:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:初任國中教師之數學哲學觀與教學實務的個案研究
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:王明慧柳賢洪振方 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ming-huiLeou, ShianHung, Jeng-fung
出版日期:2007
卷期:21:1
頁次:頁65-89
主題關鍵詞:教學實務絕對論數學哲學觀Teaching practiceAbsolutismThe philosophical perspective of mathematics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:15
本研究目的在分析初任教師的數學哲學觀與教學實務,並探討其在這兩者的一致性,以及影響這兩者的經驗。研究對象爲一位男國中教師。採詮釋研究法,依據Ernest的五種數學哲學觀點爲判準作資料分析。主要研究結果:1.數學本質的概念是形成個案教師之數學哲學觀的核心,並影響到他的教學實務;2.個案教師之數學哲學觀與教學實務均呈現絕對論的觀點;但針對五種數學哲學觀點,他在這兩方面的表現並未完全一致;3.影響個案教師之數學哲學觀與教學實務的經驗有:他人之期望、個案教師本身,以及制度化之課程;但全面性的國家教育政策與方案卻是一個負面影響個案教師的經驗。
The purpose of this research is to analyze a new case teacher's philosophical perspective of mathematics and teaching practice; we also explore the coherence and the experiences influencing between his philosophical perspective of mathematics and teaching practice. The subject is a male junior high school math teacher. This research adopts the qualitative method. According to Ernest's five philosophical perspectives, we analyze the data. The main results of the study are as follows: 1. The core of the case teacher's philosophical perspective of mathematics lies in the understanding of the nature of mathematics, which influences his teaching practice. 2. The case teacher's philosophical perspective of mathematics and teaching practice are belong to absolutism; based on the five philosophical perspectives, The case teacher's philosophical perspective of mathematics and teaching practice show inconsistency. 3. The influent factors of the case teacher's philosophical perspective of mathematics and teaching practice include the others' expectation, case teacher himself, as well as the institutionalization curriculum; but the overall national education policies and the plans will influence the case teacher's experience negatively.
期刊論文
1.鄭章華、王夕堯(20010600)。協助國中數學教師改變教學初探--以數學哲學為媒介。科學教育研究與發展季刊,23,57-81。  延伸查詢new window
2.Abelson, R.(1979)。Differences between belief system and knowledge system。Cognitive Science,3,355-366。  new window
3.Ernest, P.(1991)。Mathematics teacher education and quality。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,16(1),56-65。  new window
4.Golafshani, N.(2002)。Teachers' Conceptions of Mathematics and their Instructional Practices。Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal,75。  new window
5.Handal, B.(200305)。Philosophy and pedagogies of mathematics。Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal,17。  new window
6.Hersh, R.(1979)。Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics。Advances in Mathematics,31,31-50。  new window
7.Pepin, B.(1999)。Epistemologies, beliefs and conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning: The theory, and that is manifested in mathematics teachers' work in England, France and Germany。TNTEE Publications,2(1)。  new window
8.Schmittau, J.(1991)。Mathematics education in the 1990s: Can it afford to ignore its historical and philosophical foundations?。Educational Theory,41(2),121-133。  new window
9.Southwell, B.(1999)。The lowdown on the philosophy of mathematics education。Reflections,24(1),44-47。  new window
10.Thompson, A. G.(1984)。The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instruction practice。Educational Studies in Mathematics,15,105-127。  new window
11.Wilson, M. R.(1994)。One preservice secondary teacher's understanding of function: The impact of a course integrating mathematical content and pedagogy。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,25(4),346-370。  new window
12.Ernest, P.(1989)。The Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of the Mathematics Teacher: A Model。Journal of Education for Teaching,15(1),13-33。  new window
13.Raymond, A. M.(1997)。Inconsistency Between a Beginning Elementary School Teacher's Mathematics。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(5),577-601。  new window
14.呂玉琴、溫世展(20010900)。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,459+461-490。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Lerman, S.(1990)。Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching of mathematics。British Educational Research Journal,16(1),53-61。  new window
會議論文
1.Ernest, P.、Greenland, P.(1990)。Teacher belief systems: Theory and observations。British Society for Research on the Learning of Mathematics Annual Conference Proceedings. Oxford, England: BSRLM.。Oxford, England:BSRLM。  new window
2.Rogerson, A.(1994)。Symbols as cultural communication-A historical and dialectical perspective。46th International Meeting of the CIEAEM。Toulouse, France。  new window
學位論文
1.Chin, C.(1995)。Mathematics teachersr beliefs, their classroom practices and influences on student learning: four case studies(博士論文)。University of Cambridge。  new window
2.Teo, W. L.(1997)。Espoused Beliefs of Singapore Teachers about Mathematics and its Teaching and Learning(碩士論文)。University of Toronto。  new window
3.王郁華(1996)。臺灣南區中學數學科教師信念之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eggleton, P. J.(1995)。The Evolving Mathematical Philosophy of a Preservice Mathematics Teacher。A Bell & Howell Company。  new window
2.National Research Council(1989)。Everybody counts: A report on the future of mathematics education。Washington, D. C.:National Academy Press。  new window
3.Russell, B.(1943)。The principles of mathematics。New York:Norton。  new window
4.Lakatos, Imre(1976)。Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery。Cambridge。  new window
5.Ernest, Paul(1991)。The Philosophy of Mathematics Education。London。  new window
6.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hersh, R.(1986)。Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics。New directions in the philosophy of mathematics。Boston:Birkhauser。  new window
2.Thompson, A. G.(1992)。Teachers' Beliefs and Conception: A Synthesis of the Research。Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top