宗教或文化霸權的國家,將很難因應未來全球化的挑戰」。
     This article creates the term "ethnic techno-nationalism" to characterize Malaysia's national development and discusses the predicament the country faces in an are of globalization. The article is divided into four parts. The first introduces the concept of "ethnic techno-nationalism." The second part elaborates on the use of the term for analyzing Malaysia's national development. The third discusses the development of "ethnic techno-nationalism" in Malaysia. The last section argues that such "ethnic techno-nationalism" is not sufficient for Malaysia to tackle the challenge brought by globalization. If Malaysia fails to establish equality and trust among different ethnic groups, its national development will remain limited. The main point of this article is to put forward the proposition that "any country reducing itself into some sort of national, ethnic, religious or cultural hegemony will have difficulty to cope with the challenge brought by globalization."
期刊論文
1.吳祖田(19921100)。馬來西亞「新經濟政策」的背景與性質。問題與研究,31(11),51-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張亞中(19970100)。多元文化整合的困境:以馬來西亞。東南亞季刊,2(1),23-42。  延伸查詢new window
3.Krugman, Paul R.(1994)。The Myth of Asia's Miracle。Foreign Affairs,73(6),62-78。  new window
4.Samuels, R. J.(1991)。Reinventing Security: Japan Since Meiji。Dedalus,120(4)。  new window
5.Reich, R. B.(1987)。The Rise of Techno-Nationalism。The Atlantic Monthly,259(5),62-70。  new window
6.Krugman, P.(1995)。Dutch Tulips and Emerging Markets。Foreign Affairs,73(4),28-44。  new window
7.Krugman, P.(1999)。Depression Economics Returns。Foreign Affairs,78(1),66-73。  new window
學位論文
1.Ho, Khai Leong(1988)。Indigenizing the State: The New economic Policy and the Bumiputera State in Peninsular Malaysia(博士論文)。Ohio State University。  new window
圖書
1.Gramsci, A.、Quintin Hoare、Geoggrey Nowell Smith(1976)。Selections from the Prison Notebooks。New York, NY:International Publishers。  new window
2.Mahathir, Mohamad、劉鑑銓(1981)。《馬來人的困境》。新加坡:皇冠出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Friedman, Thomas L.(1999)。The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization。New York, NY:Farrar, Straus & Giroux。  new window
4.王賀白、鄭又平、藍於琛(1999)。國際政治中的族群衝突。國際政治中的族群衝突。臺北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊建成(1982)。馬來西亞華人的困境--西馬來西亞華巫政治關係之探討(1957-1978)。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Soros, G.(1998)。The crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered。London:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
7.Thurow, L.(1992)。Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe, and America。New York, NY:William Morrow and Company, Inc.。  new window
8.Fukuyama, F.(1995)。Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity。New York:Free Press。  new window
9.馬立誠、凌志軍(1998)。交鋒:當代中國三次思想解放實錄。臺北:天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.顧長永(2000)。東南亞政府與政治。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.魏萼(2000)。中國國富論。台北:時報文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.薩德賽、蔡百銓(2001)。東南亞史。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Lazomick, W.(1991)。Business Organization and the Myth of the Market。Economy, New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.宋鎮照(1996)。東協國家之政經發展。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mutalib, Hussin(1990)。Islam and Ethnicity in Malay Politics。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.曾慶豹(1996)。與2020共舞:新馬來人思潮與文化霸權。吉隆坡:華社資料研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡維衍(2001)。主編序。當代馬華文存經濟卷,90年代卷。馬來西亞,吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
18.Mohadmad, M.(1999)。Kebangktian Semula Asia。Kebangktian Semula Asia。Subang Jaya, Malaysia。  new window
19.劉世平(2001)。亞洲新未來:建立永續發展的經濟體。亞洲新未來:建立永續發展的經濟體。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.Maaruf, S.(1988)。Malay Ideas on development: From Feudal Lord to Capitalist。Malay Ideas on development: From Feudal Lord to Capitalist。Singapore。  new window
21.Jomo, K. S.(1986)。A Question of Class: Capital, the State and Uneven Development in Malaysia。A Question of Class: Capital, the State and Uneven Development in Malaysia。Singapore。  new window
22.朱章才(2000)。1947.8.15德里:殖民統治的結束。1947.8.15德里:殖民統治的結束。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.Krugman, P.(1994)。Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations。Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations。New York, NY。  new window
24.Coastes, D.(2000)。Model of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era。Model of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era。Oxford。  new window
25.張宗漢(1994)。管理市場-經濟理論與東亞國家由政府主導工業化。管理市場-經濟理論與東亞國家由政府主導工業化。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.Means, G. P.(1976)。Malaysian Politics。Malaysian Politics。London, UK。  new window
27.Bocock, R.(1986)。文化霸權。文化霸權。London, UK。  延伸查詢new window
28.Fallow, J.(1993)。Looking at the Sun: The Rise of the New East Asian Economic System。Looking at the Sun: The Rise of the New East Asian Economic System。New York, NY。  new window
29.李巧云、Murphy, R. Taggart(1998)。日圓神話。日圓神話。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
30.策略資訊研究中心(2000)。巫統的困境:第十屆大選分析。巫統的困境:第十屆大選分析。馬來西亞,吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
31.姜雪影、李定健(1985)。推動日本奇蹟的手:通產省。推動日本奇蹟的手:通產省。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
32.Zysman, J.、Cohen, S.(1986)。The International Experience。The Changing American Economy。Cambridge。  new window
33.三菱總合研究所(1998)。亞洲全預測,1998-解析巨變下的亞洲大未來。亞洲全預測,1998-解析巨變下的亞洲大未來。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
34.Caporaso, J. A.(1993)。Global Political Economy。Political Science: The State of the Discipline II。Washington, DC。  new window
35.Samuels, R. J.(1974)。Rich Nation/ Strong Army: National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan。Rich Nation/ Strong Army: National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan。Itasca, IL。  new window
圖書論文
1.張景云(1994)。華團與政治:解去政治化的前景。當代大馬華人政治省思。吉隆坡:華社資料研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE