:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跆拳道選手與大專生深度知覺之比較 : 絕對及相對辨識的距離誤差
書刊名:成大體育
作者:劉妍秀 引用關係黃千綺朱彥穎 引用關係史麗珠林逸錄張榮三 引用關係
出版日期:2011
卷期:43:2=59
頁次:頁56-66
主題關鍵詞:深度知覺運動視覺跆拳道絕對及相對辨識距離誤差Depth perceptionSports visionTaekwondoAbsolute and relativeDiscriminationDistance error
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:7
目的:比較跆拳道選手與大專生在深度知覺的不同距離辨識能力。 方法:以15名國立台灣體育大學甲組跆拳道隊之男性選手與15名不同大學、未學習跆拳道男性學生為參與對象。參考Melcher and Lund(1992)測量深度知覺的原理,測量深度知覺之絕對及相對辨識在 4公尺、1.5 公尺、1 公尺的距離誤差。統計方法採重複量數變異數分析,顯著水準定為α=0.05。 結果:3 維重複量數變異數分析結果顯示,僅 2 維交互作用(組別、三種距離)達統計顯著意義(F(2,56)=8.65,partial eta square=0.24,p=.001),及絕對及相對的主效應達統計顯著意義(F(1,28)=78.47,partial eta square=0.74,p =.000)。不論組別、三種距離,相對辨識之距離誤差(8.16± 7.02公分)小於絕對辨識之距離誤差(17.57±9.52公分) (p =.000)。跆拳道組在 4 公尺辨識的距離誤差(11.47±7.22公分)明顯優於大專組(20.52±12.47公分)(p < .0001);在 1 公尺及1.5公尺辨識的距離誤差,兩組間無統計顯著差異(p >.05)。 結論:跆拳道組在深度知覺之 4公尺的辨識能力明顯優於大專組。本研究結果可提供跆拳道教練與研究者未來規劃構思跆拳道運動之深度知覺的辨識距離能力訓練課程作參考。
Purpose: Compare the depth perception (absolute and relative discrimination of distance error) between taekwondo contestants and colleges students. Method: Fifteen male subjects from Group-A taekwondo contestants of National Taiwan Sport University and another 15 male college students from different university were recruited respectively. The measurement of absolute and relative discrimination of distance (4, 1.5 and 1 meter) error was modified based on Melcher and Lund’s(1992)method. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and the significance level (α) was 0.05. Results: Three ways repeated measures ANOVA reveals that only 2 way interaction between group and distance (F(2,56)=8.65,partial eta square=0.24,p=.001), and the main effect of absolute vs. relative discrimination (F(1,28)=78.47,partial eta square=0.74,p =.000) reached statistically significant. Regardless of the group (taekwondo contestants vs. college students), distance (4, 1.5, 1 meter), the error of depth discrimination was significantly smaller in relative distance (8.16± 7.02cm) than that in absolute distance (20.52±12.47cm) (p<.0001). Regardless absolute or relative distance, group-A taekwondo contestants showed significant smaller depth discrimination at 4 meters (11.47±7.22cm) than college students (20.52±12.47cm) did (p<.0001). However, there was no significant difference in depth discrimination at 1 meter and 1.5 meters between Group-A taekwondo contestants and college students (p>.05). Conclusion: Group-A taekwondo contestants had better depth discrimination at 4 meters than college students did. Our results provide the direction for coaches and researchers of Taekwondo to design and plan their training program using the parameters of depth discrimination in the future.
期刊論文
1.陳俊汕(2005)。運動視覺與選擇性注意的機轉及其在運動上的應用。北體學報,75,200-209。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kulp, M. T.、Schmidt, P. P.(1998)。Relationship between visual skills and performance on saccadic eye movement testing。Optometry and Vision Science,75(4),284-287。  new window
3.Lauren, M. B.、Kenneth, J. R、Daniel, F. M(2009)。A comparison of static near stereo acuity in youth baseball/softball players and non-ball players。Optometry,80,121-125。  new window
4.Peters, B. T(2005)。Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets。Acta Oto-laryngol,725(4),353-357。  new window
5.Tuckey, HP、Selvaratnam, M(1991)。Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation and reflection。Journal of chemical Education,68,460-464。  new window
6.Ludeke, A.、Ferreira J.(2002)。The difference in visual skills between professional versus non-professional rugby players。The South African Optometrist,62(4),150-158。  new window
7.彭譯箴、李雲光、謝素貞(20060900)。不同種類運動選手深度知覺之比較研究。大專體育學刊,8(3),89-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉強、王翔星、劉雅甄(20000400)。棒球運動中的運動視覺。國立體育學院論叢,10(2),203-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Livingstone, N. S.、Conway, B. R.(2004)。Was rembrandt stereoblind。New England Journal of Medicine,351(12),1264-1265。  new window
10.劉強、鍾宇政、張德照(20000200)。運動視覺之初探。大專體育,47,53-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Long, G. M.、Johnson, D. M.(1996)。A comparison between methods for assessing the resolution of moving targets (dynamic visual acuity)。Perception,25(12),1389-1399。  new window
12.Melcher, M. H.、Lund, D. R.(1992)。Sports vision ant the high school student athlete。Journal of the American Optometric Association,63(7),466-474。  new window
13.Rouse, M. W.、DeLand, P.、Christian, R.、Hawley, J.(1988)。A comparison study of dynamic visual acuity between athletes and non-athletes。Journal of the American Optometric Association,59(12),946-950。  new window
14.彭譯箴、李雲光(20051200)。籃球選手與大專生深度知覺之比較研究。北體學報,13,88-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃雅玲(2004)。構圖方向與立體影像深度知覺關係探討。藝術教育研究,8,95-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Beckerman, S.、Fornes, A. M.(1997)。Effects of changes in lighting level on performance with the AcuVision 1000。Journal of the American Optometric Association,68(4),243-249。  new window
圖書
1.張春興(1995)。凍心理學。台北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃千綺(1999)。跆拳道運動員與一般健康人之視覺技巧差異。桃園縣:長庚大學復健科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.林明聲(1999)。運動視覺訓練法。臺南市:大坤書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.孟慶茂、常建華(2000)。心理學實驗。台北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Loran, D. F. C、Macewen,C. J(1995)。Sports vision。Oxford:Butterworth -Heinemann。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE