:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數理教師對科學、數學與數理統整的態度與信念
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:蔡淑君段曉林 引用關係邱守榕
作者(外文):Tsai, Shu-chunTuan, Hsiao-linChiu, Sou-yung
出版日期:2006
卷期:14:5
頁次:頁545-570
主題關鍵詞:數理統整數理教師教師信念教師態度Integrating science and mathematicsMathematics and science teachersTeacher' beliefsTeacher' attitudes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:50
本研究主要探討數理教師對科學/數學與數理統整的態度與信念,冀以作為科學與數學統整研究參考的基礎。研究對象為89 位在職進修的數理老師,進行「科學/數學本質與教學的態度與信念問卷」量表施測,並挑選8 位教師晤談。量化資料以T 檢定分析數理教師對科學/數學本質與教學的態度與信念,並輔以晤談資料佐證,另再以「社會空間分析架構」分析晤談資料呈現數理教師在數理本質、教學、學習、統整等方面的觀點。結果發現,數理老師在科學與數學的信念(BSM)、對科學與數學的態度(ASM)、教科學與數學的信念(BSMT)、對學習如何教科學與數學的態度(ASMLT )、以及對教科學與數學的態度(ASMT)各向度表現均顯示正向。此外數學老師在對科學和數學的態度(ASM)向度、對未來進修數學相關領域的意願等方面顯著高於科學教師,其影響數學教師進修的原因除了喜愛程度之外,學科教學的需求是很重要的影響因素。最後,數理教師在數理本質、教學、學習、統整等看法大致相似,唯在學習先天論、「科技」在教學上的角色、對「操作」的定義、「生活實例」在教學上的功用等方面有不同的看法。
Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes are important to their professional development and their integration of science and math into classroom teaching. Thus, this study focused on a group of experienced science and math teachers enrolled in an in-service professional development program. Their attitudes and beliefs toward the content, pedagogy, and integration of science and math were investigated. Eighty-nine teachers, including 52 math and 32 science, completed questionnaires and eight teachers were subsequently interviewed. The questionnaire used to collect data was “Attitudes and Beliefs about the Nature of and the Teaching of Mathematics and Science” (McGinnis, et al, 2002). It consisted of five scales: beliefs about mathematics and science, attitudes toward mathematics and science, beliefs about the teaching mathematics and science, attitudes toward learning to teach mathematics and science, and attitudes toward teaching mathematics and science. Results showed significant differences between science and math teachers in their attitudes toward science and math, and their desires for taking further math courses in the professional development program. In addition, there were different views between science and math teachers on the usefulness of technology, the definition of “operation”, and the use of “daily-life example”. Suggestions for more study were provided in the paper.
期刊論文
1.莊淑琴(20030500)。國小教師數學本質信念之研究。彰化師大教育學報,4,139-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Farenga, Stephen J.、Joyce, Beverly A.(1999)。Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences。Science Education,83(1),55-75。  new window
3.Handal, B.(2003)。Teachers' Mathematical Beliefs: A Review。The Mathematics Educator,13(2),47-57。  new window
4.Lee, O.(2004)。Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,65-93。  new window
5.蔡淑君、段曉林(20041200)。論科學與數學之統整。科學教育,275,6-19。  延伸查詢new window
6.Peterson, P. L.、Fennema, E.、Carpenter, T. P.、Loef, M.(1989)。Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics。Cognition and Instruction,6(1),1-40。  new window
7.Fang, Z. H.(1996)。A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices。Educational Research,38(1),47-65。  new window
8.Beane, J. A.(1996)。On the Shoulders of Giants! The Case for Curriculum Integration。Middle School Journal,28(1),6-11。  new window
9.Czerniak, C. M.、Weber, W. B.、Sandmann, A. Jr.、Ahern, J.(1999)。A literature review of science and mathematics integration。School Science and Mathematics,99(8),421-430。  new window
10.Davison, D. M.、Miller, K. W.、Metheny, D. L.(1995)。What does integration of science and mathematics really mean?。School Science and Mathematics,95(5),226-230。  new window
11.Cornett, J. W.、Yeotis, C.、Terwilliger, L.(1990)。Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and interactional actions: A case study of a secondary teacher。Science Education,74(5),517-529。  new window
12.呂玉琴、溫世展(20010900)。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,459+461-490。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Beane, J. A.(199504)。Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge。Phi Delta Kappan,76(8),616-622。  new window
14.Kagan, D. M.(1992)。Implications of research on teacher belief。Educational Psychologist,27(1),65-90。  new window
15.Brickhouse, Nancy W.(1990)。Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice。Journal of Teacher Education,41(3),53-62。  new window
16.Grouws, D. A.、Good, T. L.(1989)。Research into practice: Issues in problem-solving instruction。Arithmetic Teacher,36(8),34-35。  new window
17.Stipek, D. J.、Givvin, K. B.、Salmon, J. M.、MacGyvers, V. L.(2001)。Teachers' beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction。Teaching and Teacher Education,17(2),213-226。  new window
18.陳忠志、Taylor, Peter C.、Aldridge, Jill M.(19981200)。國中教師科學本質及科學教學信念對理化教室環境的影響。科學教育學刊,6(4),383-402。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Tsai, Chin-Chung(2002)。Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science。International Journal of Science Education,24(8),771-783。  new window
20.Frykholm, Jeffrey A.、Meyer, Margaret R.(2002)。Integrated Instruction: Is It Science? Is It Mathematics?。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,7(9),502-508。  new window
21.Berlin, D. F.(1994)。The Integration of Science and Mathematics Education: Highlights from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference Plenary Papers。School Science and Mathematics,94(1),32-35。  new window
