:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以國中基本學力測驗成績探討班級規模效應
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:宋曜廷 引用關係邱佳民劉欣宜曾芬蘭陳柏熹 引用關係
作者(外文):Sung, Yao-tingChiou, Jia-minLiu, Hsin-yiTseng, Fen-lanChen, Po-hsi
出版日期:2009
卷期:54:2
頁次:頁59-83
主題關鍵詞:城鄉差異班級規模國中基本學力測驗UrbanizationClass size effectBasic competence test
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:201
摘要: 班級規模對教學歷程和學習成果的影響向來在教育政策和教學研究文獻中備受矚目,但臺灣目前探討班級大小和學生學習成就之關係的實徵研究十分有限。本文之研究目的有三:一、探究臺灣地區國民中學階段班級規模與學生學習成就的關聯;二、探討如果班級規模效應存在,學校的屬性(公私立)會不會影響此種效應的大小;三、探討如果班級規模效應存在,學校的所屬城鄉的都市化程度會不會影響此種效應的大小?本研究以參加2005年國中基本學力測驗的273,418 名應屆畢業國三學生為對象,透過線性階層模式(Hierarchical Linear Modeling, HLM)探討班級大小、學校屬性、學校所在地都市化程度等主要變項對於學生國中基測成績的影響。研究結果發現,臺灣地區的國中,班級規模愈大,成績顯著愈高,且此種現象在公立國中比私立國中明顯,此種現象在低都市化所在地的學校較中都市化和高都市化所在學校更為明顯。這些發現與歐美各國所發現的小班效應有明顯不同,本研究提出「成就排比模型」(achievement-sorting model)來解釋相關發現。
Abstract: Effects of class size on teaching progress and learning performance has been one of the most important research topics in the domains of educational policies and instructional research. However, in Taiwan, only limited numbers of empirical studies were conducted to investigate the relationship between class size and learning achievement. There are three objectives of this study. The first one is to investigate the effects of junior high school class size on students learning achievement in Taiwan. Secondly, if class size might influence students learning, this study aims to seek whether or not school characteristics (public or private) will intervene the effects. Finally, if class size might influence students learning, this research would also like to examine whether or not the degree of urbanization of schools will intervene the effects. The subjects of this study were 273,418 junior high schools graduates who participated in the Basic Competence Test in 2005. The Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) was adopted to investigate the effects of class sizes, school characteristics, and school urbanization degree on students Basic Competence Test scores. The results show that students in large classes had significantly higher scores than those in small classes. This phenomenon is more evident when the students study in public schools. Furthermore, the phenomenon is also more evident when schools are located in low urbanized districts. These findings differ from the results of previous studies conducted in western countries. Not only the findings can complement the references of related research fields, it will also provide an alternative thinking for scholars and policy makers to design curriculum for different class sizes.
期刊論文
1.徐世瑜(20000400)。小班教學精神的理論與實務。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,93-103。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳利銘、許添明(20030800)。我國小班政策之檢討與改進建議。教育政策論壇,6(2),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jin, L.、Cortazzi, M.(1998)。Dimensions of dialogue: Large classes in China。International Journal of Educational Research,29,739-761。  new window
4.Pong, S. L.、Pallas, A.(2001)。Class size and eighth-grade math achievement in the united states and abroad。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,23,251-273。  new window
5.吳清山、蔡菁芝(20011000)。中美兩國降低班級人數政策之研究。初等教育學刊,10,1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Nye, B.、Hedges, L. V.、Konstantopoulos, S.(2001)。Are effects of small classes cumulative? Evidence from a Tennessee experiment。The Journal of Educational Research,94(6),336-352。  new window
7.李詠吟(20010300)。加州小班教學的實施成效及其對臺灣教育的啟示。文教新潮,6(1),17-27。  延伸查詢new window
8.Mosteller, F.(1995)。The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades。The Future of Children: Critical Issues for Children and Youths,5(2),113-127。  new window
9.劉介宇、洪永泰、莊義利、陳怡如、翁文舜、劉季鑫、梁賡義(20060600)。臺灣地區鄉鎮市區發展類型應用於大型健康調查抽樣設計之研究。健康管理學刊,4(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王淑珍。小班教學之政策分析。國教新知,52,56-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.洪欽國。國小如何實施小班教學精神。現代教育論壇,5,49-53。  延伸查詢new window
12.國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會(2000)。基本學力測驗的分數。飛揚期刊,6,10-15。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃義良。實施「小班教學」對國小師生互動與學童學習動機影響之研究。人文及社會學科教學通訊,13,143-153。  延伸查詢new window
14.翟本瑞。小班教學與學習成效影響之研究。教育社會學通訊,56,6-11。  延伸查詢new window
15.翟本瑞、薛淑美。臺灣降低國民中小學班級人數成效及現況。教育社會學通訊,64,9-14。  延伸查詢new window
16.Biggs, J.。Learning from the Confucian Heritage: So Size doesn't Matter?。International Journal of Educational Research,29,723-738。  new window
17.Blatchford, P.、Bassett, P.、Goldstein, H.、Martin, C.。Are Class Size Differences Related to Pupils' Educational Progress and Classroom Process? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of Children aged 5-7 Years。British Educational Research Journal,29,709-730。  new window
18.Blatchford, P.、Goldstein, H.、Martin, C.、Browne W.。A Study of Class Size Effects in English School Reception Year Classes。British Educational Research Journal,28,169-185。  new window
19.Blatchford, P.、Moriarty, V.、Edmonds, S.、Martin, C.。Relationship between Class Size and Teaching: A Multimethod Analysis of English Infant Schools。American Educational Research Journal,39,101-132。  new window
20.Desimone, L. M.、Smith, T.、Baker, D.、Ueno, K.。Assessing Barriers to the Reform of U.S. Mathematics Instruction from an International Perspective。American Educational Research Journal,42,501-535。  new window
21.Ehrenberg, R. G.、Brewer, D. J.、Gamoran, A.、Willms, J. D.。Class Size and Student Achievement。Psychological Science,2,1-30。  new window
22.Finn, J. D.、Achilles, C. M.。Tennessee's Class Size Study: Findings, Implications, Misconceptions。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,21,97-109。  new window
23.Glass, G. V.、Smith, M. L.。Meta-analysis of Research on Class Size and Achievement。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,1,2-16。  new window
24.Grissmer, D.。Class Size Effects: Assessing the Evidence, Its Policy Implications, and Future Research Agenda。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,21,231-248。  new window
25.Hanushek, E. A.。Some Findings from an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment and from Other Investigations of Class Size Effects。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,21(2),143-164。  new window
26.Lindahl, M.(2005)。Home Versus School Learning: A New Approach to Estimating the Effect of Class Size on Achievement。Scandinavian Journal of Economics,107(2),375-394。  new window
27.Zahorik, J.。Reducing Class Size Leads to Individualized Instruction。Educational Leadership,570,50-53。  new window
學位論文
1.Wen, M. L.。Computer Availability and Students' Science Achievement in Taiwan and the United States。  new window
圖書
1.Bryk, Anthony S.、Raudenbush, Stephen W.(1992)。Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Raudenbush, S. W.、Bryk, A. S.、Cheong, Y. F.、Congdon, R.、du Toit, M.。HLM6: Hierarchical Linear & Nonlinear Modeling。HLM6: Hierarchical Linear & Nonlinear Modeling。Lincolnwood, IL。  new window
其他
1.Wößmann, L.,West, M. R.。Class-size Effects in School Systems Around the World: Evidence from between-grade Variation in TIMSS。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE