臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：探索國際關係理論的後設理論爭論：國際關係學科的科學進展反思
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：莫大華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Mo, Tahua
出版日期：2013
卷期：52:3
頁次：頁1-41
主題關鍵詞：後設理論；國際關係方法論；結構與行為主體性；分析層次；個體主義與整體主義；Metatheory；Methodology of international relations；Structure and agency；Levels of analysis；Individualism and holism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:48
國際關係理論的第三次大辯論中，廣為人知的是（新）自由主義與（新）現實主義的辯論，較少為人關注的是實證主義與後實證主義之間的後設理論爭論，以及因此引發的後設理論研究爭議。後實證主義質疑既有國際關係理論的本體與知識基礎，更使國際關係學者質疑到底後設理論研究是否有助於國際關係理論與實務的研究。後實證主義關注的是後設理論層次而非實質理論層次，後設理論是（國際關係）理論的理論（a theory of theory）或是有關（國際關係）理論的理論（a theory about theory），或是對（國際關係）理論進行理論性思考，藉以從各國際關係理論中尋找出好的理論。本文目的在於探索這場源自實證主義與後實證主義的後設理論辯論涉及到關鍵議題，以及其對國際關係學科知識發展，藉以理解國際關係後設理論辯論，以期國內學者能瞭解而逐漸建立與發展國內尚未熟悉的國際關係方法論。
In the third Great Debate in International Relations, the debate between (Neo) Realism and (Neo) Liberalism has been well known; whereas the metatheoretical debate between Positivism and Postpositivism have been ignored. Postpositivism questioned the ontological and epistemological foundations of the established International Relations theory. It has caused the scholars to wonder whether metatheoretical researches exert positive incluences on theories and practices of International Relations. Postpositivism is concerned with the metatheoretical dimension and not the substantial dimension. Metatheory is a theory of theory, a theory about theory, and a theoretically thinking on theory to identify good theories. This paper aims at exploring the metatheoretical debates, along with related critical issues, and the effects on the disciplinary development of International Relations. It is hoped that domestic scholars may begin to understand this unfamiliar scope, and develop the methodology for this necessary course in International Relations.
期刊論文
1.Monteiro, Nuno P.、Ruby, Keven G.(2009)。IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations。International Theory，1(1)，15-48。  new window
2.(199712)。American Political Science Review91(4)。  new window
3.Bennett, Andrew、Elman, Colin(2006)。Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods。Annual Review of Political Science，9(1)，455-476。  new window
4.Bieler, Andreas、Morton, Adam David(2001)。The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective。European Journal of International Relations，7(1)，5-35。  new window
5.Bohman, James(2009)。What is to be done? The Science Question in International Relations。International Theory，1(3)，488-498。  new window
6.Bousquet, Antoine、Curtis, Simon(2011)。Beyond Models and Metaphors: Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking and International Relations。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，24(1)，43-62。  new window
7.Chernoff, Fred(2009)。Defending Foundations for International Relations Theory。International Theory，1(3)，466-477。  new window
8.Doty, Roxanne Lynn(1997)。Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory。European Journal of International Relations，3(3)，365-392。  new window
9.Doty, Roxanne Lynn(1999)。A Reply to Colin Wight。European Journal of International Relations，5(3)，387-390。  new window
10.Earnest, David C.(2008)。Coordination in Large Numbers: An Agent-based Model of International Negotiations。International Studies Quarterly，52(2)，363-382。  new window
11.Hudson, Natalie Florea(2010)。The State of Experimental Research in IR: An Analytical Survey。International Studies Review，12(2)，165-192。  new window
12.Jabri, Vivienne、Chan, Stephen(1996)。The Ontologist Always Rings Twice: Two More Stories about Structure and Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith。Review of International Studies，22(1)，107-110。  new window
13.Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus(2004)。Hegel's House, or 'Peoples are States too'。Review of International Studies，30(2)，281-287。  new window
14.Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus(2009)。A Faulty Solution to a False (ly characterized) Problem: A Comment on Monteiro and Ruby。International Theory，1(3)，455-465。  new window
15.Jones, Adam(2002)。Interview with Kal Holsti。Review of International Studies，28(3)，619-633。  new window
16.Joseph, Jonathan(2008)。Hegemony and the Structure-Agency Problem in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Contribution。Review of International Studies，34(1)，109-128。  new window
17.Kurki, Milja(2009)。The Politics of the Philosophy of Sciencc。International Theory，1(3)，440-454。  new window
18.Lake, David A.(2011)。Why 'isms' Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sect as Impediments to Understanding and Progress。International Studies Quarterly，55(2)，465-480。  new window
19.Lijhart, Arend(1974)。The Structure of Theoretical Revolution in International Relations。International Studies Quarterly，18(1)，41-74。  new window
20.Maliniak, Daniel、Oakes, Amy、Peterson, Susan、Tierney, Michael J.(2011)。International Relations in the US Academy。International Studies Quarterly，55(2)，437-464。  new window
21.Mercado, Raymond(2009)。Keep Muddling Through?。International Theory，1(3)，478-487。  new window
22.Neumann, Iver B.(2004)。Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State。Review of International Studies，30(2)，259-267。  new window
