:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:非行少年之雙軸性(時間軸與人際軸)自我概念:以誠正中學收容少年為例
書刊名:青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者:戴伸峰 引用關係
作者(外文):Tai, Shen-feng
出版日期:2009
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁71-92
主題關鍵詞:自我目標設定希望可能自我害怕可能自我非行少年Self goal settingHope for selvesFear of selvesPossible selvesInterpersonal selves
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:46
摘要 未來導向自我概念(可能自我possible selves)是一組關於人們如何看待自 己未來的希望以及未來的恐懼的自我概念(Markus and Nirius, 1986)。這樣的 自我狀態也會受到來自少年朋友或師長等方面人際關係而來的建議而改變。 本研究係針對新竹誠正中學收容之非行少年203 位為研究對象,由研究者 親訪並實際實施調查後回收有效問卷199 份。研究工具為研究者參考Markus, et al.(1986)所自編之時間軸自我概念(希望可能自我以及害怕可能自我)開放式 問卷以及人際軸自我概念封閉式量表。研究發現: 1. 非行少年所反應的希望可能自我數量較害怕可能自我數量多,在反應內容 部分亦出現差異。非行少年針對自我設定的希望目標或是擔心的害怕,其 具體實現行動或是趨避行動並不多,並且具體實現性亦不高。 2. 在希望可能自我部分,非行少年反應出最多與物質享受有關的希望可能自 我目標,此外就是與自身相關的短期收容狀況結束的自我目標。另外在本 研究中也發現有些少年回答出與傳統社會價值觀相違背的、與犯罪行為親 和度更高的希望可能自我目標,原因除了是少年對於問卷填答採取胡鬧態 度外,其背後的真正原因,應由相關輔導老師繼續輔導追蹤。 3. 受試少年提出較少具體行動以實現希望或避免害怕,本部分有可能因為少 年身處於收容環境中,其日常行動受到收容學校管制,因之無法對自己的 人生規劃做出進一步的具體實現行動。 4. 受試少年對於自我目標設定較為重視自己的能力及經驗評估,而較無法產 生符合社會傳統價值標準的自我目標。
The future orientation of self concept (poosible selves) is about how people hope for and fear of their own future (Markus and Niruis, 1986). Possble selves are not only based on the people’s private experiences, but also influenced by other people’s suggestions such as psrents, teachers, and friends. The present study examed the youth inmates of Chengjheng High School in Shinchu about their possble selves by an open-answer possible selves questionaire and about their interpersonal selves by a 5-point Likert scale. The results suggested that: 1. The youth inmates had more reponsese of positive hope for possible selves then negative fear of possible selves. However, youth inmates had less concrete behavioral plan to make the hope become true or avoid the fear of possible selves. 2. The youth inmates answered their positive hope for selves most of the enjoyment of material dimension and thfy hope to finish their jail lives quickly. Some inmates answered their possible selves iabout the illegal way, this may due to their illegal experiences in the past. 3. The youth inmates had less concrete behavioral plans for their self goals may be due to that they are controlled by the school, so they can not have real activities to fulfill their hope. 4. The youth inmates emphasized their own expereinces when they decide their future goal, but they paid less attention to those goals of traditional values.
期刊論文
1.蔡德輝、楊士隆(20001200)。The Girls' Delinquency: An Empirical Test of a General Theory of Crime and Social Learning Theory in Taiwan。犯罪學期刊,6,205-224。new window  new window
2.蔡德輝、楊士隆(20000600)。臺灣地區少年強姦犯、非暴力犯及一般少年犯罪危險因子之比較研究。犯罪學期刊,5,1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃富源(20020400)。當前我國青少年犯罪原因與對策。國家政策論壇,2(4),81-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.周愫嫻(20040600)。社會階級與少年偏差行為關係。犯罪學期刊,7(1),31-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡德輝、楊士隆(19991100)。幫派入侵校園之問題與對策。學生輔導,65,8-17。  延伸查詢new window
6.Oyserman, D.、Terry, K.、Bybee, D.(2002)。A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement。Journal of Adolescence,25(3),313-326。  new window
7.蔡德輝、楊士隆(20030100)。臺灣地區少年加入幫派危險因子之實證研究。警學叢刊,33(4)=146,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Markus, Hazel R.、Nurius, Paula(1986)。Possible Selves。American Psychologist,41(9),954-969。  new window
9.蔡德輝、揚士隆(1994)。少年犯罪防治之對策。學生輔導,32,58-65。  延伸查詢new window
10.Oyserman, D.、Bybee, D.、Terry, K.、Hart-Johnson, T.(2004)。Possible selves as roadmaps。Journal of Research in Personality 38,130-149。  new window
11.Oyserman, D.、Gant, L.、Ager, J.(1995)。Asocially contextualized model of Afirican American identity: possible selves and school persistence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(6),1216-1232。  new window
12.Oyserman, D.、Markus, H.(1990)。Possible selves in balance: Implications for delinquency。Journal of Social Issues,46(2),141-157。  new window
13.Oyserman, D.、Markus, H.(1990)。Possible selves and delinquency。Journal of Personality and Social psychology,59(1),112-125。  new window
14.Oyserman, D.、Saltz, E.(1993)。Competence, delinquency, and attempts to attain possible selves。Journal of Personality and Social psychology,65(2),360-374。  new window
15.Hoyle, R. H.、Sherrill. M. R.(2006)。Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation and behavior。Journal of Personality,74(6),1673-1696。  new window
16.Quinlan, S,L.、Jaccard, J.、Blanton, H.(2006)。A decision theoretic and prototype conceptualization of possible selves: Implications for the prediction of risk behavior。Journal of Personality,74(2),599-630。  new window
17.Abrams, L.S.、Aquilar, J. P.(2005)。Negative trends, possible selves. and behavior change: A qualitative study of juvenile offenders in residential treatment。Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice,4(2),175-196。  new window
18.Norman, C.C.、Aron, A.(2003)。Aspects of possible self that predict motivation to achieve or avoid it。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,39,500-507。  new window
圖書
1.許春金(2003)。犯罪學。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許福生(2006)。台灣地區少年非行狀況與防治策略之探討。  延伸查詢new window
3.Oyserman, D.、Fryberg, S.(2006)。The possible selves of diverse adolescents: content and fonction across gender。Possible selves: Theory, research and applications。Hauppauge, NY, US。  new window
4.Oyserman, D.、Markus, HR.(1993)。The sociocultural self。Psychological Perspectives on the Self。NJ。  new window
其他
1.侯崇文(2002)。青少年偏差行為問題的特性與預防策略。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE