:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路羽球戰術系統對培養國小學童創造力之研究
書刊名:教育傳播與科技研究
作者:洪祥偉 引用關係陳五洲(Chen, Wu-chou李德仁 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Shiang-weiLi, De-ren
出版日期:2013
卷期:104
頁次:頁37-51
主題關鍵詞:電腦輔助線上學習創意思考體育課程多媒體學習Computer assistedCreative thinkingE-learningPhysical education curriculumMultimedia learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:83
本研究目的探討羽球創造力支援工具對國小五年級學生「創造思考能力」以及「創造性傾向」之影響。方法:採用準實驗研究法。經立意取樣選取台北市某國小五年級一個班級學生,共28 人(男15 人;女13 人)。運用羽球創造力支援工具進行為期四週四次的教學,在實驗前後以威廉斯創造力評量組合測驗進行成效評估,資料以相依樣本t考驗進行分析。結果:在創造思考能力方面:流暢力、開放力、獨創力、精密力與標題皆有顯著提升(t =-2.33, -3.36, -4.82, -3.21, -3.15, p < .05),變通力則未達顯著差異(t =-0.14, p > .05);在創造性傾向方面:冒險性、好奇性、想像力與挑戰性皆無顯著提升(t= 1.07, 1.25, 0.48, -0.21, p > .05)。結論:1. 羽球創造力支援工具提供變異法、重組法、視像法的環境而能提升學生的流暢力、開放力、精密力與標題方面能力。2. 羽球創造力支援工具與教師鼓勵能提升學生的獨創力能力。3. 學生因信心不足或壓力造成學生的創造性傾向能力未能提升。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of creativity support tool on badminton on improving students’ creative thinking. Methods: the participants were 28 fifth graders (15 males and 13 females) recruited from an elementary school in northern Taiwan. They received one treatment a week and lasted for four weeks. A creativity test, Williams creativity assessment packet including evaluation of divergent feeling and thinking, was conducted before and after the treatment. Results: through the analysis of a paired t-test, the results show that regarding divergent thinking aspect, the participants had significant improvement on dimensions of fluency, originality, elaboration, and glasnost. For divergent feeling, no significant improvement was identified in dimensions of curiosity, imagination, complexity, and risk taking. Conclusion: these findings indicated that the creative instruction course with creativity support tool on badminton systems was able to improve the students’ performance on thinking of creativity.
期刊論文
1.林偉文、賴美辰、鄭麗齡、江孟鴻(20101200)。創造思考技法於海洋教育上之應用。北縣教育,73,35-43。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭瑜婷(20050500)。初探創造性思考教學。體育學系(所)刊,5,53-60。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖玉光(2003)。球類教學:會教學法。體康學報,9(2),58-62。  延伸查詢new window
4.紀世清、彭俊秀、姚漢禱(20100600)。羽球單打比賽戰術類型研究之效度與信度。休閒運動健康評論,1(2),33-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Giaconia, R. M.、Hedges, L. V.(1982)。Identifying features of effective open education。Review of Educational Research,52(4),579-602。  new window
6.蕭顯勝、洪琬諦、伍建學(20090400)。以網路遊戲實施科技創造力教學之研究。藝術學報,84,93-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Holt, Nicholas L.、Strean, William B.、Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia(2002)。Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: New avenues for future research and practice。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,21(2),162-176。  new window
8.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1991)。An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development。Human Development,34(1),1-31。  new window
9.藍孝勤、王炫智、陳五洲(2010)。多媒體輔助教學對大專生八式太極拳學習效果之影響。體育學報,43(3),109-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Scott, G. M.、Leritz, L. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2004)。The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review。Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388。  new window
11.Edmondson, A. C.(2002)。The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective。Organization Science,13(2),128-146。  new window
12.謝依婷、周建智、黃美瑤(20090700)。專題導向學習對大學生創造力之研究。北體學報,17,84-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.呂金燮(20030300)。創造力教學的本質與陷阱。資優教育,86,1-9。  延伸查詢new window
14.Cohen, Wesley M.、Levinthal, Daniel A.(1990)。Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation。Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1),128-152。  new window
15.王文宜、闕月清、周建智(2010)。創思教學對不同身體動覺能力學生創造力之影響。運動研究,19(2),42-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張書瑋、周建智、黃美瑤(2010)。從運動情境中培養學童創造力:槪念構圖理論觀點。大專體育,106,48-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.侯雅齡(200411)。非同步網路教學系統在創造力教學課程實施之行動研究。2004年資優教育學術研討會。臺南市:國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃志成(2003)。球類教學新趨勢理解式教學。臺灣運動教育學會九十二年度年會暨學術論文發表會。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chen, W. C.、Chu, F. C.、Hung, S. W.(200808)。A prototype of creativity support tool on badminton。The 1st International Pre-Olympic Conference。Nanjing, China。163-167。  new window
研究報告
1.周建智、黃璧惠、黃美瑤、藍美玉(2003)。創意教師vs.創造力學童「擴散式之體育教學策略對學童之腦力激盪與獨立思考能力的影響:以探索式運動遊戲教育課程介入為例」 (計畫編號:0910200044)。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何秀美(2010)。創造思考技法融入國小Scratch程式設計教學之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳奇鈺(2008)。學齡前兒童動作技能及創造力之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊偉彣(2004)。創造性肢體活動與兒童多元智能之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾雄豪(2005)。創造性思考教學對國小五年級學童動作技能與創造力之影響(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐岳聖(2008)。合作學習對國小五年級學童創造力與籃球技能表現之影響(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.王文宜(2005)。教育性體操課程對國小五年級學童動作技能、創造力與兒童社交技巧之影響(碩士論文)。台北市立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳宗麟(2004)。體育課學習歷程價值取向對國中生創造力影響之研究--以探索教育為例(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.詹幼君(2009)。小靈魂的遊戲--創造性舞蹈對幼兒創造力影響之行動研究(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃秀珍(2004)。資訊科技融入低年級生活課程創造思考教學之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.林幸台(1973)。創造性教學對才賦優異者創造力發展的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.張樹琳(2004)。運用動作教育模式對國小學生創造力培育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
12.徐文俊(2005)。Web3D/VR太極拳教學系統之開發研究--以四十二式太極拳競賽套路為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jalongo, M. R.(2003)。The child’s right to creative thought and expression: A position paper of the association for childhood education international。Olney, MD:Association for Education International。  new window
2.Jonassen, D. H.(1999)。Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
3.Resnick, M.、Myers, B.、Nakakoji, K.、Shneiderman, B.、Pausch, R.、Selker, T., et al.(2005)。Design principles for tools to support creative thinking。Creativity Support Tools。  new window
4.Torrance, E. P.、Orlow, E. B.(1986)。Torrance tes ts of creat ive thinking streamlined manual。Bensenville, IL:Scholastic Testing Service。  new window
5.Williams, F. E.(1972)。Encouraging creative potential: A total creativity program for individualizing and humanizing the learning process。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology。  new window
6.Yussen, S. R.(1985)。The role of metacognition in contemporary theories of cognitive development。Metacognition,cognition, and human performance, Vol. 1。Orlando, FL:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
7.Buzan T.、孫易新、Buzan, B.(2007)。心智圖聖經:心智圖法理論與實務篇多元知識管理系統。臺北:耶魯國際。  延伸查詢new window
8.Griffin, L. L.、Mitchell, S. A.、Oslin, J. L.(1997)。Teaching sport concepts and skills:A tactical games approach。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
9.Butler, J.、Griffin, L.、Lombardo, B.、Nastasi, R.(2003)。Teaching Games for Understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective。Reston, Virginia:National Association of Sport and Physical Education。  new window
10.教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.Williams, Frank E.(1970)。Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling。Buffalo, New York:D. O. K. Publishers, Inc.。  new window
12.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗:指導手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kraft, Richard J.、Sakofs, Mitchell(1985)。The theory of experiential education。Association for Experiential Education。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2009)。97 年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要,http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326, 2013/02/01。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fazio, R. H.(1995)。Attitudes as objectevaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility。Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequence。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Sweeney, M.、Everitt, A.、Carifio, J.(2003)。Teaching games for understanding: A Paradigm shift for undergraduate students。Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective。Reston, VA:National Association of Sport and Physical Education。  new window
3.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。The curriculum model。Rethinking games teaching。University of Technology。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE