:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:矯正機關收容少年使用黑話之社會語言學分析
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:涂淑瑩
作者(外文):Tu, Su-ying
出版日期:2007
卷期:8
頁次:頁93-131
主題關鍵詞:少年矯正機關黑話監獄次文化社會語言學Juvenile correction facilitiesSlangPrison subcultureSociolinguistics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:69
本研究以質性研究的方式,訪談國內2所輔育院,2所矯正學校,合計共19組的收容少年,將所蒐集到的黑話語料,運用社會語言學的理論,分別從一、語言變異;二、社會情境;三、社會功能等面向予以歸納分析。 研究結果發現,收容少年使用黑話並不單純只是為了避開管教人員的監聽或處罰,這除了與先前個人的經驗、接觸的次文化有關之外,矯正機關嚴密監控的環境,特殊的人際關係,以及生活型態的改變,都會促使收容少年使用與創造黑話。 性別、班級、禁忌語、生活型態的轉變、不同的少年矯正機關及其管理措施,是使收容少年的黑話產生變異的社會因素。語、義分離,跳脫正規語法的構詞方式,將黑話隱晦的特色展現出來。維持秘密傳遞訊息,仍然是使用黑話的最大功能,只是維持秘密的目的,男女生有所不同。這些以語詞形態為主的黑話,大多與人際關係有關,我們可從黑話中瞭解收容少年的次文化特性,更可拼出收容少年的社會關係圖,瞭解在一個封閉環境裡人際互動的情形。
Using a qualitative research methodology, 19 selected juveniles in groups from 2 juvenile reformatory schools and 2 juvenile rehabilitation facilities were interviewed. By applying a sociolinguistic approach, this study analyzes commonly used argot or 'slang' in juvenile correctional facilities. The study then examined the sociolinguistic meanings of the dialogue by identifying their (1) linguistic deviations, (2) social contexts and (3) social functions. The research found that the use of slang by juveniles was not only to avoid monitoring by or punishment from correctional officers. The reason juveniles create and use slang is because of previous personal experiences, prison subcultures, the strict monitoring environment of correctional institutions, special interpersonal relationships and changes of life style. Some social factors can result in changes to the formation of slang, such as gender, class, taboos, changes of life style, different correctional institution, and management measures. The characteristic of slang is its semantic separation and non-standard grammatical wordbuilding. The main function of slang is to transmit messages secretly. There are gender differences in the 'purpose of keeping a secret'. Slang is based on word expressions and is related to interpersonal relationships. The study of slang in youth institutions can give an insight into certain characteristics of the 'inner life' the juveniles. Furthermore, we can piece t6ogether social relationships and understand juveniles' interpersonal interaction in a closed environment.
期刊論文
1.楊士隆(19890600)。美國監獄社會學研究之探討。警政學報,15,139-155。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林琪芳(2002)。監獄受刑人副文化之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃徵男(2005)。21世紀監獄學:理論、實務與對策。台北:一品出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳原(2001)。在語詞的密林裡:應用社會語言學。台灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳原(2001)。語言與社會生活:社會語言學。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周愫嫻(1997)。變遷中的犯罪問題與社會控制--台灣經驗。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王家鳳(2003)。青少年的語言天地。  延伸查詢new window
2.曲彥斌(1991)。中國民間隱語行話。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈錫倫(2003)。語言文字的避諱、禁忌與委婉表現。  延伸查詢new window
4.林金珠(2002)。雲林縣國中校園流行新詞之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.林茂榮、楊士隆(2003)。監獄學 : 犯罪矯正原理與實務。  延伸查詢new window
6.林美麗(1998)。社會語言學資源利用專題。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃蓉詩(2003)。應用系統功能語言學中的社交功能、語境及文步分析改善實用文的教與學。  延伸查詢new window
8.洪惟仁(2006)。第四章社會語言學。  延伸查詢new window
9.高強華(1997)。瞭解青少年次文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.許春金(2000)。犯罪學。  延伸查詢new window
11.張德聰(1997)。從青少年次級文化談校園危機處理。  延伸查詢new window
12.許斐絢(1998)。解讀當下青少年流行語。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃徵男(2001)。監獄共和國:你所不知道的另類社會。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃徵男、林金藏(2000)。矯正實務。  延伸查詢new window
15.鄭博文(2003)。權力場域的三個空間向度之建構:嘉義市、嘉義舊監及身體的研究。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝國平(2005)。語言學概論。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊祖珺譯,歐蘇利文(Tim O'Sullivan)等著(1997)。傳播及文化研究主要概念。  延伸查詢new window
18.Beier, A.L.(2005)。Identity, language, and resistance in the making of the Victorian。  new window
19.Bruce, D. J. and B. Flutura , J. S. Stephen and D. Eloise(2006)。Marijuana argot as subculture threads; social constructions by users in New York city。  new window
20.Carol, L R. and E. M. Thomas(2004)。The life and death of Carnie。  new window
21.Gillespie, W.(2003)。Prisonization: Individual and Institutional Factors Affecting Inmate Conduct。  new window
22.Judith, T. I.(2001)。“Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation。  new window
23.Lawrence, W.(2006)。In praise of the blue-sky thinkers。  new window
24.Marek, M. K.(2003)。Games prisoners play: Allocation of social roles in a total institution。  new window
25.Niyi , A.(2004)。Prison argot and penal discipline。  new window
26.Paul, L.(1967)。Argot, symbolic deviance and subcultural delinquency。  new window
27.Susan, S.(1994)。Shouts on the Street: Bakhtin’s Anti-Linguistics。  new window
28.Stephen, V. B. and G. Glenn(1996)。Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance。  new window
29.Tomer, E. and E. Haim(2000)。Inmate argot as an expression of prison subculture: The Israeli case。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE