臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：網路化學習歷程檔案同儕互評之信效度研究
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：張基成 引用關係／吳炳宏
作者(外文)：Chang, Chi-cheng／Wu, Bing-hong
出版日期：2011
卷期：14:2
頁次：頁1-28
主題關鍵詞：學習歷程檔案；網路化學習歷程檔案；網路化檔案評量；同儕互評；Portfolio；Web-based portfolio；Web-based portfolio assessment；Peer-assessment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:72
本研究探討網路化檔案同儕互評的信、效度。以某高職二年級修習「計算機應用」課程的七十二位學生為研究樣本。學習者藉由網路化檔案評量系統進行個人檔案的製作、觀摩與同儕互評。結果顯示：（1）不同學生彼此間評分結果（對同一份檔案）不具一致性（評分者間信度）。（2）三分之二學生的評分結果（每位學生對不同份檔案）不具一致性（評分者內部信度）。（3）同儕互評與教學者評分量結果不具一致性（外在效標關聯效度）。（4）同儕互評分數與測驗成績一致性低，顯示網路化檔案同儕互評不易反應學習成就（外在效標關聯效度）。簡言之，網路化檔案同儕互評不具信、效度。
This study explores the reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer-assessments. The research samples consist of seventy-two students who take "Computer Application" course of the second grade in a vocational high school. The students use the web-based portfolio assessment system for creating their portfolio, emulating peers' portfolio, and performing peer-assessments. The results show that the assessment scores between different students (on the same one portfolio) have no adequate consistence (reliability between assessors). The assessment scores of two-third students (each student on different portfolios) have no adequate consistence (reliability within an assessor). The scores of peer-assessments and teacher assessment have no adequate consistence (external object association validity). The consistence between peer-assessments and test scores is low, meaning the web-based portfolio peer-assessments do not demonstrate learning achievement (external object association validity). In short, web-based portfolio peer-assessment have no adequate reliability and validity.
期刊論文
1.Topping, K. J.、Smith, E. F.、Swanson, I.、Elliot, A.(2000)。Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，25(2)，149-169。  new window
2.Cho, K.-S.、Schunn, C. D.、Wilson, R. W.(2006)。Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives。Journal of Educational Psychology，98(4)，891-901。  new window
3.Ballantyne, R、Hughes, K、Mylonas, A(2002)。Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，27(5)，427-441。  new window
4.Bloxham, S.West, A.(2004)。Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students，conceptions of assessment。Assessment &. Evaluation in Higher Education，29(6)，721-733。  new window
5.Burch, C. B.(1999)。Inside the portfolio experience: The student's perspective。English Education，32(1)，34-49。  new window
6.Chang, C.(2008)。Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment。Computers in Human Behavior，24(3)，1753-1771。  new window
7.Chang, C.(2009)。Using a Web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based Learning performances。Interactive Learning Environments，16(2)，25-37。  new window
8.Chang, C. C.、Tseng, K. H.(2009)。Use and performances of web-based portfolio assessment。British Journal of Educational Technology，40(2)，358-370。  new window
9.Derham, C(2007)。Digital professional portfolios of preservice teaching: An initial study of score reliability and validity。International Journal 23 of Technology and Technology and Teacher EducationTeacher Education，75(3)，363-381。  new window
10.Gadbury(2003)。Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program。Journal of Dental Education，67(9)，991-1002。  new window
11.Jenkins, M.(2004)。Unfulfilled promise: Formative assessment using computer-aided assessment。Learning and Teaching in Higher Education，1，67-80。  new window
12.Johnson, R. L、McDaniel, F(2000)。Using portfolios in program evaluation: An investigation oi mterrater reliability。American Journal of Evaluation，27(1)，65-81。  new window
13.Lankes, D.、Maria, A.(1998)。Portfolios: A new wave in assessment。THE Journal，25(9)，18-19。  new window
14.Lin, S.(2001)。Web-based peer assessment: Attitude and achievement。IEEE Transactions on Education，44(2)，13-13。  new window
15.Lin, S.(2001)。Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various tninking-styles。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning，77(4)，420-432。  new window
16.Oskay, O、Schallies, M、Morgil，I(2008)。A closer look at findings from recent publication。Journal of Education,H. U.，35，263-272。  new window
17.Prins，F. J、Sluijsmans，D. M. A、irschner，P. A、Strijbos, J.-W(2005)。Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，30，417-444。  new window
18.Sadler, P.(2006)。The impact of self- and peer-graaing on student learning。Educational Assessment，11(1)，1-31。  new window
19.Sung, Y.(2005)。The design and application of a web-based self and peer-assessment system。Computers & Education，45，187-202。  new window
20.Sung, Y.(2003)。Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment。Teaching of Psychology，50(4)，331-334。  new window
21.Yang, Y.-F.、Tsai, C.-C.(2010)。Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment。Learning and Instruction，20(1)，72-83。  new window
22.Falchikov, N.、Goldfinch, J.(2000)。Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks。Review of Educational Research，70(3)，287-322。  new window
23.Sluijsmans, D.、Dochy, R.、Moerkerke, G.(1999)。Creating a learning environment by using self-,peer- and co-assessment。Learning Environment Research，1，293-319。  new window
24.張基成(20011000)。網路化學習檔案之系統化建構經驗及相關問題探討。視聽教育雙月刊，43(2)=254，9-22。  延伸查詢new window
25.Tsai, C.、Liang, J.(2009)。The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views。Instructional Science，37(3)，293-310。  new window
26.Tseng, S. C.、Tsai, C. C.(2007)。On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course。Computers & Education，49(4)，1161-1174。  new window
27.Wen, L. M. C、Tsai, C.C(2006)。University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (Online) peer assessment。Higher Education，51，27-44。  new window
28.Miller, P. J.(2003)。The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，28(4)，383-394。  new window
29.Davies, P.(2000)。Computerized peer assessment。Innovations in Education and Training International，37(4)，346-355。  new window
30.Liu, E. Z. F.、Lin, S. S. J.、Chiu, C. H.、Yuan, S. M.(2001)。Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer。IEEE Transactions on Education，44(3)，246-251。  new window
31.盧貞穎(20010700)。讓學生做學習的主人--檔案評量應用與省思。敦煌英語教學雜誌，30，15-21。  延伸查詢new window
32.張麗麗(20020400)。檔案評量信度與效度的分析--以國小寫作檔案為例。教育與心理研究，25(上)，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.林珊如、卓宜青、劉旨峰、袁賢銘(2000)。網路化學習歷程與同儕互評系統之建構經驗。資訊與教育雜誌，80，57-64。  延伸查詢new window
34.Chen, C.-H.(2010)。The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system。Computers & Education，55(1)，229-236。  new window
35.Topping, Keith J.(1998)。Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities。Review of Educational Research，68(3)，249-276。  new window
36.Tsai, C. C.、Lin, S. S. J.、Yuan, S. M.(2002)。Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system。Computers & Education，38，241-252。  new window
37.Sweat-Guy, R.、Buzzetto-More, N.(2007)。A comparative analysis of common e-portfolio platforms and available features。Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Education，5(1)，327-342。  new window
38.Chang, C.-C.(2001)。A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP)。British Journal of Educational Technology，32(4)，435-458。  new window
39.Bouzidi, L.、Jaillet, A.(2009)。Can online peer assessment be trusted?。Educational Technology & Society，12(4)，257-268。  new window
會議論文
1.劉旨峰、林珊如、袁賢銘(2002)。網路化學習歷程檔案之學習成效分析及 未来展望。第三屆電子化企業經營管理理論暨實務硏討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sulzen, J.、Young, M.、Hannifin, R.(2008)。Reliability and validity of an ecologically-grounded student teacher electronic portfolio rubric。Chesapeake, VA：AACE。153-159。  new window
學位論文
1.李同立(2003)。網路化學習歷程檔案在國小主題教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳嘉鴻(2002)。高職資訊性向量表信效度與結果運用之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gadbury(2003)。Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program(博士論文)。University of Missonri-Kansas City。  new window
4.Gelinas, A. M.(1998)。Issue of reliability and validity in using portfolio assessment to measure foreign language teacher performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation(博士論文)。Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio。  new window
5.Liu, Z.(2002)。Studies of Networked Peer Assessment(博士論文)。National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu。  new window
6.劉勝鈺(2003)。使用資訊科技學習數學：以網路同儕互評為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳信汛(2002)。應用群集技術支援國小學童網路同儕互評之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊國鑫(2001)。推廣網路同儕互評系統於高級工業職業學校教學課程之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Zimmerman, Barry J.、Bonner, Sebastian、Kovach, Robert、林心茹(1996)。自律學習。臺北：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reckase, M. A(2002)。Portfolio define. Paper presented at the Workshop of Portpolio Assessment。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
3.Zimmerman, B. J.、Bonner, S.、Kovach, R.(1996)。Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
4.余民寧(2003)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王保進(2006)。英文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市：心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.ePortfolio Portal(2009)。A generic rubric for evaluating ePortfolios. Retrieved February 22，http://www.danwiIton.com/eportfolios/rubric.php， 2011/02/22。  new window
2.Morris, J. L(2007)。Rubric for Assessing Electronic Portfolios，http://www.uvm.edu/~jmorris/.。  new window
3.Rcampus(2010)。iRubric: ePortfolio rubric，http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowcxfxn?code=W38X23&sp=true&， 2011/02/22。  new window
4.University of(2010)。Evaluating your portfolio，http://www.uwstout.edu/art/artedportfolios/evaluating/portevaluatiorubric.html， 2011/02/22。  new window
5.Worcester(2000)。Electronic portfolio scoring rubric，http://www.sv400.kl2.ks.us/port/rubric.html， 2011/02/22。  new window
圖書論文
1.卓宜青、劉旨峰、林珊如、袁賢銘(2001)。網路化學習歷程檔案系統之設 計及同儕評量。第五届全球華人學習科技硏討會暨第十屆國際電腦輔助教學硏討會論文集。桃園：中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gibbs, G.(2006)。How assessment frames student learning。Innovative Assessment in Higher Education。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Lenze, J(2004)。Inter-rater reliability in the evaluation of electronic portfolios: A survey of empirical research results。Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004。Chesapeake, VA：AACE。  new window
4.Price, M.O、Donovan, B(2006)。Improving performance through enhancing student understanding of criteria and feedback.。Innovative assessment in higher education。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
5.Rice, R.(2001)。Composing the Internet-based electronic portfolio using "common" tools。Electronic Portfolios - Emerging Practice in Student, Faculty, and Institutional Learning。Washington, DC：American Association for Higher Education Press。  new window
6.Yancey, K. B.(2001)。General patterns and the future。Electronic Portfolios - Emerging Practice in Student, Faculty, and Institutional Learning。Washington, DC：American Association for Higher Education Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：314（臺灣：304，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67984687
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上