臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：原油價格水準不同之能源稅課徵效果
書刊名：東吳經濟商學學報
作者：黃琝琇 引用關係／林建甫 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Wen-hsiu／Lin, Jeff Chien-fu
出版日期：2011
卷期：72
頁次：頁31-80
主題關鍵詞：能源稅；雙重紅利；油價；總體計量模型；Energy tax；Double dividend；Oil price；Macro-econometric model
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:64
本文以總體經濟計量年模型，模擬分析當原油價格處於不同水準下，課徵能源稅對台灣經濟的影響差異。模型採用樣本期間為1951年至2008年之年資料，政策模擬分析是假設於2010年實施能源稅條例草案，而油價設定分別為高油價、中油價與低油價水準下，課徵能源稅的衝擊效果。結果顯示，在低油價時課徵能源稅相較高油價時，二氧化碳排放量與能源消費與供給減少較多，顯示節能減碳的效果較好，不過，對國民經濟生產也造成較大的負面衝擊，失業增加較多，所得分配惡化程度較大。此亦表示，高油價不應是能源稅條例草案不宜實施的理由，因為若就能源稅衝擊幅度的觀點而言，低油價時課徵能源稅對經濟所造成的衝擊將反而較大。
This paper analyzes the effects of initiating energy taxes on the Taiwan economy. According to the simulations, it shows that energy taxes effectively reduce CO2 emission and energy consumption, but have negative effects on the macro economy and income distribution. Furthermore, the simulations focus on the energy taxes effects in three different oil price levels, including of high price level, medium price level, and low price level. The negative impacts of energy taxes on the economy can be alleviated when the oil price is high. Initiating energy taxes in low oil price level has advantages of protecting environment and restraining energy consumption, but makes the economy and income distribution worse. Therefore, it seems that the energy taxes can not gain two advantages in both environmental and economic respects no matter what the oil price level is.
期刊論文
1.Löschel, A.(2002)。Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey。Ecological Economics，43(2/3)，105-126。  new window
2.Oates, Wallace E.(1995)。Green taxes: can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time?。Southern Economic Journal，61(4)，915-922。  new window
3.Narayan, P. K.、Smyth, R.(2007)。A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Demand for Oil in the Middle East。Energy Policy，35，6258-6265。  new window
4.楊浩彥(20091000)。能源稅的經濟效果--考慮參數不確定的可計算一般均衡分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，40(1)，79-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.何金巡、蕭麗卿、周麗芳、林建甫(20040300)。開放經濟體系勞工退休制度之總體經濟計量分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，34(2)，73-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hsiao, C.(1997)。Cointegration and Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model。Econometrica，65(3)，647-670。  new window
7.Park, J. Y.、Phillips, P. C. B.(1988)。Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes。Econometric Theory，4，468-497。  new window
8.Park, J. Y.、Phillips, P. C. B.(1989)。Statistical Inference in Regressions with Integrated Processes。Econometric Theory，5，95-131。  new window
9.林建甫(20060300)。臺灣總體經濟金融模型之建立。中央銀行季刊，28(1)，5-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Bovenberg, A. Lans、de Mooij, Ruud A.(1994)。Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation。The American Economic Review，84(4)，1085-1089。  new window
11.Lotfalipour, M. R.、Falahi, M. A.、Ashena, M.(2010)。Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran。Energy，35(12)，5115-5120。  new window
12.吳中書、范芝萍(20061000)。營業稅調整對總體經濟之可能衝擊。臺灣經濟預測與政策，37(1)，113-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.梁啟源(20091000)。能源稅對臺灣能源需求及經濟之影響。臺灣經濟預測與政策，40(1)，45-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Halicioglu, F.(2009)。An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey。Energy Policy，37(3)，1156-1164。  new window
15.Hall, Robert E.、Jorgenson, Dale W.(1967)。Tax Policy and Investment Behavior。The American Economic Review，57(3)，391-414。  new window
16.Ando, Albert、Modigliani, Franco(1963)。The 'Life Cycle' Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests。American Economic Review，53(1)，55-84。  new window
17.林幸樺、蘇漢邦(2007)。「開徵能源稅之雙紅利效果評估」。碳經濟，第五期，頁52-62。  延伸查詢new window
18.吳再益(2007)。「我國課徵能源稅之經濟影響初步評估」。碳經濟，第五期，頁23-31。  延伸查詢new window
19.Barker, T.、Baylis, S.、Madsen, P.(1993)。A UK Carbon/Energy Tax: The Macroeconomic Effects。Energy Policy，21(3)，296-308。  new window
20.Barker, T.(1998)。The Effects on Competitiveness of Coordinated versus Unilateral Fiscal Policies Reducing GHG Emission in the EU: An Assessment of a 10% Reduction by 2010 Using the E3ME Model。Energy Policy，26(14)，pp.1083-1098。  new window
21.Kumbaroglu, G. S.(2003)。Environmental Taxation and Economic Effect: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for Turkey。Journal of Policy Modeling，25，pp.795-810。  new window
22.Barker, T.、Kohler, J.(1998)。Equity and Ecotax Reform in the EU: Achieving a 10 per cent Reduction in CO2 Emissions Using Excise Duties。Fiscal Studies，19(4)，375-402。  new window
23.Bor, Y. J.、Huang, Y.(2010)。Energy Taxation and the Double Dividend Effect in Taiwan's Energy Conservation Policy-An Empirical Study Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model。Energy Policy，38，pp.2086-2100。  new window
24.Bosello, F.、Carraro, C.(2001)。Recycling Energy Taxes: Impacts on a Disaggregated Labour Market。Energy Economics，23(5)，569-594。  new window
25.Carraro, C.、Galeotti, M.、Gallo, M.(1996)。Environment Taxation and Unemployment: Some Evidence on the Double Dividend Hypothesis in Europe。Journal of Public Economic，62，pp.141-181。  new window
26.Commission of the European Communities CEC(1992)。The Climate Challenge-economic Aspects of the Community's Strategy for Limiting CO2 Emissions。European Economy，51。  new window
27.England, R. E.(2007)。Motor Fuel Taxation, Energy Conservation, and Economic Development: A Regional Approach。Ecological Economics，61，pp.409-416。  new window
28.Goulder, L. H.(1995)。Environment Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader Guide。International Tax and Public Finance，2(2)，pp.157-183。  new window
29.Parry, I.、Williams, R.、Goulder, L.(1999)。When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，37(1)，pp.52-84。  new window
30.Rosen, R.(2003)。Climate Change Polices and Tax Recycling Schemes: Simulations with a Dynamic General Equilibrium of the Italian Economy。Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies，15(1)，pp.26-44。  new window
31.Conrad, K.、Loschel, A.(2005)。Recycling of Eco-Tax. Labor Market and the True Cost of Labor-A CGE Analysis。Journal of Applied Economics，8(2)，pp.259-278。  new window
32.Dannenberg, A.、Mennel, T.、Moslener, U.(2008)。What does Europe pay for clean energy?- Review of Macroeconomic Simulation Studies。Energy policy，36，pp.1318-1330。  new window
33.Sancho, F.(2010)。Double Dividend Effectiveness of Energy Tax Policies and the Elasticity of Substitution: A CGE Appraisal。Energy Policy，38，pp.2927-2933。  new window
34.Say, N. P.、Yucel, M.(2006)。Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Empirical Analysis and Future Projection Based on Economic Growth。Energy Policy，34，pp.3870-3876。  new window
35.Speak, S.(1999)。Energy and Carbon Taxes and their Distributional Implications。Energy Policy，27，pp.659-667。  new window
36.Dargay, J. M.、Gately, D.(1995)。The Imperfect Price-reversibility of Non-Transport Oil Demand in the OECD。Energy Economics，17(1)，pp.59-71。  new window
37.Taio, G. C.、Tsay, R. S.、Man, K. S.、Chu, Y. J.、Xu, K. K.、Chen, C.、Lin, J. L.、Hsu, C. M.、Lin, C. F.、Mao, C. S.、Ho, C. S.、Liou, R. W.、Yang, Y. F.(1998)。A Time Series Approach to Econometric Models of Taiwan's Economy。A Statistica Sinica，8，pp.991-1044。  new window
38.Tiezzi, S.(2005)。The Welfare Effects and the Distributive Impact of Carbon of Carbon Taxation on Italian Households。Energy Policy，33，pp. 1597-1612。  new window
39.West, S. E.(2005)。Equity Implications of Vehicle Emissions Taxes。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy，39(1)，pp.1-24。  new window
40.Tonn, B.、Peretz J. H.(2007)。State-level Benefits of Energy Efficiency。Energy Policy，35，pp.3665-3674。  new window
41.Yang, H. Y.(2001)。Fuel Taxes and the Distribution of Income in Taiwan。The Journal of Energy and Development，26(1)，pp.1-18。  new window
42.Jansen H.、Klaassen, G.(2000)。Economics Impacts of the 1997 EU Energy Tax: Simulation with Three EU-Wide Models。Environmental and Resource Economics，15，pp.179-197。  new window
43.Jorgenson, D. W.、Wilcoex, P. J.(1993)。Reducing US Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment。Resource and Energy Economics，15，pp.7-25。  new window
44.Kahn, J. R.、Farmer, A.(1999)。The Double Dividend, Second-Best Worlds, and Real-World Environmental Policy。Ecological Economics，30，pp.433-439。  new window
45.Kiuila, O.、Sleszynski, J.(2003)。Expected Effects of the Ecological Tax Reform for the Polish Economy。Ecological Economic，46，pp.103-120。  new window
46.Kuper, G. H.(1996)。The Effect of Energy Tax on Productivity and Employment: The Case of Netherlands。Resource and Energy Economics，18，pp.137-159。  new window
47.Manresa, A.、Sancho, F.(2005)。Implementing a Double Dividend: Recycling Ecotaxes towards Lower Lobour Taxes。Energy Policy，33，pp.1577-1585。  new window
會議論文
1.Okun, A. M.(1962)。Potential GNP: its measurement and significance。The Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association。American Statistical Association。98-104。  new window
2.何金巡、林建甫、周麗芳(2005)。「台灣總體技術進步、生產力成長之總體經濟計量分析」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃宗煌(2007)。「能源稅對我國產業及總體經濟之影響」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.梁啟源(2007)。能源稅相關問題之釐清與經濟影響評估。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭代基、羅時芳、王京明、黃耀輝(2007)。推動能源稅之影響評估及應有配套措施之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fair, R.(1984)。Specification, estimation, and analysis of macroeconometric models。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Keynes, John M.(1936)。The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money。London, UK：A Harbinger Book：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.許振邦(2006)。溫室氣體減量政策對能源政策之影響及因應對策。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Whalley, J.(1987)。Operationalizing Walras: Experience with Recent Applied General Equilibrium Tax Models。Advances in Econometrics, 2。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1242（臺灣：1218，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67782447
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上