:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實踐推論語用教學法--以交通大學通識教學為例
書刊名:通識教育學刊
作者:徐金雲 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Chin-yun
出版日期:2012
卷期:9
頁次:頁85-112
主題關鍵詞:實踐推論非形式邏輯論證軟體語用學習法Practical reasoningInformal logicArgument softwareLearning pragmatically
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
期刊論文
1.Gordon, T. F.、Prakken H.、Walton D.(2007)。The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof。Artificial Intelligence,171,875-896。  new window
2.Hitchcock, D.(1985)。ymematic Arguments。Informal Logic,7,83-97。  new window
3.Breat, T.(2005)。The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme。Argumentation,19,65-83。  new window
4.Dung, P. M.(1995)。On the Acceptability of Arguments and It’s Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and N-Person Games。Artificial Intelligence,77(2),321-357。  new window
5.Ennis, R.(1982)。Identifying Implicit Assumptions。Synthese,51,61-86。  new window
6.Pollock, J.(1987)。Defeasible Reasoning。Cognitive Science,11(4),481-518。  new window
7.Reed, C.、Rowe, G.(2004)。Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation。International Journal of AI Tools,14,961-980。  new window
8.Rowe, G.、Macagno, F.、Reed, C.、Walton, D.(2006)。Araucaria as a Tool for Diagramming Arguments in Teaching and Studying Philosophy。Teaching Philosophy,29(2),111-124。  new window
會議論文
1.徐金雲(2011)。莊子與惠施的「濠梁之辯」─一個當代非形式邏輯的考察。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐金雲(2012)。證明的責任與批判的責任─視覺化的論證圖示與法律推理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Walton, D.(2011)。Modeling Critical Questions as Additional Premises。Windsor。1-13。  new window
學位論文
1.Habermas, Jürgen、Lawrence, Frederick(1987)。The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures(-),Cambridge, Mass。  new window
2.徐金雲(2010)。亞里斯多德《修辭學》中的「語用空缺」問題研究─一個當代非形式邏輯的考察。東海大學,臺中。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Walton, D. N.(1996)。Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Van Eemeren, F. H.、Grootendorst, R.(1992)。Argumentation, communication, and fallacies。London。  new window
3.黃錦鋐(1988)。新譯莊子讀本。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gorden, T. F.、Karacapilidis, N.(1997)。The Zeno Argumentation Framework。Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law。Melbourne。  new window
5.Johnson, R.(2000)。Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Study of Argument。Mahwah, N. J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Tindale, C. W.(2004)。Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice。Thousand Oaks, Calif:Sage Publications。  new window
7.Walton, D.(1990)。Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation。Maryland。  new window
8.Gabby, D. M.、Woods J.(2005)。The Practical Turn in Logic。Handbook of Philosophical Logic。Berlin。  new window
9.Gorden, T. F.(1993)。The Pleading Games。An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top