:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:降低班級人數的論辯:實施小班之論證基礎及其爭議
書刊名:彰化師大教育學報
作者:陳利銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Li-ming
出版日期:2003
卷期:5
頁次:頁229-252
主題關鍵詞:小班成本效益教育政策Class-size reductionSmall-classesEducational policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:14
期刊論文
1.徐世瑜(20000400)。小班教學精神的理論與實務。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,93-103。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳利銘、許添明(20030800)。我國小班政策之檢討與改進建議。教育政策論壇,6(2),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳清山、蔡菁芝(20011000)。中美兩國降低班級人數政策之研究。初等教育學刊,10,1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Finn, J. D.(2002)。Small classes in American schools: Research, practice, and politics。Phi Delta Kappan,83(7),551-560。  new window
5.Stecher, B.、Bohrnstedt, G.(2001)。Class-size reduction in California: A story of hope, promise, and unintended consequences。Phi Delta Kappan,82(9),670-674。  new window
6.Ogawa, R. T.、Houston, D.、Stine, D. E.(1999)。California's class-size reduction initiative: Differences in teacher experience and qualification across schools。Education Policy,13(5),659-673。  new window
7.Bracey, G. W.(1999)。Reducing class size: The findings, the controversy。Phi Delta Kappan,81(3),246-247。  new window
8.潘清富(20020400)。小班教學之師生互動--從存在主義之師生關係談起。國教天地,148,115-119。  延伸查詢new window
9.傅祿建(19980800)。實施小班化教育的理論思考。教育資料文摘,42(2)=247,148-155。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳利銘、梁金盛(20040300)。小班教師專業成長內涵之探究。國民教育研究學報,12,135-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Nye, B.、Hedges, L. V.、Konstantopoulos, S.(2001)。Are effects of small classes cumulative? Evidence from a Tennessee experiment。The Journal of Educational Research,94(6),336-352。  new window
12.Evertson, C. M.、Randolph, C. H.(1992)。Teaching practices and class size: A new look at an old issue。Peabody Journal of Education,67(1),85-105。  new window
13.湯梅英(1998)。有效實施小班教學是迷思或迷失。現代教育論壇,5,66-68。  延伸查詢new window
14.李詠吟(20010300)。加州小班教學的實施成效及其對臺灣教育的啟示。文教新潮,6(1),17-27。  延伸查詢new window
15.高強華(19981200)。提昇小班教學成效的途徑。中等教育,49(6),109-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張素貞(2003)。教育部規劃推動發展小班教學精神計畫從教師素質提升開始:辦理教師進修的問題與想法。「教育部降低國民中小學班級學生人數計畫成果展示」小班小校北區學術研討會,國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所,教育部主辦 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.單文經(2000)。建構以學習為本的小班小校。八十八學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會,國立臺北師範學院 139-162。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳明印(2003)。台灣地區國中小小班制目標之評析。「教育部降低國民中小學班級學生人數計畫成果展示」小班小校北區學術研討會,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,教育部主辦 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.台北市政府主計處(1999)。市政統計週報。台北:台北市政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Achilles, C. M.(1999)。Let's put kids first, finally。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin。  new window
2.教育部(1998)。教育部發展小班教學精神計畫研習手冊。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(1998)。發展小班教學精神計畫。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.四一〇教育改造聯盟(1996)。民間教育改革藍圖:朝向社會正義的結構性變革。台北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院(1998)。教育改革行動方案。台北:行政院。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Noddings, Nel、曾漢塘、林季薇(2000)。教育哲學。臺北:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Knight, George R.、簡成熙(2002)。教育哲學導論。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Zahorik, J.,Monar, A.,Ehrle, K.,Halbach, A.(2000)。Effective teaching in reduced-size classes,http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/CERAI/documents/sage/NCREL.pdf, 2002/12/16。  new window
2.Wößmann, L.,West, M. R.(2002)。Class-size effects in school systems around the world: Evidence from between-grade variation in TIMSS,http://www.uni-kiel.de/ifw/pub/kap/2002/kap1099.pdf, 2002/07/07。  new window
3.U.S. Department of Education(1999)。Reducing class size what do we know,http://www.ed.gov/pubs/ReducingClass/Class_size.html, 2002/06/07。  new window
4.Lazear, E. P.(2001)。Paying teachers for performance: Incentives and selection,http://cee.lse.ac. Uk/conference%2opapers/teacher%20pay%20and%20incentives/lazear.pdf, 2002/07/07。  new window
5.Harris, D.,Plank, D.(2000)。Making policy choices: is class size reduction the best alternative,http://www.epc.msu.edu/publications/workpapers/choices.pdf, 2002/07/07。  new window
6.Finn, J. D.(1998)。Class size and students at risk what is know? Who is next,http://www.ed.gov/pubs/Classsize/practice.html, 2002/07/07。  new window
7.Cohen, D. K.,Raudenbush, S.,Ball, D. L.(2000)。Educational resources, instruction, and research,http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dkcohen/revised_for_EEPAdb.doc_2.do.pdf, 2002/12/18。  new window
8.劉力仁(20030929)。教師上街頭提五大訴求。  延伸查詢new window
9.Picus, L.(1999)。Class size reduction: Effects and relative costs,http://jlarc.leg.wa.gov/Reports/99-9K12App12Paper4.pdf, 2002/07/07。  new window
10.Hanushek, E. A.(1998)。The evidence on class size,http://www.wallis.rochester.edu/WallisPapers/wa1lis_l0.pdf, 2002/06/07。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rice, J. K.(2002)。Making the evidence matter: Implications of the class size research debate for policy makers。The Class Size Debate。Washington, DC:Economic Policy Institute。  new window
2.Mishel, L.、Rothstein, R.(2002)。[The Class Size Debate] Introduction。The Class Size Debate。Washington, DC:Economic Policy Institute。  new window
3.Krueger, A. B.(2002)。Understanding the magnitude and effect of class size on student achievement。The Class Size Debate。Washington, DC:Economic Policy Institute。  new window
4.Hanushek, Eric A.(2002)。Evidence, Politics, and the Class Size Debate。The Class Size Debate。Washington, DC:Economic Policy Institute。  new window
5.邱兆偉(1988)。存在主義哲學與教育思潮。現代教育思潮。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE