提　　要 幾個世紀以來，各國間為了避免戰爭的發生，提出了許多的解決方法，較著名的 方法與途徑有安全結盟、功能性合作、權力平衡、集體安全、國際仲裁及信心建立措 施等。其中「信心建立措施」(confidence building measures；CBMs)是最近在國際上 受到重視的方法，不僅已經在許多地區與國家之間產生良好的成果，對此議題提出許 多理論與架構；而在「信心建立措施」的內涵中，「軍事互信機制」(military building measures；MCBMs)的建立則是降低緊張、誤判與避免錯估危機的最有效管道。 本文將從「信心建立措施」理論內涵為始，循國際、區域及非政府組織等三個層 次之實證分析，進而探討兩岸「建立軍事互信」限制、可行性與務實性作法，試圖為 兩岸的衝突解決與和平擘劃開創另一種思考的方向。

Abstract Since several centuries, many famous solutions have been proposed, such as security alliance, functional cooperation, power balance, collective security, international arbitration and the confidence building measures, to avoid the war occurrence between various countries. Accordingly, the confidence building measures is one of the best way which accepted by international society. It makes not only a good achievement between many areas and the country; but also develops many theories and the construction regarding to this issue. Thus, the establishment of the military building measures is the most effective pipeline to reduce intense, misjudge, and misestimate crisis in confidence building measures. This article embarks from the theory connotation, follows three levels of international, region and non-official organization through real diagnosis of analysis, and then discusses its limits, the feasibility and the practical method for the purpose of finding another way to solve the conflict between the cross-straits.