臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：違反女性意願性交及性侵害兒童量表的建立初探
書刊名：亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者：黃軍義 引用關係／簡誼萍
作者(外文)：Huang, Jiun-yih／Chien, I-ping
出版日期：2012
卷期：8:2
頁次：頁55-90
主題關鍵詞：自陳式問卷調查；社會讚許反應；性侵害兒童量表；違反女性意願性交量表；Children's Sexual Abuse Scale；Self-reported questionnaire；Social desirability；Women's Sexual Assault Scale
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:52
本研究旨在發展一份適用於臺灣地區的性侵害行為量表，內容包含「違反女性意願性交量表」（含脅迫性交及強制性交兩個分量表）以及「性侵害兒童量表」（含猥褻兒童及與兒童性交兩個分量表）兩部分。針對男性成年犯、少年犯、以及一般男性學生進行無記名自陳式問卷調查，得到有效問卷數680份。以內部一致性係數考驗量表的一致性信度、以相隔一周的前後測考驗量表的再測信度、以因素分析檢定量表的因素效度、以強暴迷思接受性考驗違反女性意願性交量表的構念效度、以性侵害兒童迷思接受性考驗性侵害兒童量表的構念效度、以監獄成人犯在量表上的自陳情形與法院判決記錄進行比對而考驗量表的效標關聯效度。研究結果顯示，本研究發展的「違反女性意願性交量表」及「性侵害兒童量表」，具有可接受的內部一致性係數、隔周再測信度、性侵害行為官方統計的高犯罪黑數、違反女性意願性交及性侵害兒童量表的應用、及本研究的限制與未來研究方向進行討論。
This study developed sexual aggression scales suitable for research and practical use in Taiwan. We developed the Women's Sexual Assault Scale (containing the ”sexual coercion” and ”rape” subscales) and the Children's Sexual Abuse Scale (containing the ”child obscenities” and ”sexual intercourse with children” subscales). Participants included male inmates from a northern Taiwan prison, male juvenile delinquents from a northern Taiwan reform institute, and students from senior high schools and universities in Taiwan. An anonymous self-reported questionnaire was adopted to collect data. The internal consistent reliability of the scales was examined using Cronbach's alpha, the one-week test-retest reliability was examined at the pretest and post-test, and the factorial validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis. The construct validity of the Women's Sexual Assault Scale was examined using rape myth acceptance, the construct validity of the Children Sexual Abuse Scale was examined using child molestation myth acceptance, and the criterion-related validity was verified by comparing the self-reports of prison inmates on the scales and their court record. The results showed that both the Women's Sexual Assault Scale and the Children's Sexual Abuse Scale have acceptable internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability, factorial validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity. Finally, the reliability of the self-report on highly sensitive questions, the dark figure regarding official sexual offense statistics, comparisons between methods to identify sexual aggressors using the self-reporting scale and the court verdict, the common method variance problem, applications of the Women's Sexual Assault Scale and the Children's Sexual Abuse Scale, limitations, and future study directions were addressed.
期刊論文
1.Chapleau, K. M.、Oswald, D. L.(2010)。Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity。Journal of Sex Research，47(1)，66-78。  new window
2.Cohen, M. L.、Garofalo, R. F.、Boucher, R.、Seghorn, T.(1971)。The psychology of rapists。Seminars in Psychiatry，3(3)，307-327。  new window
3.Franiuk, R.、Seefelt, J. L.、Cepress, S. L.、Vandello, J. A.(2008)。Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism。Violence Against Women，14(3)，287-309。  new window
4.Hammond, E. M.、Berry, M. A.、Rodriguez, D. N.(2011)。The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario。Legal & Criminological Psychology，16(2)，242-252。  new window
5.Jolliffe, D.、Farrington, D. P.、Hawkins, J. D.、Catalano, R. F.、Hill, K. G.、Kosterrman, R.(2003)。Predictive, concurrent, prospective and retrospective validity of self-reported delinquency。Criminal Behavior and Mental Health，13(3)，179-197。  new window
6.Koss, M. P.、Gidycz, C. A.(1985)。Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，53(3)，422-423。  new window
7.Seto, M. C.、Lalumière, M. L.(2010)。What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis。Psychological Bulletin，136(4)，526-575。  new window
8.陳若璋、劉志如、王家駿(20020500)。性暴力連續犯危險因子分析研究。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，1=13，1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.湯元皓、蔡佩潔、陳明俊、王家駿(20070300)。接受強制診療之性侵害加害人否認型態。臺灣精神醫學，21(1)，17-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳慧菁、唐宜楨(20071100)。性侵害加害人家庭結構探討。社區發展季刊，118，211-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Baugher, S. N.、Elhai, J. D.、Monroe, J. R.、Gray, M. J.(2010)。Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，25(11)，2036-2053。  new window
12.Foubert, J. D.、Brosi, M. W.、Bannon, R. S.(2011)。Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault。Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity，18，212-231。  new window
13.Franiuk, R.、Shain, E. A.(2011)。Beyond Christianity: The status of women and rape myths。Sex Roles，65(11/12)，783-791。  new window
14.Koss, M. P.、Oros, C. J.(1982)。Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，50，455-457。  new window
15.Koss, M. P.、Gidycz, C. A.、Wisniewski, N.(1987)。The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among a national sample of college women。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，55(2)，162-170。  new window
16.張碧娥、鍾志宏、黃永順(20091200)。從犯罪多元性比較性罪犯再犯風險及心理社會因子。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，5(2)，223-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Basow, S. A.、Minieri, A.(2011)。"You owe me": Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，26(3)，479-497。  new window
18.Bohner, G.、Pina, A.、Viki, G. Tendayi、Siebler, F.(2010)。Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups。Psychology, Crime & Law，16(8)，671-693。  new window
19.Bohner, G.、Siebler, F.、Schmelcher, J.(2006)。Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity。Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity，32，286-297。  new window
20.Briere, J.(1989)。University males, sexual interest in children: Predicting potential indices of "pedophilia" in a nonforensic sample。Child Abuse and neglect，13，65-75。  new window
21.Canter, D. V.、Bennell, C.、Alison, L. J.、Reddy, S.(2003)。Differentiating sex offences: A behaviorally based thematic classification of stranger rapes。Behavioral Sciences and the Law，21，157-174。  new window
22.Chapleau, Kristine M.、Oswald, Debra L.、Russell, Beenda L.(2008)。Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，23(5)，600-615。  new window
23.Haywood, H.、Swank, E.(2008)。Rape Myths Among Appalachian College Students。Violence and Victims，23(3)，373-389。  new window
24.Langevin, R.(1991)。A note on the problem of response set in measuring cognitive distort。Annals of Sex Resear，4，288-292。  new window
25.Lee, J.、Kim, J.、Lim, H.(2010)。Rape myth acceptance among Korean college students: The roles of gender, attitudes toward women, and sexual double standard。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，25(7)，1200-1223。  new window
26.Mann, R.、Webster, S.、Wakeling, H.、Marshall, W.(2007)。The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs。Psychology, Crime & Law，13(5)，443-458。  new window
27.Quinsey, V. L.、Chaplin, T. C.、Upfold, D.(1984)。Sexual Arousal to Nonsexual Violence and Sadomasochistic Themes Among Rapists and Non-Sex-Offenders。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，52(4)，651-657。  new window
28.蔡景宏、龍佛衛、曾冬勝(20061200)。測謊對於性侵害受刑犯否認態度之應用。臺灣精神醫學，20(4)，264-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Malamuth, N. M.(1981)。Rape Proclivity among Males。Journal of Social Issues，37(4)，138-157。  new window
30.Burt, Martha R.(1980)。Cultural myths and supports for rape。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，38(2)，217-230。  new window
31.Malamuth, N. M.、Linz, D.、Heavey, C. L.、Barnes, G.、Acker, M.(1995)。Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，69(2)，353-369。  new window
32.鍾昭瑛、許文耀(20081200)。性犯罪者「自負特質」與攻擊行為及自我控制的關係。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，4(2)，31-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.黃軍義、林邦傑(20080600)。母親因素對強暴行為可能性之影響路徑的探討。中華心理衛生學刊，21(2)，169-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.蔡宗晃、林瑞欽、朱秀琴、黃介良、黃瑞芬(20080300)。性侵害犯與暴力犯之自尊、焦慮、憂鬱及敵意的研究。臺灣精神醫學，22(1)，26-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.鍾明勳、陳若璋、陳筱萍、沈勝昂、林正修、唐心北、吳嘉瑜、黃健、黃介良、施志鴻、張盛堂、林佩芸(20041200)。團體心理治療對本土性侵害加害人之影響。中華團體心理治療，10(4)，1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Lonsway, K. A.、Fitzgerald, L. F.(1994)。Rape myths: In review。Psychology of Women Quarterly，18(2)，133-164。  new window
37.Payne, D. L.、Lonsway, K. A.、Fitzgerald, L. F.(1999)。Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale。Journal of Research in Personality，33(1)，27-68。  new window
38.Ward, T.、Keenan, T.(1999)。Child molesters' implicit theories。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，14，821-838。  new window
39.沈勝昂、林明傑(20071200)。變與不變：性侵害再犯「穩定動態危險因子」與「急性動態危險因子」的關係。犯罪學期刊，10(2)，1-11+13-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.黃健(20090900)。性與暴力犯罪者之敵意與性錯覺關連反應。中華心理衛生學刊，22(3)，241-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.陳若璋、施志鴻、林正修(20030600)。性加害者犯案動機、歷程及路徑分析。中華心理衛生學刊，16(2)，47-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.王郁文、修慧蘭(20080300)。性侵害加害人否認行為之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，23，177-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.陳若璋、劉志如、林烘煜(20070900)。比較強暴犯與兒童性侵害犯接受團體治療之療效評估。中華輔導學報，22，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Hall, G. C.、Shondrick, D. D.、Hirschman, R.(1993)。The role of sexual arousal in sexually aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，61，1091-1095。  new window
45.Quinsey, V.、Chaplin, T.(1984)。Stimulus control of rapists' and non-sex offenders' sexual arousal。Behavior Assessment，6，169-176。  new window
46.Finkelhor, D.(1994)。The International Epidemiology of Child Sexual Abuse。Child Abuse & Neglect，18(5)，409-417。  new window
研究報告
1.黃富源、黃徵男、周文勇、廖有祿、許福生、黃翠紋、黃家珍(1999)。性侵害加害人之特質與犯罪手法之研究。內政部性侵害防治委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯永河(1999)。「性侵害加害人心理狀態評估工具編製」研究計畫報告。臺北：國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林淑梨(2001)。併有與未併有反社會人格障礙之強暴犯在強暴相關認知差異之探討(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁耕原(2008)。性侵害加害人的羞恥感、罪惡感、自我專注與同理心之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學，新北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.卿盛瑛(2005)。性侵害加害者人格特質、家庭經驗、酒精使用、強暴迷思與性侵害之關係(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.白宜庭(2010)。不同類型性侵害犯罪與問題行為影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李連冀(2007)。性罪犯心理評估量表之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡政融(2009)。以成人依附觀點探討性侵害加害者親密缺損、自負特質及攻擊性之關連(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.鍾昭瑛(2006)。性犯罪者的「自負特質」與再犯因子的關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.魏弘軒(2008)。以男童為性侵害對象之加害人性侵害動機與犯罪路徑之探索性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.顏佳珍(2010)。性侵害加害人特質及犯罪歷程之研究--以被害人為智能障礙者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.廖怡玲(2006)。性罪犯認知扭曲--內隱理論的引用(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳敏欣(2000)。少年強姦犯兩性經驗與性價值觀之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.曾姿雅(2003)。不同類型性罪犯在動態、靜態及病態人格特質差異研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.董子毅(2005)。台灣性侵害加害人再犯調查與靜態因素九九評估量表適用性之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.李維娜(2001)。性侵害犯罪加害人之認知扭曲研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳彥林(2010)。性侵害犯罪者壓力與因應狀況之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
16.廖玲燕(2000)。台灣本土社會讚許量表之編製及其心理歷程分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.林冠宇(2000)。性侵害加害人的性格特徵研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
18.段成富(2000)。強姦犯罪加害人人際關係與職業功能之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
19.孫鳳卿(2001)。性侵害加害人之犯罪型態與危險性探討(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳毓琪(2009)。女性性侵害犯罪人的生命歷程與類型(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Clark, L. M. G.、Lewis, D. J.(1977)。Rape: the Price of Coercive Sexuality。Toronto：Canadian Women's Educational Press。  new window
2.許春金、馬傳鎮(1992)。強制女性性交犯罪型態與加害者人格特性之研究。台北市：台北市政府研考會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃軍義(1995)。強姦犯罪之訪談研究--相關成因概念模型之建立。臺北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳若璋(1993)。大學生性騷擾、性侵害經驗特性之研究。臺北：教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃軍義、陳若璋(1997)。強姦犯罪之成因及相關問題之研究。台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Brownmiller, Susan(1975)。Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape。Penguin。  new window
7.Groth, A. N.、Birnbaum, H. J.(1979)。Men who rape: The psychology of the offender。Plenum Press。  new window
8.侯崇文、周愫嫻(2000)。性侵害案件偵查心理描繪技術。台北市：內政部性侵害犯罪防治委員會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.法務部(2013)。檢察統計，http://www.moj.gov.tw/site/moj/public/MMO/moj/stat/gender/g2.pdf。  new window
2.內政部(2013)。內政統計年報，http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm， 2013/01/05。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pollard, P.(1994)。Sexual violence against women: Characteristics of typical perpetrators。Male violence。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Farrington, David P.(1983)。Offending from 10 to 25 years of age。Crime and justice: An annual review of research。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.黃軍義(2011)。大專學生對強暴迷思的接受程度。強暴迷思、自我觀、與強暴行為。台北市：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Finkelhor, D.、Lewis, I. A.(1988)。An epidemiologic approach to the study of child molestation。Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives。New York：New York Academy of Sciences。  new window
5.Paulhus, Delroy L.(1991)。Measurement and Control of Response Bias。Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes。San Diego, CA：Academic Press。  new window
6.Knight, R. A.、Prentky, R. A.(1990)。Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models。Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories, and Treatment of the Offender。Plenum。  new window
7.Earls, C.(1988)。Aberrant sexual arousal in sexual offenders。Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives。New York, NY：New York Academy of Sciences。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：632（臺灣：625，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67173888
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上