:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:日本對長江上游航行安全問題的因應之道 (1920~1925)
書刊名:國史館館刊
作者:應俊豪 引用關係
作者(外文):Ying, Chun-hao
出版日期:2010
卷期:23
頁次:頁33-78
主題關鍵詞:長江上游航行安全問題日本使領與海軍宜陽丸案德陽丸案長沙案Shipping securities on Upper YangtzeJapanese diplomats and consulsJapanese NavyI-yang Maru IncidentTeh-yang Maru IncidentChangsha Incident
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:186
1920年代前期受到四川內戰與紛亂的影響,日本在長江上游地區的商務與航運發展遭受嚴重威脅,輸船頻遭中國軍隊徵用或攻擊。然而長江上游特殊的地理環境與四川獨立於北京政府之外的客觀環境,卻使得日本傳統正規的使領交涉無法發揮應有的作用,海軍也無法像在長江中下游地區一樣提供充分支援。日本想要在此類徵用或攻擊事件上討回公道,並非易事。其次,川軍攻擊日本輸船初始並未帶有針對性或排日情緒,僅是企圖課徵非法稅收或強制徵用輸船。不過,日本輸船多次疑似涉入、介入四川內戰事務,引起部分川軍派系的敵意,間接導致重大中日衝突事件的發生。再加上領事與海軍系統對於中日衝突問題的看法也不太一致,使得此善後處理益形棘手。最後,自1922年、1923年開始,派駐在長江流域的日本第一遣外艦隊,為了因應日益嚴重的長江上游航行安全問題,逐漸探取積極的作為來強化保護日商航行安全。姑且不論海軍護航或動武方針是否真能達到提高航行安全的目的,強硬武裝政策所引起的後續效應,反倒可能為航行安全問題投下更不易處理的變數。長沙案、宜陽丸案、德陽丸案等一再發生的中日衝突事件,勢必再起漣漪,引起一波波群眾運動,諸如排斥與燒毀日貨、抵制日本輸船、反日示威遊行、對日商罷業等活動此起彼落。因此,海軍介入保護與避免排日運動之間,分寸應該如何拿捏,實考驗著日本駐華海軍與使領的智慧。
In the first half of 1920s, Japanese shipping and business on Upper Yangtze were greatly threatened by the civil wars and unrests in Szechuan. But, its geographical conditions and independence from the Peking government weakened the Japanese diplomats and consuls' regular negotiations, and refrained their Navy from taking operations. It was not an easy work for Japan to get what it wanted. Besides, The Szechuanese attacks on Japanese vessels were not brought up by the anti-Japanese sentiments but for practical purposes of illegal taxes and transportation. However, due to Japanese steamers' having got involved in the civil wars in Szechuan, some military factions began to resent the Japanese, resulting in serious Sino-Japanese conflicts. Finally, since 1922, the Japanese Navy has to take the hard line to deal with the navigation securities on Upper Yangtze. This strong military interference, regardless of the doubt as to its effectiveness on the improvement of this situation, whether it can improve the situation or not, must arouse more violent anti-Japanese movements, such as boycotts and demonstrations, that would surely make Upper Yangtze shipping issues more complex. The meditation between the Navy's interference and the avoidance of anti-Japanese campaigns by the Japanese diplomats, consuls and naval officers was a challenge to their determination and decision.
期刊論文
1.應俊豪(20091100)。1920年代上半期長江上游美國海軍護航行動爭議。國立政治大學歷史學報,32,71-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.應俊豪(20090600)。長江上游航行安全問題與美國駐華海軍的因應之道(1920-1925)。國史館館刊,20,123-125+127-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.應俊豪(20071100)。航運、砲艦與外交--1924 年中、英「萬縣案」研究。國立政治大學歷史學報,28,287-327。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林能士、楊維真(19980500)。抗戰前國民政府與地方實力派之關係--以川滇黔為中心的探討(1928-1937)。國立政治大學歷史學報,15,199-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.應俊豪(20050600)。內戰、輪船與綁架勒贖:中日宜陽丸事件(1923-1924)。近代中國,161,116-137。  延伸查詢new window
6.林志龍(20070600)。日清汽船與中英長江滬漢集資協定之航運競爭,1921-1927。興大歷史學報,18,249-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.應俊豪(20080600)。抵制日輪與中日衝突--長沙案及其善後交涉(1923-1926)。東吳歷史學報,19,111-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.(1924)。The Situation on the Upper Yangtze。The China Press。  new window
9.(1923)。各埠商情:萬縣。上海總商會月報,3(8),15-16。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1923)。Anti-Japanese Boycott Gains in Szechuen: Students and Others at Ichang Keep up Agitation。The China Press。  new window
11.(1923)。Boycott Still on: Aids is Refused to Wrecked Vessels。The China Press。  new window
12.(1923)。Japanese Chambers in Session here Warn China: Patience is Nearing End; Advocate Drastic Counter Measures in Retaliation against Anti-Japan Agitation through Country。The China Press。  new window
13.(1923)。Japanese Ship Delayed by Death Threats: Chunking Students Menace Pilots; Gunboat Can't Proceed。The China Press。  new window
14.(1923)。Japanese Urge Chamber heads to End Boycott。The China Press。  new window
15.(1923)。Reports of Sino-Japanese Clashay Ichang Distorted。The China Press。  new window
16.(1923)。Second Japanese Gunboat Floated from Yards Here: Consul-General Funatsu Comments on Need for Protection on Yangtze。The China Press。  new window
17.應俊豪(2009)。四國海因應長江上游航行安全問題採取的聯合行動。東吳歷史學報,22,169-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊端六、侯厚培(1931)。六十五年來中國國際貿易統計。南京:國立中央研究院社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Cole, Bernard D.(1978)。The United States Navy in China, 1925-1928(博士論文)。Auburn University,Auburn。  new window
圖書
1.許同莘、汪毅、張承棨(1963)。清末對外交涉條約輯。清末對外交涉條約輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Braisted, William(2009)。Diplomats in Blue: U. S. Naval Officers in China, 1922-1933。Gainesville。  new window
3.Asada, Sadao(2006)。From Mahan to Pearl Harbor: American Strategic Theory and the Rise of the Imperial Japanese Navy。Annapolis:Naval Institute Press。  new window
4.中央研究院近代史研究所(1993)。中日關係史料─排日問題。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬宣偉、蕭波(1983)。四川軍閥楊森。成都。  延伸查詢new window
6.匡珊吉、楊光彥(1991)。四川軍閥史。成都。  延伸查詢new window
7.Tolley, Kemp(1971)。Yangtze Patrol: The U.S. Navy in China。Yangtze Patrol: The U.S. Navy in China。Annapolis。  new window
8.Grover, David H.(1992)。American Merchant Ships on the Yangtze, 1920-1941。Westport:Praeger Publishers。  new window
9.費成康(1991)。中國租界史。上海:上海社會科學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭近以(1989)。近代中國史綱。香港:中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃月波、于能模、鮑釐人(1935)。中外條約彙編。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hattendorf, John B.、Jordoan, Robert S.(1989)。Maritime Strategy and The Balance of Power: Britain and America in the Twentieth Century。St. Martin's Press。  new window
13.喬誠、楊續雲(1987)。劉湘。華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.李白虹(2007)。二十年來之川閥戰爭。四川內戰詳記。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.應俊豪(2008)。輪船入侵與華洋衝突:1920年代上半期長江上游航行安全問題。東亞海域與文明交會:港市、商貿、移民與文化傳播。基隆。  延伸查詢new window
16.日本外務省(1979)。日本外交文書.昭和2年(第1部第1卷)。日本外交文書.昭和2年(第1部第1卷)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
17.Gardiner, Robert(1985)。Randal Gray and Przemyslaw Budzbon, Conway%s All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-0921。Randal Gray and Przemyslaw Budzbon, Conway%s All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-0921。Annapolis。  new window
18.Kennedy, Malcolm D.(1969)。The Estrangement of Great Britain and Japan, 1937 -35。The Estrangement of Great Britain and Japan, 1937 -35。Berkeley and Los Angles。  new window
19.Reinhardt, Ann(2002)。Navigating Imperialism in China: Steamship, Semicolony, and Nation, 1860-1937。Navigating Imperialism in China: Steamship, Semicolony, and Nation, 1860-1937。Ann Arobr。  new window
20.蕭波、馬宣偉(1984)。四川軍閥混戰。四川軍閥混戰。成都。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.外務省記錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1922)。Describes Events on Upper River: Mr. H Sander Tells Exciting Story of Szechuen。  new window
3.U. S. Department of State(1960)。Records of the Department of State Relating to the International Affairs of China, 1910-1929,Washington, D. C.。  new window
4.The War Department(1987)。Correspondence of the Military Intelligence Division Relating to General, Political, Economic, and Military Conditions in China, 1918-1941,Washington, D. C.。  new window
5.Great Britain Foreign Office。China, Embassy and Consular Archives,London。  new window
6.Jarman, Robert L.(2001)。China: Political Reports 1911-1960,Slough。  new window
7.外交檔案。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1922)。Japan Protests Yangtze Troops Firing on Ships。  new window
9.(1922)。Kuomintung Win in Szechuen。  new window
10.(1922)。Szechuen Army Takes Steamer from Japanese: First Ask it as Loan: Then Commandeer Craft up River Run。  new window
11.(1922)。The Civil War in Szechuan: The Defeated Second Army; A renew of the Struggle。  new window
12.(1924)。The Fight in Szechuan: 2nd Army Entirely Collapsed; Appeal to Wu Pei-fu。  new window
13.(1924)。The Rival Factions in Szechuan。  new window
14.(1922)。Upper River Attacks on Foreign Steamers: Navigation Difficulties; Japanese Boats' Casualties。  new window
15.(1922)。Upper Yangtze Unsafe; Troops Fire on Ships; Japanese Gunboat and Steamer Sustain Casualties; Teal Acts as Escort。  new window
16.(1919)。重慶にも排日運動起り日清汽船破壞,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1919)。重慶の排日騷擾,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.(1921)。宜昌戰鬥決せず:兩軍互に讓らず宜昌重慶交通杜絕,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.(1922)。四川は無政府狀態:外國船射擊損害頻タ,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.(1922)。日清天華で約十萬弗:指揮官の命令に依る故意の暴動と判明す。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1922)。支那兵の暴行、長江航行の不安:各國船共に被害頻頻。  延伸查詢new window
22.(1923)。驅逐隊を派遣す楊子江方面の邦人保護じして,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.(1923)。支那の不當を鳴さん重慶在留日本人より,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.(1923)。宜陽丸事件の真相,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.(1924)。又も重慶で邦人船員を拉致した支那兵の暴狀唐師長の謝罪て落著,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.(1921)。鳥羽陸戰隊登陸,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.(1922)。各方面要訊。  延伸查詢new window
28.(1923)。重慶排日運動惡化,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
29.(1923)。全國注目之長沙中日交涉,北京。  延伸查詢new window
30.(1924)。各公司競爭長江上游航業,上海。  延伸查詢new window
31.應俊豪(2009)。美旗下的迷思:從字水號輪航被劫事件看美國眼中的長江上游航行全安全問題(1924),廈門。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.朱蔭貴(2007)。1895年後日本輪運勢力在長江流域的擴展。四川內戰詳記。北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE