臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：景觀構圖類型之視覺評估研究
書刊名：造園學報
作者：李素馨 引用關係／李繼勉
作者(外文)：Lee, Su-hsin／Lee, Chi-mian
出版日期：2005
卷期：10:2
頁次：頁37-59
主題關鍵詞：景觀構圖類型；瞳位追蹤儀；瞳孔孔徑；視覺軌跡；Landscape composition pattern；Eye tracking system；Pupil aperture；Visual locus
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:37
人們在瀏覽不同構圖類型之景觀圖像時，是否會因構圖類型有所差異而產生不同視覺感受？又何種構圖類型最為人所偏好？本研究應用西畫繪畫原則，歸納出水平構圖、垂直構圖、三角型構圖、斜線構圖、以及鋸齒型構圖五種，並探討受測者觀看五種構圖類型之景觀圖片時其生理、心理反應以及喜好程度。本研究挑選五種構圖類型各4張之景觀圖片共20張，針對40位受測者進行實驗，運用瞳位追蹤儀測量生理反應（視覺軌跡長度、瞳孔孔徑大小），並以問卷方式獲得受測者之心理反應（一致性、易辨識性、複雜性、神秘感）及偏好之評值，結果顯示：（1）受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時，其視覺生理反應之視覺軌跡長度不會因構圖類型不同而有差異，而瞳孔孔徑大小會因構圖類型不同而有差異。（2）受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時，其一致性、易辨識性、複雜性、神秘感評值均會因構圖類型不同而有差異。一致性以水平構圖與三角形構圖較高，易辨識性以斜線構圖與水平構圖較高，複雜性以鋸齒型構圖與三角形構圖較高，神秘感以垂直構圖、鋸齒型構圖與三角形構圖較高。（3）受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時，其偏好評值會因構圖類型不同而有差異，以三角形構圖與水平構圖最受偏好，垂直構圖的評值最低，本研究並依據研究結果提出討論與後續研究建議。
This research was to explore how people react to different composition of landscape images and what kinds of landscape composition patterns were preferred. Applying the principle of western painting to classify the landscape composition patterns, the study generalized five kinds of compositions, including horizontal, vertical, triangular, oblique, and zigzag compositions. This research also probed the relationships between the patterns of landscape composition and physiological, psychological, and preference reaction of subject's examinees viewing the landscape photos. There were 20 landscape photos, which included four photos for each type of composition and were tested on 40 participants. Eye-tracking system was utilized to measure the physiological reactions (pupil aperture size, and visual locus length) of the subjects, and a questionnaire was used to survey subject's, psychological reactions (coherence, legibility, complexity, and mystery) and preference value. The study obtained three major findings. (1) For physiological reaction, there were on significante difference in the length of visual locus, but there were significant differences in pupil aperture. (2) The subjects had different psychological reactions when viewing different composition of Ahotos. Horizontal and traingular composition patterns had higher scores in coherence, oblique and horizontal composition patterns had higher scores in legibility, zigzag and triangular composition patterns had higher scores in complexity, while vertical, oblique and zigzag composition patterns had higher scores in mystery. (3) The subjects showed significant preference scores when looking at the photos with different kinds of composition pattern. Triangular and horizontal composition patterns were more preferred than the other patterns in this research. Vertical composition pattern had the least preference value. Discussion and suggestion for further research were also included.
期刊論文
1.林宸生(1998)。光學式瞳位追蹤器簡介。電子月刊。  延伸查詢new window
2.堀透、藤井英ニ郎、安蒜俊比古、淺野二郎(1982)。Fundamental Studies on the Planting Design--An analysis of visual perception of solely planted trees。造園雜誌，46(1)，13-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.堀透、藤井英二郎、安蒜俊比古、淺野二郎(1984)。A Deciding Factor of Eye Fixation Pattern Inspecting a Solitary Tree of Cedrus deodala Loud。造園雜誌，47(5)，251-256。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bernaldez, F. G.、Ruiz, J. P.、Benayas, J.、Abello, R. P.(1988)。Real landscapes versus photographed landscapes: Preference dimensions。Landscape Research，13(1)，10-11。  new window
5.De Lucio, J. V.、Mohamadian, M.、Ruiz, J. P.、Banayas, J.、Bernaldez, F. G.(1996)。Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking。Landscape and Urban Planning，34，135-142。  new window
6.Herzog, T. R.(1987)。A cognitive analysis of preference for natural environments: mountains, canyons, deserts。Landscape Journal，6(2)，140-152。  new window
7.Shafer, E. L.、Hamilton, J. F.、Schmidt, E. A.(1969)。Natural landscape preference: A predictive model。Journal of Leisure Research，1，1-19。  new window
8.Ulrich, R.(1986)。Human response to vegetation and landscapes。Landscape and Urban Planning，13，29-44。  new window
9.Yang, B. E.、Brown, T. J.(1992)。A cross-cultural comparison of preference for landscape styles and landscape elements。Environment and Behavior，24，471-507。  new window
10.張俊彥(20000800)。造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究。造園學報，7(1)，45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李素馨、何英齊(20000700)。應用瞳位追蹤方法建立景觀偏好模式之研究。造園學報，6(1/2)，71-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Herbert, W. S.、Brian, O.(1994)。Viewer preference for spatial arrangement of park trees。Environmental Management，18(1)，119-128。  new window
13.Smardon, R. C.(1988)。Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation。Landscape and Urban Planning，15(1/2)，85-106。  new window
14.李素馨(19950600)。環境知覺和環境美質評估。規劃與設計學報，1(4)，53-74。  延伸查詢new window
15.張俊彥、彭家麟(20000300)。不同景觀型態刺激生、心理反應差異之研究--一個案例研究。中國園藝，46(1)，93-102。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李繼勉、李素馨(2001)。景観構圖視覺軌跡與景觀偏好關係之研究。第五屆國土規劃論壇學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Iwamoto, K.、Tanie, K.(1996)。Binocular head mounted display with eye movement tracking function : Development of the prototype and its application。IEEE/RSJ。  new window
學位論文
1.郭中仁(1997)。以CD影像作視向偵測(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹永舟(1999)。瞳位追蹤應用於眼控系統及眼球動態量測儀器之製作與分析(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡金源(1997)。以眼球控制之殘障者人機介面系統：紅外線視動滑鼠(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉文義(1996)。以眼球電訊號控制之殘障者人機介面設計(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳景容(1987)。構圖與繪畫分析。台北：武陵出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁小鴻(1973)。繪畫構圖概論。台南：友寧出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁國元(1986)。構圖的技法。台北：唐代文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃夢生(1982)。繪畫構圖。台北：藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾培堯(1980)。構圖研究。台北：藝術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.新形象編輯部(1992)。繪畫表現技法。台北：新形象出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1982)。Cognition and Environment : Function in an Uncertain World。New York：Praeger。  new window
8.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1989)。The Experience of Nature。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Schiffman, H. R.(1982)。Sensation and Perception。New York：Wiley。  new window
10.Zimbardo, Philip G.、游恆山(1999)。心理學導論。台北：五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.袁金塔(19870000)。中西繪畫構圖之比較。臺北：藝風堂。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.鄭信雄，李月卿，蔡政楒(1985)。對學障兒童實施感覺運動訓練前後閱讀動眼生理檢查的評估。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林宸生(1998)。瞳位追蹤器設備簡介及其臨床應用初探。運動神經元疾病病友協會會刊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Daniel, T. C.、Vinning, J.(1984)。Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality。Human Behavior and Environment。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：260（臺灣：260，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2344557 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68141265
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上