:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:儒家信念與地方治理效能:臺灣七縣市地方菁英之調查及探究(2001)
書刊名:社會科學論叢
作者:廖達琪 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Da-chi
出版日期:2007
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁105-143
主題關鍵詞:儒家信念地方治理效能臺灣地方菁英政治表現和諧Confucian beliefLocal effectivenessTaiwanLocal elitesCongruence-consonance theory of political performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:80
本文試圖探討儒家信念與地方治理效能間的關係。根據相關的研究及文獻,本文提出的假設是:儒家信念與地方的民主化發展無直接關係,但也無傷;對地方的經濟發展應有正面效益,但其條件為「政治表現和諧論」所提醒:地方領導群體間或地方菁英與群眾間,對儒家信念或相關價值有相當的共識。本文所運用的資料主要為廖達琪和Eldersveld於2000-2001年主持完成的「臺灣第二波地方菁英調查研究」中,所訪談臺灣七縣市菁英的紀錄,另外輔以2001年「臺灣選舉與民主化調查」(TEDS)訪談群眾有關民主價值的部分資料。 所得結果為:七縣市依據儒家信念強度排序,確實顯示和地方政治民主化治理績效指標-社會團體成長率及地方議會內政黨結構變化率,沒有關係,但也不構成傷害;七縣市儒家信念強度和地方和諧度結合一起,則和地方經濟發展的指標-家庭平均每戶經常性收入成長率及平均失業率,有較明顯的關係。 綜合以上,儒家信念與地方治理效能,確實如假設預期,有政治上不妨害民主發展,經濟上,在領導契合地方價值的情境中,有助於發展的功效;但地方菁英秉持儒家信念發揮治理效能的具體作為,還有待進一步的研究及探索。
This study tries to explore the relationship between Confucianism and the effectireness of local governance. Two hypotheses are derived: from prior literature On the one hand, Confucianism should exercise no positive impact upon the development of local democracy, but do no harm to that either. On the other hand, it should be positively related to the development of local economy. This positive relationship, however, should be subjected to one condition, as suggested by ”congruence-consonance theory of political performance,” that local leaders’ Confucian belief or other relevant values are consonant among themselves, or congruent with that of their local mass. This study mainly utilizes survey data of Taiwanese local leaders provided by Eldersveld and Dachi Liao in Taiwan's seven counties and cities in 2001. It also uses some mass data from the project of Taiwan's Election and Democracy Survey (TEDS) done in 2001. The findings of this study are: A locality whose leaders hold relatively strong Confucian belief, generally has achieved more, in both the growth rate of its annual per household income and maintaining a low unemployment rate than that with relatively weak one does; but that has no obvious relationship with the growth rate of its civil associations and with the changing ratio of party composition in its council. However, the condition of value congruence-consonance among different elite groups or between elite and mass indeed is a crucial intervening variable between the strength of Confucian belief held by local leaders and the performance of local economy. In sum, the hypothesized relation between Confucian belief and local effectiveness has been primarily verified by this paper. As for the specific leadership style which may make local leaders who bear strong Confucian belief, effective in local governing still demands further research.
期刊論文
1.Fukuyama, Francis(1997)。The Illusion of Exceptionalism。Journal of Democracy,8(3),146-150。  new window
2.杜維明(2005)。儒家人文精神的核心價值。明報月刊,40(6),67-70。  延伸查詢new window
3.Neher, Clark D.(1994)。Asian-Style Democracy。Asian Survey,34(11),940-961。  new window
4.Mahbubani, K.(1995)。The Pacific Way。Foreign Affairs,74(1),100-111。  new window
5.黃光國(19991200)。儒家倫理與專業倫理:矛盾與出路。思與言,37(4),31-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Huntington, Samuel P.(1984)。Will More Countries Become Democratic?。Political Science Quarterly,99(2),193-218。  new window
7.張佑宗、朱雲漢、蔡自強(20051200)。Confucianism and Democratic Values in Three Chinese Societies。Issues & Studies,41(4),1-33。new window  new window
8.胡忠慈(1999)。亞洲金融風暴後,亞太區域之各國銀行安全體系之發展。APEC通訊,5。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.廖達琪、黃志呈(2003)。民主化與地方的行動效能一一從臺灣兩波(1993-2001)地方菁英的認知判斷探析。政治科學論叢,19,85-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.廖達琪(2004)。沒有孔子主義,只有馬基維利主義:公元2004年總統及立法院選舉後的臺灣行政立法關係分析。兩岸與國際事務季刊,1(4),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉述先(1999)。儒學的理想與實際一近時東亞發展之成就與限制之反省。鵝湖月刊,25(4),2-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Berger, Peter L.(1984)。Underdevelopment Revisited。Commentary,28(1),41-45。  new window
13.Chan, Joseph.(1997)。An Alternative View。Journal of Democracy,8(2),13-18。  new window
14.Chao, Linda, Ramon H. Myers, and James A. Robinson.(1997)。Promoting Effective Democracy, Chinese Style。Asian Survey,37(7),669-682。  new window
15.Gurr, Ted Robert.(1974)。Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800-1971。American Political Science Review,68,1482-1504。  new window
16.Hahm, Chaibong, and Wooyeal Paik.(2003)。Legalistic Confucianism and Economic Development in East Asia。Journal of East Asian Studies,3,461-491。  new window
17.Kausikan, Bilahari.(1997)。Governance That Works。Journal of Democracy,8(2),24-34。  new window
18.Liao, Da-chi.(2000)。Does Culture Matter?--A Study of Democratic Values of Local Elites in the Four East Asian System: Mainland China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan。Journal of Social Sciences,8(2),157-204。  new window
研究報告
1.廖達琪(1993)。台灣地方菁英政治文化及決策影響力之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖達琪、Eldersveld等(2001)。民主與地方統治:第二波臺灣地方菁英之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.Eckstein, Harry.(1971)。The Evaluation of Political Performance: Problems and Dimensions。Beverly Hills。  new window
圖書
1.Harrison, Lawrence E.(1992)。Who Prospers? How Cultural Values Shape Economic and Political Success。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Tu, Wei-ming(1984)。Confucian Ethics Today: The Singapore Challenge。Curriculum Development Institute of Singapore。  new window
3.Gurr, Ted Robert、King, Desmond(1987)。The State and the City。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Kuhn, H.、Hudson Institute(1979)。World economic development: 1979 and beyond。New York, NY:Westview Press。  new window
5.杜維明(1989)。Centrality and Commonality。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
6.Hsu, Leonard Shihlien.(1975)。The Political Philosophy of Confucianism。London, UK:Curzon。  new window
7.H. H. Gerth、Weber, Max.(1951)。The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism。The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism。沒有紀錄:Free Press。  new window
8.Eldersveld, Samuel J.、Stromberg, Lars、Derksen, Wim(1995)。Local Elites in Western Democracies: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Political Leaders in The U.S., Sweden, and The Netherlands。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
9.Bell, Daniel A.(2006)。Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.林清山(1988)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡佛(1998)。政治學的科學研究(三):政治參與與選舉行為。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.費孝通(1991)。鄉土中國.鄉土重建。上海:香港:上海書店:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation & Opposition。New Haven, CT。  new window
14.Pye, Lucian W.、Pye, Mary W.(1985)。Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority。Cambridge:The Belk nep Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Weber, Max、Roth, Guenther、Wittich, Claus(1978)。Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology。Berkeley。  new window
16.Putnam, Robert D.(1976)。The Comparative Study of Political Elites。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
17.Bell, Daniel A.(1995)。Democracy in Confucian Societies:the Challenge of Justification。Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia。New York。  new window
18.Clark, Terry N. eds.(1981)。Urban Policy Analysis。Beverly Hills, CA。  new window
19.Curtis, Gerald L.(1988)。The Japanese Why of Politics。New York。  new window
20.Diamond,Larry, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour M. Lipset, eds.(1988)。Politics in Developing Countries。Boulder Colo。  new window
21.Huntington, Samuel P.(2000)。Culture Count。in Harrison。New York。  new window
22.Mintzberg, Henny etal.(1998)。Harvard Business Review on Leadership。  new window
23.Richardson, Bradley.(1997)。Japanese Democracy。New Haven。  new window
24.Przeworski, Adam, etal.,(2000)。Democracy and Development。Cambridge。  new window
25.Sowell, Thomas.(1994)。Race and Culture: A World View。New York。  new window
26.Tan, Sor-hoon,(2004)。Confucian Democracy。New York。  new window
27.Teune, Henry, and Philip E. Jacob et al.(1971)。Values and the Active Community。N.Y.。  new window
28.Tu, Wei-ming(1979)。Humanity and Self-Cultivation: Essays in Confucian Thought。Berkeley:Asian Humanities Press。  new window
29.Tu, Wei-ming.(1991)。The Triadic Chord: Confucian Ethics, Industrial East Asia, and Max Weber。Singapore。  new window
30.Tu, Wei-ming.(1992)。The Modern Transformation of the Confucian Tradition (儒家傳統的現代變化)。Beijing。  new window
圖書論文
1.廖達琪、許家豪(2002)。總統擴權現象的探討--一個中西「法治」思想比較的觀點。憲政法制與總統權力。臺北:國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Berger, Peter L.、蕭新煌(1988)。An East Asian Development Model?。Search of an East Asian Development Model。New Brunswick, NJ:Oxford, UK:Transaction Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE