:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創造性問題解決模式對國小學童籃球學習之成效影響
書刊名:臺灣體育學術研究
作者:余雅婷周宏室 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Ya-tingChou, Hung-shih
出版日期:2012
卷期:53
頁次:頁25-42
主題關鍵詞:國小學童籃球技能問題解決教學模式直接教學Elementary school studentsBasketball skillProblem solvingTeaching modelDirect instruction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:28
本硏究旨在探討創造性問題解決模式融入國小五年級籃球活動對其籃球問題解決能力與籃球技能表現之影響。以立意取樣選擇臺北縣某國民小學五年級學生共70名爲硏究對象,並以隨機分配方式將兩組分爲創造性問題解決組爲實驗組與直接教學組爲控制組,兩組皆進行爲期10週之教學實驗。兩組在實驗教學前後皆施以「籃球問題解決能力測驗」 與「籃球技能表現測驗」,並使用SPSS 17.0中文版統計套裝軟體進行描述性統計、相依樣本t檢定與單因子共變數分析之資料分析。其硏究結果發現:一、實驗組在籃球問題解決能力與籃球技能表現上皆有顯著提昇(t = -3.63,t = -3.84,p<.05 ) ; 二、控制組在籃球問題解決能力上有顯著退步情形存在(t = 2.98,p<.05 ),而在籃球技能表現則無顯著差異(t =1.60, p>.05);三、兩組在籃球問題解決能力(F(l, 56) = 9.46,p<.05) 與籃球技能表現(F(l,56) = 60.02,p<.05)之後測表現有顯著差異’且實驗組優於控制組。本硏究結論爲應用創造性問題解決模式於體育教學 中可有效提昇學生籃球問題解決能力與籃球技能表現。因此,於未來硏究中可從創造性問題解決模式角度來探究不同運動項目在問題解決能力與技能表現上之差異性,增加創造性問題解決模式在體育教學應用的廣泛性°
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving model applied on basketball problem solving ability and basketball skill in Grade 5 elementary school students. Seventy Grade 5 elementary school students (N=70) were used as subjects in this study for purposive sampling. They were randomized into experimental group (N=35) which receiving Creative Problem Solving lessons, and control group (N=35) which receiving Direct Instruction. The intervention was for 10 weeks. The Test of Problem Solving Ability in Basketball and Basketball skill test were administered before and after the intervention. The SPSS for Windows 17.0 version was utilized to analyze all the data by descriptive statistics, paired t-test and one-way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The level of significance for acceptance or rejection for this study was set at the .05 level. Results indicated that: 1. there were significant improvements of the experimental group on the abilities of problem solving and skills in basketball; 2. there were significant deteriorations of the control group on basketball problem solving abilities, but there were no significant improvements on basketball skills; 3. there were significant differences on the basketball problem solving ability, and basketball skill between two groups in the post-test, and the experimental group was better than the control group. The conclusion was that the Creative Problem Solving model can improve the ability of problem solving in basketball and basketball skills on elementary school students effectively. Therefore, in the future study could apply the Creative Problem Solving model to investigate the effectiveness of problem solving ability and skills on different types of sports, and increase the application of Creative Problem Solving model on physical education extensively.
期刊論文
1.吳培安(19950400)。「問題解決」式的科技教育教學模式。教師之友,36(2),12-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡雅菁(1998)。品格教育的第一堂課。天下雜誌,287,36-40。  延伸查詢new window
3.Goldstein, S.(2002)。Review of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnotic Scale。Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,32,611-616。  new window
4.吳德邦(19871200)。解題導向的數學教學策略--「閱讀問題」部份。臺中師院學報,1,224-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Deluca, V. M.(1992)。Survey of Technology Education Problem-Solving Activities。The Technology Teacher,51(5),26-30。  new window
6.黃茂在、陳文典(20041000)。「問題解決」的能力。科學教育月刊,273,21-41。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.周建智、林錚、林信宏、石國棟(2006)。探討概念構圖學習策略、合作學習策略與傳統教學策略在國小體育教學之實驗研究 (計畫編號:NSC95-2413-H154-006)。臺北市:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林姿君(1999)。同儕互動中閱讀策略使用歷程之探討--以國小四年級國語科小組討論爲例(博士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.張振松(2001)。自然科創造性問題解決基學對國小學童創造力及問題解決能力之硏究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.余雅婷(2008)。創造性問題解決模式介入籃球教學隊五年級學童籃球問題解決能力之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳翠珍(2004)。不同教學模式生命教育課程對國小四年級學生自我槪念人際關係影響之硏究--以角色扮演教學模式和直接教導教學模式爲例(碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.林美嬌(2005)。國小生活科技課程實施創造性問題解決教學之研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
6.程上修(2000)。運用合作學習及創造思考問題解決策略於高一氣象學習之成效分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.許維倫(2003)。創造性問題解決模式對國小學童問題解決能力之影響--以社會科為例(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
8.翁玉華(1998)。問題解決能力與科學過程技能之相關探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭雅文(2002)。創造性問題解決教學法應用於高職經濟學教學研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.李金樹(2006)。實施創造性問題解決訓練課程對國小六年級學生科學創造力與問題解決能力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許義雄(1997)。目標與架構:體育教學設計與實施學校體育教材與評量。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.闕月清(2003)。初任體育教師學科教學知識與腳色知覺之相關研究。臺北市:漢文。  延伸查詢new window
3.Strand, B.、Willson, R.(1993)。Assessing Sport Skills。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.黃幸美(2003)。兒童的問題解決思考研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Graham, G.、Holt-Hole, S. A.、Parker, M.(2004)。Children Moving: Reflective Approach to Teaching Physical Education。McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.周宏室(2002)。運動教育學研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.周宏室(1994)。Mosston(摩斯登)體育教學光譜的理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Driscoll, M. P.(1994)。Psychology of learning for instruction。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
9.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Treffinger, D. J.、Isaksen, S. G.、Dorval, K. B.(1994)。Creative Problem Solving: An Overview。Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity。Norwood, New Jersey:Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top