:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「戊申,衛州籲弒其君完」考辨--以《四庫全書.春秋類》為範圍
書刊名:國立高雄海洋科大學報
作者:余蕙靜 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Hui-ching
出版日期:2008
卷期:22
頁次:頁145-167
主題關鍵詞:四庫全書春秋戊申Siku QuanshuSpring and Autumn annalsChunqiuWu-shen
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:94
本文以清代紀昀等所纂《欽定文淵閣四庫全書本》‧經部一三七~一七五‧春秋類 其中所收錄有關春秋經文隱公四年「戊申,衛州籲弒其君完。」的文意探討。本句經文 主要提出四項重點,即戊申、稱衛、不書公子、及書弒等,各家針對此四點提出的不同 看法可歸納為以下幾個部分:1.戊申:有(1)赴告,(2)國君不正,(3)史官記事之例義例; 2.稱衛:(1)欲弒君自立,(2)繼位不正,(3)與魯國事做一區別;及3.不稱公子:(1)未受 三命,(2)罪莊公不待以公子之道,(3)貶州籲,(4)自有義例;4.弒:各家看法均同,即殺 也。本文即針對歧見之處,分析歸納各家註解之說,並對照《春秋》經文其他歷史資料, 將三類分歧見解還原其真正意涵,得出三點結論,即1.「戊申」為事件發生的時間,2. 「稱衛」是為了要與魯國的事情做一區分,3.不稱州籲為公子,是為了要貶州籲之意, 同時借此以廓清自漢代以降,經文為後代學者誤讀之例。
There have been various views held by scholars in the section of Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu) in Classics (jing), Siku Quanshu on the connotation of the sentence “In the year of Wu-shen, Zhouxu of Wei committed regicide on his lord Wan.” The major differences in interpretation lies in four categories:1. the meaning of “Wu-shen”; 2. the mention of Wei; 3. the truth that Zhouxu’s being the Duke’s son not mentioned; and 4. the use of the word “regicide” (shi)’s. Most of the scholars corroborate their own views by the following three considerations: the stylistic rules governing the writing of the Annals, that Confucius based his record on immediate obituaries, and that Confucius made appraisals of people in his Annals. This article summarizes annotations made by different schools down to the Qing Dynasty in comparison to passages in the Spring and Autumn Annals related to the sentence under analysis with am aim to clarify the real meaning of the above-mentioned sentence as well as to dispel misinterpretations of various sorts by scholars from the Han Dynasty onward.
期刊論文
1.謝德瑩(19870200)。春秋書弒例辨。孔孟月刊,25(6)=294,14-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.盧心懋(19860100)。左傳「弒君凡例」淺析。孔孟月刊,24(5)=281,31-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃漢昌(19820800)。左傳「弒君」凡例試論。孔孟月刊,20(12),39-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.齊思和(1947)。周代賜命禮考。燕京學報,32,197-226。  延伸查詢new window
5.李宗侗(19660800)。封建的解體。國立臺灣大學文史哲學報,15,309-343。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.丁山(1934)。宗法考源。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,4(4),415。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.成玲(1990)。春秋公羊傳稱謂例釋(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.紀昀(1983)。欽定文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
2.章學誠(1985)。文史通義。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭樵(1986)。欽定四庫全書薈要。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王泉根(1993)。華夏姓氏之謎。臺北:雲龍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.傅武光、賴炎元、韓非子(1997)。新譯韓非子。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.司馬遷(1983)。景印文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.顧炎武(1965)。日知錄。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.阮元(1989)。十三經注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.竹添光鴻(198209)。左傳會箋。臺北:明達出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.韓非、王先慎(1983)。韓非子集解。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.左丘明、楊伯峻(1993)。春秋左傳注。洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE