:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生態遊憩區價值之估計--假設市場評價法之應用
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:胡志平 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Chich-ping
出版日期:2006
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:生態保育環境品質環境敏感地區假設市場評價法非使用價值Ecological conservationEnvironmental qualityEnvironmental sensitivity areasContingent valuation methodNon-use value
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:79
  • 點閱點閱:204
由於近年來生態保育的推廣與重視旅遊之環境品質下,市民漸漸瞭解自然保育與遊憩發展並重的旅遊觀念-生態旅遊。但是具有自然景觀的地點,大部份都是屬於環境敏感地區,例如濕地、水源區、野生動物保護區…等,開發行為將會造成更嚴重的環境破壞與負面經濟效益衝擊。因此,有關環境敏感地區開發效益的評價,更是制訂觀光旅遊政策時,最重要的經濟數據。本文主要的的目的,主要是在評估新竹沿岸環境敏感地區,發展生態旅遊之經濟價值效益,資料的來源是利用新竹市民,對於新竹沿岸地區發展生態旅遊的意識問卷調查,並且利用非市場評價法之假設市場評價法,推估其各項經濟價值。本文主要內容包含,(1)市民心中對於生態遊憩區價值的認知:觀光遊憩價值、教育研究價值、景觀美學價值與生態保育價值這四個意識調查結果顯示,四種價值在發展生態旅遊有一定的認同,其認同度愈高參與生態旅遊的遊憩活動興趣愈高,相對而言對於發展生態旅遊的價值認知也高;(2)各項經濟價值之推估結果:使用價值的觀光遊憩價值是459.321元、教育研究價值是306.903元、景觀美學價值是937.780元,而非使用價值上存在價值為-2842.920元、選擇價值為849.245元、遺贈價值為1771.900元;(3)根據資料分析的結果,可以得到延伸的意涵,本文提出以下的發展策略:(1)建立生態旅遊認知的資訊;(2)建立生態旅遊的維護管理配套措施。
The citizens have gradually noted the importance of recreation ecologically, equally emphasize on environmental conservation as well as recreational development, since the spread of ecological conservation and the respect on the environmental quality from travel during these years. But, in Hsin Chu, Taiwan, most of the places of natural recreation have become environmental sensitivity areas, such as wet land, water sources area, and wild animal protection area, etc. The development on these sites should do harm of the environment and a negative impact on the economic benefits. Therefore, valuation on the environmental sensitivity areas is the most important strategy while setting up the tourism policies. The purposes of this paper are to evaluate the economic benefit of environmental sensitivity areas along the Coastal of Hsin Chu and the value of ecotourism while developing these sites. The data, from the survey on the residents' consciousness, are arranged to estimate the different kind of economic values by using the contingent valuation method. The contents of this paper include threefold: first, the residents' perceptions of ecological recreation such as tourism recreation value, education approach value, esthetics value, and ecological conservation value; second, the derivation of economic benefits from the survey such as use vale: tourism recreation value- $459.321, education approach vale- $306.903, esthetics value- $937.780, and non- use value: existence value- $-2842.920, option value- $849.245, bequest value- $1771.900; third, the derived development strategies from the results include establishment of ecotourism perception information system and a complete ecotourism maintain and management system.
期刊論文
1.Thayer, Mark A.(1981)。Contingent Valuation Techniques for Assessing Environmental Impacts: Further Evidence。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,8(1),27-44。  new window
2.Boyle, K. J.、Bishop, R. C.、Welsh, M. P.(1985)。Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games。Land Economics,61,188-195。  new window
3.鄭蕙燕、闕雅文(19971200)。鰲鼓海岸濕地遊憩經濟價值評估。戶外遊憩研究,10(4),7-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Shabman, L.、Stephenson, K.(1996)。Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative Perspective。Land Economics,72(4),433-439。  new window
5.Davis, R. K.(1963)。Recreation planning as an economic problem。Natural Resources Journal,3(3),239-249。  new window
6.陸雲(19900300)。環境資源估價之研究--非市場估價方法。經濟論文,18(1),93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉錦添(19900900)。淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估--封閉式假設市場評估法之應用。經濟論文,18(2),99-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Rowe, R. D.、D'Arge, R. C.、Brookshire, D. S.(1980)。An Experiment on the Economic Value of Visibility。Journal of Enviroivnental Economics and Management,7(1),1-19。  new window
9.吳珮瑛、謝雯華(19950500)。環境財需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊,1(1),1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hanemann, W. Michael(1984)。Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3),332-341。  new window
11.鄭蕙燕(1998)。水鳥保護區遊客之時問價值評估。「農林學報」,47(3),121-129。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭蕙燕、羅炳和(1999)。以野生動物保護區保育價值評估檢驗條件評估法之次序效果。「農業經濟叢刊」,5(1),89-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭蕙燕、林政德(2000)。條件評估法之嵌入效果:台灣野生動物保護區之驗證。「農業經濟半年刊」,64期,125-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Bishop, R. C.、Heberlein, T. A.、Keally, M. J.(1983)。Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparisons with a Simulated Market。Natural Resources Journal,23(3),619-633。  new window
15.Brookshire, D. S., Eubanks, L. S., and Randall, A.,(1983)。‘Estimating Option Prices and Existence Values for Wildlife Resources”。Land Economics,59,1-15。  new window
16.Whitehead, J. C.(1993)。Total Economic Values for Coastal and Marine Wildlife: specification, Validity ,and Valuation Issues。Land Economics,71,207-15。  new window
研究報告
1.劉錦添(1992)。「台灣地區民眾對環境風險認知與面臨環境風險下的行為分析」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張偉祐(2000)。保育森林生態系之經濟價值評估--以八仙山森林生態系經營試驗區為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李凌純(1993)。都市林整體效益評估--條件評估法之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳信甫(1995)。遊憩效益評估法之應用與比較--以綠島為例(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃士嘉(2002)。金門國家公園發展生態旅遊之遊憩效益評估(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.詹雅文(2001)。墾丁國家公園發展生態旅遊之效益評估(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.林淑瑜(1996)。雪霸國家公園遊憩效益評估研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾明遜(1996)。濕地保育評價:條件評價法之應用與檢討(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳恭鋑(1994)。關渡沼澤區的保護效益評估--假設性市場評價法之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
2.von Ciriacy-Wantrup, Siegfried(1942)。Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
3.Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., and Schultze, W. D.(1986)。Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation。Totowa, NJ。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE