歷史社會學的方法論爭議__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	歷史社會學的方法論爭議
書刊名：	社會科學論叢
作者：	苗延威
作者(外文)：	Miao, Yen-wei
出版日期：	2013
卷期：	7:1
頁次：	頁99-147
主題關鍵詞：	歷史社會學；比較社會學；歷史轉向；方法論爭議；穆勒比較法；Historical sociology；Comparative sociology；The historical turn；Methodological debates；Mill's methods
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:3 點閱:110

本文回顧了「歷史社會學」在1980年代由Theda Skocpol等先驅者引領的「歷史轉向」風潮，以及在這個發展裡，包括它與穆勒比較法和比較社會學的結合，其中所涉及的一些重要方法論爭議。透過1990年代批評者的種種質疑，以及歷史社會學者的多方向辯護，將有助於我們省思歷史社會學的侷限，並探索可能的化解途徑。歷史社會學躋身為社會學學門旁支或次領域的「方法化」過程，反映了歷史社會學仍處於灰色地帶，這不僅是由於它在社會學理論與歷史材料之間，存在著模糊難分的關係，同時也是由於它與戰後初期渴望回歸古典社會學傳統的批判精神漸行漸遠，而這正是晚近歷史社會學者意識到的「馴化」危機。本文討論了數波歷史社會學的方法論爭議，藉由剖析這些一來一往的攻防論辯，期盼可以為歷史社會學在相關知識體系中的位置，及其可能遭遇的難題，提供一個有所助益的參考架構。

以文找文

This article reviews the process whereby Theda Skocpol and other pioneers of the ”historical turn” in the 1980s, by employing J. S. Mill's methods and other comparative research designs, have led a generation of sociologists to claim legitimacy for historical sociology and how they have been involved within the so-called ”methodological debates” with mainstream sociologists in the 1990s. The debates show more than confirming the already confirmed. The warnings proposed by critics help sociologists rethink and deal with the possible limits of historical sociology. Historical sociology is viewed as a gray area not only because of its obscure relations both to sociological theories and historical data, but also because of its being ”domesticated” as a methodologically-oriented subfield in the discipline rather than maintaining its critical spirit and its longing for reviving the classical tradition since the early postwar period. This article discusses several waves of the methodological debates over historical sociology. By analyzing these debates, it aims to provide us a useful frame of reference to define historical sociology among relevant academic disciplines and to overcome the challenges we are going to face with.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	趙剛(20000900)。社會學要如何才能和激進民主掛勾？--重訪米爾士的「社會學想像」。臺灣社會研究，39，191-237。延伸查詢
2.	Amenta, Edwin、Poulsen, Jane D.(199408)。Where to Begin: A Survey of Five Approaches to Selecting Independent Variables for Qualitative Comparative Analysis。Sociological Methods and Research，23(1)，22-53。
3.	Amenta, Edwin(199101)。Making the Most of a Case Study: Theories of the Welfare State and the American Experience。International Journal of Comparative Sociology，32(1-2)，172-194。
4.	Aminzade, Ronald(199205)。Historical Sociology and Time。Sociological Methods and Research，20(4)，456-480。
5.	Berg-Schlosser, Dirk、De Meur, Gisele(199705)。Reduction of Complexity for a Small-N Analysis: A Stepwise Multi-Methodological Approach。Comparative Social Research，16，133-162。
6.	Brewer, John D.(200409)。Imagining The Sociological Imagination; the Biographical Context of A Sociological Classic。British Journal of Sociology，55(3)，319-333。
7.	Calhoun, Craig(1998)。Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory。American Journal of Sociology，104(3)，846-871。
8.	Goldstone, Jack A.(199705)。Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology。Comparative Social Research，16，107-120。
9.	Goldthorpe, John H.(1991)。The Use of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies。British Journal of Sociology，42(2)，211-230。
10.	Griffin, Larry J.、Korstad, Robert R.(199812)。Historical Inference and Event-Structure Analysis。International Review of Social History，43(6)，145-165。
11.	Hammersley, Martyn(199702)。Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on Its Prospects and Problems。Sociology，31(1)，131-142。
12.	Hicks, Alexander(1994)。Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction: The Case of the Emergence of the Social Security State。Sociological Methods and Research，23(1)，86-113。
13.	Isaac, Larry W.、Street, Debra A.、Kna, Stan J.(1994)。Analyzing Historical Contingency with Formal Methods: The Case of the 'Relief Explosion' and。Sociological Methods and Research，23(1)，114-141。
14.	Kiser, Edgar、Hechter, Michael(1991)。The Role of General Theory in Comparative-Historical Sociology。American Journal of Sociology，97(1)，1-30。
15.	Kiser, Edgar、Hechter, Michael(1998)。The Debate on Historical Sociology: Rational Choice Theory and Its Critics。American Journal of Sociology，104(3)，785-816。
16.	Lustick, Ian(199609)。Political Science: Historical Records and Selection Bias。American Political Science Review，90(3)，605-618。
17.	Mahoney, James(199901)。Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis。American Journal of Sociology，104(4)，1154-1196。
18.	Markoff, John(199012)。A Comparative Method: Reflections on Charles Ragin's Innovations in Comparative Analysis。Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History，23(4)，177-181。
19.	Mauthner, Natasha S.、Parry, Odette、Backett-Milburn, Kathryn(199811)。The Data Are Out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data。Sociology，32(4)，733-745。
20.	Nissen, Sylke(199811)。The Case of Case Studies: On the Methodological Discussion in Comparative Political Science。Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology，32(4)，399-418。
21.	Platt, Jennifer(198102)。Evidence and Proof in Documentary Research。Sociological Review，29(1)，31-66。
22.	Quadagno, Jill、Knapp, Stan(199205)。Have Historical Sociologist Forsaken Theory? Thoughts on the Theory/History Relationship。Sociological Methods and Research，20(4)，481-507。
23.	Ragin, Charles C.(199705)。Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research。Comparative Social Research，16，27-42。
24.	Ragin, Charles C.(199812)。The Logic of Qualitative Comparative Analysis。International Review of Social History，43(6)，105-124。
25.	Rueschemeyer, Dietrich、Stephens, John D.(199705)。Comparing Historical Sequences-A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe's 'Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology。Comparative Social Research，16，55-72。
26.	Teune, Henry(199705)。Stories, Observations, Systems, Theories。Comparative Social Research，16，73-83。
27.	Tilly, Charles(1995)。Macrosociology: Past and Future。Newsletter of the Comparative and Historical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association，8(1/2)，1-4。
28.	Tilly, Charles(199705)。Means and Ends of Comparison in Macrosociology。Comparative Social Research，16，43-53。
29.	Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P.(199101)。A Qualitative Comparative Approach to Latin American Revolutions。International Journal of Comparative Sociology，32(1-2)，82-109。
30.	Abbott, A.(1992)。From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism。Sociological Methods & Research，20(4)，428-455。
31.	Goldthorpe, John H.(1997)。Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Debate on Methodological Issues。Comparative Social Research，16，1-26。
32.	Somers, Margaret R.(199811)。We're No Angels': Realism, Rational Choice, and Relationality in Social Science。American Journal of Sociology，104，722-784。
33.	Stryker, Robin(199602)。Beyond History versus Theory: Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation。Sociological Methods and Research，24(3)，304-352。
34.	Goldstone, Jack A.(1998)。Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence, and Explanation in Historical Sociology。American Journal of Sociology，104(3)，829-845。
35.	Skocpol, T.、Somers, M.(198004)。The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry。Comparative Studies in Society and History，22(2)=622，174-197。
36.	Haydu, Jeffrey(1998)。Making use of the past: Time periods as cases to compare and as sequences of problem solving。American Journal of Sociology，104(2)，339-371。
37.	Wetherell, Charles(1998)。Historical Social Network Analysis。International Review of Social History，43，125-144。
38.	Lijphart, Arend(1971)。Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method。American Political Science Review，65(3)，682-693。
39.	Abbot, A.(199705)。On the Concept of Turning Point。Comparative Social Research，16，85-105。
40.	Griffin, Larry J.(1992)。Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology: An Introduction。Sociological Methods and Research，20(4)，403-427。
41.	Skocpol, T.(1986)。Analyzing Causal Configurations in History: A Rejoinder to Nichols。Comparative Social Research，9，187-194。
42.	Nichols, E.(198601)。Skocpol on Revolution: Comparative Analysis vs. Historical Conjuncture。Comparative Social Research，9，163-186。
43.	Griffin, L.、Ragin, C.(199408)。Some Observations on Formal Methods of Qualitative Analysis。Sociological Methods and Research，23(1)，4-21。

圖書
1.	Lieberson, Stanley(1992)。Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases。What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry。Cambridge, Nork York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Durkheim, Émile、黃丘隆(1989)。社會學研究方法論。台北：結構群。延伸查詢
3.	埃米爾．迪爾飢姆、胡華(1999)。社會學方法的規則。北京：華夏出版社。延伸查詢
4.	Abbott, Andrew(1992)。What Do Cases Do: Some Notes on Activity in Sociological Analyses。What is a Case?。NY：Cambridge University Press。
5.	Foran, John(1997)。The Comparative-Historical Sociology of Third World Social Revolutions: Why a Few Succeed, Why Most Fail。Theorizing Revolutions。London：Routledge。
6.	McDonald, Terrence J.(1996)。What We Talk about When We Talk about History: The Conversations of History and Sociology。The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences。Ann Arbor, MI：The University of Michigan Press。
7.	Mill, John Stuart(1952)。A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive。NY：Harper & Brothers。
8.	Przeworski, Adam(1987)。Methods of Cross-National Research, 1970-83: An Overview。Comparative Policy Research: Learning from Experience。NY：St. Martin's Press。
9.	Ragin, Charles C.(1995)。Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Study Configurations。Qualitative Methodology and Computers。London：Sage。
10.	Skocpol, Theda(1984)。logy's Historical Imagination。Vision and Method in Historical Sociology。NY：Cambridge University Press。
11.	Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P.(1992)。Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes since 1956。Princeton University Press。
12.	Lieberson, Stanley(1985)。Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。
13.	Ragin, Charles C.(1987)。The Comparative Method。Berkeley, California：The Regents of the University of California。
14.	Weber, Max、Shils, Edward、Finch, Henry(1903)。The methodology of the social sciences。Glencoe, Illinois：Free Press。
15.	Durkheim, Émile、許德珩(1999)。社會學方法論。台北：台灣商務印書館。延伸查詢
16.	Mills, C. Wright(1959)。Sociological Imagination。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
17.	Mills, C. Wright、國立編譯館、張君玫、劉鈐佑、孫中興(1995)。社會學的想像。巨流。延伸查詢
18.	Weber, Max、黃振華、張與健(1991)。社會科學方法論。臺北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。延伸查詢
19.	Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan：Addison-Wesley。
20.	Wallerstein, Immanuel(1979)。The Capitalist World-Economy。Cambridge University Press。
21.	Stinchcomb, Authur(1968)。Constructing Social Theories。New York：Harcourt, Brace & World。
22.	Skocpol, Theda(1984)。Vision and Method in Historical Sociology。Cambridge University Press。
23.	Tarrow, Sidney、吳慶宏(2005)。運動中的力量：社會運動與鬥爭政治。北京：譯林出版社。延伸查詢
24.	Tilly, Charles(1981)。As Sociology Meets History。Academic Press。
25.	Skocpol, Theda(1979)。States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China。Cambridge University Press。
26.	Tilly, Charles(1984)。Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons。New York：Russell Sage Foundation。
27.	King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。
28.	Przeworski, Adam、Teune, Henry(1970)。The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
29.	Moore, Barrington Jr.(1966)。Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World。Beacon Press。
30.	Abrams, Philip(1982)。Historical sociology。Cornell University Press。
31.	Tilly, Charles(1990)。Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990。Basil Blackwell Publishers。
32.	Durkheim, Emile、Lukes, Steven、Halls, W. D.(1982)。The Rules of Sociological Method。Free Press。
33.	Harper, D.(1992)。Small N's and community case studies。What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
34.	Ragin, Charles C.(1992)。Introduction: Cases of "What Is a Case?"。What is a case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。

圖書論文
1.	Calhoun, Craig(1996)。The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology。The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences。Ann Arbor, MI：University of Michigan Press。
2.	Skocpol, Theda(1984)。Emerging Agendas and Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology。Vision and Method in Historical Sociology。Cambridge University Press。
3.	Sewell, William H. Jr.(1996)。Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology。The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences。Ann Arbor：University Michigan Press。
4.	Somers, Margaret R.(1996)。Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge, Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies。The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences。Ann Arbor, MI：University of Michigan Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	纏足研究的經濟中心論：評Laurel Bossen and Hill Gates, «Bound Feet, Young Hands: Tracking the Demise of Footbinding in Village China» (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017)
2.	把歷史學帶進來：歷史社會學的跨學科想象與策略
3.	課堂如田野：以導論課程作為公共人類學實踐場域
4.	以「方法論中國人」超克分斷體制
5.	為何反全球化？如何反？--關於全球化的一些問題的思考與對話
6.	社會學要如何才能和激進民主掛勾？--重訪米爾士的「社會學想像」

1.	運動、情感與形構社會學：臺灣女子舉重的進程

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	社會學方法論再檢討
2.	儒家的社會建構：中國社會研究視角和方法論的探討
3.	哲學解釋學、方法論與方法
4.	韋伯論「行動」與「秩序」--以一九一三年〈範疇〉一文為出發點
5.	韋伯理想型概念之探索--社會科學方法論與自然科學方法論的對話
6.	魯曼系統理論中的宗教社會功能觀
7.	問題導向的勤務策略--一個方法論上與認識論上之批判與質疑
8.	女性主義的政治學方法論
9.	從認識論的高度再思考"發展經濟學"：《原初豐裕社會》代譯跋
10.	社會學理論之方法論上幾個重大面向的初探
11.	Disaggregated Growth and Environmental Quality in Developing Countries: Some Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
12.	綠色縉紳化？臺北都會區水岸住宅發展初探
13.	如何跳脫經紀人邏輯：探索轉型消費者研究及日常社會學理論內涵
14.	經濟學一門怪異的學科：一位旁觀者的批判與參與者的反省

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