臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：對話論證的探究對促進學童科學概念理解之探討
書刊名：花蓮教育大學學報
作者：林燕文／洪振方 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Yen-Wen／Hung, Jeng-Fung
出版日期：2007
卷期：24
頁次：頁139-177
主題關鍵詞：論證；科學解釋；解釋架構；Argumentation；Scientific explanations；Explanatory frameworks
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:22
期刊論文
1.Schwab, Joseph J.(1960)。What do scientists do?。Behavioral Science，5(1)，1-27。  new window
2.林永喜(19970900)。略述杜威教育思想對科學教育的啟示。科學教育研究與發展季刊，8，4-13。  延伸查詢new window
3.Anderson, R. C.、Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim、McNurlen, B.、Archodidou, A.、Kim, S.-Y.、Reznitskaya, A.、Tillmans, M.、Gilbert, L.(2001)。The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children。Cognition and Instruction，19(1)，1-46。  new window
4.Karmiloff-Smith, A.(1988)。The child is a theoretician, not an inductivist。Mind and Language，3，183-195。  new window
5.Samarapungavan, A.、Wiers, R. W.(1997)。Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence。Cognitive Science，21(2)，147-177。  new window
6.Flick, L. B.(2000)。Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science。Journal of Science Teacher Education，11(2)，109-129。  new window
7.Felton, M. K.、Kuhn, M.(2001)。The development of Argumentive discourse Skill。Discourse Processes，32(2/3)，135-153。  new window
8.Kuhn, D.(1999)。A developmental model of critical thinking。Educational Researcher，28(2)，16-25。  new window
9.Herrenkohl, L. R.、Palincsar, A. S.、DeWater, L. S.、Kawasaki, K.(1999)。Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach。Journal of the Learning Sciences，8(3/4)，451-494。  new window
10.顏瓊芬、黃世傑(20030600)。學生在開放式科學探究過程中互動模式之研究。科學教育學刊，11(2)，141-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.洪振方(20020400)。美國「國家科學教育標準」之科學的歷史和本質的標準。中華科技史同好會會刊，2(2)=5，89-94。  延伸查詢new window
12.洪振方(20031200)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15(3)，641-662。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
14.Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education，38(1)，39-72。  new window
15.Glaser, Robert(1984)。Education and thinking: The role of knowledge。American Psychologist，39(2)，93-104。  new window
16.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Rodríguez, A. B.、Duschl, R. A.(2000)。"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics。Science Education，84(6)，757-792。  new window
17.Lawson, A. E.(2003)。The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching。International Journal of Science Education，25(11)，1387-1408。  new window
18.Newton, P.、Driver, R.、Osborne, J.(1999)。The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science。International Journal of Science Education，21(5)，553-576。  new window
19.Nussbaum, E. M.、Sinatra, G. M.(2003)。Argument and conceptual engagement。Contemporary Educational Psychology，28(3)，384-395。  new window
學位論文
1.Samarapungavan, A.(1990)。Childrens metajudgments in theory choice tasks: An investigation of scientific rationality in childhood(博士論文)。The University of Illinois，Urbana-Champaign。  new window
圖書
1.Wellman, Henry M.(1990)。The Child's Theory of Mind。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
2.Toulmin, Stephen E.(1958)。The Use of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.溫明麗(20020000)。皮亞傑與批判性思考教學。臺北：洪葉文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Jones, Beau Fly、Rasmussen, Claudette M.、Moffitt, Mary C.、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩(2003)。問題解決的教與學。臺北：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃幸美(20030000)。兒童的問題解決思考研究。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡偉鼎(2002)。批判性思考導論--如何精進辯論。臺北：學富。  延伸查詢new window
7.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for scientific literacy: A Project 2061 report。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Mintzes, J. J.、Wandersee, J. H.、Novak, J. D.(1999)。Assessing science understanding。California：A Harcourt Science and Technology Company Press。  new window
9.楊龍立(2002)。中西科學教育發展簡史。臺北：文景。  延伸查詢new window
10.Goswami, Usha、羅雅芬(2003)。兒童認知。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
11.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
12.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
13.Thagard, Paul(1992)。Conceptual Revolutions。Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Vygotsky, Lev Semyonovich(1978)。Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brewer, W.、Samarapungavan, A.(1991)。Children's theories versus scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge?。Cognition and the Symbolic Processes: Applied and Ecological Perspectives。Hillsdale, N. J.：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.DiSessa, A.(1988)。Knowledge in pieces。Constructivism in the Computer Age。Hillsdale, N. J.：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Metz, K. E.(1998)。Scientific inquiry within reach of young children。International handbook of science education: Learning。Netherlands：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
4.Baker, M.(1999)。Argument and constructive integration。Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing。Amsterdam：Amsterdam University Press。  new window
5.Chi, M. T. H.(1992)。Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: implications for learning and discovery in science。Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
6.Schwab, J. J.(1962)。The teaching of science as enquiry。The teaching of science。Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：739（臺灣：715，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67420573
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上