:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:耗盡原則與軟體轉售--以美國與歐盟的發展為中心
書刊名:東吳法律學報
作者:蕭宏宜 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Hung-yi
出版日期:2013
卷期:24:4
頁次:頁139-173
主題關鍵詞:耗盡原則第一次銷售原則終端使用者授權協議數位著作權二手軟體Exhaustion principleFirst sale doctrineEULADigital copyrightUsed software
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:71
本文主要處理的是二手軟體轉售於歐盟與美國的若干重要發展。數位傳輸的興起,如電子書、MP3與軟體程式等,不僅對於傳統的購買概念產生衝擊,並且影響到消費者能否依其所願,再度轉售或散布其已購買的作品。由於欠缺耗盡原則如何適用於數位作品的清楚操作判準,著作權人遂透過內容不斷強化的授權契約,對此類作品的使用與轉讓做出限制,用以規避散布權的耗盡。結果是,耗盡原則不斷的邊緣化與購買數位著作消費者的挫敗。數位產品與數位服務之間的區別越來越模糊,與此同時,美國實務卻不斷助長軟體業者對於散布控制的強化,而與歐洲呈現不同的取徑。我認為,對於軟體使用所謂「授權」的概念,對比現實上已透過載體(CD、DVD、硬碟)永久持有重製作品者的情形,與耗盡原則的理念衝突;並且,只有將耗盡原則無分軒輊的適用於網路領域,才能有效對抗軟體商規避此原則的契約條款。
This article is mainly discussing about some important developments with regard to the resale of used software licenses in EU and U.S.. In more detail, the rise of digitally transmitted content such as eBooks, mp3s and computer programs has conflicted traditional notions about whether consumers actually own what they buy, and whether they will be entitled to resell or otherwise dispose of their downloaded purchases as they please. Given the lack of clarity as to whether the principle of exhaustion applies to digitally transmitted works and the doctrine's inapplicability to situations where possession but not ownership of a copy of the work occurs, copyright owners have increasingly implemented license agreements in order to impose restrictions on the use and transferability of digital works and to circumvent the exhaustion of distribution right. As a result, the principle of exhaustion is increasingly marginalized and buyers are frustrated. The distinction between digital goods and digital services are getting vague and in the U.S. jurisprudence the position of software vendors to control distribution seems to be strengthened. In Europe jurisprudence, on the other hand, the position of software vendors might be weakened. In my opinion, using the meaning of ”licensing” software, where that means transferring perpetual possession of a copy but retaining title to the copy, is incoherent with exhaustion principle. Only the application of the exhaustion principle to the online sale of software as well as the sale of a master copy may render countervailing contractual clauses in the producer's licensing agreements invalid.
期刊論文
1.林利芝(20110300)。淺談美國著作權法之「First Sale Doctrine」。月旦法學,190,94-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊智傑(20120400)。著作權濫用與不當使用之研究。公平交易季刊,20(2),1-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡明誠(2010)。著作權契約之解釋與目的讓與理論及契約目的理論--從智慧財產法院九十八年民著上字第一號民事判決談起。月旦裁判時報,5,93-103。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝銘洋(2004)。著作之散布權與權利耗盡。月旦法學教室,25,28-29。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭宏宜(20121100)。第一次銷售原則與輔助侵害著作權的美國實務趨勢。科技法律透析,24(11),48-62。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ashtar, Reuven(2011)。Licensing as Digital Rights Management, from the Advent of the Web to the iPad。YALE J. L. & TECH.,13,141-187。  new window
7.Berrier, Andrew L.(2011)。Note: Vernor V. Autodesk, Inc.: The Last First Sale?。WAKE FOREST L. REV,46,867。  new window
8.Carver, Brian W.(2010)。Why License Agreements Do Not Control Copy Ownership: First Sales and Essential Copies。BERKELEY TECH. L. J.,25,1887-1954。  new window
9.Costa, David A.(2010)。Vernor v. Autodesk: An Erosion of First Sale Rights。RUTGERS L. REC,213,213-226。  new window
10.Keegan, Terence(2012)。John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng。N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV.,57,185-204。  new window
11.Kolczynski, Janusz Piotr(2011)。Exhaustion of copyright of computer software online: a European (Polish, German, Austrian) and US perspective。E.I.P.R.,33(9),578-583。  new window
12.Lopresto, Charles(2011)。Gamestopped: Vernor v. Autodesk and the Future of Resale。CORNELL J. L. & PUB. POL'Y,21,227-246。  new window
13.McCombs, David L.(2011)。Phillip B. Philbin & Nick B. Nelson, Intellectual Property Law。SMU L. REV.,64,367-392。  new window
14.Nechev, Vladimir L.(2012)。Globalizing the First-Sale Doctrine to Prohibit Potential Loopholes and Unfair Profiting and to Facilitate the Free Flow of Goods。NEW ENG. J. INT'L & COMP. L.,18,537-546。  new window
15.Nimmer, Raymond T.(2011)。Copyright First Sale and the Over-Riding Role of Contract。SANTA CLARA L. REV.,51,1311-1346。  new window
16.Perzanowski, Aaron、Schultz, Jason(2011)。Digital Exhaustion。UCLA L. REV.,58,889-946。  new window
17.Reese, R. Anthony(2003)。The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks。B. C. L. REV.,44,577-652。  new window
18.Rothchild, John A.(2004)。The Incredible Shrinking First-Sale Rule: Are Software Resale Limits Lawful?。RUTGERS L. REV,57,1-106。  new window
19.Rub, Guy A.(2011)。Symposium: The Licensing of Intellectual Property: Contracting around Copyright: The Uneasy Case of Unbundling of Rights in Creative。U. CHI. L. REV.,78,257-279。  new window
20.Shikowitz, Ross(2010)。Note, License to Kill MDY v. Blizzard and the Battle over Copyright in World of Warcraft。BROOKLYN L. REV,75,1015-1053。  new window
21.Sikich, Adam W.(2011)。Buyer Beware: The Threat to the First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age。J. INTERNET L.,14,1-24。  new window
22.Tjeerd, Overdijk(2011)。Polo van der Put, Eva de Vries and Schafft Thomas, Exhaustion and Software Resale Rights。CRi,33-39。  new window
23.Van Houweling、Molly Shaffer(2011)。Touching and Concerning Copyright: Real Property Reasoning in MDY Industries, Inc. v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.。SANTA CLARA L. REV.,51,1063-1085。  new window
24.Vinje, Thomas(2012)。Vanessa Marsland and Anette Gärtner, Software Licensing After Oracle v. UsedSoft, Implications of Oracle v. UsedSoft (C-128/11) for European copyright law。CRi,97-102。  new window
25.Wang, Vivian F.(2010)。Sale or License? UMG v. Augusto, Vernor v. Autodesk, and the First Sale Doctrine。TEX. INTELL. PROP. L. J.,19,1-23。  new window
26.Wiebe, Andreas(2009)。The Principle of Exhaustion in European Copyright Law and the Distinction Between Digital Services。GRUR INT.,58(2),114-117。  new window
27.Bräutigam, Peter、Wiesemann, Hans Peter(2010)。Der BGH und der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz bei Software。CR,215。  new window
28.Haberstumpf, Helmut(2012)。Handel mit gebrauchter Software im harmonisierten Urheberrecht。CR,561。  new window
29.Hilty, Reto M.(2012)。Die Rechtsnatur des Softwarevertrages。CR,625。  new window
30.Hoerren, Thomas(2010)。Die Online-Erschöpfung im Softwarebereich - Fallgruppen und Beweislast。MMR,447。  new window
31.Hoeren, Thomas、Försterling, Matthias(2012)。Onlinevertrieb gebrauchter” Software - Hintergründe und Konsequenzen der EuGH-Entscheidung UsedSoft”。MMR,642。  new window
32.Leistner, Matthias(2011)。Gebrauchtsoftware auf dem Weg nach Luxemburg。CR,209。  new window
33.Schneider, Jochen(2012)。Spindler, Gerald, Der Kampf um die gebrauchte Software – Revolution im Urheberrecht?, Das Urteil des EuGH vom 3.7.2012 - Rs. C-128/11 - “UsedSoft” Gebrauchtsoftware。CR,489。  new window
34.Sosnitza, Olaf(2009)。Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Vorgaben und urheberrechtlicher Gestaltungsspielraum für den Handel mit gebrauchter Software。ZUM,521。  new window
35.蔡明誠(1990)。論智慧財產權之用盡原則--試從德國法觀察、兼論歐洲法之相關規範。政大法學評論,41,225-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.沈宗倫(20071100)。由對價平衡觀點論智慧財產權耗盡原則之適用--以平行輸入為中心。國立中正大學法學集刊,23,161-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.馮震宇(20031000)。新著作權法重要修正內容與爭議問題簡介。月旦法學,101,51-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Elkin-Koren, Niva(2005)。What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons。Fordham L. Rev.,74,375-422。  new window
39.Goodman, Batya(1999)。Honey, I Shrink-Wrapped The Consumer: The Shrink-Wrap Agreement As An Adhesion Contract。CARDOZO L. Rev.,21,319。  new window
40.陳起行(19961200)。資訊法律的整合研究--以美國法律界因應軟體專利及著作權問題為中心。政大法學評論,56,239-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.章忠信(20040400)。新著作權法「散布權」相關規定之檢討。政大智慧財產評論,2(1),49-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.林利芝(20110800)。從「著作權商品」的認定解釋探討禁止真品平行輸入之除外規定--評析臺灣高等法院高雄分院九十六年度上易字第一〇六三號判決。月旦法學,195,204-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.Van Houweling、Molly Shaffer(2008)。The New Servitudes。GEO. L. J.,96,885-950。  new window
44.Bkstrand, Victoria Smith(2006)。Protecting the Public Policy Rationale of Copyright Reconsidering Copyright Misuse。COMMUNICATION LAW AND POLICY,11,565+579。  new window
45.Charnelle, Ilan(2002)。The Justification and Scope of the Copyright Misuse Doctrine, and its Independence of the Antitrust Laws。UCLA Ent L. Rev.,9,167-208。  new window
46.Zinda, S.(2012)。Preserving the copyright balance: Why copyright misuse should invalidate software licenses designed to prohibit resale and oust service market competition。Houston Law Review,48,1241-1274。  new window
會議論文
1.林利芝(2011)。作權濫用之探討--以科技保護措施控制一般商品「售後市場」為例。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃銘傑(2007)。進口著作物所涉著作權法之輸入權、出租權及散布權適用關係法制之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡明誠(2006)。禁止真品平行輸入法制之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rehbinder, Manfred(2008)。Urheberrecht。München:C.H. Beck。  new window
2.Semadeni, Thomas(2004)。Erschöpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht (Diss.)。Bern:Stämpfli AG。  new window
3.蕭雄淋(2007)。著作權法論。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅明通(2009)。著作權法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.王泰銓(20080000)。歐洲聯盟法總論。臺北:財團法人臺灣智庫。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Hoerren, Thomas(2006)。Gutachten zur Frage der Geltung des Urheberrechtlichen Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes bei der Online-übertragung von Computerprogrammen,http://www.usedsoft.com/en/pdf/marginal/Ergaenzungsgutachten_Prof_Hoeren_Online_Erschoepfung.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE