Quantifier Words and Their Multi-functional(?) Parts__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Quantifier Words and Their Multi-functional(?) Parts
書刊名：	語言暨語言學
作者：	Szabolcsi, Anna／Whang, James Doh／Zu, Vera
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	15:1
頁次：	頁115-155
主題關鍵詞：	量化助詞；無定代詞；布林語意學；詢問語意學；極大性；遞增性；語言類型；語意學；句法學；構詞學；Additive；Boolean；Indeterminate pronoun；Inquisitive；Maximality；Morphology；Quantificational particle；Semantics；Syntax；Typology
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:16

形式語意學經常基於組合原則，以詞為建構語意的最小單位。然而，近期各種語法理論都指出，詞並非語法劃分的最小單位；類似的觀點也見於分析最高級的組合語意學上。本文採用這種向下延伸組合語意學的理論，探討一些助詞（如日語的 ka 和 mo、中文的「都」、匈牙利語的 vala/vagy、mind 以及 is）如何組成數量詞，並且充當連接詞、遞增詞、程度詞、疑問詞以及存在動詞。本文主要的目的在於討論這些跨語境助詞是否具有高度規律化的語意相似性，抑或僅是一些具有家族相似性的不同語意詞彙化後的結果。本文雖無具體結論，但卻運用布林語意學及詢問語意學的原理提出許多可能的分析。本文同時也有系統地比較 mo 和「都」的異同，並且透過極大性與遞增性來評論先前的分析。

以文找文

Formal semantic analyses often take words to be minimal building blocks for the purposes of compositionality. But various recent theories of morphology and syntax have converged on the view that there is no demarcation line corresponding to the word level. The same conclusion has emerged from the compositional semantics of superlatives. In the spirit of extending compositionality below the word level, this paper explores how a small set of particles (Japanese ka and mo, Chinese dou, and Hungarian vala/vagy, mind, and is) form quantifier words and serve as connectives, additive and scalar particles, question markers, and existential verbs. Our main question is whether the meanings of these particles across the varied environments are highly regular, or they are lexicalized with a variety of different meanings that bear a family resemblance. This paper does not reach definitive conclusions, but it raises analytical possibilities using Boolean semantics and Inquisitive Semantics (the semantics of alternatives). It also draws attention to systematic similarities and some differences between the multiple uses of mo and dou that have not been studied in the literature, and reviews accounts in terms of maximality and additivity.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Xiang, Ming(2008)。Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: a case study of Mandarin Dou。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，17(3)，227-245。
2.	Amritavalli, R.(2003)。Question and negative polarity in the disjunction phrase。Syntax，6(1)，1-18。
3.	AnderBois, Scott(2012)。Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions。Natural Language Semantics，20(4)，349-390。
4.	Hackl, Martin(2009)。On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half。Natural Language Semantics，17(1)，63-98。
5.	Halle, Morris、Marantz, Alec(1994)。Some key features of distributed morphology。MIT Working Papers in Linguistics，21，275-288。
6.	Hamblin, Charles L.(1958)。Questions。Australasian Journal of Philosophy，36(3)，159-168。
7.	Hunyadi, László(1987)。On the interpretation of the Hungarian quantifiers mind ‘every’ and akár ‘any’。Acta Linguistic Hungarica，37，125-136。
8.	Jacobson, Pauline(2002)。The (dis)organization of the grammar: 25 years。Linguistics and Philosophy，25(5)-6，601-626。
9.	Jayaseelan, K. A.(2011)。Comparative morphology of quantifiers。Lingua，121(2)，269-286。
10.	Kobuchi-Philip, Mana(2009)。Japanese mo: universal, additive and NPI。Journal of Cognitive Science，10(2)，172-194。
11.	Kobuchi-Philip, Mana(2010)。Indeterminate numeral quantifiers, 'some' and 'many' readings, and questions in Japanese。Korean Journal of Linguistics，35，503-530。
12.	Paul, Ileana(2005)。Or, wh- and not: free choice and polarity in Malagasy。UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics，12，359-367。
13.	Roelofsen, Floris(20130425)。Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content。Synthese，190，79-102。
14.	Reinhart, Tanya(1997)。Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions。Linguistics and Philosophy，20(4)，335-397。
15.	Schlenker, Philippe(2008)。Be articulate: a pragmatic theory of presupposition projection。Theoretical Linguistics，34(3)，157-212。
16.	Shimoyama, Junko(2006)。Indeterminate noun phrase quantification in Japanese。Natural Language Semantics，14(2)，139-173。
17.	Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann(2004)。The syntax of person, tense, and speech features。Rivista di Linguistica，16，219-251。
18.	Szabolcsi, Anna(1986)。Comparative superlatives。MIT Working Papers in Linguistics，8，245-266。
19.	Szabolcsi, Anna(2002)。Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity。Approaches to Hungarian，8，217-241。
20.	Yatsushiro, Kazuko(2009)。The distribution of quantificational suffixes in Japanese。Natural Language Semantics，17(2)，141-173。
21.	Enç, Mürvet(1991)。The semantics of specificity。Linguistic Inquiry，22(1)，1-25。
22.	Jayaseelan, K. A.(2001)。Questions and question-word incorporating quantifiers in Malayalam。Syntax，4(2)，63-93。
23.	Koopman, Hilda(2005)。Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective。Linguistic Inquiry，36(4)，601-633。
24.	Karttunen, Lauri(1977)。Syntax and semantics of questions。Linguistics and Philosophy，1(1)，3-44。
25.	Lin, Jo-wang(1998)。Distributivity in Chinese and its implications。Natural Language Semantics，6(2)，201-243。
26.	Giannakidou, Anastasia、Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen(2006)。(In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice。Journal of Semantics，23(2)，135-183。
27.	Barwise, John、Cooper, Robin(1981)。Generalized quantifiers and natural language。Linguistics and Philosophy，4(2)，159-219。
28.	Hamblin, Charles Leonard(1973)。Questions in Montague English。Foundations of Language，10(1)，41-53。
29.	Rooth, Mats Edward(1992)。A theory of focus interpretation。Natural Language Semantics，1(1)，75-116。

會議論文
1.	Groenendijk, Jeroen、Roelofsen, Floris(2009)。Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics。Language, Communication and Rational Agency，(會議日期: May 30-31, 2009)。Stanford：Stanford University。
2.	Kratzer, Angelika、Shimoyama, Junko(2002)。Indeterminate pronouns: the view from Japanese。The Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics。Tokyo：Hituzi Syobo。1-25。
3.	Ramchand, Gillian(1997)。Questions, polarity, and alternative semantics。The 27th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society。Amherst：GLSA。383-396。
4.	Szabolcsi, Anna(2012)。Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most。The 22nd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference，1-25。
5.	Goro, Takuya、Akiba, Sachie(2004)。The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese。The 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics。Somerville：Cascadilla Press。251-264。

學位論文
1.	Huang, Shi-Zhe(1996)。Quantification and Predication in Mandarin Chinese: A Case Study of Dou(博士論文)。University of Pennsylvania。
2.	Alonso-Ovalle, Luis(2006)。Disjunction in Alternative Semantics(學士論文)。University of Massachusetts，Amherst。
3.	Leu, Thomas(2009)。The Internal Syntax of Determiners(學士論文)。New York University，New York。
4.	Mascarenhas, Salvador(2009)。Inquisitive Semantics and Logic(碩士論文)。University of Amsterdam，Amsterdam。
5.	Slade, Benjamin M.(2011)。Formal and Philological Inquiries Into the Nature of Interrogatives, Indefinites, Disjunction, and Focus in Sinhala and Other Languages(學士論文)。University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign，Urbana。
6.	Rooth, Mats Edward(1985)。Association with Focus(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts，Amherst, Massachusetts。

圖書
1.	Kayne, Richard S.(2005)。Movement and Silence。Oxford University Press。
2.	Cable, Seth(2010)。The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping。New York：Oxford University Press。
3.	Benkő, Loránd(1967)。A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára。Budapest：Akadémiai Kiadó。
4.	Bobaljik, Jonathan David(2012)。Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words。Cambridge：MIT Press。
5.	Borzdyko, Oxana(2004)。La disjonction, l’indéfinition et l’interrogation: la particule CI du biélorusse。Ottawa：University of Western Ontario disertation。
6.	Hagstrom, Paul Alan(1998)。Decomposing Questions。Cambridge：MIT dissertation。
7.	Schwarzschild, Roger(1996)。Pluralities。Kluwer。
8.	Szabolcsi, Anna(2010)。Quantification。Cambridge University Press。
9.	Tancredi, Chris(2004)。Wh-mo NPs in Japanese: quantifiers, plurals, or a different beast altogether? Talk handout。University of Maryland。
10.	Haspelmath, Martin(1997)。Indefinite Pronouns。Clarendon Press。
11.	Keenan, Edward L.、Faltz, Leonard M.(1986)。Boolean Semantics for Natural Language。Dordrecht：Boston：D. Reidel。
12.	Kiss, Katalin É.(2002)。The Syntax of Hungarian。Cambridge：New York：Cambridge University Press。
13.	Koopman, Hilda Judith、Szabolcsi, Anna(2000)。Verbal Complexes。Cambridge：MIT Press。
14.	Landman, Fred(1991)。Structures for Semantics。Dordrecht：Boston：Kluwer。
15.	Reichenbach, Hans(1947)。Elements of Symbolic Logic。New York：The Free Press：MacMillan。
16.	Julien, Marit(2002)。Syntactic Heads and Word Formation。Oxford University Press。
17.	Kayne, Richard S.(2010)。Comparisons and Contrasts。Oxford University Press。
18.	Nishigauchi, Taisuke(1990)。Quantification in the Theory of Grammar。Kluwer Academic Publishers。

單篇論文
1.	Bumford, Dylan，Whang, James Doh，Zu, Vera(2011)。Composing quantifiers in Chinese and Japanese，New York：New York University。

其他
1.	Ciardelli, Ivano，Groenendijk, Jeroen，Roelofsen, Floris(2012)。Inquisitive semantics，https://sites.google.com/site/inquisitivesemantics/courses/nasslli-2012。
2.	Gärtner, Hans-Martin，Gyuris, Beáta(2007)。Interpreting vajon，http://ny01.nytud.hu/~gyuris/vajon-pres6-final.pdf。
3.	Gil, David(2008)。Conjunctions and universal quantifiers，http://wals.info/feature/description/56。
4.	Heim, Irene(1985)。Notes on comparatives and related matters，http://semanticsarchive.net。
5.	Heim, Irene(1999)。Notes on superlatives，http://semanticsarchive.net。
6.	Kobuchi-Philip, Mana(2008)。Presuppositional compositionality with Japanese mo，http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/18.496。
7.	Martí, Luisa，Abels, Klaus(2011)。Propositions or choice functions: What do quantifiers quantify over?，http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001376。
8.	Shan, Chung-chieh(2002)。Binding alongside Hamblin alternatives calls for variable-free semantics，http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/14.289。
9.	Starke, Michal(2009)。Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language，http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001230。

圖書論文
1.	Crain, Stephen、Thornton, Rosalind(2003)。Acquisition of syntax and semantics。Handbook of Psycholinguistics。Amsterdam & Boston：Elsevier。
2.	Csirmaz, Aniko、Szabolcsi, Anna(2012)。Quantification in Hungarian。Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language。Dordrecht & New York：Springer。
3.	Harley, Heidi(2012)。Semantics in distributed morphology。Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning。Berlin：New York：De Gruyter Mouton。
4.	Leu, Thomas(2010)。The internal syntax of jeder 'every'。Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009。Amsterdam：Philadelphia：John Benjamins。
5.	Szabolcsi, Anna(1997)。Strategies for scope taking。Ways of Scope Taking。Dordrecht：Boston：Kluwer。
6.	Szabolcsi, Anna(1997)。Background notions in lattice theory and generalized quantifiers。Ways of Scope Taking。Dordrecht & Boston：Kluwer。
7.	Szabolcsi, Anna(1997)。Quantifiers in pair-list readings。Ways of Scope Taking。Dordrecht：Boston：Kluwer。
8.	Zimmermann, Malte(2009)。Variation in the expression of universal quantification and free choice: the case of Hausa koo-wh expressions。Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2008。Amsterdam：Philadelphia：John Benjamins。
9.	Beghelli, Filippo、Stowell, Tim(1997)。Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every。Ways of Scope Taking。Kluwer Academic Publishers。
10.	Gil, David(1995)。Universal Quantifiers and Distributivity。Quantification in Natural Language。Dordrecht：Boston：Kluwer。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	語言馬賽克及其生物基礎
2.	臺灣國語和方言中的「有」--談語法學中的社會因緣與歷史意識
3.	為甚麼問怎麼樣，怎麼樣問為甚麼

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	Numeral Classifiers in Ersu
2.	In Defense of the Numeral-based Model of Austronesian Phylogeny, and of Tsouic
3.	The Modal System in Hainan Min
4.	Phonological Patterning of Prevocalic Glides in Squliq Atayal
5.	Color Isn't Silent, Shallow Isn't Deep: Two Case Studies of Evaluating Silent Elements
6.	Constituent Structure in a Tagalog Text
7.	共性與差異：粵方言名詞短語研究
8.	漢語「聞／嗅」義詞的現狀與歷史
9.	南寧地區語言「去」義語素的語法化與接觸引發的「複製」
10.	在族群與語言接觸下形成的臺灣華語--從聲學分析的結果看起
11.	析論越南漢字音魚虞分韻的歷史層次
12.	臺灣閩南語情態詞「通」的語義句法屬性：存在、否定、情態、語氣的互動
13.	Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. By Yong-Ju Rue and Grace Qiao Zhang. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2008)
14.	The Prosodic History of Chinese Resultatives
15.	Typology of Word Order in Chinese Dialects: Revisiting the Classification of Min

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