1.王俊秀(2001)。「環境社會學的想像」。台北市:巨流圖書公司。2.王俊秀(2001)。「環境社會學的出發:讓故鄉的風水有面子」。台北市:巨流圖書公司。3.毛壽龍(2001)。「政治社會學」。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
4.吳倩瑤(1995)。空氣污染防制費可行性研究-以政策分析的角度。中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
5.吳昆基(2004)。綠色國民所得發展趨勢與展望。「主計月刊」,580,57-65頁。
6.李明輝(1992)。考績制度運作與組織成員對考績接受認知之探討,公營企業個案實證研究,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7.李禮仲(2002)。由國外綠色稅法制改革經驗評估我國綠色租稅改革可能性。行政院國科會研究計畫。
8.朱澤民(2001)。如何在維持財政穩定條件下,逐步將貨物稅定位成特種銷售稅,以創造工商業優良銷售稅環境。財政部委託研究期末報告。
9.朱澤民(2001)。台灣地區課徵地方所得稅可行性之研究。「賦稅改革與財政政策」,台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。
10.池田篤(2001)。「圖說日本稅制」。平成13年版,東京:財經詳報社。
11.汪明生、洪東煒(2003)。都市公共財評量模式CVM與SJT之比較-以高雄市愛河水上巴士為例。「管理評論」,22(2),31-148。12.汪明生、黃國良(1991)。高雄市製造業勞動條件之研究-社會判斷理論之應用。「管理評論」,10,1-22。13.汪明生(1992)。「環境決策與管理」,高雄市:復文書局。
14.汪明生(2004)。「公共事務管理與實務」(尚未出版),高雄市。
15.汪明生、楊仁壽(1990)。結合事實與價值的環境影響評估模式-SAGE。「工程環境期刊」,12,27-39。
16.周嫦娥(2002)。國際綠色租稅改革探討,台北:財團法人台灣經濟研究院。
17.周嫦娥、李繼宇(2003)。國際綠色租稅改革之探討(II),2003永續發展科技與政策研討會,台北。
18.周嫦娥(2004)。綠色租稅改革與環境稅之第二重紅利。「經濟論衡」,台北:行政院經建會。
19.林大侯、李堅明、李涵茵(2000)。綠色財政改革與經濟成長之研究。「自由中國之工業」,92(2),1-77。
20.林月麗(1995)。降低機動車輛空氣污染排放量之效益研究。台北:中興大學財政研究所碩士論文。
21.林裕文(1999)。結合事實與價值環境決策模式-於美濃水庫興建決策之應用,高雄市:中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
22.施鴻志(2001)。「環境規劃」,新竹市:建都文化事業股份有限公司。23.孫玳(1999)。國軍部隊社區關係管理系統建構之探討-以陸軍仁武營區為例。高雄市:中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
24.張山嶺、劉亞明(1996)。「稅收與環境:互補性政策」,台北:中國環境科學出版社。
25.張世秋、李彬(1996)。「環境管理中的經濟手段」,台北:中國環境科學出版社。
26.張帆(2000)。「環境與自然資源經濟學」,台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
27.張政國(1996)。課徵營建業者空氣污染防制費之省思。「營造天下」,2,34-36。
28.張憲國(2000)。台灣海岸景觀與海岸保全的相容發展與展望。「海下技術季刊」,台北市。
29.梁啟源(1995)。空氣污染防治對台灣空氣污染社會成本及經濟之影響。「經濟情勢評論」,1(3),100-106。
30.陳小玲(2002)。我國石油稅制綠色改革。台北市:台北大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。
31.陳淑君(1994)。我國空氣污染管制政策之研究-以石化業為研究焦點。台北市:中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
32.陳澤義與許志義(1997)。空氣污染防制費之執行效益評估。台北:行政院環保署。
33.陳鴻達(2001)。綠色租稅改革-歐美環境稅的推動現況。「財稅研究」,33(4),161-192。34.陳連芬(2002)。論地方稅立法權之侷限與實踐。「稅務旬刊」,1883,10-17。
35.陸雲(1990)。環境資源估價之研究-非市場估價方法。「經濟論文」,18(1),93-120。36.黃宗煌(2002)。綠色財政改革。台北市:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
37.黃俊英(1989)。台灣省政府集中辦公及促進內外聯繫問題之研究。南投:台灣省政府研考會編印。
38.黃耀輝(2000)。以環境稅為基礎的前瞻性財政改革。「經濟前瞻」,台北市。
39.黃耀輝(2003)。一舉兩得的環境財政改革:改善財政和提昇綠色所得。「農業與經濟」,30,89-115。40.楊鴻鎰(2000)。我國空氣污染防治費政策之分析。台南市:成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士論文。
41.楊子涵(2002)。我國現行稅制從事綠色租稅改革之探討。台北市:行政院國科會研究計畫。
42.溫麗琪(1999),空氣污染防制與相關賦稅之整合研究。台北市:中華經濟研究院規劃報告。
43.廖文琦(1996)。空污費爭議之探討。「台灣經濟研究」,19(8),95-98。44.劉宜君(1990)。管制和經濟誘因制度的污染防制政策之比較。台北市:中興大學公共政策研究所論文。
45.蔡茂寅(1998)。略論預算法上之特種基金-以空氣污染防制基金為例。「財稅研究」,30(2),90-110。46.蔡益忠(2003)。地方稅法通則之制定與地方政府對賦予課稅權之運用。「財稅園地」,台北市:財政部財稅人員訓練所。
47.蕭代基(1995)。空氣污染防制費制度之檢討。「永續發展」,7,5-7。
48.蕭代基(1998)。空氣污染防制費收費辦法與執行之檢討。「經社法制論叢」,22,203-226。
49.蕭代基、葉淑琦譯(1998)。「綠色稅制改革-OECD最新環境稅報告」,台北市:台灣地球日出版社。
50.蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪(2002)。「環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用」,台北市:俊傑書局股份有限公司。51.簡錦紅(2000)。OECD綠色稅制改革經驗對我國之啟示。「財稅研究」,32(4),37-54。52.歐陽嶠暉(1997)。環境問題與保護對策,中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理研究中心。53.稅務旬刊(2003)。地方稅法通則有再檢討修正必要(社論),台北市:稅旬文化出版事業有限公司。
54.財政部稅制會(2003)。「中華民國財政」,財政部,台北縣:啟耀印制事業有限公司。
55.高雄市政府財政局(2004)。「高雄市政府財政局工作報告」,高雄市。
56.高雄市政府主計處(2004)。「高雄市統計年報」,高雄市政府主計處,高雄市。
57.財政部統計處(2003)。「中華民國、台灣地區財政統計月報」,財政部,台北市。
58.高雄市政府主計處(2004)。「高雄市統計月報」,高雄市政府主計處,高雄市。
59.Alexender, B. (1979). The Reduction of Cognitive Conflict:Effect of Various Types of Communication. Journal of Conflict Solution, 23(1), 120-138.
60.Anderson Norman H. (1990). Contributions to Information Integration Theory Volume I: Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc. New Jersey, U.S.A.
61.Ballard, C. L., & Medema, (1993).The Marginal Efficiency of Taxes and Subsides in the Presence of Externalities: A Computational General Equilibrium Approach. The Journal of Public Economics, 52(2), 199-216.
62.BMU (German federal environment ministry)(2003). The Ecological Tax Reform: Introduction Continuation and Further Development to an Ecological Financial Reform.
63. Brehmer, B & Joyce,C.R.B. (1988). Advances in Psychology:Human Judgment -The SJT View. New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, INC.
64.Bovenberg,A.L., & Goulder,L.H.(1996). Optimal Environmental Taxation in The Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrum Analyses. American Economic Review, 86, 985-1000.
65.Bovenberg, A.L., & Mooij,R.A., (1994). Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation. American Economic Review, 84,.1085-1089.
66.Brunswik, E. (1952). The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.Bremer, B. (1988). The Development of Social Judgment Theory. In B. Brehmer and C.R.B. Joyce (Eds), Human Judgment: The SJT View Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier, 13-40.
68.Brehmer, B. (1971). Effects of Communication and Feedback on Cognitive Conflict. The Journal of Psychology, 12, 205-216.
69.Brady, D., Rappoport, L. (1973). Policy Capturing in the Field: The Nuclear Safeguards Problem. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 253-266.
70.Ciriacy Wantrup, S. V. (1947). Capital Returns From Soil-Conservation Practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 29,PP.1181-1196.
71.Cooksey, R. W., Freebody, P., & Davidson, G. (1986). Teacher’s Predictions of Children’s Early Reading Achievement: An Application of Social Judgment Theory. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 41-64.
72.Danish Energy Agency, 2000a(2000). Green Tax for Trade and Industry: Description and Evaluation, Coopenhagen.
73.Dwight R. Lee & Walter S. Misiolek (1985). Substituting Pollution Taxation for General Taxation. The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13,338-347.
74.Daniel Kahenman & Jack L. Knetsch (1992). Contingent Valuation and The Value of Public Goods: Reply. Journal of Emisonmental Economice and Management, 22, 90-94.
75.ECOTEC (2001). Study on the Economic and Environmental Implicalions of the use of Environmental Taxes and Charges in the European Union and its Member States, Final Report, ECOTEC Research and Consulting, Brussels.
76.Eban Goodstein (2003). The Death of the Pigouvian Tax? Policy Implications From the Double-dividend Debate. Land Economics, 79(3.),403-411.
77.Gene M. Owens (1994). Financing Environmentally Sound Development. Asian Development Bank.
78.Goulder, Lawrence.H., (1995) Environmental Taxation and The Double Dividend: A Reader''s Guide. Public Economics and The Environment in an Imperfeet World.
79.Goulder, Lawrence.H., (1999). Environmantal Policy Making in a Second-Best Settling. Discussion Paper, Stanford University, CA.
80.Hammond, k. R., McClelland, G., & Mumpower, J. (1980). Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, Procedures. Praeger Publisers, New York, U.S.
81.Hill, Morris (1986). A Goals-achievement Matrix for Evaluating Alternative Plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners ,34, 19-28.
82.Hoerner, J.A. & Benoit Bosquet (2001). Environmentally Tax Reform: The European Experience. Center for a Sustainable Economy.
83.Hyman Eric L. & Stiftel Bruce (1988). Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment: Theories and Techniques. Westview Press, Inc, U.S.A
84.Hammond, K.R., Todd, F.J., & Wilkins, M.M., (1966). Cognitive Conflict Between Persons: Application of the Lens Model Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 343-360.
85.Hammond, K.R., (1955). Probabilistic Functionalism and the Clinical Method. Psychological Review, 51,150-159.
86.Hammond, K.R., & Summers D. A. (1965). Cognitive Dependence on Linear and Nonlinear Cues. Psychological Review, 72, 215-224.
87.Hammond, K.R., Stewart, T.R., & Adelman, K. (1975). Report to the Denver City Council and Mayor Regarding the Choice of Handgun Amnunition for the Denver Policy Department. Report No.179, Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado, Boulder, Co.
88.Hammond, K.R., Hursch, C.J. & Todd, F.J. (1964). Analyzing the Components of Clinical Inference. Psychological Review, 71, 438-456.
89.Hammond, K.R., and Joyce, C. R., (1955). Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment: Theory and Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
90.Hildreth, W.B. & J.A. Richardsoneds.,(1999). Handbook on Taxation, New York : Marcel Dekker, Inc., Chapter 8 and 9.
91.Holzworth R.J., (1983). Intervention in a Cognitive Conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 216-231.
92.Inglehart, Ronald (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
93.Inglehart, Ronald (1997). Modernization and Postmoderation: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
94.Jackson, B.(2002). The Employment and Productivity Effects of Environmental Taxation: Additional Dividents or Added Distractions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(3), 389-406.
95.Jaeger, W. K. (2001). Double Dividend Reconsidered. Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Newsletter.
96.Joraenson, A. & Welcoxen, B. (1995). Reducing U.S.Carbon Emissions: An Economic General Equilibrium Assessment, CA: Stanford University Press.
97.Jaeger William K. (2002). Carbon Taxation When Climate Affects Productivity. Land Economics, 78(3). 354-365.
98.Kenneth R. Hammond & Barry F. Anderson(1981). Concepts in Judgment and Decision Research, Definitions, Sources, Interrelations, Comments. Prager Publishers, New York. U.S.
99.Ming-Shen, Wang and Jen-Shou, Yang (1992). An Experimental Validation for SAGE’S Value Assessment Procedures. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 267-283.
100.Martin F. Kaplan & Steven Schwartz (1975). Human Judgment and Decision Processes. Academic Press, Inx. New York.
101.Mooij, R. A., (1999). The Double Dividend of an Environmental Tax Reform. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 293-306.
102.Mumpower, J., Veirs, V., & Hammond, K.R. (1979). Scientific Information, Social Values, and Policy Formation: The Application of Simulation Models and Judgment to the Denver Regional Air Pollution Problem. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 464-476.
103.Mumpower, J., (1983). The Judgment Policies of Negotiators and the Structure of Negotiation Problems. Management Science , 37, 1304-1324.
104.OECD, 1997, Environmental Taxes and Green Tax Reform, OECD, Paris.
105.OECD, 2000. Green Tax Mix in OECD Countries: A Preliminary Assessment. Organization for Economic Cooperation and development, Paris.
106.OECD, 2001a. Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries: Issues and Strategies. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and development, Paris.
107.OECD, 2002a. Climate Change and Employment. Report on a Meeting of Management and Trade union Experts Held Under the OECD Labour/Management Programme, Organization for Economic Cooperation and development, Paris.
108.OECD, 2003. OECD Report Sectoral Tax Burdens Falling in Many OECD Countries.
109.OECD, 2003a. Environmental Taxes and Competitiveness: An Overview of Issues, Policy Options, and Research Needs. Organization for Economic Cooperation and development, Paris.
110.Pearce, D. W., (1991). The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. Economic Journal, 101, 38-948.
111.Parry, Ian. & Bento, A. (2000). Tax Deductions, Environmeutal Policy, and The Double Dividend Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,39, 67-96.
112.Parry, Ian. (1995). Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling. Jounal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 64-s77.
113.Pearce, D. W., (2003). Environmental Harmful Subsidies:Barriers to Substainable Development, in Environmental Harmful Subsidies:Policy Issues and Challenges. OECD, Paris.
114.Pigou, A.C., (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London:Macmillan.
115.Ribeiro, S. & Gee, B. (1999). Environmental Taxes Seem to be Effective Instruments For The Environment. The Market and The Environment-The Effectiveness of Market-Based Policy Instruments For Environmental Reform, 81-203.
116.Ray W. Cooksey (1996). Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. University of New England, Australia.
117.Rothsein, K. (1986). The Effects of Time Pressure on Judgment on Multiple Cue Probability Learning, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 37. 83-92.
118.Smith, B. & Krutilla, T. (1980). Explorations in Natural Resource Economics Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
119.Stewart, T. R., (1997). The Importance of the Task in Analyzing Expert Judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 69(3), 205-219.
120.Terkla, D. (1984). The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,11(2), 107-123.
121.Tullock, G. (1967). Excess Benefit.Water Resources Reseach, 3(2), 643-344.
122.Walls, Margaret. & Jean, Hanson (1996). Distribution Impects of an Environmental Tax Shift: The Case of Motor Vehicle Emissions Taxes, Resource For The Future.
123.Wallace, E. Oates (1995). Pollution Charges as a Source of Public Revenues. Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns, Springer-verlag.
124.Welsch, E. (1996). Recyling of Carbon / Energy Taxes and The Labor Market: A General Equilibrium Analysis for The Europeon Community. Environmental and Resources Economics, 8(2), 141-155.
125.William, B. Lord (1982). Contingent Valuation and Social Judgment Analysis As Methods for Estimating Monetary Values of Forest Recreation. University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science, U.S.
126.William, N. Dunn (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction(second edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc. U.S.A.
127.Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiattribute Utility Measurement in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. The Journal of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis, 65, 409-445.