:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:法律、融貫性與權威
書刊名:政治與社會哲學評論
作者:王鵬翔 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Peng-hsiang
出版日期:2008
卷期:24
頁次:頁23-68
主題關鍵詞:德沃金拉茲原則一貫性融貫性權威法實證主義法概念DworkinRazIntegrityCoherenceAuthorityLegal positivismThe concept of law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:58
Ronald Dworkin法律哲學的核心主張「法律作為原則一貫性」(Law as Integrity,又譯為「整全法」)向來被視為一種法律的融貫論(a coherence theory of law)。對於Dworkin法律融貫論的主要挑戰之一是Joseph Raz的權威論據。Raz認為,Dworkin的原則一貫性理論無法說明法律的權威本質。Raz對於Dworkin的批評是否能夠成立,以及Dworkin式的融貫論要如何回應權威論據的挑戰,是本文所要探討的問題。本文首先歸納了Dworkin法律融貫論的幾個主要論點,其次討論Raz基於權威論據對於Dworkin融貫論的批評,除了介紹Dworkin自己對此一批評的回應之外,我也嘗試提出其它的論據(重構命題與正確衡量命題)來辯護Dworkin式的法律融貫論。本文最後則簡單討論了融貫命題與法之概念(the concepts of law)的關係。
The core tenet of Ronald Dworkin's legal philosophy "Law as Integrity" is usually regarded as a coherence theory of law. One of the positivistic challenges to Dworkin's coherence theory of law is Joseph Raz's argument from authority. Raz claims that Dworkin's theory of Law as Integrity cannot give a satisfactory account of the authoritative nature of law. The main issue of this essay is whether Raz's criticism is justified and how to defend the Dworkinian coherence thesis against Raz's attack. In this essay I will firstly summarize the main theses of Dworkin's coherence theory and then discuss Raz's authority-based arguments. Besides referring to Dworkin's reply, I will propose my own arguments (the reconstruction thesis and the correct balance thesis) to show how a Dworkinian coherence theory can meet Raz's challenge. The final part of this essay is a brief discussion about the relation between the coherence thesis and the concepts of law.
期刊論文
1.莊世同(20070600)。描述性法理論是可能的嗎?--一個批判性的反省。政治與社會哲學評論,21,1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Dworkin, Ronald(1996)。Objectivity and truth: You'd better believe it。Philosophy and Public Affairs,25(2),87-139。  new window
3.陳起行(20010300)。Dworkin法理學、融貫與法資訊系統。政大法學評論,65,1-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Günther, Klaus(1989)。A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal Justification。Ratio Juris,2(2),155-166。  new window
5.Dworkin, Ronald M.(2004)。Hart's Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy。Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,24(1),1-37。  new window
學位論文
1.李忠謙(2006)。法學融貫論之研究--以德沃金的整全法為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hart, H. L. A.(1982)。Essays on Bentham。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Raz, Joseph(1979)。The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Raz, Joseph(1988)。The Morality of Freedom。New York, NY:Clarendon Press。  new window
4.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London:Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
5.Dworkin, Ronald、李冠宜(2002)。法律帝國。臺北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Raz, Joseph.(1995)。Ethics in the Public Domain-Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
7.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press。  new window
8.Dworkin, Ronald M.(2006)。Justice in Robes。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Marmor, Andrei(2005)。Interpretation and Legal Theory。Interpretation and Legal Theory。Oxford, UK/ Portland, OR。  new window
10.Raz, Joseph(1999)。Practical Reason and Norms。Practical Reason and Norms。New York, NY/ Oxford, UK。  new window
11.Kress, Ken(1996)。Coherence。A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory。Cambridge, MA。  new window
12.Dworkin, Ronald(2004)。Ronald Dworkin Replies。Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin。Malden, MA。  new window
13.Bracker, Susanne(2000)。Kohärenz und Juristische Interpretation。Kohärenz und Juristische Interpretation。Baden-Baden, Germany。  new window
14.Alexy, Robert(1998)。Law and Correctness。Current Legal Problems 1998, Vol. 51: Legal Theory at the End of the Millennium。New York, NY/ Oxford, UK。  new window
15.Raz, Joseph(2002)。Reasoning with Rules。Current Legal Problems 2001, Vol. 54。New York, NY/ Oxford, UK。  new window
16.Moore, Michael S.(2000)。Educating Oneself in Public: Critical Essays in Jurisprudence。Educating Oneself in Public: Critical Essays in Jurisprudence。New York, NY/ Oxford, UK。  new window
17.Coleman, Jules(2001)。The Practice of Principles: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory。The Practice of Principles: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory。Oxford, UK。  new window
18.顏厥安(2006)。規範縫隙初探。法律的分析與解釋-楊日然教授紀念論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Dickson, Julie(2005)。Interpretation and Coherence in Legal Reasoning,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE