臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Selection of Factor-Based WAIS-III Tetrads in the Taiwan Standardization Sample: A Guide to Clinical Practice
書刊名：中華心理學刊
作者：陳心怡 引用關係／花茂棽 引用關係／朱建軍／陳榮華
作者(外文)：Chen, Hsin-yi／Hua, Mau-sun／Zhu, Jianjun／Chen, Yung-hwa
出版日期：2008
卷期：50:1
頁次：頁91-109
主題關鍵詞：魏氏成人智力量表第三版；簡短版；臺灣常模；WAIS-III；Short form；Taiwan norm
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:193
本研究使用台灣版魏氏成人智力量表第三版之標準化樣本，共888位16至84歲之正常成年人，來檢視以魏氏成人智力量表第三版四因素爲基礎的簡短式測驗組型。以各種心理計量特質、時間限制、以及比例與線性方程式的質性估計程序來比較54組測驗組型，結果支持使用線性方程式的程序。「類同－矩陣推理－算數－數字符號」組型在效度、內容代表性、以及節省時間的考量上，都比其他組型爲優。Kaufman (1990)的「類同－圖畫補充－算數－數字符號」組型，以及「常識－圖畫補充－算數－數字符號」組型兩者也都是整體而言相對較佳的估計組型。對於認爲圖形設計分測驗可提供高度臨床資訊的臨床工作者，另外兩個組型，「類同－圖形設計－算數－數字符號」與「常識－圖形設計－算數－數字符號」，亦可以提供很好的估計品質。然而，目前的發現顯示即使是最好的組型還是有相當程度的錯誤分類比率，而且這些以四因素爲基礎的測驗組型傾向會低估能力很高的正常成年人。使用者必須注意到這些簡短版的測驗組型，主要目的僅作爲篩檢的用途。本研究結果提供相對的心理計量特質，來幫助我們選擇不同的魏氏成人智力量表第三版的簡短式測驗組型。
Factor-based WAIS-Ⅲ tetrads were investigated with the Taiwan WAIS-Ⅲ standardization sample of 888 normal adults, ages 16 to 84 years old. Various psychometric characteristics, time constraints, as well as qualities of estimation among prorating and linear equating procedures, were compared among 54 tetrads. Our results supported the use of the linear equating procedure. The Similarities-Matrix Reasoning-Arithmetic-Digit Symbol form exceeded others with respect to validity, content representation, and time saving. Kaufman's (1990) Similarities-Picture Completion-Arithmetic-Digit Symbol combination, and the Information-Picture Completion-Arithmetic-Digit Symbol short forms were both among the most efficient estimations. For clinicians who highly value the clinical information of Block Design, two other forms, Similarities-Block Design-Arithmetic-Digit Symbol and Information-Block Design-Arithmetic-Digit Symbol, were found providing better estimation quality. Nonetheless, current findings revealed that even preferred tetrads had substantial misclassification rates, and these factor-based tetrads tend to show under-estimation for people with top abilities. Users are cautioned to use these short forms for screening purposes only. Results of this study are consistent with literature and assist in choosing among WAIS-Ⅲ factor-based tetrads by providing their relative psychometric quality.
期刊論文
1.Iannone, V. N.、Blyler, C. R.、Gold, J. M.、Buchanan, R. W.(2000)。Short form of the WAIS-III for use with patients with schizophrenia。Schizophrenia Research，46，209-215。  new window
2.Thompson, A. P.、Howard, D.、Anderson, J.(1986)。Two- and Four-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R: Validity in a Psychiatric Sample。Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science，18，287-293。  new window
3.Paolo, A. M.、Ryan, J. J.(1993)。WAIS-R Abbreviated Forms in the Elderly: A Comparison of the Satz-mogel with a Seven-subtest Short Form。Psychological Assessment，5，425-429。  new window
4.Tam, W. C. C.(2004)。The Utility of Seven-Subtest Short Forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in Young Adults。J Psychoeduc Assess，22，62-71。  new window
5.Entin, A. D.、Resnick, R. J.(1971)。Is an abbreviated form of the WISC valid for Afro-American children?。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，36，97-99。  new window
6.Tellegen, A.、Briggs, P. F.(1967)。Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales。Journal of Consulting Psychology，31(5)，499-506。  new window
7.Cyr, J. J.、Brooker, B. H.(1984)。Use of appropriate formulas for selecting WAIS-R short forms。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，52，903-905。  new window
8.Grossman, I.、Mednitsky, S.、Dennis, B.、Scharff, L.、Kaufman, A. S.(1993)。Validation of an amazingly short form of the WAIS-R for a clinically depressed sample。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，11，173-181。  new window
9.Kaufman, A. S.、Ishikuma, T.、Kaufman-Packer, J. L.(1991)。Amazingly short forms of the WAIS-R。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，9，4-15。  new window
10.Silverstein, A. B.(1982)。Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale。Revised., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，50，415-418。  new window
11.Silverstein, A. B.(1985)。Two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R: A closer look at validity and reliability。Journal of Clinical Psychology，41，95-97。  new window
12.Silverstein, A. B.(1990)。Short forms of individual intelligence tests。Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，2，3-11。  new window
13.Thompson, A. P.(1987)。Methodological issues in the clinical evaluation of two-and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R。Journal of Clinical Psychology，43，142-144。  new window
14.陳心怡、花茂棽、朱建軍(20071200)。Development of the Taiwan WAIS-III Two-Subtest Short Forms。測驗學刊，54(2)，305-330。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳心怡(2002)。臺灣魏氏成人智力量表第三版（WAIS-III）施測時間估計及其影響因素研究。測驗年刊，49(1)，39-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Cravens, T. B.(1999)。Evaluation of Kaufman, Ishikuma, and Kaufman-Packer's short forms for use with psychiatric African American children。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，17，332-342。  new window
17.Plumridge, S.、Thompson, A.(1999)。Two- and four-subtest Short forms of the WAIS-R: A Comparative Validity Study with a Normal Sample。Psychological Reports，84，371-380。  new window
18.Ryan, J. J.、Lopez, S. J.、Werth, T. R.(1998)。A Administration Time Estimates for WAIS-III Subtests, scales, and Short Forms in a Clinical Sample。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，16，315-323。  new window
19.Iverson, G. I.、Myers, B.、Adams, R. L.(1997)。Comparison of Two Computational Formulas for a WAIS-R Seven-subtest Short Form。Journal of Clinical Psychology，53，465-470。  new window
20.Benedict, R. H. H.、Schretlen, D.、Bobholz, J. H.(1992)。Concurrent Validity of Three WAIS Short Forms in Psychiatric Inpatients。Psychological Assessment，4，322-328。  new window
21.Ward, L. C.、Ryan, J. J.(1996)。Validity and Time Savings in the Selection of Short Forms of the WAIS-R。Psychological Assessment，8，69-72。  new window
22.Ryan, J. J.(1985)。Application of a WAIS-R Short Form with Neurological Patients: Validity and Correlational Findings。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，3，61-64。  new window
23.Clark, P. L.、Reynolds, C. R.、Willson, V. L.(1983)。A Four-test Short Form of the WAIS-R for Clinical Screening。Clinical Neuropsychology，5，111-116。  new window
24.Kennedy, M. L.、Gnys, J.、Guilmette, T. J.、Dabrowski, J.(1999)。A Comparison of Nine WAIS-R Short Forms in Individuals with Mild to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury。Assessment，6，33-41。  new window
25.McCusker, P. J.(1994)。Validation of Kaufman, Ishikuma, and Kaufman-packer's Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised Short Forms on a Clinical Sample。Psychological Assessment，6，246-248。  new window
26.Donders, J.(2001)。Using a Short Form of the WISC-III: Sinful or Smart?。Child Neuropsychology，7，99-103。  new window
27.Donders, J.(1997)。A Short Form of the WISC-III for Clinical Use。Psychological Assessment，9，15-20。  new window
28.Ward, L. C.、Ryan, J. J.(1999)。Validity, Reliability, and Standard Errors of Measurement for Two Seven-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-III。Psychological Assessment，11，207-211。  new window
29.Robiner, W. N.、O'Dowd, W. T.、Dossa, D. E.(1997)。Use of the Reynolds. Willson, and Clark WAIS-R Short Form in a Brain-injured Population: A Cautionary Note。The Clinical Neuropsychologist，11，91-95。  new window
30.Ryan, J. J.、Ward, L. C.(1997)。Validity of Quick Short Forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised with Brain-damaged Patients。Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology，12，63-69。  new window
31.Leiker, M.、Clinton, W. M., Jr.、Satterfield, W. A.(1994)。A Comparison of Four WAIS-R Short Forms in Patients Referred for Psychological/Neuropsychological Assessments。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，12，364-371。  new window
32.Smith, G. T.、McCarthy, D. M.、Anderson, K. G.(2000)。On the Sins of Short-form Development。Psychological Assessment，12，102-111。  new window
33.Eisenstein, N.、Losonczy, M.、Johnson, V.、Engelhart, C. I.(1999)。Comparison of Linear Equating and Prorated Short Forms for Estimating WAIS-RFSIQ in a Neuropsychological Population。The Clinical Neuropsychologist，13，95-99。  new window
34.Donders, J.、Axelrod, B. N.(2002)。Two-subtest Estimates of WAIS-III Factor Index Scores。Psychological Assessment，14，360-364。  new window
35.Ward, L. C.、Axelrod, B. N.、Ryan, J. J.(2001)。Evaluation of Seven-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-III in a Referred Sample。Clinical Neuropsychology，16，1-8。  new window
36.Kaufman, A. S.、McLean, J. E.、Balgopol, R.、Kaufman, J. C.(1996)。Comparison of Three WISC-III Short Forms: Weighting Psychometric, Clinical, and Practical Factors。Journal of Clinical Child Psychology，25，97-105。  new window
37.Van Kammen, D. P.、Barry, E. J.、Kelley, M. E.、Allen, D. N.、Huegel, S. G.、Gurklis, Jr. J. A.(1997)。Utility of WAIS-R Short Forms in Schizophrenia。Schizophrenia Research，26，163-172。  new window
38.Gold, J. M.、Goldberg, T. E.、Missar, C. D.(1994)。WAIS-R Short Forms in Chronic Schizophrenia。Schizophrenia Research，26，163-172。  new window
39.Patterson, C. A.、Saklofske, D. H.、Zhu, J.、Weiss, L. G.、Gorsuch, R. L.(2005)。General Ability Index for the WAIS-III: Canadian Norms。Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science，37，44-48。  new window
40.Silverstein, A. B.(1985)。An Appraisal of Three Criteria for Evaluating the Usefulness of WAIS-R Short Forms。intelligence，41，676-680。  new window
41.Ward, L. C.(1990)。Prediction of Verbal, Performance and Full scal IQs from Seven Subtests of the WAIS-R。Journal of Clinical Psychology，46，436-440。  new window
42.Callahan, C. D.、Schopp, L. H.、Johnstone, B.、Herrman, T. D.、Roudebush, I. S.(2001)。Two Abbreviated Versions of the WAIS-III: Validation among Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury。Rehabilitation Psychology，46，279-287。  new window
43.Boone, D. E.(1992)。Evaluation of Kaufman's Short Forms of the WAIS-R with Psychiatric Inpatients。Journal of Clinical Psychology，48，239-245。  new window
44.Nagle, R. J.、Bell, N. L.(1995)。Clinical Utility of Kaufman's "Amazingly" Short Forms of the WAIS-R with Educable Mentally Retarded Adolescents。Journal of Clinical Psychology，51，396-400。  new window
45.Ryan, J. J.、Larsen, J.、Prifitera, A.(1983)。Validity of Two- and Four-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R in a Psychiatric Sample。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，51。  new window
46.Axelrod, B. N.、Kulas, J. F.(2002)。Comparison of Seven-subtest and Satz-Mogel Short Forms of the WAIS-III。Journal of Clinical Psycology，58，773-782。  new window
圖書
1.Kaufman, A. S.(1990)。Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Sattler, J. M.(2001)。Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications。San Diego, Calif.：J.M. Sattler。  new window
3.陳榮華、陳心怡(2002)。魏氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)中文版指導手冊。臺北：中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaufman, Alan S.、Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O.(1999)。Essentials of WAIS-III Assessment。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Kaufman, A. S.、Lichtenberger, E. O.(2002)。Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence。Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
6.Tulsky, D. S.、Zhu, J.、Prifitera, A.(2000)。Assessment of Adult Intelligence with the WAIS-III。Handbook of Psychological Assessment。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
7.Tulsky, D. S.、Saklofske, D. H.、Zhu, J.(2003)。Revising a Standard: An Evaluation of the Origin and Development of the WAIS-III。Clinical Interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III。San Diego, CA。  new window
8.Wechsler, D.(1997)。Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Third Edition (WAIS-III)。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。  new window
9.Wechsler, D.(2003)。Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。  new window
10.Wechsler, D.(1991)。Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition (WISC-III)。Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition (WISC-III)。San Antonio, TX。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：804（臺灣：798，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67993858
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上