:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:測謊對於性侵害受刑犯否認態度之應用
書刊名:臺灣精神醫學
作者:蔡景宏龍佛衛曾冬勝
作者(外文):Tsai, Ching-hongLung, For-weyTzeng, Dong-sheng
出版日期:2006
卷期:20:4
頁次:頁264-271
主題關鍵詞:否認態度測謊技術性侵害犯Polygraph techniqueDenial attitudeSex offenders
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:55
目的:本研究之目的即針對南部某監獄性侵害犯,運用測謊技術,探討「否認」現象,以了解此一技術在國內的使用狀況。方法:選取40名南部某一監獄中之性侵害罪犯,實施測謊技術,特別鎖定罪犯過去性侵害史在揭露測驗 (complete disclosure testing) 方面之圖譜分析,以了解其性侵害史之否認現象。結果:40名性侵害罪犯個案中,在過去性侵害史測試上,有13位呈現DI (deception indicated) 反應,代表有高度否認現象;11 位呈現inconclusive 反應,代表可能有否認現象;16 位呈現NDI (no deception indicated),代表較無否認現象。刑期長短在說謊與非說謊組有統計意義(t =-3.328, p = 0.002),而年齡、教育程度、婚姻、宗教及過去性與暴力因素則無統計相關。結論:監獄中接受強制診療之性侵害犯可能有60%採取不同程度之否認態度;另外分析也發現否認現象與個案刑期長短有明顯相關,即刑期愈長其否認現象程度愈高。
Objective: Most convicted sex offenders deny or minimize their crimes. Post-conviction polygraph technique examinations are increasingly used as a tool to assist in managing denial attitude in sex offenders more safely and effectively. There has been little study of the problem of denial attitude among offenders in Taiwan. This study used the complete disclosure examination to investigate the denial attitude of incarcerated male sexual offenders. Method: Forty incarcerated male sex offenders were included in this study. All of the subjects gave informed consent to undergo polygraph examination. Data obtained by complete disclosure examination were analyzed to estimate the probability of deception regarding sexual history. All data were recorded with a Lafayette 4000 Computerized Polygraph System by a certificated polygraph examiner. The charts were analysed by POLYSCORE scoring system and by an experienced examiner. Result: Chart analysis led to the classification of deception in 13 subjects, inconclusive results in 11 subjects and no deception in 16 subjects. A significant difference in the duration sentence was found between (deception indicated+inconclusive) and no deception indicated groups. No significant difference was found in age, level of education, marital status and prior sexual offense or violence record among these three groups of subjects. Conclusion: This study found that 60% of incarcerated sex offenders maintained a denial attitude during an interview with their psychiatric treatment provider. This finding suggests the importance of monitoring of the denial problem of sexual offenders by treatment professionals.
期刊論文
1.Laflen, B.、Sturm, W. R.(1994)。Understanding and working with denial in sexual offenders。Journal of Child Sexual Abuse,3(4),19-36。  new window
2.Special Issue: Post-conviction Sex Offender Testing。Polygraph。  new window
3.Abram, S.、Simmon, G.(2000)。Post-conviction polygraph testing: then and now。Polygraph,29,63-67。  new window
4.Abram, S.(1986)。Polygraph surveillance of probation。Polygraph,13,174-182。  new window
5.Ahlmeyer, S.、Heil, P.、McKee, B.、English, K.(2000)。The Impact of Polygraphy on Admissions of Victims and Offenses in Adult Sexual Offenders。Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,12(2),123-138。  new window
6.Alexander, M. A.(1999)。Sexual Offender Treatment Efficacy Revisited。Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,11(2),101-116。  new window
7.Fox, D.(1992)。Polygraph techniques for sex offenders on probation。Polygraph,21,44-50。  new window
8.Abel, G.(1988)。Multiple Paraphilic Diagnoses Among Sex Offenders。Bull Am Acad of Psychiatry and the Law,16,153-168。  new window
9.Quinsey, V.(1993)。Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders。J Interper Violence,8,512-523。  new window
10.Prentky, R. A.、Lee, A. F. S.、Knight, R. A.、Cerce, D.(1997)。Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: a methodological analysis。Law Hum Behav,21,635-659。  new window
11.Hall, G. C. N.(1995)。Sex Offender Recidivism Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Treatment Studies。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63(5),802-809。  new window
12.Sefarbi, R.(1990)。Admitters and deniers among adolescent sex offenders and their families: a preliminary study。Am J Orthopsychiatry,60,460-465。  new window
13.Marshall, W. L.、Barbaree, H. E.(1988)。The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters。Behaviour research and therapy,26(6),499-511。  new window
14.Heilbrun, K.(1992)。The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment。Law and Human Behavior,16,257-272。  new window
15.Seto, M. C.、Barbaree, H. E.(1999)。Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(12),1235-1248。  new window
16.Fox, D.(1992)。Polygraph techniques for sex offenders on probation。Polygraph,21,44-50。  new window
17.翁景惠、高一書(20030500)。測謊在我國法院使用之實證研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,32(3),149-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Barbaree, H. E.(1991)。Denial and minimization among sex offenders: Assessment and treatment outcome。Forum on Corrections Research,3(4),30-33。  new window
19.Happel, R. M.、Auffrey, J. J.(1995)。Sex offender assessment: Interrupting the dance of denial。American Journal of Forensic Psychology,13(2),5-22。  new window
學位論文
1.羅時強(2002)。測謊「區域比對法」之本土化研究初探(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Salter, A.。Treating child sex offenders and victims。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Abrams, S.(1993)。Polygraph Testing of the Pedophile。Ryan Gwinner Press。  new window
3.Walsh, E. R.、Cohen, F.(2000)。Sex offender registration and community notification: a "Megan's law" sourcebook。Kingston, NJ:Civic Research Institute。  new window
4.(200001)。Community Supervision of the Sex Offender: An Overview of Current and Promising Practices。MD:Silver Spring。  new window
5.Abrams, S.(1989)。The complete polygraph handbook。Lexington, MA:Lexington Books。  new window
6.English, K.、Pullen, S.、Jones, L.(1996)。Managing adult sex offenders on probation and parole: A containment approach。American Probation and Parole Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE