一、中文部份
尤詩憶（2004）。試行價值導向的PCDC教學於國中數學課室之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
王明慧、柳賢、洪振方（2006）。高一學生在解題歷程中的數學建模之分析：以指數單元為例。屏東教育大學學報，24，271-310。
朱苑瑜、葉玉珠（2003）。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，41-66。呂玉琴、溫世展（2001）。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報，14，459-490。金鈐（2003）。職前中學數學教師學價值的學習歷程分析。行政院國家科學委員會
專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC-91-2511-S-003-001），未出版。
金鈐、林福來（1998）。準數學教師學習教學之前的教學觀念。科學教育學刊，6(3)，219-254。吳依芳（2003）。建模教學活動對國二學生學習線型函數概念之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
吳威廷（2004）。國民中學教師信念、教學行為與其學生學習結果之關係探討-以雲林縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
李佳陵、鍾靜（2007）。數學種子教師專業知能內涵之探討。師大學報：科學教育類，52。23-47。
李源順（2006）。國小教師數學教學專業知能標準。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 94-2522-S-133-001），未出版。
林勇吉（2009）。透過敘說取向個案研究探討四位國中數學教師發展數學探究教學之故事：聚焦於信念、知識、實務（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。林勇吉、秦爾聰、段曉林（2010）。以敘說探究探討一位國中教師發展數學探究教學之信念與實務。教育科學研究期刊，55(3)，1-32。林國源（2005）。高中數學建模課程與實踐之研究〈未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。
林福來、楊凱琳、陳嘯虎和呂又寧（2003）。透過數學建模活動培養高中生的數學創造力。臺北市：教育部顧問室創造力教育計畫推動辦公室。
林碧珍（2000）。在職教師數學專業發展方案的協同行動研究。新竹師院學報，13，115-147。林碧珍（2003）。發展種子教師與教師之學生數學認知知識之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 92-2521-S-134-001），未出版。
林碧珍、蔡文煥（2007）。數學領域實習輔導教師專業標準指標的發展與建立之初探。新竹教育大學教育學報，24(2)，61-92。姚如芬（2006）。成長團體之「成長」－ 小學教師數學教學專業之探究。科學教育學刊，14(3)， 309-331。施羿如（2005）。從數學建模的觀點探究高一生指數函數單元解題歷程之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
柳賢、陳蕙如（2006）。從建模觀點探討數學初任教師教學改變及其影響因子。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，26，163-190。胡政德（2006）。準教師數學建模歷程分析研究－以Voronoi圖為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
胡政德、左台益（2006年12月）。準教師數學建模的個案研究。科學教育學術研討會之論文，國立臺灣師範大學。
唐昭容（2009）。數學建模教學對國小六年級學生解題能力提升及數學學習態度改變影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
康木村（2010）。結合協作教學與互啟式對話的數學教師實習輔導模式之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
莊淑琴（2002）。國小教師數學信念之研究。臺東師院學報，13（上），210-232。張靜嚳（1995）。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討。科學教育學刊，3，139-165。張靜嚳（2008）。建模活動的發展及其應用於促進國中生數學能力之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 97-2511-S-018-002-M），未出版。
張靜嚳（2011）。透過建模活動促進中學數學教師專業成長之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-018-003-M），未出版。
張靜嚳（2013）。透過引模活動促進中學數學教師專業發展與中學生數學學習之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 99-3511-S-018-013-MY3），未出版。
張瓊文（2010）。臺中市國小教師數學知識信念與數學教學行為之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
郭麟瑤（2007）。國中數學科教師在九年一貫課程數學學習領域中教學信念與教學行為表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。
梁崇惠、邱姵萍、施皓耀（2009）。開發數學建模的教材。臺灣數學教師（電子）期刊，19，15-34。陳均伊（2006）。以合作專業成長模式協助二位科學教師實施探究教學之個案研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。陳冠州（2009）。數學建模活動下國小五年級學生代數思考及其發展歷程之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。陳彥廷（2002）。教學問題因應策略與教學信念關係之研究-以一位高中數學教師為例。台東師院學報，13（上），171-200。曾志華（2006）。兩位在職數學教師教學專業成長歷程及其影響因素之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。楊子錕（2010）。以數學建模教學方式進行國中三年級學生相似形概念之補救教學（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
楊子瑩（2010）。促進在職數理科老師資訊支援探究教學專業成長模式之探討（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。楊凱琳（2009）。數學建模的評量與教學之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 95-2521-S-003-012-MY3），未出版。
楊凱琳、林福來（2006）。探討高中數學教學融入建模活動的支撐策略及促進參與教師反思的潛在機制。科學教育學刊，14(5)，517-543。楊凱琳、楊子錕（2008年10月6日）。從數學建模學什麼【線上論壇】。 取自http://study.ck.tp.edu.tw/mathcenter/file_lista.asp?f_resid=21&;f_mnuid=&;f_mcat=02_%B1%D0%BE%C7&;f_scat=b_%B1M%C3D&;f_page=1&;f_pagesize=8#tfile
萬世勳（2005）。一元二次方程式及函數的建模教學（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
詹啟明（2009）。建模教學與一般教學對學習成效之探討-以一元一次方程式為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南教育大學，臺南市。
莊淑琴（2002）。國小教師數學信念之研究。臺東師院學報，13（上），210-232。莊婷媜（2007）。教師教學信念與教學行為關係之個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
甄曉蘭、周立勳（1999）。國小教師數學教學信念及其相關因素之探討。課程與教學季刊1999，2(1)，49-68。鍾靜（2000）。以學校本位教師進修有效支持數學課程改革。研究彙刊，10(2)，71-89。
蘇素慧、詹勳國（2005）。實施九年一貫課程後國小教師數學教學信念與行為之研究。師大學報：教育類，50(1)，27-51。二、英文部份
Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mmathematics, 65, 95-120.
Blomhøj, M., &; Jensen, T. H. (2007). What’s all the fuss about competencies? In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, &; M. Niss, Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education: The 14th ICMI Study. (pp. 45-56). New York, NY: Springer.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 15-30). New York, NY: Springer.
Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice: The case of the dance of agency. In N. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, &; J. T. ZillioX (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th PME International Conference: vol 1. (pp. 3-16). Honolulu, Hawai'i - USA: PME.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg E., &; Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436.
Clark, K. K. &; Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling approach to describe teacher knowledge. In R. Lesh, &; H. M. Doerr, Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. (pp.159-173). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Clarke, D. J., &; Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
Chapman, O. (1999). Research mathematics teacher thinking. In O. Zaslavsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference: vol 2. (pp. 85-192). Haifa, Israel: PME.
Chapman, O. (2004). Facilitating peer interactions in learning mathematics: Teachers’ practical knowledge. In M. J. HØines &; A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th PME International Conference: vol 2. (pp. 191-198). Bergen, Norway: PME.
Charalambous, C., Philippou, G., &; Kyriakides, L. (2002). Towards understanding teachers’ philosophical beliefs about mathematics. In A. D. Cokburn &; E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th PME International Conference : vol 2.(pp. 217-224). Norwich, United Kingdom: PME.
Cobb, P. &; Yackel, E. (1993). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, &; U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom: Analyses and changes (pp. 158-190). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., &; Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod, &; V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Cooney, T. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F.-L. Lin &; T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of Mathematics Teacher Education. (pp. 9-31). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Diefes, H. A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P. K., &; Follman, D. (2004, October). A
framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. In J. L. A. Hughes, Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
Doerr, H. M. (2007). What knowledge do teachers need for teaching mathematics
through application and modelling? In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, &; M. Niss, Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education: The 14th ICMI Study. (pp. 69-78). New York, NY: Springer.
Doerr, H. M. &; Lesh, R. A. (2003). A modeling perspective on teacher development. In R. A. Lesh &; H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 125-139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
de Abreu, G. Bishop, A. J., &; Pompeu, G. Jr. (1997). What children and teachers count as mathematics. In T. Nunes, &; P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective. (pp. 233-264). Hove, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
Doerr, H. M., &; Lesh, R. (2011). Models and modeling perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics in the twenty-first century. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 247-268). New York, NY: Springer.
Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L. &; Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-202.
Eynde, P. O., De Corte. E., &; Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pohkonen, &; G. Törner(Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13-37). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Forgasz, H. J., &; Leder, G. C. (2008). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics
teaching. In P. Sullivan, &; T. Wood (Eds.), Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development (pp. 173-194). The Netherlands: Sense.
Förster, F. (2011). Secondary teachers’ beliefs about teaching applications-design and selected results of a qualitative case study. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 65-74). New York, NY: Springer.
Furinghetti, F. &; Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pohkonen, &; G. Törner(Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39-57). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gate, P. (2001). Mathematics teacher belief systems: Exploring the social foundations. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Eds.), Proceeding of the 25th PME International Conference: vol 3.(pp. 17-24). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.
Girnat, B., &; Eichler, A. (2011). Secondary teachers’ beliefs on modeling in geometry and stochastics. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 75-84). New York, NY: Springer.
Gopnik, A., &; Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
Hart, L. C. (2002). A four year follow-up study of teachers’ beliefs after participating in a teacher enhancement project. In G. C. Leder, E. Pohkonen, &; G. Törner(Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp. 161-176). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Henningsen, M. &; Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-529.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., &; Schillimg, S. G. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
Hoyles, C. (1992). Illuminations and reflections: Teachers, methodologies and mathematics. In W. Geeslin &; K. Graham (Eds.), Proceeding of the 16th PME International Conference: vol 3.(pp. 263-286). Durham, USA: PME.
Kaiser, G., &; Maass, K. (2007). Modelling in lower secondary mathematics classroom- problems and opportunities. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, &; M. Niss, Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education: The 14th ICMI Study. (pp. 99-108). New York, NY: Springer.
Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R. and Stillman, G. (2011).Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modeling-Perface. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 1-5). New York, NY: Springer.
Kilpatrick, J., &; Swafford, J. (2002). Helping shildren learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Korthagen, F. &; Lagerwerf, B. (2001). Teachers’ professional learning: How does it work? In F. A. J. Korthagen, J. Kessel, B. Koster, B. Lagerwerf, B. &; T. Wubbles. Linking practice and theory: The pegagogy of realistic teacher education. (pp. 175-206). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2011). Making teacher education relevant for practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Orbis Scholae, 5(2), 31-50.
Kuntze, S. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ view about modeling tasks in the mathematics classroom- results of a quantitative empirical study. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 279-288). New York, NY: Springer.
Leder, G. C. &; Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. C. Leder, E. Pohkonen, &; G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp. 95-113). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Leder, G. C. &; Forgasz, H. J. (2006). Affect and mathematics education. In A, Gutiérrez, &; P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future. (pp. 403-427). UK: Sense.
Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F.-L. Lin &; T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 33 –52). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Lesh, R., &; Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling
perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lesh, R., &; Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly, &; R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research esign in mathematics and science Education (pp. 197-230). Hahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lesh, R., Post, T., &; Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among
representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.),
Problems of representation in teaching and learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., &; Lamon, S. (Eds.). (1992). Assessment of authentic performance in school
mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Lesh, R., &; Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester, Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.763-804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing &; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lester, F. K. (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing &; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Llinares, S., &; Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez &; P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Maaβ, K., &; Gurlitt, J. (2011). LEMA- Professional development of teachers in relation to mathematical modelling. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, &; G. Stillman, Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 629-640). New York, NY: Springer.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1991). Prfessional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In Gagarsis, A., &; Papastavridis, S. (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education, (pp. 115-124). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Mathematical Society and Cyprus Mathematical Society.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework - Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
Pang, J. S. (2012). Changing teaching practices toward effective mathematics instruction in Korean context: Characteristics and implications. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44,137-148
Pereira de Oliveira, A. M. &; Barbosa, J. C. (2010). Mathematical modeling and the teachers’ tensions. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, &; A. Hurford, Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 511-517). New York, NY: Springer.
Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., &; Loef, M. (1990). Mathematics Beliefs Scales. Madison: University of Wisconsin- Madison.
Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Eds.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing &; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Pintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames, &; M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwidsh, CT: JAI Press.
Pohkonen, E. &; Törner, G. (1999). Introduction to the abstract book for the Oberwalfach meeting on belief research. In Proceedings of the workshop in Oberwalfach on mathematical beliefs and their impact on teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3-10). Oberwalfach, Germany: Gerhard Mercator Universitat Duisburg.
Ponte, J. P. (1994). Mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge. In J. P. Ponte &; J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th PME International Conference: vol 1.(pp. 195-210). Lisbon, Portugal: PME.
Ponte, J. P. &; Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A, Gutiérrez, &; P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future (pp. 461-494). UK: Sense.
Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 102-119). New York, NY: Simon &; Schuster.
Rossouw, L., &; Smith, E. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of geometry. In A. Olivier &; K. Newstead (Eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd PME International Conference: vol 4.(pp. 57-63). Stellenbosch, South Africa: PME.
Saxe, G. B. (1999). Professional development, classroom practices, and students’ mathematics learning: A cultural perspective. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference: vol 1.(pp. 25-39). Haifa, Israel: PME.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Problem solving from cradle to grave. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 11, 41-73.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think. New York, NY: Taylor &; Francis.
Schorr, R. Y., &; Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling approach to provide teacher development. In R. Lesh, &; H. M. Doerr, Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp.141-157). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Simon, M. A. (1991). Initial development of prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of mathematics pedagogy. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.) Proceedings of the 15th PME International Conference: vol 2. (pp. 40-47). Assisi, Italy: PME.
Simon, M., &; Tzur, R. (1997). Generalizing theoretical accounts of mathematics teachers’ practices. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st PME International Conference: vol 4. (pp. 160-167). Lahti, Finland: PME.
Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E. &; Williams, S. R. (2005, July 20). Elaborating a Change Process Model for Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Current Issues in Education [On-line]. Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number19/
Speer, N. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
Swan, M. (2006). Designing and using research instruments to describe the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers. Research in Education, 75, 58-70.
Thomas, K. &; Hart, J. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of model eliciting activities. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, &; A. Hurford, Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 531-538). New York, NY: Springer.
Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teacher’s conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361-391.
Thompson, A. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127-146). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Warner, L. B., Schorr, R. Y., Arias, C. C. &; Sanchez, L. (2010). A case study of two teachers: Teacher questions and student explanations. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, &; A. Hurford, Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 519-529). New York, NY: Springer.
Valero, P., &; Gómez, C. (1996). Precalculus and graphic calculators: The influence on teachers’ beliefs. In L. Puig, A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference: vol 4. (pp. 363-370). Valencia, Spain: PME.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. &; De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. The Netherlands: Swets &; Zeitlinger.
Yackel, E. &; Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.
Yu, S. Y., Chang, C. K., &; Lin, L. M. (2007, July). Taiwan Mathematics Teachers Remodel Their Teaching Model via Doing and Conducting Modeling Activity in Classrooms. In R. Lesh, Meeting of The Thirteen International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modeling and Applications, Indiana, U. S. A.
Zollman, A. &; Mason, E. (1992). The standards’ beliefs instrument (SBI): Teachers’ beliefs about the NCTM standards. School Science and Mathematics, 92(7), 359-364.