:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:少年矯正學校教師對非行原因之認知及非行對策嚴懲化態度研究
書刊名:犯罪學期刊
作者:戴伸峰 引用關係
作者(外文):Tai, Shen-feng
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:少年非行原因認知矯正學校教師嚴懲化支持態度Juvenile delinquencyCausal attributionTeachers of correction schoolPunitive attitudes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:179
本研究針對新竹誠正中學以及高雄明陽中學之教師以及輔導人員,以戴伸峰(2009)之少年非行原因認知問卷以及自編非行對策嚴懲化支持量表爲工具,以郵寄方式發送並回收問卷。研究時間爲民國97年4月中旬至5月中旬。共發出誠正中學40份問卷,明陽中學35份問卷,合計75位。實際回收有效問卷爲誠正中學32份,明陽中學24份,合計57份。有效問卷回收率爲76.00%。研究結果發現:戴伸峰(2009)所抽取出之少年非行原因16因子架構在矯正教師樣本上得到因子適合度指標的滿足以及確認。少年矯正學校教師對少年非行原因認知以「缺乏家庭管教」、「負面家庭氣氛」、「軟弱的人格特質」、「非行團體行爲」等因子之平均認知得分較高。在對嚴懲化對策支持度方面,以預防性爲主的「對少年實施嚴格管制」因子得分最高,其次是「少年法體系的嚴懲修正」,最後才是「少年適用成人法體系」。與先行研究一致,當矯正教師有較強的少年非行人格原因認知時,他們也會對於非行嚴懲化對策有較強的支持度。此外,在本研究中地域環境惡化的原因認知強化了對少年行爲嚴格管制的嚴懲支持態度,而大社會環境惡化認知則強化了少年法體系嚴懲修正的態度。
The present study examed causal attributions and punitive attitudes of juvenile delinquency of teachers' samples from the Ming-Yang and Cheng-Jheng correction high schools. We used the 64items causal attribution questionaire constructed by Tai (2009), and questionaire of puntive attitude toward juvenile dleinquency. We sent 75 questionaires to participants and got valid answers of 57. First, we found that participants from correction high schools had multiple attributional factors toward juvneile delinquency, and factor structures of Tai (2009) had been confirmed by samples of teachers. Teachers of correction schools tended to emphasize the nagative influences of family and the weak mind of juvenlie which made the delinquency happened. We also found that teachers tended to approve some punitive methods to protect juvenile instead of punishing them. Besides, we found that personal causal attribution of juvenile delinquency strengthened punitive attitudes toward juvenile delinquency. Some environmental factors also had the same effect. We interpreted this may due tu the protective tendency toward juvenile delinquency.
期刊論文
1.Bridges, G.S.、Steen, S.(1998)。Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms。American Sociological Review,63,554-570。  new window
2.Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., and Rooney, J.(2000)。A quasi-experiment evaluation of an intensive rehaabilitation supervision program。Criminal Justice and Behavior,27,312-329。  new window
3.Furnham,A.(1982)。Explanations for unemployment in Britain。European Journal of Social Psychology,12,335-352。  new window
4.Furnham, A.(1982)。Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain。Brtish Journal of Social Psychology,21,311-322。  new window
5.Cullen, F.T., Clark,G.A., Cullen,J.B., and Mathers,R.A.(1985)。Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning。Criminal Justice and Behavior,12,305-311。  new window
6.Tyson, G.A.、Hubert, C.J.(2002)。Cultural differences in adolescents’ explanations of juvenile delinquency。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33,459-463。  new window
7.Banks, C.、Maloney, E.、Willcock, H. D.(1975)。Public attitudes to crime and the penal system。British Journal of Criminology,15,228-241。  new window
8.Furnham, A.、Henderson, M.(1983)。Lay theories of delinquency。European Journal of Social Psychology,13,107-120。  new window
9.Reuterman, M. A.(1978)。The public's view of delinquency causation: A consideration in comprehensive juvenile justice planning。Juvenile and Family Court Journal,29,39-47。  new window
10.Tyson, G. A.、Hubert, C.(2000)。Australian adolescents’ explanations of juvenile delinquency。Australian Journal of Psychology,52(2),119-124。  new window
11.Tyson, G. A.、Stones, C. R.(2002)。South African adolescents' explanations for juvenile delinquency。South African Journal of Psychology,32(3),1-6。  new window
12.蔡德輝、楊士隆(20030100)。臺灣地區少年加入幫派危險因子之實證研究。警學叢刊,33(4)=146,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.戴伸峰、大渕憲一(2004)。青少年犯罪に対する一般市民の認知。犯罪心理学研究,42(2),13-34。  延伸查詢new window
14.戴伸峰、大渕憲一、石毛博、山入端津由(2006)。青少年犯罪の原因に対する一般市民と専門家の認知の比較。犯罪心理学研究,44(1),19-32。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cann A., Calhoun G.L., and Seiby W.J.(1980)。Attributions for delinquent behaviour: Impact consensus and consistency information。British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,19,33-40。  new window
16.Carroll, J.S.(1978)。Causal attribution in expert parole decisions。Journal of Personlaity and Social Psychology,36,1501-1511。  new window
17.Carroll J.S. and Payne W.J.(1977)。Crime seriousness, recidivism risk, and causal attributions in judgments of prison term by students and experts。Journal of Applied Psychology,62,595-602。  new window
18.Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W.T., Lurigio, A.J., and Weaver, F.M.(1987)。Sentencing Goals, Causal Attributions, Ideology, and Personality。Journal of Personality and Spcial Psychology,52,107-118。  new window
19.Daley, C.E. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J.(2004)。Attributions toward violence of male juvenile delinquents: A concurrent mixed-methodological analysis。The Journal of Social Psychology,144(6),549-570。  new window
20.Erskine. H.(1974)。The polls:Causes of crime。Public Opinion Quarterly,38,288-295。  new window
21.Franworth,M., Frazier,C., and Neuberger, A.(1988)。Orientations to juvenile justice: exploratory notes from a statewide survey of juvenile justice decision makers。Journal of Criminal Justice,16,477-491。  new window
22.Hardiker,P. and Webb,D.(1974)。Explaining deviant behaviour: The social context of “action' and “unfraction”accounts in the probation service。Sociology,13,1-16。  new window
23.Hudson B. and Bramhall, G.(2005)。Assessing the ‘other’- Constructions of ‘Asianess’ in risk assessments by probation officers。British Journal of Criminology,45,721-740。  new window
24.Leiber,M.J., Schwarze K., Mack, K.Y., and Farnworth M.(2002)。The effect of occupation and education on punitive orientations among juvenile justice personnel。Journal of Criminal Justice,30,303-316。  new window
25.Levesque, R. J. R.(1996)。Is there still a place for violent youth in juvenile justice?。Aggression and Violent Behavior,1,69-79。  new window
26.Moak, S.C. and Wallace,L.H.(2000)。Attitudes of Louisiana practitioners toward rehabilitation of juvenile offenders。American Journal of Criminal Justice,24,271-285。  new window
27.Tai Shen-feng(2007)。Causal perception, prediction of juvenile dleinquency, and approval attitude toward punitive to the juvenile: Sample from Taichung citizens。Journal of Criminology(Taiwan),10(2),57-74。  new window
28.Tai Shen-feng(2009)。Causal attribution, prediction of juvenile crime, and positive attitude toward punitive to juvenile crime: The Japanese and Taiwanese Sample。Journal of Research in Delinquency and Prevention (Taiwan),1(1),83-108。  new window
29.Tai Shen-feng and Ohbuchi Ken-ichi.(2004)。Causal perception of juvenile delinquency and approval attitude toward punitive amendments of the Juvenile Law。Tohoku Psychologica Folia,63,112-118。  new window
30.Tai Shen-feng, Ohbuchi Kenichi, and Huang, Fu-yuan, Frank.(2006)。Taiwan citizens’ causal perception toward juvenile delinquency。Journal of Criminology (Taiwan),9(2),1-30。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部(2002)。社會氣候、道德、治安滿意度調查:政府應該採取什麼辦法來抑制犯罪。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Losel, F.(1998)。Treatment and management of psychopaths。Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society。Dordrecht。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE