:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:隱匿校園性侵入法議題探討:「消極邪惡」的視角分析
書刊名:臺北市立大學學報. 教育類
作者:陳成宏 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Cheng-hung
出版日期:2013
卷期:44:2
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:消極邪惡教育行政隱匿校園性侵Passive evilEducational administrationConcealing campus sexual assault
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:46
本文從「消極邪惡」的視角分析隱匿校園性侵入法議題,說明教育人員因隱匿而對性侵受害者所造成的行政傷害,其責任已由道義責任延伸至永不錄用的行政重罰,甚或可能拉高到刑事責任層級,因此隱匿校園性侵入法顯已非憑空指控、坐地栽贓的「假議題」,而是對於教育人員消極坐視校園性侵的真實嚴厲控訴。藉由期刊文獻、相關法令、實際案例、媒體報導以及焦點團體座談,以之整合鑲嵌入消極邪惡的論述架構,本文分析歸納教育人員之所以隱匿校園性侵,其可能原因在於,「主觀建構的價值信念」、「自身利益的精心算計」、「秋後算帳的擔憂恐懼」、「情感面上的個人私心」、「制度運作的陳陳相因」、「組織成員的社會動力」以及「組織大我的顧全期許」。本文末以討論隱匿校園性侵入法在教育行政上的意涵並提出建議做結。
This paper analyzed the issue of ”passing laws governing concealing campus sexual assaults” through the lens of ”passive evil.” It emphasized that the liabilities that educators incur when they ignore or conceal campus sexual assaults has been expanded from moral responsibility to more severe punishments including permanent disqualification. Therefore this issue has already become a serious accusation on educators' passivity rather than just a groundless ”false issue.” By incorporating relevant literature, regulations and orders, practical cases, media reports, and focus group interviews into a coherent framework, this paper revealed that the causes for concealing campus sexual assault for educators consist of ”belief and value from subjective construction,” ”private calculations for personal interest,” ”concern about persecution after the event,” ”selfishness from personal affection,” ”procrastination in systematic operation,” ”social dynamic of group members,” and ”self-expectation for organizational interest.” This paper concludes by discussing the implications of passing such laws in educational administration and proposing some suggestions.
期刊論文
1.白銳(2008)。投射於組織中的人性。公共行政評論,3,190-196。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳乃德(2009)。服從權威是邪惡的根源嗎?。思與言,47(3),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Balfour D.(2007)。Guerrillas in government? Ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government。American Review of Public Administration,37(1),114-116。  new window
4.姚其壯(20120800)。談校園性侵害案件的國家賠償責任--以臺中市立某國民小學為例。教師天地,179,73-79。  延伸查詢new window
5.Dillard, J.、Ruchala, L.(2005)。The rules are no game: From instru, emtal rationality to administrative evil。Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,18(5),608-630。  new window
6.Hoffman, M. C.、Pyne, J.、Gajewski, M.(2012)。The ten masks of administrative evil。Administrative Theory & Praxis,34(1),125-132。  new window
7.Kellough, J. E.(1999)。Reinventing public personnel management: Ethical implications for managers and public personnel systems。Public Personnel Management,28(4),655-671。  new window
8.Menzel, D. C.(1999)。The morally mute manager: Fact or fiction?。Public Personnel Management,28(4),515-527。  new window
9.Samier, E.(2008)。The problem of passive evil in educational administration: Moral implications of doing nothing。International Studies in Educational Administration,36(1),2-21。  new window
10.Smith, K. C.(2008)。Book Reviews (The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil)。Public Integrity,10(3),287-295。  new window
11.陳成宏、粘忠倚(20070100)。學校組織變革的團體決策行為:「艾比里尼弔詭」與「團體迷思」的觀點分析。興國學報,7,263-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bandura, Albert(2002)。Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency。Journal of Moral Education,31(2),101-119。  new window
13.Terry, Larry D.(1998)。Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement。Public Administration Review,58(3),194-200。  new window
14.吳清基(19900700)。重建教育行政倫理。研習資訊,63,1-5。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bandura, A.(1990)。Selective activation and disengagement of moral control。Journal of Social Issues,46(1),27-46。  new window
16.Bandura, Albert(1999)。Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities。Personality and Social Psychology Review,3(3),193-209。  new window
17.Bandura, A.、Barbaranelli, C.、Caprara, G. V.、Pastorelli, C.(1996)。Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(2),364-374。  new window
18.余一鳴、顏志龍(20111200)。道德認同對軍事社會化與道德疏離間的調節作用。教育心理學報,43(2),477-497。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Adams, G. B.、Balfour, D. L.(2004)。Unmasking administrative evil。New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
2.Ophir, R.(2005)。The order of evils: Toward an ontology of morals。NY:Zone Books。  new window
3.Zimbardo, P.(2008)。The Lucifer effect: How good people turn evil。London:Ebury Publishing。  new window
4.Janis, Irving L.(1972)。Victims of Groupthink。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
5.Denhardt, K. G.(1988)。The ethics of public service: Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations。Westport。  new window
6.王政彥(19940000)。團體式教育決策參與。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳瓊恩(2010)。行政學。臺北市:三民。  延伸查詢new window
8.范熾文(2008)。教育行政研究:批判取向。五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Janis, I. L.(1982)。Groupthink。Boston:Houghton-Mifflin Company。  new window
其他
1.何孟奎(2010)。教師隱匿性侵擬最高判7年,http://www2.cna.com.tw, 2011/08/01。  延伸查詢new window
2.何哲欣,楊惠琪(20111116)。修法加碼狼師將永不錄用。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳乃德(2009)。邪惡眞的「庸常」嗎?,http://news.chinatimes.com, 2011/07/15。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡慕情(2010)。終止隱匿校園性侵立委連署修法,littp://prm.pts.org.tw/main/?p=11400, 2011/01/20。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳慧萍,胡清暉,林曉雲,何玉華(2010)。隱匿校園性侵擬最高判7年,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw, 2011/08/08。  延伸查詢new window
6.許淑惠(2010)。校長吃案護淫師竟判無罪。性侵案通報成性騷擾法院:不構成傷造文書,http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/todayapple/type/old, 2011/07/15。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉芷纭(20110225)。隱匿校園性侵校長、教職員永不錄用。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉素萍(2010)。校方掩蓋男師性侵監院糾正中市,http://www2.cna.com.tw, 2011/08/01。  延伸查詢new window
9.曾韋禎,胡清暉,謝文華(2011)。性平法修正,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw, 2011/08/08。  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇龍麒(2011)。隱匿狼師免職教部盼速修法,http://www2.cna.com.tw, 2011/08/09。  延伸查詢new window
11.Martin L. K., Jr.。BrainyQuote.com,http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/rn/martinluthl24474.html, 2013/10/22。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE