:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高二學生在理想氣體多重表徵教學前後心智模式的改變
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:鍾曉蘭邱美虹 引用關係
作者(外文):Chung, Shiao-lanChiu, Mei-hung
出版日期:2012
卷期:57:4
頁次:頁73-101
主題關鍵詞:心智模式多重表徵氣體粒子模型Mental modelsMulti-representational modeling teachingGas particle models
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:47
期刊論文
1.Vosniadou, S.、Brewer, W. F.(1992)。Mental meanings of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood。Cognitive Psychology,24(4),535-585。  new window
2.Johnstone, A. H.(1993)。The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand。Journal of Chemical Education,70(9),701-705。  new window
3.diSessa, A. A.、Gillespie, N. M.、Esterly, J. B.(2004)。Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force。Cognitive Science,28(6),843-900。  new window
4.Vosniadou, Stella、Brewer, William F.(1994)。Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle。Cognitive Science,18(1),123-183。  new window
5.邱美虹、劉俊庚(20081100)。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建模能力。科學教育,314,2-20。  延伸查詢new window
6.Liang, J. C.、Chou, C. C.、Chiu, M. H.(2011)。Student test performances on behavior of gas particles and mismatch of teacher predictions。Chemistry Education Research and Practice,12(2),238-250。  new window
7.Johnstone, A. H.(1991)。Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,7(2),75-83。  new window
8.邱美虹、翁雪琴(19950300)。國三學生「四季成因」之心智模式與推論歷程之探討。科學教育學刊,3(1),23-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.邱美虹、陳英嫻(19950600)。月相盈虧之概念改變。師大學報,40,509-548。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Carey, S.(1985)。Conceptual change in childhood。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
2.Mayer, Richard E.(2001)。Multimedia learning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.史嘉章(2002)。發展二階試題以探討國高中學生氣體迷思概念。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳怡嫺、邱美虹(200612)。探究高中生氣體粒子概念之心智表徵與課本表徵之關聯性。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明珠(2004)。從科學史中理論模型的發展暨認知學心智模式探討化學概念的理解--層析理論的模型化案例。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱美虹(2006)。科學概念學習研究(VI):化學科-子計畫二:台灣地區中學生「粒子與化學平衡」概念之心智模式與概念改變之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.洪振方(1987)。學生空氣體積及壓力之粒子模型概念與推理能力之相關研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳盈吉(2004)。探究動態類比對於科學概念學習與概念改變歷程之研究--以國二學生學習氣體粒子為例。  延伸查詢new window
7.鍾曉蘭、邱美虹(200612)。探究高二學生理想氣體中混合氣體的心智模式與概念改變。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘冠錡、陽季吟(2006)。氣體動力論。  延伸查詢new window
9.Adadan, E., Trundle, K. C., & Irving, K. E.(2010)。Exploring grade 11 students’ conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multi-representational instruction。  new window
10.Benson, D. L., Wittrock, M. C., & Baur, M. E.(1993)。Students’ preconceptions of the Nature of Gases。  new window
11.Chi, M. T. H.(2005)。Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust。  new window
12.Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D.(2002)。The process and challenges of conceptual change。  new window
13.Chiu, M.-H., & Chung, S.-L.(200708)。Investigating correctness, consistency, and completeness of students’ mental models and paths of conceptual change in learning the nature of gas particles via multiple modeling activities。  new window
14.Chiu, M.-H., & Chung, S.-L.(200909)。Investigating students’ ontological change in their mental models of gas particles。  new window
15.Chiu, M.-H., Guo, C.-J., & Treagust, D. F.(2007)。Assessing students’ conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan。  new window
16.de Berg, K. C.(1995)。Student understanding of volume mass, and pressure of air within a sealed syringe in different stage of compression。  new window
17.de Vos, W., & Verdonk, A. H.(1996)。The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science。  new window
18.diSessa, A. A.(1988)。Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall。  new window
19.Freksa, C., & Barkowsky, T.(1999)。On the duality and on the integration of propositional and spatial representations。  new window
20.Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C.(1998)。Learning science through models and modeling。  new window
21.Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M.(2000)。Explanations with models in science education。  new window
22.Gobert, J., Snyder, J., & Houghton, C.(200504)。The influence of students’ understanding of models on model-based reasoning。  new window
23.Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F.(1996)。Secondary Students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry。  new window
24.Johnson, P.(1998)。Progression in children’s understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: A longitudinal study。  new window
25.Johnson, P., & Papageorgiou, G.(2010)。Rethinking the introductory of particle theory: A substance-based framework。  new window
26.Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1999)。Formal rules versus mental models in reasoning。  new window
27.Johnstone, A. H.(2000)。Chemical education research: Where from here?。  new window
28.Margel, H., Eylon, B. S., & Scherzo, Z.(2008)。A longitudinal study of junior high school students’ conceptions of the structure of materials。  new window
29.Millar, R.(1990)。Making sense: What use are particle ideas to children?。  new window
30.Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J.(1981)。Pupils’ understanding of the particles nature of matter: A cross-age study。  new window
31.Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L.(2002)。Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science。  new window
32.Vosniadou, S.(2002)。On the nature of naïve physics。  new window
33.Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki K.(2004)。Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy。  new window
34.Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I.(2008)。The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change。  new window
圖書論文
1.Boulter, C. J.、Buckley, B. C.(2000)。Constructing a typology of models for science education。Developing models in science education。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Buckley, B. C.、Boulter, C. J.(2000)。Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models。Developing models in science education。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.、Mansfield, H.(1996)。Investigating student understanding as a prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics。Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics。New York:Teachers College。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE