資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.136.161.64)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
測謊對於性侵害受刑犯否認態度之應用
書刊名:
臺灣精神醫學
作者:
蔡景宏
/
龍佛衛
/
曾冬勝
作者(外文):
Tsai, Ching-hong
/
Lung, For-wey
/
Tzeng, Dong-sheng
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
20:4
頁次:
頁264-271
主題關鍵詞:
否認態度
;
測謊技術
;
性侵害犯
;
Polygraph technique
;
Denial attitude
;
Sex offenders
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
8
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
8
共同引用:
6
點閱:55
目的:本研究之目的即針對南部某監獄性侵害犯,運用測謊技術,探討「否認」現象,以了解此一技術在國內的使用狀況。方法:選取40名南部某一監獄中之性侵害罪犯,實施測謊技術,特別鎖定罪犯過去性侵害史在揭露測驗 (complete disclosure testing) 方面之圖譜分析,以了解其性侵害史之否認現象。結果:40名性侵害罪犯個案中,在過去性侵害史測試上,有13位呈現DI (deception indicated) 反應,代表有高度否認現象;11 位呈現inconclusive 反應,代表可能有否認現象;16 位呈現NDI (no deception indicated),代表較無否認現象。刑期長短在說謊與非說謊組有統計意義(t =-3.328, p = 0.002),而年齡、教育程度、婚姻、宗教及過去性與暴力因素則無統計相關。結論:監獄中接受強制診療之性侵害犯可能有60%採取不同程度之否認態度;另外分析也發現否認現象與個案刑期長短有明顯相關,即刑期愈長其否認現象程度愈高。
以文找文
Objective: Most convicted sex offenders deny or minimize their crimes. Post-conviction polygraph technique examinations are increasingly used as a tool to assist in managing denial attitude in sex offenders more safely and effectively. There has been little study of the problem of denial attitude among offenders in Taiwan. This study used the complete disclosure examination to investigate the denial attitude of incarcerated male sexual offenders. Method: Forty incarcerated male sex offenders were included in this study. All of the subjects gave informed consent to undergo polygraph examination. Data obtained by complete disclosure examination were analyzed to estimate the probability of deception regarding sexual history. All data were recorded with a Lafayette 4000 Computerized Polygraph System by a certificated polygraph examiner. The charts were analysed by POLYSCORE scoring system and by an experienced examiner. Result: Chart analysis led to the classification of deception in 13 subjects, inconclusive results in 11 subjects and no deception in 16 subjects. A significant difference in the duration sentence was found between (deception indicated+inconclusive) and no deception indicated groups. No significant difference was found in age, level of education, marital status and prior sexual offense or violence record among these three groups of subjects. Conclusion: This study found that 60% of incarcerated sex offenders maintained a denial attitude during an interview with their psychiatric treatment provider. This finding suggests the importance of monitoring of the denial problem of sexual offenders by treatment professionals.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Laflen, B.、Sturm, W. R.(1994)。Understanding and working with denial in sexual offenders。Journal of Child Sexual Abuse,3(4),19-36。
2.
Special Issue: Post-conviction Sex Offender Testing。Polygraph。
3.
Abram, S.、Simmon, G.(2000)。Post-conviction polygraph testing: then and now。Polygraph,29,63-67。
4.
Abram, S.(1986)。Polygraph surveillance of probation。Polygraph,13,174-182。
5.
Ahlmeyer, S.、Heil, P.、McKee, B.、English, K.(2000)。The Impact of Polygraphy on Admissions of Victims and Offenses in Adult Sexual Offenders。Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,12(2),123-138。
6.
Alexander, M. A.(1999)。Sexual Offender Treatment Efficacy Revisited。Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,11(2),101-116。
7.
Fox, D.(1992)。Polygraph techniques for sex offenders on probation。Polygraph,21,44-50。
8.
Abel, G.(1988)。Multiple Paraphilic Diagnoses Among Sex Offenders。Bull Am Acad of Psychiatry and the Law,16,153-168。
9.
Quinsey, V.(1993)。Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders。J Interper Violence,8,512-523。
10.
Prentky, R. A.、Lee, A. F. S.、Knight, R. A.、Cerce, D.(1997)。Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: a methodological analysis。Law Hum Behav,21,635-659。
11.
Hall, G. C. N.(1995)。Sex Offender Recidivism Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Treatment Studies。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63(5),802-809。
12.
Sefarbi, R.(1990)。Admitters and deniers among adolescent sex offenders and their families: a preliminary study。Am J Orthopsychiatry,60,460-465。
13.
Marshall, W. L.、Barbaree, H. E.(1988)。The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters。Behaviour research and therapy,26(6),499-511。
14.
Heilbrun, K.(1992)。The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment。Law and Human Behavior,16,257-272。
15.
Seto, M. C.、Barbaree, H. E.(1999)。Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(12),1235-1248。
16.
Fox, D.(1992)。Polygraph techniques for sex offenders on probation。Polygraph,21,44-50。
17.
翁景惠、高一書(20030500)。測謊在我國法院使用之實證研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,32(3),149-207。
延伸查詢
18.
Barbaree, H. E.(1991)。Denial and minimization among sex offenders: Assessment and treatment outcome。Forum on Corrections Research,3(4),30-33。
19.
Happel, R. M.、Auffrey, J. J.(1995)。Sex offender assessment: Interrupting the dance of denial。American Journal of Forensic Psychology,13(2),5-22。
學位論文
1.
羅時強(2002)。測謊「區域比對法」之本土化研究初探(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Salter, A.。Treating child sex offenders and victims。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。
2.
Abrams, S.(1993)。Polygraph Testing of the Pedophile。Ryan Gwinner Press。
3.
Walsh, E. R.、Cohen, F.(2000)。Sex offender registration and community notification: a "Megan's law" sourcebook。Kingston, NJ:Civic Research Institute。
4.
(200001)。Community Supervision of the Sex Offender: An Overview of Current and Promising Practices。MD:Silver Spring。
5.
Abrams, S.(1989)。The complete polygraph handbook。Lexington, MA:Lexington Books。
6.
English, K.、Pullen, S.、Jones, L.(1996)。Managing adult sex offenders on probation and parole: A containment approach。American Probation and Parole Association。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
求職者就業隱私權法制探討
2.
臺灣性侵害加害人抑制取向之現況:聚焦觀護人運作預防性測謊的協同合作經驗
3.
觀護人運作預防性測謊所覺知的關係困境及其因應策略
4.
違反女性意願性交及性侵害兒童量表的建立初探
5.
少年性侵害加害人之作案手法及犯罪歷程研究
6.
性侵害犯罪防治與人權議題之探討--兼論社區處遇之作法
7.
觀護人對測謊在性侵害加害人觀護效能之知覺研究
8.
不同類型性罪犯之作案手法及犯罪歷程研究
9.
性侵害與性騷擾加害人的司法心理治療
10.
測謊鑑定於性侵害案證據採用之研究
11.
測謊鑑定--日本最高裁判所昭和四十三年二月八日第一小法庭判決(刑集第二二卷二號五五頁、判例時報第五○九號十九頁)
12.
修正緊張高點法在測謊上之應用
13.
測謊於臺灣南部地區法院運用之研究
14.
測謊在我國法院使用之實證研究
1.
性侵害犯罪人社會復歸影響因子與歷程之研究
2.
不同類型性罪犯之發展歷程及作案手法研究
3.
犯罪偵查程序中隱私權保障之研究-以警察機關為中心
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code