23.Schmidt, Brian(1997)。Further Ahead or Further Beyond? The Debate over Positivism。Mershon International Studies Review，41(1)，107-112。  new window
24.Shaw, Karena(2004)。Knowledge, Foundations, Politics。International Studies Review，6(4)，7-20。  new window
25.Smith, Steve(2002)。The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: "Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline"。International Studies Review，4(2)，67-85。  new window
26.Starr, Harvey(1978)。'Opportunity' and 'Willingness' as Ordering Concepts in the Study of War。International Interactions，4(4)，363-387。  new window
27.Thies, Cameron G.(2004)。Are Two Theories Better than One? A Constructivist Model of Neorealist-Debate。International Political Science Review，25(2)，159-183。  new window
28.Wendt, Alexander(1992)。Levels of Analysis Versus Agents and Structure。Review of International Studies，18(2)，181-185。  new window
29.Wendt, Alexander(1998)。On Constitution and Causation in International Relations。Review of International Studies, 24(Special Issue，24(Special Issue)，105-147。  new window
30.Wendt, Alexander(2004)。The State as Person in International Theory。Review of International Studies，30(2)，289-316。  new window
31.Wight, Colin(2000)。Interpretation A ll the Way Down? A Reply to Roxanne Lynn Doty。European Journal of International Relations，6(3)，423-430。  new window
32.黃旻華、郭銘傑(20061200)。科學研究綱領方法論在國際關係學門的誤用：重新檢視現實主義典範進步或退化的辯論。東吳政治學報，24，117-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Carlsnaes, W.(1992)。The Agency Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis。International Studies Quarterly，36(3)，245-270。  new window
34.Elman, Colin、Elman, Miriam F.(2002)。How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant: Appraising Progress in IR Research。International Studies Quarterly，46(2)，231-262。  new window
35.Smith, Steve、Hollis, Martin(1991)。Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations。Review of International Studies，17(4)，393-410。  new window
36.Hollis, M.、Smith, S(1992)。Structure and Action: Further Comment。Review of International Studies，18(2)，187-188。  new window
37.Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus(2008)。Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory。Review of International Studies，34(1)，129-153。  new window
38.Pouliot, Vincent(2007)。'Sobjectivism': Toward a Constructivist Methodology。International Studies Quarterly，51(2)，359-384。  new window
39.Wendt, Alexander(1991)。Bridging the Theory/meta-theory Gap in International Relations。Review of International Studies，17(4)，369-398。  new window
40.Singer, John David(1960)。International Conflict: Three Levels of Analysis。World Politics，12(3)，453-461。  new window
41.Dessler, David(1989)。What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?。International Organization，43(3)，441-473。  new window
42.Keohane, Robert O.(1998)。International Institutions: Two Approaches。International Studies Quarterly，32(4)，379-396。  new window
43.莫大華(20070300)。探索國際關係理論的建橋計畫：理性主義與建構主義的理論綜合。政治科學論叢，31，175-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.莫大華(20060900)。國際關係建構主義理論內部的建橋計畫--知識論的對話與綜合。復興崗學報，87，221-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.O'Neill, Kate、Balsiger, Jorg、VanDeveer, Stacy D.(2004)。Actors, Norms, and Impact: Recent International Cooperation Theory and the Influence of the Agent-Structure Debate。Annual Review of Political Science，7(1)，149-175。  new window
46.Wight, Colin(200404)。State Agency: Social Action without Human Activity?。Review of International Studies，30(2)，269-280。  new window
47.Wendt, Alexander E.(1987)。The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory。International Organization，41(3)，335-370。  new window
48.Levy, Jack S.(1997)。Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations。International Studies Quarterly，41(1)，87-112。  new window
49.Adler, Emanuel(1997)。Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics。European Journal of International Relations，3(3)，319-363。  new window
50.Vasquez, John A.(1997)。The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition。American Political Science Review，91(4)，899-912。  new window
51.莫大華(20100300)。國際關係建構主義理論的心物二元論：Alexander Wendt量子社會科學理論的分析與批判。問題與研究，49:(1)，29-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1996)。A Response: Why Epistemology Matters in International Theory。Review of International Studies，22(1)，111-116。  new window
53.Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1994)。Two Stories about Structure and Agency。Review of International Studies，20(3)，241-251。  new window
54.Chan, Stephen(1998)。An Ontologist Strikes Back: A Further Response to Hollis and Smith。Review of International Studies，24(3)，441-443。  new window
55.Wight, C.(1999)。They Shoot Dead Horses Don't They? Locating Agency in the Agent-Structure Problematique。European Journal of International Relations，5(1)，109-142。  new window
56.Christensen, T. J.、Snyder, J.(1990)。Progressive Research on Degenerate Alliances。American Political Science Review，91(4)，919-922。  new window
57.Patomäki, Heikki(1996)。How to Tell Better Stories about World Politics。European Journal of International Relations，2(1)，105-133。  new window
58.Ray, James L.(2001)。Integrating Levels of Analysis in World Politics。Journal of Theoretical Politics，13(4)，355-388。  new window
59.Hellmann, Gunther(2003)。In Conclusion: Dialogue and Synthesis in Individual Scholarship and Collective Inquiry。International Studies Review，5(1)，147-150。  new window
60.Monteiro, Nuno P.、Ruby, Keven G.(2009)。The Promise of Foundational Prudence: A Response to Our Critics。International Theory，1(3)，499-512。  new window
61.Caprioli, Mary(2004)。Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology: A Critical Analysis。International Studies Review，6(2)，253-269。  new window
會議論文
1.Hamati-Ataya, Inanna(2001)。Reflexivity in International Relations Theory: Prospects for an Interdisciplinary Research Programme。International Studies Association Annual Convention, Montreal Canada，(會議日期: March 16-19, 2011)。  new window
圖書
1.Sprinz, Detlef F.、Wolinsky-Nahmias, Yael(2004)。Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations。Ann Arbor：University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.Axelrod, Robert M.(1997)。The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
3.Beers, Francis A.(1996)。Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations。Lansing, MI：East Michigan State University Press。  new window
4.Geller, Daniel S.、Vasquez, John A.(2004)。The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge。Malden, MA：Blackwell。  new window
5.Harvey, Frank P.、Brecher, Michael(2002)。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
6.Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1990)。Explaining and Understanding International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.James, Patrick Thaddeus(2002)。International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered。Columbus：Ohio State University Press。  new window
8.Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus(2011)。The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics。Routledge。  new window
9.Jordan, Richard et al.(2009)。One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries。Williamsburg, VA：The College of William and Mary。  new window
10.Kaplan, Morton A.(1957)。System and Process in International Politics。New York：Wiley：Krieger。  new window
11.Klotz, Audie、Prakash, Deepa(2008)。Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Kurki, Milja(2008)。Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Lake, David A.、Powell, Robert(1999)。Strategic Choice and International Relations。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Lebow, Richard Ned、Lichbach, Mark Irving(2007)。Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
15.Moore, Cerwyn、Farrands, Chris(2010)。International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues。London：Routledge。  new window
16.Morgenthau, Hans(1978)。Politics Among Nations。New York：Knopf。  new window
17.Ruggie, John Gerard(1997)。Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization。London：Routledge。  new window
18.Sprout, Harold、Sprout, Margaret(1968)。A Ecological Paradigm for the Study of International Politics。Princeton：Center of International Studies, Princeton University。  new window
19.Steans, Jill(2006)。Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates, and Future Directions。New York：Polity。  new window
20.Weber, Cynthia(2010)。International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction。London: Routledge。  new window
21.Booth, K.、Smith, S.(1995)。International Relations Theory Today。New York, NY：Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
22.Chernoff, Fred(2007)。Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and Contending Accounts。New York：Palgrave MacMillan。  new window
23.Friedman, Gil、Starr, Harvey(1997)。Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry。London：Routledge。  new window
24.Klotz, Audie、Lynch, Cecelia(2007)。Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations。Armonk, New York：M. E. Sharpe。  new window
25.Vasquez, John A.(1998)。The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism。New York：Cambridge：Cambridge University Press：Cambridge University Press。  new window
26.Elman, Colin、lman, Miriam Fendius(2003)。Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field。Cambridge：The MIT Press。  new window
27.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
28.Jarvis, D. S. L.(2000)。International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism: Defending the Discipline。Columbia, SC：University of South Carolina Press。  new window
29.Reus-Smit, Christian(1999)。The Moral Purpose of the State: Cultural. Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
30.Wight, Colin(2006)。Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
31.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
32.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1959)。War: A Theoretical Analysis。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
33.Derian, James Der(2009)。Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial Media-Entertainment Network。Routledge。  new window
34.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。  new window
35.Vasquez, John A.(1983)。The Power of Power Politics: A Critique。New Brunswick, New Jersey：Rutgers University Press。  new window
36.Sprout, Harold、Sprout, Margaret(1956)。Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics。Princeton：Center of International Studies, Princeton University。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fearon, James D.、Wendt, Alexander(2002)。Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View。Handbook of International Relations。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Waever, Ole(1996)。The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Waever, Ole.(1997)。Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms。The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?。Routledge Press。  new window
4.Brams, Steven J.。Game Theory in Practice: Problems and Prospects in Applying It to International Relations。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。  new window
5.Braumoeller, Bear F.、Sartori, Anne E.(2004)。The Promise and Perils of Statistics in International Relations。Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods fo r Studying International Relations。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
6.Buzan, Barry(1996)。The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered。International Relations Theory Today。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
7.Collier, David、Elman, Colin(2008)。Qualitative and Multimethod Research: Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration。The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno。Accomplishments and Limitations of A Game-Theoretic Approach to International Relations。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。  new window
9.Elman, Colin、Elman, Miriam Fendius。Introduction: Appraising Progress in International Relations Theory。Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, eds.: Progress in International Relations Theory。  new window
10.Halliday, Fred(1996)。The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Hoffman, Matthew J.(2008)。Agent-based Modeling。Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Holsti, Kalevi J.(2001)。Along the Road of International Theory in the Next Millennium: Four Travelogues。International Relations: Still an American Social Science?。New York：SUNY Press。  new window
13.Keohane, Robert(1986)。Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond。Neorealism and Is Critics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
14.Klotz, Audie、Prakash, Deepa(2008)。Introduction。Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
15.Kurki, Milja、Wight, Colin(2010)。International Relations and Social Science。International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Kydd, Andrew H.(2008)。Methodological Individualism and Rational Choice。The Oxford Handbooks of International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
17.Lakaros, Imre(1970)。Falsification and Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes。Criticism and the growth of Knowledge。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.Mansfield, Edward D. Pevehouse, Jon C.(2008)。Quantitative Approaches。The Oxford Handbook of International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
19.Neufeld, Mark(1994)。Reflexivity and International Relations Theory。Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations。Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
20.Nicholson, Michael(2002)。Formal Methods in International Relations。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
21.Ray, James Lee(2002)。Reflections on Millennia, Old and New: The Evolution and Role of Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Politics。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
22.Singer, J. David(1990)。One Man's View: A Personal History of the Correlates of War Project。Prisoners of War? Why Nation-States in the Modern Era。Lexington：Lexington Books。  new window
23.Smith, Steve(1997)。New Approaches to International Theory。The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
24.Smith, Steve(2002)。Historical Sociology and International Relations Theory。Historical Sociology of International Relations。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
25.Snidal, Duncan(2004)。Formal Models of International Politics。Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
26.Sorensen, Georg(1998)。IR Theory after the Cold War。The Eighty Years' Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
27.Sprinz, Detlef F.、Wolinsky-Nahmias, Yael(2004)。Conclusion: Multimeathod Research。Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
28.Starr, Harvey(2002)。Cumulation, Synthesis, and Research Design for the Post-Wave。Evaluating Methodology in International Studies。Ann Arbor：The University of Michigan Press。  new window
29.Vasquez, John A.(1995)。The Post-Positivist Debate: Reconstructing Scientific Enquiry and International Relations Theory After Enlightenment's Fall。International Relations Theory Today。Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
30.Wight, Colin(2002)。The Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations。Handbook of International Relations。London：Sage。  new window
31.Smith, Steve(1996)。Positivism and beyond。International theory: Positivism and beyond。Cambridge University Press。  new window
32.Smith, Steve(2001)。Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches to International Theory。The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1004（臺灣：996，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67836721
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上