:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國「教育研究」評析
書刊名:比較教育
作者:鄭勝耀 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Sheng-yao
出版日期:2012
卷期:73
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:美國教育研究教育科學院The United StatesEducation researchInstitute of Education ScienceIES
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
自1990年以來,經濟合作與發展組織(Organisation Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD)、聯合國教育、科學及文化組織(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO)等國際組織開始對各國的教育研究進行一系列的評估,發現到許多教育研究的經驗證據薄弱,而教育知識也多流於拼湊,無法對教育政策提供有效的建言;為解決上述的難題與困境,各國紛紛針對自身的教育研究進行檢討並提出改進策略。本研究旨在探究美國教育研究的發展與沿革,包含教育研究制度化的過程(包括學會、科系、研究組織、刊物等)及《RAND基金會報告書》與《提升學生學習:對教育研究的策略性計畫與使用》報告書等相關報告資料,並分析由美國教育研究學會(American Education Research Association, AERA)出版的官方刊物Educational Researcher,自1972年創刊號至2009年12月的期刊中有關「教育研究」的研究方法與研究領域的歷史更迭及轉變,進一步歸納出「教育研究」在美國的歷史沿革、現況,以及由美國教育科學院(Institute of Education Science, IES)所主導「嚴謹」與「相關」的教育科學化發展趨勢。
Since1990, international organizations like the Organisation Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) have been conducting a series of research projects engaging in an historical and critical examination of education research around the world. Unfortunately, most of these projects have found serious weaknesses in the outcomes and products of academic research in the field of education. They have also discovered that knowledge about education systems is patchy, and it is hard to produce “evidence” to inform policy. To solve these problems, a number of researchers have been reviewing education research in their own countries and trying to provide strategies to improve the quality of such research. The principal investigator of this study collected historical archives on education research in the United States and in this paper reviews a series of research reports, including the RAND Reports and Improving Student Learning: A Strategic Plan for Education and Its Utilization. He also analyzes the changing roles of the National Institute of Education (NIE), the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), and the Institute of Education Science (IES). The researcher has conducted long term meta-analysis ofthe American Education Research Association (AERA) sponsored academic journal, Educational Researcher, from 1972 to 2009, to analyze the development of education research via research disciplines and research methods in the United States. Finally, the author hopes to figure out the current status of education research in the United States, as well aspredict future trends under the leadership of the Institute of Education Science, which is pushing to increase the rigor and relevance of such research.
期刊論文
1.Bernard, R. M.、Vinovkis, M. A.(1977)。The female school teacher in Ante-bellum Massachusetts。Journal of Social History,10(3),332-345。  new window
2.Hsieh, P.、Hsieh, Y.-P.、Chung, W.-H.、Acee, T.、Thomas, G. D.、Kim, H. J.(2005)。Is educational intervention research on the decline?。Journal of Educational Psychology,97(4),523-529。  new window
3.Childer, S. M.(2008)。Methodology, Praxis, and Autoethnography: A Review of Getting Lost。Educational Researcher,37(5),298-231。  new window
4.Lagemann, E. C.(1989)。The plural worlds of education research。History of Education Quarterly,29(2),183-214。  new window
5.Royce, J.(1891)。Is there a science of education?。Educational Review,1,15-25。  new window
6.Sroufe, G.(2003)。Legislative reform of federal education research programs: A political annotation of the education sciences reform act of 2002。Peabody Journal of Education,78(4),220-229。  new window
7.Cooper, H. M.、Nye, B.、Charlton, K. K.、Lindsay, J.、Greathouse, S.(1996)。The Effects of Summer Vacation on Achievement Test Scores: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review。Review of Educational Research,66(3),227-268。  new window
8.楊深坑(19850600)。教育理論與實踐的關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,27,213-235。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Centre for Educational Research and Innovation(2007)。Evidence in education: Linking research and policy。Paris:OECD。  new window
2.Averch, H. A.、Carroll, S. J.、Donaldson, T. S.、Kiesling, H. J.(1972)。How effective is schooling? A critical review and synthesis of research findings。Santa Monica, CA:RAND。  new window
3.Brickman, W. W.(1986)。Pedagogy, professionalism, and policy: History of the graduate school of education at the University of Pennsylvania。Philadelphia, PA:Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania。  new window
4.Hofstadter, R.(1962)。Anti-intellectualism in American life。New York:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
5.Dexter, E. G.(1971)。A history of education in the United States。New York:Lenox Hill。  new window
6.National Research Council(1999)。Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization。Washington, DC:National Academies Press。  new window
7.Lagemann, E. C.(2000)。An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Institute of Education Science(2008)。Rigor and relevance redux: Director's Biennial report to congress。Washington, DC:Institute of Education Science:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
9.Office of Management and Budget(2007)。Program assessment, institute of education sciences research。Washington, DC:Office of Management and Budget。  new window
10.OECD(2004)。Innovation in the knowledge economy。Paris:OECD。  new window
11.OECD(2003)。New challenges for educational research。Paris:OECD。  new window
12.National Research Council(2004)。Advancing research in education。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
13.President's Commission on School Finance(1971)。Progress report of the president's commission on school finance。Washington, DC:President's Commission on School Finance。  new window
14.Peterson, K.(2010)。Personal interview by Kent Chen。Chiayi, Taiwan:National Chung Cheng University。  new window
15.U.S. Office of Education(1935)。National survey of the education of teachers。Washington, DC:U.S. Office of Education。  new window
16.Senate(2008)。Senate report 110-117。Washington, DC:Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agences Appropriation Bill。  new window
17.Schneider, B.、Carnoy, M.、Kilpatrick, J.、Schmidt, W. H.、Shavelson, R. J.(2007)。Estimating casual effect using experimental and observational designs。Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association。  new window
18.WWC(2008)。What works clearinghouse intervention rating scheme。Washington, DC:WWC。  new window
19.Vinovskis, M. A.(2001)。Revitalizing federal education research and development。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press。  new window
20.U.S. Department of Education(2007)。National board for education sciences 2007 annual report。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
21.Tooley, James、Darby, Doug(1998)。Educational Research-A critique。London:OFSTED。  new window
其他
1.Ravitch, D.(19930407)。Enhancing the federal role in research in education。  new window
圖書論文
1.Burns, T.、Schuller, T.(2007)。The evidence agenda。Evidence in education: Linking research and policy。Paris:OECD。  new window
2.March, J. G.(1978)。Foreword。Organization an anarchy: Belief, bureaucracy, and politics in the National Institute of Education。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Rudalevige, A.(2008)。Structure and science in federal education research。When research matters: How scholarship influences educational policy。Cambridge, MA:Harvard Education Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE