《清華簡‧繫年》中多記載有關楚國歷史者，其內容或可與《左傳》互證，如文王伐蔡滅息娶息媯事、楚晉城濮之戰、宋華元求成於楚事、楚晉邲之戰、莊王以來的楚吳關係、楚共與晉景、厲時的弭兵之盟、楚康以來的楚晉弭兵之盟、靈王以來的楚蔡關係等。然而兩者的情節或有不同，如文王伐蔡滅息娶息媯事中楚文王伐蔡與滅息事分屬二年，先與蔡侯為客於息，見息媯後還。次年來滅息，復娶息媯。異於傳文的分列伐蔡與滅息於〈莊公十年傳〉與〈莊公十四年傳〉中；宋華元求成於楚事中抶宋公之僕者簡文作「申公叔侯」，聘於齊者作「孫伯亡畏」，傳文兩者皆作「文之亡畏」（申舟），故「申公叔侯」與「文之無畏」可能為同一人；莊王以來的楚吳關係中以「少」為陳公子徵舒之妻，與傳文從杜預以來，皆認為夏姬為夏徵舒之母不同；楚共與晉景、厲時的弭兵之盟事中，簡文以為宋華元行楚晉之成，乃楚王所使，且後來因晉先背盟伐秦，故楚人圍鄭以報復。其敘述觀點異於《左傳》所載的楚子反先背盟不同，可見楚人史觀。而〈繫年〉亦見《左傳》不及載的楚國史，可補其記事與記年，如《葛陵楚簡》載大莫敖陽為與晉師戰於長城之歲，據〈繫年〉為簡王九年事。而〈羌鐘〉載羌佐韓宗征秦，迫齊師入長城事亦可與簡文中的聲王事對應等，本文將針對〈繫年〉中的楚史記載來與《左傳》相校，以見其異同。

Among the Chu Dynasty Bamboo slips which Shanghai Museum and Tsing-Hua University contain, some slips recorded stories of Chu written by Chu compatriots. However, there is a slight discrepancy between the recording of the slips and hand-down-literature. This paper uses eight events as examples to compare the records in ”Xi-Nian” and ”Zuo Zhuan”; furthermore, this paper would show some records about King Chien, King Sheng, and King Dao of Chu, which didn’t record in ”Zuo Zhuan” but in ”Xi-Nian”. The comparison between the two kinds of texts would generate new historical data and hence contribute to our knowledge of the history of the state of Chu.