22.Berlin, D. F.、White, A. L.(1992)。Report from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference: A Network for Integrated Science and Mathematics for Teaching and Learning。School Science and Mathematics,92(6),340-342。  new window
23.Berlin, D. F.、White, A. L.(1994)。The Berlin - White Integrated Science and Mathematics Modle (BWISM)。School Science and Mathematics,94(1),2-4。  new window
24.Elliott, B.、Oty, K.、McArthur, J.、Clark, B.(2001)。The Effect of an Interdisciplinary Algebra/Science Course on Student' Problem Solving Skills, Critical Thinking Skills and Attitudes Towards Mathematics。International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,32(6),811-816。  new window
25.Haigh, W.、Rehfeld, D.(1995)。Integration of Secondary Mathematics and Science Methods Course: A Codel。School Science and Mathematics,95(5),240-247。  new window
26.Isaacs, A.、Wagreich, P.、Gartzman, M.(1997)。The Quest for Integration: School Mathematics and Science。American Journal of Education,106,179-206。  new window
27.Lederman, N. G.、Niess, M. L.(1997)。Inte grated, Interdisciplinary, or Thematic Instruction? Is This a Question or Is It Questionable Semantics?。School Science and Mathematics,97(2),57-58。  new window
28.Lederman, N. G.、Niess, M. L.(1998)。5 Apples + 4 Oranges =?。School Science and Mathematics,98(6),281-284。  new window
29.Lehman, J. R.(1994)。Integrating Science and Mathematics: Perceptions for Preservice and Practicing Elementary Teachers。School Science and Mathematics,94(2),58-64。  new window
30.McGinnis, J. R.、Kramer, S.、Shama, G.、Graeber, A.、Parker, C. A.、Watanabe, T.(2002)。Undergraduates' Attitudes and Beliefs about Subject Matter and Pedagogy Measured Periodically in a Reform-based Mathematics and Science Teacher Preparation Program。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(8),713-737。  new window
31.Oakley, J. S.(1974)。Reflection on the Integration of Mathematics and Science。School Science and Mathematics,74(4),293-296。  new window
32.Pang, J. S.、Good, R.(2000)。A Review of the Integration of Science and Mathematics: Implications for Further Research。School Science and Mathematics,100(2),73-82。  new window
33.Stevens, C.、Wenner, G.(1996)。Elementary Preservice Teachers Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Science and Mathematics。School Science and Mathematics,96(1),2-9。  new window
34.Stuessy, C. L.(1995)。Invited Comments: A Model for Preservice Teacher Preparation that Integrates the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics and Science。School Science and Mathematics,94(1),30-31。  new window
35.Thompson, A. G.(1984)。The Relationship Between Teachers Conceptions of Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching to Instructional Practice。Educational Studies in Mathematics,15,105-127。  new window
36.Tobin, K.、Fraser, B. J.(1989)。Bar-riers to Higher-level Cognitive Learning in High School Seiebce。Science Education,73(6),659-682。  new window
37.Westbrook, S. L.(1998)。Examining the Conceptual Organization of Students in an Integrated Algebra and Physical Science Class。School Science and Mathematics,98(1),19-25。  new window
會議論文
1.McGinnis, J. R.、McDuffie, A.、Parker, C.(1999)。An Investigation in Preparing Teacher Candidates to Make Connections between Science and Mathematics。0。  new window
2.McGinnis, J. R.、McDuffie, A.、Parker, C.(1999)。An Action Research Perspective of Making Connections between Science and Mathematics in a Science Methods Course。0。  new window
3.McGinnis, J. R.、Parker, C.、Graeber, A.(2000)。What Happens to First Year Teachers Prepared to Make Connections between Science and Mathematics When They Enter the Workplace?。0。  new window
4.McGinnis, J. R.、Watanabe, T.、Shama, G.、Graeber, A.(1997)。Development of an Instrument to Measure Teacher Candidates' Attitudes and Beliefs about Mathematics and Science。0。  new window
5.McGinnis, J. R.、Shama, G.、Graeber, A.、Watanabe, T.(1997)。The Assessment of Elementary/Middle Level Candidates' Attitudes and Beliefs about the Nature of and the Teaching of Mathematics and Science。0。  new window
6.Schwartz, J. E.、Riedesel, C. A.(1994)。The Relationship between Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs and the Teaching of Elementary Mathematics。0。  new window
7.Schwartz, R. S.、Gfeller, M. K.、Lederman, N. G.(2001)。Integrating Science and Mathematics: A Natural Connection or Strange Bedfellows?。0。  new window
圖書
1.Jacobs, Heidi Hayes(1989)。Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
2.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Ormerod, M. B.、Duckworth, D.(1975)。Pupils' Attitudes to Science: A Review of the Research。Pupils' Attitudes to Science: A Review of the Research。Atlantic Highlands, NJ。  new window
5.Steen, L. A.(1994)。Integrating School Science and Mathematics: Fad or Folly?。NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference: A Network for Integrated Science and Mathematics Teaching and Learning。Columbus, OH。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2004)。九年一貫課程數學學習領域之能力指標,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Thompson, A. G.(1992)。Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
2.Clark, Christopher M.、Peterson, Penelope L.(1986)。Teachers' thought processes。Handbook of Research on Teaching。Macmillan。  new window
3.Berlin, D. F.、White, A. L.(1998)。Integrated Science and Mathematics Education: Evolution and Implications of a Theoretical Model。International Handbook of Science Education。Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE