:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:海德格究竟主張神學性的哲學或哲學性的神學?--與胡塞爾及鄂蘭立場的比較來看
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:汪文聖 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Wen-sheng
出版日期:2011
卷期:38:3=442
頁次:頁75-93
主題關鍵詞:海德格胡塞爾鄂蘭現象學神學驚訝離逸隱喻圖像HeideggerHusserlArendtPhenomenologyTheologySurpriseEvasionMetaphorImage
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:93
本文首先以胡塞爾與漢娜鄂蘭的哲學為代表來說明哲學性神學的可能意義:胡塞爾將基督教的義涵建立在希臘哲學的基礎上,而這是以作為哲學起點的驚訝基調為因素的;鄂蘭將基督教世俗化於哲學裡,而這是以隱喻性的語言同時為哲學的語言為因素的。本文接著提出西方哲學中圖像性語言的可能,並從這個角度來看一種非哲學性的神學。最後本文從海德格哲學中所具的離逸性基調與圖像性語言來詮釋其哲學為一種神學性的哲學。
This article at first explains some possible meanings of philosophical theology, represented by Edmund Husserl's and Hannah Arendt's philosophy: Husserl lays the foundation of the significance of Christianity in the Greek philosophy, and bases this consideration in the attunement of surprise as the begin of philosophy; Arendt secularizes Christianity in philosophy, and realizes this idea in her understanding of the metaphor language as philosophical language. The article then proposes a possibility of the image language in the Western philosophy, and from this point of view understands a non philosophical theology. Lastly, the article, based on the attunement of evasion and image language in Heidegger's philosophy, interprets his philosophy as a kind of theological philosophy.
期刊論文
1.Held, Klaue(1981)。Phänomenologie der Zeit nach Husserl。Perspektive Philosophie,7,185-221。  new window
2.汪文聖(20100700)。處於倫理內在性與宗教超越性之間:胡塞爾與海德格宗教現象學之比較。中央大學人文學報,43,227-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.汪文聖(2000)。有關「空間現象學」的經典證釋。哲學雜誌,32,48-79。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫周興(2003)。爲什麼我們需要一種低沉的情緒? --海德格對於哲學基本情緒的歷史分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wang, Wen-Sheng(2010)。Religious Philosophy or philosophical Religion. A Comparison between Chinese and Western Philosophy via Hannah Arendt's Reflection on Image and Metaphor Language。  new window
圖書
1.Heidegger, M.(1979)。Sein und Zeit。Tübingen, Germany:Mohr。  new window
2.Arendt, Hannah、McCarthy, Mary(1979)。Vom Leben des Geistes。München:Piper。  new window
3.Augustine of Hippo、Chadwick, Henry(1991)。Confessions。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Crowe, Benjamin D.(2006)。Heidegger's Religious Origin: Destruction and Authenticity。Indiana University Press。  new window
5.Smith, James K. A.。Speech and Theology: Language and the logic of incarnation。London ; New York。  new window
6.Kant, Immanuel(1990)。Kritik der reinen Vernunf。Hamburg。  new window
7.Heidegger, Martin(1993)。Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1919/1920), G. 58。Frankfurt a.M.。  new window
8.Husserls Edmund。A VII 9, E III 7, E III 9, E III 10。  new window
9.Bernauer, James W.(1987)。The Faith of Hannah Arendt: Amor Mundi and its Critique--Assimilation of Religious Experience。Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt。Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster。  new window
10.Becker, Oskar(1995)。Ergänzungen aus der Nachschrift von Oskar Becker。Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, G60 (Anhang II)。Frankfurt a.M.。  new window
11.Heidegger, Martin。Einleitung in die Phänomenologie der Religion。Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, a.a.O.。  new window
12.Husserl, Edmund(1987)。Fichtes Menschheitsideal。Aufsätze und Vorträge (1912-1921), Hua. XXV。Dordrecht。  new window
13.Husserl, Edmund(1989)。Fünf Aufsätze uber Erneuerung。Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922-1937), Hua. XXVII。Dordrecht。  new window
14.Nelson, Eric Sean(2006)。Die formale Anzeige der Faktizitat als Frage der Logik。Heidegger und die Logik。Amsterdam-New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE