臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：董監事結構、董監事連結與經營績效之關係研究
書刊名：商管科技季刊
作者：黃營杉／梁富梅
作者(外文)：Hwang, Ing-San／Liang, Fu-Mei
出版日期：2007
卷期：8:2
頁次：頁175-198
主題關鍵詞：董監事結構；代理理論；資源依賴理論；董監事連結；Board structure；Agency theory；Resource dependence theory；Interlocking directorates
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:168
董事會是公司治理中最重要的一環，而董事會中的外部董事因為沒有實際參與公司運作，在監督效率上優於內部董事，且豐富的外部資源，可透過董監事連結為公司帶進經營所需資源，進而減少交易成本，提升經營績效。國內此方面的研究相當少，因此，本研究以國內93年上市電子產業為研究對象，利用多元迴歸分析，探討董監事結構對董監事連結以及經營績效的影響，並分析董監事連結的中介角色。研究結果發現台灣電子產業董監事連結行為不及美國及新加坡，且連結對象傾向產業內之企業。此外，董監事結構的確影響經營績效；董監事連結在董監事結構對經營績效間扮演部分中介角色；且不同的連結行為對績效有不同的影響。
A company’s board of directors is at the core of corporate governance. Outside directors of the board are not involved in the management of the company, and, therefore, they play effective monitors of senior managers. Besides, outside directors bring in rich external resources by interlocks that allow the company access to productive resources, information and reducing transactional cost. Literature on the interlocking directorates is very few. We adopt 2004 data on 279 Taiwanese public electronic firms to construct multi regression models and exam the relationship among board structure, interlocks, and firm performance. The result finds that Taiwanese electronic firms have less interlocks than America and Singapore, while the interlocks of Taiwanese electronic firms are more likely occurred in the same industry. In addition, the results demonstrate that board structure is positively related to firm performance. The mediating role of interlocks between the relationship of board structure and firm performance is significant. Different kinds of interlocks effect firm performance differently.
期刊論文
1.Phan, P. H., Lee, S. H.,、Lau, S. C.(2003)。The performance impact of interlocking directorates: the case of Singapore。Journal of Managerial Issues，15(3)，338-352。  new window
2.Mintz, Beth、Schwartz, Michael(198112)。Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group Formation。American Sociological Review，46(6)，851-869。  new window
3.Burt, R.(1980)。Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks - A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing。Administrative Science Quarterly，25，557-581。  new window
4.劉韻僖(20021000)。上市公司間董事會連結之研究。管理學報，19(5)，901-926。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dooley, P. C.(1969)。The Interlocking Directorate。The American Economic Review，59，314-323。  new window
6.Dalton, D. R.、Daily, C. M.、Ellstrand, A. E.、Johnson, J. L.(1998)。Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and firm performance。Strategic Management Journal，19(3)，269-290。  new window
7.Mizruchi, M. S.(1996)。What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates。Annual Review of Sociology，22(1)，271-298。  new window
8.Peng, M. W.(2004)。Outside Directors and Firm Performance during Institutional Transitions。Strategic Management Journal，25(5)，453-471。  new window
9.Schoorman, F. D.、Bazerman, M. H.、Atkin, R. S.(1981)。Interlocking Directorates: A Strategy for Reducing Environmental Uncertainty。The Academy of Management Review，6，243-251。  new window
10.Baron, R. M.、Kenny, D. A.(198612)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，51(6)，1173-1182。  new window
11.Weisbach, Michael S.(1988)。Outsider Directors and CEO Turnover。Journal of Financial Economics，20(1/2)，431-460。  new window
12.Johnson, J. L.、Daily, C. M.、Ellstrand, A. E.(1996)。Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda。Journal of Management，22(3)，409-438。  new window
13.Bhagat, Sanjai、Bernard, Black(1999)。The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance。Business Lawyer，54(3)，921-963。  new window
14.莊正民、朱文儀、黃延聰(20010700)。制度環境、任務環境、組織型態與協調機制--越南臺商的實證研究。管理評論，20(3)，123-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Lipton, Martin、Lorsch, Jay W.(1992)。A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance。The Business Lawyer，48(1)，59-77。  new window
16.Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics，20(1/2)，293-315。  new window
17.Fama, Eugene F.、Jensen, Michael C.(1983)。Separation of ownership and control。The Journal of Law & Economics，26(2)，301-325。  new window
18.Yermack, David(1996)。Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors。Journal of Financial Economics，40(2)，185-211。  new window
19.Agrawal, Anup、Knoeber, Charles R.(1996)。Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders。The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis，31(3)，377-397。  new window
20.Hillman, A. J.、Cannella, A. A.、Paetzold, R. L.(2000)。The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change。Journal of Management Studies，37(2)，235-256。  new window
21.Zahra, S. A.、Pearce, J. A. II(1989)。Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model。Journal of Management，15(2)，291-334。  new window
22.洪榮華、陳香如、王玉珍(20050900)。公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係--股權結構與董事會特性的觀點。輔仁管理評論，12(3)，23-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Daily, C. M.(1995)。The relationship between board composition and leadership structure and bankruptcy reorganization outcomes。Journal of Management，21(6)，1041-1056。  new window
24.Daily, Catherine M.、Dalton, Dan R.(1994)。Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure。Academy of Management Journal，37(6)，1603-1617。  new window
25.Jensen, Michael C.(1993)。The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems。The Journal of Finance，48(3)，831-880。  new window
26.Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。A survey of corporate governance。The Journal of Finance，52(2)，737-783。  new window
27.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review。The Academy of Management Review，14(1)，57-74。  new window
28.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics，3(4)，305-360。  new window
29.柯承恩(20000400)。我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議。會計研究月刊，173，75-81。  延伸查詢new window
30.葉銀華、邱顯比、張銘煌(19990900)。基金經理人更換、董事會組成與績效之研究。證券市場發展季刊，11(1)=41，25-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.陳銘嘉與邱素津(2006)。公司治理機制與公司價值之研究。興國學報，5，35 -51。  延伸查詢new window
32.謝錦堂(2003)。董事會的功能構造與結構特徵。全國律師，7（9 )，76 -87。  延伸查詢new window
33.Bazserman, M. H.,、Schoorman, F. D.(1983)。A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates。Academy of Management Review，8(2)，206-217。  new window
34.Boyd, B.(1990)。Corporate linkages & organizational environment: a test of the resource dependence model。Strategic Management Journal，11(6)，419-430。  new window
35.Bresser, R. K.,、Han, J. E.(1986)。Collective strategy: vice or virtue?。Academy of Management Review，11(2)，408-427。  new window
36.Daily, C. M.,、Schwenk, C.(1996)。Chief executive officers, top management team, and boards of directors: congruent or countervailing forces?。Journal of Management，22，185-208。  new window
37.Gulati, R.、Westphal, J. D.(1999)。Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-Board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures。Administrative Science Ouarterly，44(3)，473-506。  new window
38.Hanson, R. C.,、Song, M. H.(2006)。Corporate governance and asset sales: the effect of internal and external control mechanisms。The Finangial Review，41，361-386。  new window
39.Koenig, T., Gogel, R.,、Sonquist, J.(1979)。Models of the significance of interlocking corporate directorates。American Journal of Economics and Sociology，38，173-186。  new window
40.Ong, C. H., Wan, D.,、Ong, K. S.(2003)。An exploratory study on interlocking directorates in listed firms in Singapore。Corporate Governance，11，322-334。  new window
41.Ulrich, D.、Barney, J. B.(1984)。Perspectives in Organizations: Resource dependence, Efficiency, and Populations。Academy of Management Review，9(3)，471-482。  new window
42.Wan, D.,、Ong, C. H.(2005)。Board structure, process and performance: evidence from public-listed companies in Singapore。Corporate Governance，13(2)，277-290。  new window
43.Zajac, E. J.(1988)。Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: a test of critical assumptions。Academy of Management Journal，31(2)，428-438。  new window
44.Zajac, E. J.,、Westphal, J. D.(1996)。Director reputation, CEO-Board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks。Administrative Science Quarterly，41，507-529。  new window
學位論文
1.楊子江(1987)。策略性組織關聯與事業風險及財務報酬之研究:大型企業董監事連結類型的比較分析(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.廖秀梅(2004)。董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究--探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響(博士論文)。國立臺北大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Burt, Ronald S.(1983)。Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy。Academic Press。  new window
2.Bacon, J.(1973)。Corporate directorship practice: member and committees of the board。New York：The Conference Board。  new window
3.Pfeffer, Jeffrey、Salancik, Gerald Richard(1978)。The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective。Harper & Row。  new window
4.證券暨期貨市場發展基金會(2003)。公回治理。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mintz, B.,、Schwartz, M.(1985)。The power of American business。Chicago。  new window
6.Pennings, J. M.(1980)。Interlocking Directors。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1028（臺灣：1015，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67779797
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上